Sorry I'm just now seeing this. I didn't get the errors for the duplicate
entries but I also set MySQL to default all new databases to MyISAM before
creating the RB site. Maybe that is the difference.
I would also do another check on the tables to make sure they are all
MyISAM (just for good
I submitted the patch that enabled Mercurial rename support a few years
ago. For the most part it works well but there are definitely cases
where it doesn't and I haven't been able to pin them all down. I think
it may be something to do with whether the original file was added or
changed in
Trying to upgrade RB from 1.7.25 to 2.0.7 and having some problems.
*[root@codereview www]#* uname -morvs
Linux 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Nov 22 03:15:09 UTC 2013 x86_64
GNU/Linux
*[root@codereview www]#* python --version
Python 2.6.6
*[root@codereview www]#* rb-site --version
rb-site
Sent via email. Semi-sensitive information.
-Kevin
On Monday, September 22, 2014 1:05:32 PM UTC-5, Kevin Jones wrote:
Greetings,
I'd like to thank the community for their continued help in attempting to
figure out solutions to issues I'm having. I've searched the web for
possible
Hello
I'm new to reviewboard and was experimenting with it. I want to test with
default reviewers but i don't ge tit working.
My test situation:
3 SVN repo's:
repo1
repo2
repo3
All of them are structured like
repo1
trunk
branch
tag
4user:
admin (admin)
me (admin)
reviewer1
Any new information on this bug? We've run into it several times.
On Thursday, August 28, 2014 8:09:02 AM UTC-5, koval...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using Reviewboard 2.0.6 with Postgres database in utf-8.
When I making new pre-commit request on svn-based repository with
diff-file containing
Hi Sara,
There are several things here that I am very confused about:
1) Can you clarify which part is new since 2.0.7? The subject says 2.0.6.
2) How are you changing the submitter on a review request? We don't have any
support for this, without modifying the database.
3) The original bug
Hi Kevin,
A few more questions:
1) Can you show me an exact revision string from the error? I'm mostly
interested in whether it's a 7-character string (short SHA1) or a full SHA1.
2) Is the developer using RBTools (rbt post) to upload the diff?
3) If RBTools, can you have the developer `rbt
Hi Dieter,
Try '/trunk/.*' for the regex path instead. The paths are prefixed with a '/'
in modern versions of Review Board.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On September 23, 2014
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 1:11:18 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Sara,
There are several things here that I am very confused about:
1) Can you clarify which part is new since 2.0.7? The subject says 2.0.6.
That is weird. I wasn't the original poster. We have only seen the
Hi Christian,
I can't risk taking RB down. I've cloned the RB directory and the mysql DB
it's connected to but haven't had much luck getting the clone to point to
the new database. Am I missing an obvious command in rb-site manage?
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 1:20:10 PM UTC-5, Christian
Hi Austin,
Downgrading Markdown and reloading Apache shouldn't result in any further
downtime.
To get the clone to talk to the new DB, edit the
$sitedir/conf/settings_local.py file. At the top, there will be a DATABASES
variable you can change to point to the new location.
Christian
--
Hi Sara,
On September 23, 2014 at 11:39:53 AM, Sara Rayburn (sararayb...@gmail.com)
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 1:11:18 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Sara,
There are several things here that I am very confused about:
1) Can you clarify which part is new since
After following all directions for installing ReviewBoard 2.0 on CentOS 7,
I am still seeing one error that bothers me. When I try to restart httpd,
it remains in *'starting'* state and will never go to *'active (running)'*
state.
However, if I remove the following file, httpd starts and
I wish I knew what this was. We've had three developers run into this bug
today alone. It's becoming a real problem for us. More answers to your
questions inline below.
Sara
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 2:08:28 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Sara,
On September 23, 2014 at
I wish I knew too...
So, for each of these cases, is the only visible error the rsp is null error?
This is tricky to diagnose without more direct access to the server. Hoping
something will allow me to repro it here.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board -
Hi Sara,
Something that would really help is a complete dump of the request/responses
(headers and payloads) for any requests to /api/* in the Network tab of Firefox
when these issues occur.
I know some information was sent before, but those look to be the Console tab
only.
Christian
--
Hello RB users / admins,
Is there a way to specify default text within a BaseTextAreaField?
