Sorry I'm just now seeing this. I didn't get the errors for the duplicate
entries but I also set MySQL to default all new databases to MyISAM before
creating the RB site. Maybe that is the difference.
I would also do another check on the tables to make sure they are all
MyISAM (just for good me
I submitted the patch that enabled Mercurial rename support a few years
ago. For the most part it works well but there are definitely cases
where it doesn't and I haven't been able to pin them all down. I think
it may be something to do with whether the original file was added or
changed in the
Trying to upgrade RB from 1.7.25 to 2.0.7 and having some problems.
*[root@codereview www]#* uname -morvs
Linux 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Nov 22 03:15:09 UTC 2013 x86_64
GNU/Linux
*[root@codereview www]#* python --version
Python 2.6.6
*[root@codereview www]#* rb-site --version
rb-site 2.
Sent via email. Semi-sensitive information.
-Kevin
On Monday, September 22, 2014 1:05:32 PM UTC-5, Kevin Jones wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I'd like to thank the community for their continued help in attempting to
> figure out solutions to issues I'm having. I've searched the web for
> possible so
Hello
I'm new to reviewboard and was experimenting with it. I want to test with
default reviewers but i don't ge tit working.
My test situation:
3 SVN repo's:
repo1
repo2
repo3
All of them are structured like
repo1
trunk
branch
tag
4user:
admin (admin)
me (admin)
reviewer1
rev
Any new information on this bug? We've run into it several times.
On Thursday, August 28, 2014 8:09:02 AM UTC-5, koval...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I am using Reviewboard 2.0.6 with Postgres database in utf-8.
> When I making new pre-commit request on svn-based repository with
> diff-file containing n
I can also confirm that this is a new bug since 2.0.7. One of the review
requests giving us trouble was added before we updated, and when someone
tried to change the submitter on the request it seems to have run into the
error again. When the same user copied the patch and created a new review
Hi Sara,
There are several things here that I am very confused about:
1) Can you clarify which part is new since 2.0.7? The subject says 2.0.6.
2) How are you changing the submitter on a review request? We don't have any
support for this, without modifying the database.
3) The original bug rep
Hi Kevin,
A few more questions:
1) Can you show me an exact revision string from the error? I'm mostly
interested in whether it's a 7-character string (short SHA1) or a full SHA1.
2) Is the developer using RBTools (rbt post) to upload the diff?
3) If RBTools, can you have the developer `rbt po
Hi Dieter,
Try '/trunk/.*' for the regex path instead. The paths are prefixed with a '/'
in modern versions of Review Board.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On September 23, 2014
Hey Austin,
There was another issue reported recently with 'importlib'-related issues, but
we haven't had any responses yet, so we'll have to do some investigating with
your server.
I think the culprit is the Markdown module. Can you try downgrading to
Markdown-2.3.1? You can delete
/usr/lib/
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 1:11:18 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Sara,
>
> There are several things here that I am very confused about:
>
> 1) Can you clarify which part is new since 2.0.7? The subject says 2.0.6.
>
That is weird. I wasn't the original poster. We have only seen
Hi Christian,
I can't risk taking RB down. I've cloned the RB directory and the mysql DB
it's connected to but haven't had much luck getting the clone to point to
the new database. Am I missing an obvious command in rb-site manage?
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 1:20:10 PM UTC-5, Christian Hamm
Hi Austin,
Downgrading Markdown and reloading Apache shouldn't result in any further
downtime.
To get the clone to talk to the new DB, edit the
$sitedir/conf/settings_local.py file. At the top, there will be a DATABASES
variable you can change to point to the new location.
Christian
--
Ch
Hi Sara,
On September 23, 2014 at 11:39:53 AM, Sara Rayburn (sararayb...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 1:11:18 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sara,
> >
> > There are several things here that I am very confused about:
> >
> > 1) Can you clarify which part is ne
After following all directions for installing ReviewBoard 2.0 on CentOS 7,
I am still seeing one error that bothers me. When I try to restart httpd,
it remains in *'starting'* state and will never go to *'active (running)'*
state.
However, if I remove the following file, httpd starts and stop
I wish I knew what this was. We've had three developers run into this bug
today alone. It's becoming a real problem for us. More answers to your
questions inline below.
Sara
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 2:08:28 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Sara,
>
>
> On September 23, 2014 at 11:
I wish I knew too...
So, for each of these cases, is the only visible error the "rsp is null" error?
This is tricky to diagnose without more direct access to the server. Hoping
something will allow me to repro it here.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - h
Hi Sara,
Something that would really help is a complete dump of the request/responses
(headers and payloads) for any requests to /api/* in the Network tab of Firefox
when these issues occur.
I know some information was sent before, but those look to be the Console tab
only.
Christian
--
Chr
Hello RB users / admins,
Is there a way to specify default text within a BaseTextAreaField?
My current field looks something like below:
from reviewboard.reviews.fields import BaseTextAreaField
class OutputField(BaseTextAreaField):
field_id = testme'
label = 'test label'
I couldn't s
Hi Peter,
There is no official way of doing this, but you can probably try to override
the load_value() function and have it return some default text if not otherwise
specified.
I'd be happy to take a patch that implements default values cleanly.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@be
On 09/23/2014 03:38 PM, David Carson wrote:
> After following all directions for installing ReviewBoard 2.0 on CentOS
> 7, I am still seeing one error that bothers me. When I try to restart
> httpd, it remains in *'starting'* state and will never go to *'active
> (running)'* state. However, if I
Do you happen to have a database backup prior to the upgrade? I'd love to try
with a real before/after.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On September 22, 2014 at 4:15:20 PM, Christi
Oh, regarding the "fix the counts" script, I can write one, but it's very
unlikely to matter, I realized. It's just going to trigger the exact same logic
that's triggered when viewing the review request for the first time,
post-upgrade. If it got it wrong before, I don't have much reason to beli
Hi Sara,
David has a repro case for this now, so we're looking into a fix.
There will be a 2.0.8 release tonight.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On September 23, 2014 at 3:17:04
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 7:10:51 PM UTC-4, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On 09/23/2014 03:38 PM, David Carson wrote:
> > After following all directions for installing ReviewBoard 2.0 on CentOS
> > 7, I am still seeing one error that bothers me. When I try to restart
> > httpd, it remains
Should it be possible to use a more complex filter in the Custom LDAP
User Search Filter field? For example I'd like to restrict access to a
single AD/LDAP group, so I tried something like:
(&(accountusername=%s)(memberOf=CN=agroup,CN=Users,DC=corp,DC=domain,DC=com))
However, I couldn't get it to
On 09/23/2014 08:22 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
> Should it be possible to use a more complex filter in the Custom LDAP
> User Search Filter field? For example I'd like to restrict access to a
> single AD/LDAP group, so I tried something like:
>
> (&(accountusername=%s)(memberOf=CN=agroup,CN=Users,DC=co
28 matches
Mail list logo
