The hack you suggested (body_top="") works. Thank you for the help.
On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 4:33:04 PM UTC-6, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Zach,
>
> My guess is it's the mod_python support. Looking in Django 1.4's code for
> that, it assumes the existence o
ecember 1, 2016 at 12:23:11 PM UTC-6, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> It looks like you're actually hitting a bug on the server side. Can you
> look in the log file and see if you can find a traceback?
>
> -David
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:28 AM Zach Brown <brownz...@gmail.com
>
i/request.py",
line 563, in process_error
raise APIError(http_status, None, None, data)
rbtools.api.errors.APIError: HTTP 500
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 6:46:36 PM UTC-6, Christian Hammond
wrote:
>
> Hi Zach,
>
> RBTools is supposed to work with Review Board 1.7.x. Can
I'm working with a a Review Board v1.7.27, which is out of date I know, but
I can't do anything about that.
My issue is I'm trying to use RBTools and I'm running into some issues I
suspect are compatibility issues.
Is there documentation somewhere about which version of RBTools to use for
a
Hey Christian,
Do you have any other suggestions?
Thanks,
-Zach
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 9:46:41 AM UTC-4, Zach wrote:
>
> Our Apache server runs reviewboard as a wsgi daemon process. Its other
> function is to authenticate the user against active directory and
isable-proxy (or DISABLE_PROXY = True in ~/.reviewboardrc) ?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
> Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Zach <zac...@gmail.com
to make a request against `/api/session/?expand=user` (a 401
response is returned via our web proxy).
-Zach
On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 at 1:38:03 AM UTC-4, Pierre Mariani wrote:
>
> We use Review Board at work. It is installed on a web server that
> is protected by HTTP Basic Authenticatio
Filed at https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3945
On Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 4:35:22 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey Zach,
Basic reason is that a lot of companies ended up settling on very long
group names/descriptions, which are harder to digest. By choosing
The Issue
Relative links are generated from emails sent due to uploaded images on a
review.
Environment
*Reviewboard Version: *2.0.18
*OS: *RHEL6
*Python: *2.6
To Reproduce:
1. Install reviewboard 2.0.18 (we use apache to serve it via
wsgidaemonprocess with 15 threads and 3 workers)
2.
Hey Chris,
I posted a new issue to the google group, is that what you were asking for?
Thanks for the quick response.
-Zach
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 3:54:57 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Zach,
Can you file a bug report with a repro case to help us track this? It
otherwise
Posted to https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3944
On Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 2:52:18 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
Sorry, no, we need it posted on httpd://www.reviewboard.org/bugs/
Thanks!
Christian
On Thursday, August 13, 2015, Zach zac...@gmail.com
Posted to https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3944
On Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 9:31:57 AM UTC-4, Zach wrote:
The Issue
Relative links are generated from emails sent due to uploaded images on a
review.
Environment
*Reviewboard Version: *2.0.18
*OS: *RHEL6
*Python
In Reviewboard 2.0.18, if you go to the dashboard for a review group (say
the name is foo but the display name is Foo Beta Users) the url will be
http://site.com/groups/groupName.
On the dashboard of the group, it will say Review requests for foo rather
than Review requests for Foo Beta Users.
=/media/uploaded/files/2015/08/11/aecc3e18-0af0-45de-95a2-4530a7b1b8f9__BANHAMMER_400x100.png
width=38
height=62 alt=banned
-Zach
On Thursday, March 4, 2010 at 3:37:57 PM UTC-5, Paul wrote:
My users are complaining because reply mails that have comments to
lines of code end up with relative
Meant to say that the old `post-review` tool had --http-username and
--http-password options that seemed to use basic auth
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 12:34:51 PM UTC-4, Zach wrote:
Hey Chris,
Was there ever any progress made here? I notice that the old `post-review`
tool (https
-sign-on with fallback to basic auth (which
authenticates against active directory) and this feature will be important
to our users as well.
Making HTTP GET request to http://reviewboard/api/
Got HTTP error: 401
-Zach
On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 at 1:38:03 AM UTC-4, Pierre Mariani wrote:
We
Sorry to revive this from the dead, but I'm also trying to use the
`RemoteUserAuthBackend`, but against reviewboard 2.0.X.
I have it working from a I can hit this site and get an account that's
populated perspective. We ignore the auth config when hitting any /api/
routes since some scripts
thoughts on how I can fix this in the RemoteUserAuthBackend?
Thanks,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Christian Hammond christ...@beanbaginc.com
wrote:
Hi Zach,
I'm not really sure what's going on there. This backend isn't widely-used,
so it doesn't get a lot of testing.
Sometimes this stuff
Hey Christian,
One of the previous admins told me that we were using reviewboard pre 1.0 -
this may explain where the random sql came from.
Can I get a quote on how much a support contract would cost?
-Zach
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Christian Hammond christ...@beanbaginc.com
wrote:
Hey
ALTER COLUMN mirror_path TYPE
varchar(255) USING CAST(mirror_path as varchar(255));
ALTER TABLE scmtools_repository ALTER COLUMN raw_file_url TYPE
varchar(255) USING CAST(raw_file_url as varchar(255));
update siteconfig_siteconfiguration set settings='[redacted]';
```
-Zach
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015
with gitlab!).
In terms of the raw dump, what tables actually need to have rows in them? I
ask this because I will have to check with we are allowed to send some of
our information (if it's anything other than the table definition, and the
django rows / reviewboard settings, etc).
-Zach
On Tuesday
Hey Christian,
Have you had a chance to look into this? Is there any other information I
can get you?
-Zach
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Zach Auclair zach...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
The output of the list-evolutions command is actually included in my
last paragraph
I'm trying to rb-site upgrade an old 1.5.5 database to 2.0.5.
*This fails with:*
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.
The log output below, including warnings and errors,
can be ignored unless upgrade fails.
-- begin log output
23 matches
Mail list logo
