---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37827/#review96713
---
Ship it!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37187/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 6:22 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Alexander Rojas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37189/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 8:02 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Alexander Rojas
On Aug. 27, 2015, 5:34 a.m., Neil Conway wrote:
include/mesos/mesos.proto, line 102
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37655/diff/2/?file=1049806#file1049806line102
BTW, have you considered using a simpler representation, such as just a
single int64 holding # of nanoseconds (or
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37826/#review96709
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
Note: This would be useful for maintenance
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37189/#review96689
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [37187, 37188, 37189]
All
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37189/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 6:24 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Alexander Rojas
On Aug. 26, 2015, 10:34 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
Thanks for your comments!
On Aug. 26, 2015, 10:34 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
include/mesos/mesos.proto, line 101
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37655/diff/2/?file=1049806#file1049806line101
It might be useful to specify what the
On Aug. 26, 2015, 11 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
Do you plan to migrate existing protobufs to `TimeSpec` or use it for new
protobufs only?
For now, the plan is to have new protobufs use it. And we can change existing
protobufs to use it, if they benefit from having integer time.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37187/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 5:12 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Alexander Rojas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37189/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 5:15 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Alexander Rojas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36404/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 9:24 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Joris Van
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36620/#review96734
---
What's the status on this review? Is it still WIP?
Would love to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36571/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 12:33 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37655/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 1:14 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36571/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 11:58 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin
On Aug. 26, 2015, 11:04 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
include/mesos/maintenance/maintenance.proto, line 56
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36571/diff/15/?file=1053335#file1053335line56
I'm not sure `0` is a valid protobuf tag.
After double checking the docs... It is valid for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36321/#review96743
---
Ship it!
include/mesos/mesos.proto (lines 926 - 927)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37189/#review96739
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Michael Park
On Aug. 27, 2015, 6:02 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37187/#review96736
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Michael Park
On Aug. 27, 2015, 4:22 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37823/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 8:11 p.m.)
Review request for mesos.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37853/
---
Review request for mesos.
Repository: mesos
Description
---
Implemented
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37314/#review96748
---
Ship it!
include/mesos/type_utils.hpp (lines 152 - 153)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37812/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 9:05 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Timothy Chen,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37197/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 9:49 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ian Downes, Jie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37824/#review96747
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [37823]
Failed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36571/#review96746
---
Ship it!
include/mesos/maintenance/maintenance.proto (line 54)
On Aug. 24, 2015, 11:56 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
This review is a bit hard to follow because it's doing multiple things. I
would recommend you to split this into multiple reviews
#1) Expose framework user in state.json
#2) Update framework user on re-registration (need a test for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37856/#review96770
---
src/tests/environment.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37497/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 9:57 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ian Downes, Jie
On Aug. 27, 2015, 9:58 p.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
src/tests/environment.cpp, line 298
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37856/diff/1/?file=1056473#file1056473line298
It works now?
See my change in MultipleSlaves test. Basically, I fixed the isolation used in
that test so that port
On Aug. 27, 2015, 6:04 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
include/mesos/maintenance/maintenance.proto, line 56
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36571/diff/15/?file=1053335#file1053335line56
I'm not sure `0` is a valid protobuf tag.
Joseph Wu wrote:
After double checking the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37325/#review96762
---
Ship it!
src/master/http.cpp (line 1407)
On Aug. 27, 2015, 12:03 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp, line 145
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37812/diff/1/?file=1055255#file1055255line145
This is quite subtle, I think we should log and also put some
documentation around slave that we
On Aug. 26, 2015, 4:03 p.m., Joseph Wu wrote:
src/tests/fetcher_cache_tests.cpp, line 458
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37813/diff/1/?file=1055256#file1055256line458
Is it common knowledge that the sandbox holds the logs? (If not, a
short comment would suffice.)
It kinda is, but
On Aug. 27, 2015, 6:04 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
include/mesos/maintenance/maintenance.proto, lines 31-37
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36571/diff/15/?file=1053335#file1053335line31
IIUC, here you group a bunch of machines based on time intervals. Why
this grouping is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37856/#review96775
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [37726, 37734, 37735, 37738,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37497/#review96780
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [37196, 37197, 37198, 37200]
Failed
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37497/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 11:44 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ian Downes, Jie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37496/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 11:43 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Till Toenshoff
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37495/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 11:42 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ian Downes, Jie
On Aug. 26, 2015, 11:04 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
include/mesos/maintenance/maintenance.proto, lines 31-37
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36571/diff/15/?file=1053335#file1053335line31
IIUC, here you group a bunch of machines based on time intervals. Why
this grouping is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37655/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 3:24 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37853/#review96763
---
This looks great! Thanks Mei! I think the main thing left here is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37821/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 10:59 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37655/#review96778
---
include/mesos/mesos.proto (line 97)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36321/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 3:46 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37200/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 11:41 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ian Downes, Jie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37247/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 11:41 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Till Toenshoff
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37198/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 11:40 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ian Downes, Jie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36571/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 4:41 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman,
On Aug. 26, 2015, 11:05 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
include/mesos/maintenance/maintenance.hpp, line 29
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37314/diff/6/?file=1053339#file1053339line29
If it's not a protobuf, remove `Info` suffix. The suffix is there only
to avoid collisions between
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37821/#review96823
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [37821]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37532/
---
(Updated Aug. 28, 2015, 5:53 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37532/
---
(Updated Aug. 28, 2015, 1:35 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37173/#review96809
---
include/mesos/master/allocator.proto (line 31)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37773/#review96813
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [37426, 37427]
Failed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37280/#review96836
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jian Qiu
On 八月 26, 2015, 2:13 a.m., Joris
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37314/#review96643
---
include/mesos/maintenance/maintenance.hpp (line 29)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36571/#review96642
---
include/mesos/maintenance/maintenance.proto (lines 31 - 37)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37325/#review96649
---
Not a full review, mostly nit-picks. Will do a second pass.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37821/#review96655
---
3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp (line 2210)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37821/#review96653
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [37821]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37821/#review96654
---
Sorry folks, there seems to be some kind of data race here... after
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36404/#review96657
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [36999, 36646, 36404]
All
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37187/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 1:38 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Alexander Rojas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36571/#review96796
---
include/mesos/maintenance/maintenance.proto (lines 37 - 39)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35330/#review96798
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Timothy Chen
On Aug. 27, 2015, 11 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37863/#review96797
---
Ship it!
src/tests/containerizer/isolator_tests.cpp (lines 1268 -
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37821/#review96802
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [37821]
All tests passed.
-
On Aug. 26, 2015, midnight, Lily Chen wrote:
This was a WIP for you to get the patch :). Anywaz addressed the issues.
On Aug. 26, 2015, midnight, Lily Chen wrote:
src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/docker/registry_client.hpp, line 89
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37170/#review96806
---
Ship it!
Barring the s/MachineInfo/MachineID/ renames from
On Aug. 28, 2015, 12:18 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/docker/token_manager.hpp, line 69
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37427/diff/12/?file=1052806#file1052806line69
is exp and nbf web token fields?
Yes.
On Aug. 28, 2015, 12:18 a.m., Timothy Chen
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37773/
---
(Updated Aug. 28, 2015, 12:47 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Lily Chen and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37497/#review96812
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [37196, 37197, 37198, 37200,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36571/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 5:57 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman,
76 matches
Mail list logo