Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80563543
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,446 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15235#discussion_r80582937
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ListingFileCatalog.scala
---
@@ -82,73 +85,185 @@ class ListingFileCatalog(
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15235#discussion_r80583033
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ListingFileCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15235#discussion_r80582702
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ListingFileCatalog.scala
---
@@ -82,73 +85,185 @@ class ListingFileCatalog(
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15235#discussion_r80583392
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ListingFileCatalog.scala
---
@@ -82,73 +83,177 @@ class ListingFileCatalog(
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15235#discussion_r80573942
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ListingFileCatalog.scala
---
@@ -82,73 +85,185 @@ class ListingFileCatalog(
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15235#discussion_r80583326
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ListingFileCatalog.scala
---
@@ -82,73 +85,185 @@ class ListingFileCatalog(
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15235#discussion_r80574449
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ListingFileCatalog.scala
---
@@ -82,73 +85,185 @@ class ListingFileCatalog(
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15235#discussion_r80581975
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ListingFileCatalog.scala
---
@@ -82,73 +85,185 @@ class ListingFileCatalog(
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15235#discussion_r80582465
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ListingFileCatalog.scala
---
@@ -82,73 +85,185 @@ class ListingFileCatalog(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65930/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #65930 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65930/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
**[Test build #65934 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65934/consoleFull)**
for PR 14659 at commit
Github user Sherry302 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r80579059
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2421,6 +2421,69 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
Github user Sherry302 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
Hi, @tgravescs Thanks a lot for the comments. I have updated the PR to
rename local vals and remove the `@since` in `Utils.scala`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65929/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user Sherry302 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r80579032
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2421,6 +2421,69 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
**[Test build #65929 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65929/consoleFull)**
for PR 14897 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15246
**[Test build #65933 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65933/consoleFull)**
for PR 15246 at commit
GitHub user Sherry302 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15246
[MINOR][SQL] Use resource path for test_script.sh
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR modified the test case `test("script")` to use resource path for
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
@sethah AFAIK, the original gradient boosting algorithm was generic, not
specific to trees. That's Algorithm 1 from
[https://statweb.stanford.edu/~jhf/ftp/trebst.pdf] and is what MLlib has
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14818
For example:
`LogisticRegression` has `Threshold`, `Thresholds` and `AggregationDepth`
etc as parameters.
`GeneralizedLinearRegression` doesn't have such parameters. So the
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15245#discussion_r80568308
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/HadoopFileLinesReader.scala
---
@@ -30,7 +31,8 @@ import
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13998
@koeninger Could you take a look at this test flakiness in
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-master-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/1792/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9162
**[Test build #65932 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65932/consoleFull)**
for PR 9162 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15245
**[Test build #65931 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65931/consoleFull)**
for PR 15245 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15245#discussion_r80568112
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/RecordReaderIterator.scala
---
@@ -27,7 +29,8 @@ import
Github user wgtmac closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15155
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15245
Nice one, looks like something that can only help.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15245#discussion_r80567995
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/RecordReaderIterator.scala
---
@@ -52,4 +55,18 @@ class
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15245#discussion_r80567861
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/RecordReaderIterator.scala
---
@@ -38,7 +41,7 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65927/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
I added a few comments @zjffdu. I also tested this PR out and looks good
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15244
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15245
[SPARK-17666] Ensure that RecordReaders are closed by data source file scans
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch addresses a potential cause of resource leaks
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65920/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
**[Test build #65927 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65927/consoleFull)**
for PR 14426 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #65920 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65920/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959#discussion_r80567211
--- Diff: python/pyspark/conf.py ---
@@ -118,28 +130,28 @@ def setIfMissing(self, key, value):
def setMaster(self, value):
Github user andrewor14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15244
Thanks merged into master 2.0 and 1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959#discussion_r80566426
--- Diff: python/pyspark/java_gateway.py ---
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ def can_convert_list(self, obj):
ListConverter.can_convert = can_convert_list
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65926/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
**[Test build #65926 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65926/consoleFull)**
for PR 15102 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r80565861
