Windows Installation

2008-10-20 Thread SamClark
Hi Guys, I'm trying to install Review Board on a virtual machine (VMWare virtual server) to play around a bit and get a feel for the installation before I move on to a physical machine. I've installed: Django 1.0 Python 2.6 PIL sqlite I'm totally new to all of this and I'm not sure how to

Re: post-review for p4

2008-10-24 Thread SamClark
I am having the same issue. (I'm also completely new to this). When I execute: python C:\python26\post-review.py --server=myserver:8000 --debug i get: Repository info 'Path: svn://172.16.37.104:9000, Base path: /Hello/branches/ Hello_Modified, Supports changesets: False' svn diff

Re: Improper UI when staring ReviewBoard on browser

2008-11-24 Thread SamClark
I am also having the same issue installing on a new machine. Is this to be expected? As a side note the admin interface still looks good, but everything else looks like my first website. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Improper UI when staring ReviewBoard on browser

2008-11-24 Thread SamClark
to go on vacation so it'll be a while. Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:25 PM, SamClark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Installing on windows using the old instructions. On Nov 24, 2:56 pm, Christian Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: Improper UI when staring ReviewBoard on browser

2008-11-24 Thread SamClark
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 3:49 PM, SamClark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was using setup.py. I have just attempted using rb-site. For some reason mine didn't have a .py extension so I added one (I'm using the one that got copied to c: \python\scripts via cmd.exe

Re: Improper UI when staring ReviewBoard on browser

2008-11-24 Thread SamClark
Okay adding --copy-media allowed the script to complete. Swish... at least until i try to serve it :P On Nov 24, 5:08 pm, SamClark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cool I'll try that. A couple things: 1) The last piece of info I give the script is the admin account email address, so I suppose

Serving Review Board using Apache 2.2: HTTP 403 Forbidden

2008-11-25 Thread SamClark
So I have an instance of my review board site installed and I'm trying to serve it over http on my LAN with apache/mod_python. I have cut and pasted the contents of apache-modpython.conf into httpd.conf and added a NameVirtualHost directive (NameVirtualHost *: 80). I was hoping to avoid DNS by

Windows installation: Instructions to run using django dev server

2008-12-16 Thread SamClark
Is it still possible to host review board using the django dev server? I've tried manage.py runserver localhost:8000 but the user interface doesn't render properly. This is performed in the directory of a fresh svn checkout. I want to avoid using rb-site because I'm not having any luck serving

Post-review version 0.8: The patch to ... didn't apply cleanly

2008-12-18 Thread SamClark
I've been browsing other posts about this but I haven't been able to make heads or tails of them. In short when I navigate to my project working copy and run ' post-review.py --revision-range=11:12 --server=http:// my.reviewboard.server:port' The script completes successfully and spits out the

Re: Post-review version 0.8: The patch to ... didn't apply cleanly

2009-01-05 Thread SamClark
a \No newline at end of file lines at the problematic spots, which patch understands). If you're unable to resolve your problem, try to reproduce it with some dummy files that are safe to share, and post your temporary files here. On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:28 PM, SamClark pimp.roc

Re: Post-review version 0.8: The patch to ... didn't apply cleanly

2009-01-06 Thread SamClark
(There are %d months in a year, TWELVE); +printf(Another revision); return; } --- On Jan 6, 1:10 am, Muhammad Haggag mhag...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:16 PM, SamClark pimp.roc...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having

Re: Post-review version 0.8: The patch to ... didn't apply cleanly

2009-01-07 Thread SamClark
. --- Am I missing something? On Jan 6, 8:47 pm, Muhammad Haggag mhag...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:15 AM, SamClark pimp.roc...@gmail.com wrote: So... a few things. I haven't mentioned in this post that I'm on a windows machine. Maybe I should I was doing all this stuff

Re: Post-review version 0.8: The patch to ... didn't apply cleanly

2009-01-08 Thread SamClark
my hooped cygwin patchutils tools? On Jan 8, 7:20 am, Muhammad Haggag mhag...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:43 PM, SamClark pimp.roc...@gmail.com wrote: Well if I hack the file to look exactly like the svn diff output I get the 'patch didn't apply cleanly' issue, which

Re: Post-review version 0.8: The patch to ... didn't apply cleanly

2009-01-08 Thread SamClark
indirect but I never would have noticed this otherwise. I'll give an update on whether post-review.py works when I try it. Thanks again and sorry I'm such a noob. On Jan 8, 10:38 am, SamClark pimp.roc...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, I noticed something interesting. I think I've been running the patch.exe

Windows Installation w/ Apache 2: What if I don't have sites-available or sites-enabled directories?

2009-01-19 Thread SamClark
I'm trying to serve review board through apache 2.2.10. I just had rb- site.py complete but I don't have the sites-available or sites-enabled directories and it doesn't look like httpd.conf has any mention of either. Should I look for another apache distribution? I have tried pasting the review

Re: Windows Installation w/ Apache 2: What if I don't have sites-available or sites-enabled directories?

2009-01-20 Thread SamClark
, SamClark pimp.roc...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm... I updated my checkout and managed to get something actually. I think my problem was using localhost, 127.0.0.1, computername instead on my LAN address for the domain name. I'm now getting the 'manual server updates required page'. The root