I have the same problem on Ubuntu 12.04. All the rest works really well,
but I still get the same error message when trying to add local git
repositories.
Has anyone managed to do this successfully?
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for
On 08/11/2014 11:53 AM, Arjun s v wrote:
Hi
I have followed the below steps to install the Reviewboard on fedora 14
WARNING, WARNING: Fedora 14?
This version of Fedora is very old (almost four years) and is both
unsupported and known to contain many security issues (it reached
end-of-life in
OK, thanks David.
Regards
Kevan
On Tuesday, 12 August 2014 09:22:55 UTC+10, David Trowbridge wrote:
TRACKING_BRANCH should be set to something which is present in the
upstream copy of the repository that Review Board is talking to. In
general, it should be whichever branch you are
All,
My company have a TeamForge service running and are using GIT as the
default SCM.
I have a local Reviewboard server and would like to point it at the GIT
repo - instead of using the default code review tool of gerrit
I am using Reviewboard 1.7.25 currently
The TeamForge project says that
Thanks David for the response. Upgrading to 0.6.2 fixed the issue for me.
On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 2:52:46 PM UTC-5, David Trowbridge wrote:
Hi,
There was a bug in 0.6 that prevented -I from working with SVN
repositories. This bug was fixed in 0.6.1
-David
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at
Thanks Stephen!
I've attempted to install this in the CentOS 7 Docker container and I hit
the following dependency issues:
Error: Package: ReviewBoard-2.0.5-1.el7.1.noarch (epel)
Requires: httpd = 2.4.7-5
Available: httpd-2.4.6-17.el7.centos.1.x86_64 (base)
The Eclipse plugin is https://github.com/rombert/ereviewboard . I'm still
maintaining it, but I don't have a lot of time for it. Right now I'm
looking to add support for the latest Eclipse versions, so any help is
welcome :-)
Robert
On Monday, August 11, 2014 10:12:03 PM UTC+3, David
Hi all,
After upgrading from 1.7.21 to 2.0.5, some users are reporting difficulties
viewing diffs between diffs when one diff was uploaded prior to the upgrade,
and the other after. Sometimes the page just never loads, and sometimes
portions of the diffs are missing their content. Any
Having read the available documentation regarding using rbtools and git, I
am still trying to understand how git reviews are working with our git
branching strategy. Some things are not working as we expect.
We have a primary git repository origin/master. We have created a clone
repository of
Hey Andrew,
Can you check for JavaScript errors on their browsers?
Also, are these newly-uploaded diffs (since 2.0.5), or older ones?
Christian
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014, Andrew Hills (anhills) anhi...@cisco.com
wrote:
Hi all,
After upgrading from 1.7.21 to 2.0.5, some users are
Hi Daniel,
Git has no ability to fetch individual file/revisions from a remote repository,
so it’s not possible to just point to one. Instead, we have to either use a web
front-end (like cgit, gitweb, or anything that provides an accessible URL
fetching the raw file contents for a given
Hi Greg,
Which version of RBTools are you guys using?
Try setting the following in .reviewboardrc:
TRACKING_BRANCH = ‘origin/master’
That will ensure that, by default, rbt post will base commits off of
origin/master.
The important thing is making sure that developers are actually using
We had BRANCH = master in the .reviewboardrc, but no setting for
TRACKING_BRANCH. The rbtools documentation says this:
--tracking-branch
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/rbtools/dev/rbt/commands/post/#cmdoption-rbt-post--tracking-branch
Tracking branch from which your branch is derived (git
forgot to show our rbtools version:
$ rbt --version
RBTools 0.6
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You
Also, all devs use origin for the central repo.
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 3:58:42 PM UTC-4, Greg Burcher wrote:
forgot to show our rbtools version:
$ rbt --version
RBTools 0.6
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board
The BRANCH/--branch settings just fill in the Branch field on the review
request.
-David
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Greg Burcher gregburc...@gmail.com
wrote:
We had BRANCH = master in the .reviewboardrc, but no setting for
TRACKING_BRANCH. The rbtools documentation says this:
On 2014-08-12 16:39, Greg Burcher wrote:
I also removed the BRANCH setting from .reviewboardrc. This only seems to
change the branch value displayed in the review header area. Is there any
other behavior associated with the BRANCH setting? Why can't rbtools
determine the current git branch
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3524 by smallb...@gmail.com: How to get the excel documents' diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3524
I have some excel documents on svn
I want to use reviewboard display the diffs of these excel
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 3525 by smallb...@gmail.com: How to get the excel documents' diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3525
I have some excel documents on svn
I want to use reviewboard display the diffs of these excel
Comment #1 on issue 3525 by chip...@gmail.com: How to get the excel
documents' diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3525
There's no support for this, and that sort of work is very hard. Best you
can do is export to CSV and post that for review.
--
You received this
Comment #1 on issue 3524 by chip...@gmail.com: How to get the excel
documents' diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3524
Issue 3525 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 3524
Comment #2 on issue 3525 by chip...@gmail.com: How to get the excel
documents' diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3525
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this
22 matches
Mail list logo