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/DefaultReadWriteTest.scala ---
@@ -107,24 +133,34 @@ trait DefaultReadWriteTest extends TempDirectory
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959#discussion_r80565092
--- Diff: python/pyspark/conf.py ---
@@ -149,35 +161,53 @@ def setAll(self, pairs):
:param pairs: list of key-value pairs to set
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959#discussion_r80564836
--- Diff: python/pyspark/conf.py ---
@@ -149,35 +161,53 @@ def setAll(self, pairs):
:param pairs: list of key-value pairs to set
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15225
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15225
LGTM. Merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959#discussion_r80561545
--- Diff: python/pyspark/conf.py ---
@@ -101,13 +101,25 @@ def __init__(self, loadDefaults=True, _jvm=None,
_jconf=None):
self._jconf =
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959#discussion_r80561001
--- Diff: python/pyspark/conf.py ---
@@ -101,13 +101,25 @@ def __init__(self, loadDefaults=True, _jvm=None,
_jconf=None):
self._jconf =
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
* Do we want to use the subpackage ```spark.ml.feature.lsh``` or just put
the classes under ```spark.ml.feature```? This would be the first division of
```feature```. I'd prefer not using
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803
Thanks, I'm going to merge this to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15244
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r80559677
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/LSH.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
GitHub user ammills01 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15244
Update spark-standalone.md to fix link
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Corrected a link to the configuration.html page, it was pointing to a page
that does not exist
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r80556472
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/LSH.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,290 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803#discussion_r80556219
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -512,6 +512,12 @@ csvDF = spark \
These examples generate streaming DataFrames that
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r80555938
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/lsh/LSH.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,290 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15196
**[Test build #65928 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65928/consoleFull)**
for PR 15196 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
**[Test build #65929 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65929/consoleFull)**
for PR 14897 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #65930 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65930/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15196
Sounds fine. I guess I'm surprised these wouldn't have to be overridden in
the same way, but, on the other hand I suppose the existing query works today
for MySQL et al? this is a more conservative
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13493
Same here, looks fine except for @holdenk 's comment. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14852
LGTM. @yanboliang what do you think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15240
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15240
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65925/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15240
**[Test build #65925 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65925/consoleFull)**
for PR 15240 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15196
@srowen, I think that @sureshthalamati is right and that we shouldn't
override for those other dialects until we know that there's a problem with
them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65922/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #65922 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65922/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65919/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14818
Could you elaborate what's incompatible?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #65919 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65919/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15243
Hi, @danix800 .
Could you fix the following comment in this PR, too?
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601
So, I am trying to refresh my memory on this PR. I see we settled on not
supporting vector type and not supporting mode. Did we ever settle on
supporting multiple input columns? I am not sure I see
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#discussion_r80543997
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/ImputerSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239
also, you would need to add `@param ...` doc to pass the CRAN tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239
great, thanks.
- we should consolidate the write.* function to use a helper to avoid code
duplication
- I'm a bit worry about the function signature changes - could we have some
tests
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239#discussion_r80541497
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -835,7 +843,7 @@ loadDF <- function(x, ...) {
#' @note createExternalTable since 1.4.0
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239#discussion_r80540973
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/utils.R ---
@@ -334,6 +334,27 @@ varargsToEnv <- function(...) {
env
}
+# Utility function to capture the varargs
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239#discussion_r80540376
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -743,8 +743,12 @@ setMethod("toJSON",
#' @note write.json since 1.6.0
setMethod("write.json",
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15216
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14818
@felixcheung If I added it to `spark.glm`, it will break the current
`spark.glm` interface.
`setMethod("spark.glm", signature(data = "SparkDataFrame", formula =
"formula"),
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65923/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
**[Test build #65923 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65923/consoleFull)**
for PR 14897 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
**[Test build #65927 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65927/consoleFull)**
for PR 14426 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15231#discussion_r80536437
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/utils.R ---
@@ -698,6 +698,21 @@ isSparkRShell <- function() {
grepl(".*shell\\.R$", Sys.getenv("R_PROFILE_USER"), perl = TRUE)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65921/
Test FAILed.
---
201 - 300 of 536 matches
Mail list logo
