RE: Review Board with Perforce proxy servers

tes the diff content every time the diff is viewed. So, how to optimize this for your users? I don't know, but I thought I could shed some light on how it's working to help figure that out :) Dana Lacoste -Original Message- From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo..

RE: Error (with rather opaque Python diagnostic output) installing P4 integration

force C/C++ API and then build the python interfaces to it, but it's very quick and easy. I've never had it fail (and I usually use Ubuntu) Dana Lacoste -Original Message- From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Thor Simon Sent: Wed

RE: post-review and P4PASSWD

talled with the command "easy_install -U RBTools" and review board 1.5 beta 2) Dana Lacoste -Original Message- From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of RShelley Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 1:37 PM To: reviewboard Subject: Re: pos

RE: post-review with perforce

If you run "p4 counters" do you see the path to your RB server (in http://server/reviewboard/ format) in the "repository_path" counter? (If you have an older version of perforce the counter might have a different syntax, but it should still be visible) Dana Lacoste -

RE: Error uploading diff: One or more fields had errors (105) - Errors during command execution( "p4 login" )

force, then you are missing or have incorrect P4PORT, etc environment variables. If it does work, well, if you can do that part and let us know we can maybe track down a more complete solution Dana Lacoste On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Chidambar Kulkarni http://chidambar.sk/

RE: Error uploading diff: One or more fields had errors (105) - Errors during command execution( "p4 login" )

ould be able to fix this by setting up P4PORT, P4USER, P4PASSWD, and P4CLIENT variables on the server side. Dana Lacoste -Original Message- From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chidambar Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 5:03 AM To: reviewboard

RE: Question on Perforce & Diffs

l post-review and it uploads the files as described above) and then you're entirely in GUI-land and don't even need to load a command line (though you still do need to have RBTools installed.) Dana Lacoste -Original Message- From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:revie

RE: How do I install RBTools under windows?

ols Python Package easy_install -U RBTools echo. echo Installation Complete echo Use 'post-review changelist#' to post a review to the ReviewBoard echo. pause - BEGIN install-rbtools.cmd Hope that's useful to someone :) Dana Lacoste -Original Message- From: reviewboard

RE: post-review Perforce User

But, realistically, you should probably be using the environment variables P4USER, P4CLIENT, etc. Run "p4 help environment" for more information. Dana -Original Message- From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dana Lacoste Sent: Mon

RE: post-review Perforce User

post-review --help Usage: post-review-script.py [-pond] [-r review_id] [changenum] Options: --version show program's version number and exit -h, --helpshow this help message and exit -p, --publish publish the review request immediately after

1.5 Release Plan

and update to 1.5 when it ships, but I want to get an idea of how much work that will be J Thanks, Dana Lacoste -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard

RE: easy_install P4PythonInstaller failure

staller for the Python 2.6 version if that's what platform you're using. http://www.perforce.com/perforce/doc.current/user/p4pythonnotes.txt has more info. Dana Lacoste -Original Message- From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dani

RE: Is there any flexibility to change the "diff" format for a review?

, and then users could use any tool they desire to view the diffs (and, for the most part, the RB built in diff is 1239781092378912% easier to use for small changes anyways J ) Dana Lacoste PS: I know that "download the full file" is a feature on the backlog for some futur

RE: Schedule for 1.5

Thanks, Dana Lacoste From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Christian Hammond Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 12:15 PM To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Schedule for 1.5 I work on Review Board outside of work, and so I have le

RE: AttributeError: type object 'FSDirectory' has no attribute 'getDirectory'

You need to use an OLD lucene. It won't work with 3.0 :( Dana Lacoste -Original Message- From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of bigoldrock Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 12:34 PM To: reviewboard Subject: AttributeError: type o

Question about pylucene support

cene 3.0.0-1 because that clearly doesn't work, but I can't tell what _will_ work. 2.9.1? 2.9.0? something else? Thanks, Dana Lacoste -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.r

Question about "diff" recommendation with post-review

complain about using dos style pathnames, but I was wondering if anyone had a suggestion for an alternative solution. Thanks for any advice! Dana Lacoste -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.

Windows post-review .exe

So, I have everything working (from trunk, with a patch that I've uploaded for review :) to get my perforce users working with reviewboard. That is, I can, from Windows, run post-review and create a review with a diff. WooHoo! The only catch is that I've been asked to make it not require so man