Ok.
It looks like I found the issue.
I am doing query on incorrect table..
Let me try this out.
On Jan 29, 2:22 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd love to provide a patch, except I don't think Review Board is broken.
> This works fine from what I can tell, and the code has not changed
so, what is the diff between ship_it and shipit_count?
If there is at-least one ship it marked, the value of ship_it should
not be one?
I understand that ship_it is providing 0 or 1 only. It is not the
actual count.
Just want to understand why if the review is approved, ship_it is
still zero?
Kunj
ship_it is a flag on a review indicating whether or not that particular
review says that the review request is, in the reviewer's opinion, ready to
be shipped.
shipit_count on the Review Request is a counter of the total number of
reviews made on that review request where ship_it=1.
If the review
Hi, everybody.
I would like to install post-review customly but not through Python
easy_install. Easy_install will install post-view in the path
PYTHONHOME/lib/site-packages/. And after easy_install, We can execute
post-review command any where (If not in CVS directory, it will report error
I made experiment. I create very simple svn repository on linux and
try use post-review for it on Windows and on Linux. What I get:
On Linux:
>>> HTTP POSTing to http://192.168.56.2/api/json/reviewrequests/11/diff/new/:
>>> {'basedir': '/'}
--127.0.1.1.1000.2795.1265030375.375.2
Content-Disposit
On Jan 28, 10:38 pm, Kunjal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For one of our user, he does have active account and when he approves
> the review, the ship it counter is still zero.
> Why this is happening?
>
> When I debug this, I found that the user did logged in RB today but in
> the Submitters list, it is sh
Hi,
I see that the the review request notifications to the reviewers
specified in the "Groups" field are not sent out if there is an entry
in the "People" field. It works fine if there are only "Groups" or
"People".
Also, any option to specify if a reviewer should be notified as "To"
or "Cc"?
Th
Hmm.. Very hard to say. They certainly look identical.
What version of Review Board is this? I believe the 1.1 nightlies have some
additional server-side logging for these errors, but either way, it might be
worth instrumenting the server to find out where exactly it's failing. Take
a look at the
Hi,
You should be able to control where easy_install is installing things by
using the -d (--install-dir) and -s (--script-dir) options. I *think* the -s
option will control where that script is installed, but I'm not 100% sure
off-hand. By default, the scripts are installed in a system directory,
Are the groups set up to use a mailing list, or do they e-mail out to the
individual users on the group?
What version of Review Board is this?
There aren't any options to specify To vs CC. The way the logic works is
that if there are people set under the "People" list, then the To field will
have
We are evaluating the use of reviewboard for reviews on a multiport,
multiproject perforce repository. For example consider following
scenario.
1. There are two perforce servers running on different host:port
combinations.
2. Each of these servers host codelines for 3 different projects.
These code
Hi Christian!
I use Reviewboard 1.0.5.1. I can check it on ReviewBoard 1.1.
I looked to both this files when I get this error with ClearCase (I
don't check clearcase on linux yet but on windows they generate
identical error).
So the problem was in diffviewer/forms.py in
class UploadDiffForm(for
Onkar,
We have a Review Board server that has reviews for 15 or so of our repositories
(mostly Perforce, a couple SVN, and likely soon a couple Git servers once Git
support makes it into a GA release). It works quite well for us, and there's
really no need to go through the hassle of maintainin
13 matches
Mail list logo