My current field looks something like below:
from reviewboard.reviews.fields import BaseTextAreaField
class OutputField(BaseTextAreaField):
field_id = testme'
label = 'test label'
I couldn't
Hi Peter,
There is no official way of doing this, but you can probably try to override
the load_value() function and have it return some default text if not otherwise
specified.
I'd be happy to take a patch that implements default values cleanly.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond -
On 09/23/2014 03:38 PM, David Carson wrote:
After following all directions for installing ReviewBoard 2.0 on CentOS
7, I am still seeing one error that bothers me. When I try to restart
httpd, it remains in *'starting'* state and will never go to *'active
(running)'* state. However, if I
Do you happen to have a database backup prior to the upgrade? I'd love to try
with a real before/after.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On September 22, 2014 at 4:15:20 PM,
Oh, regarding the fix the counts script, I can write one, but it's very
unlikely to matter, I realized. It's just going to trigger the exact same logic
that's triggered when viewing the review request for the first time,
post-upgrade. If it got it wrong before, I don't have much reason to
Hi Sara,
David has a repro case for this now, so we're looking into a fix.
There will be a 2.0.8 release tonight.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On September 23, 2014 at 3:17:04
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 7:10:51 PM UTC-4, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 09/23/2014 03:38 PM, David Carson wrote:
After following all directions for installing ReviewBoard 2.0 on CentOS
7, I am still seeing one error that bothers me. When I try to restart
httpd, it remains in
On 09/23/2014 08:22 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
Should it be possible to use a more complex filter in the Custom LDAP
User Search Filter field? For example I'd like to restrict access to a
single AD/LDAP group, so I tried something like:
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3579 by simonwa...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM can't be
uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
What version are you running?
2.0.7
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
Comment #1 on issue 3579 by trowb...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM
can't be uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
Are there any errors in the server's log file?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #2 on issue 3579 by trowb...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM
can't be uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
Also, what repository type?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Comment #3 on issue 3579 by simonwa...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM
can't be uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
repository type is svn
I can see an error report Email sent from server:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Comment #4 on issue 3579 by simonwa...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM
can't be uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
Double checked the error in the log is the same as I got from Email, no
further message can be seen
--
You received this message because
Comment #5 on issue 3579 by trowb...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM
can't be uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
OK, that's definitely something we'll get fixed, but I'm not sure it's
causing your problem.
Can you look in the browser's Network console
Comment #6 on issue 3579 by simonwa...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM
can't be uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
Looks like a Javscript error:
TypeError: rsp is null
in http://servername/static/rb/js/newReviewRequest.min.4427138a3b1f.js
Code is where
Comment #7 on issue 3579 by trowb...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM
can't be uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
Can you look in the network tab of the browser tools to find the response
that's creating that error? It's probably a 500.
--
You received
Comment #8 on issue 3579 by simonwa...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM
can't be uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
Sorry I didn't mention it clear here, I can see no network traffic at all
after I click OK, it looks JS crashed before that. I tried using
Comment #10 on issue 3579 by trowb...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM
can't be uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
And/or any POSTS to validate-diff/ or diffs/
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment #11 on issue 3579 by simonwa...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM
can't be uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
Sorry no 500 error, there are some others after I chose Repository but all
200 normal request which I also believed is for Post-Commit
Comment #12 on issue 3579 by trowb...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM
can't be uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
Can you show me the responses to any POSTs (successful or not) to
/api/validation/diffs/ or /api/review-requests/XX/diffs/?
--
You
Comment #13 on issue 3579 by simonwa...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM
can't be uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
Sorry in this failed case there is no post to /api/validation/diffs/ or
/api/review-requests/XX/diffs/ at all.
--
You received this
Updates:
Status: PendingReview
Owner: trowb...@gmail.com
Comment #14 on issue 3579 by trowb...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM
can't be uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
OK, I have a reproduction case. We'll get this fixed for 2.0.8,
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #15 on issue 3579 by trowb...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM
can't be uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
Fixed in release-2.0.x (e7e671a). Thanks for all your help!
--
You received this message because this project
Comment #16 on issue 3579 by simonwa...@gmail.com: patch file contains BOM
can't be uploaded
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3579
Thank you for your quick fix, looking forward to the upgrade.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3580 by oswi...@gmail.com: IssueOpened checkbox status is not
loaded correctly when opening that comment dialog the 1st time after page
loading
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3580
*** READ THIS
42 matches
Mail list logo
