GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1166
[SQL] Break hiveOperators.scala into multiple files.
The single file was getting very long (500+ loc).
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1166#issuecomment-46746072
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1166#issuecomment-46746074
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1167
[SPARK-2227] Support dfs command in SQL.
Note that nothing gets printed to the console because we don't properly
maintain session state right now.
I will have a followup PR that fixes it.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1167#issuecomment-46746547
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1166#issuecomment-46747248
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1166#issuecomment-46747249
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15982/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1167#issuecomment-46747769
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1167#issuecomment-46747770
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15983/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user YanjieGao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1134#issuecomment-46754360
Hi rxin,I reformat it . Can you give me some suggestions.I will try to
make it better.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user YanjieGao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1151#issuecomment-46754425
Hi Zongheng, I try it ,and try add code like other operator. I don't know
if i want to add this except operator ,do i need to add code or modify code in
other scala
Github user YanjieGao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1127#issuecomment-46754487
Hi Zongheng, I reformat the code .I don't know if that is ok. And i hope
you can give me more suggestions . Thanks a lot
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user YanjieGao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1115#issuecomment-46754558
Hi Srowen , markhamstra .
I want to merge this to the master branch.Last time i make a mistake .
I resubmit this patch in
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1115#issuecomment-46755115
Assuming you have the `apache/spark` repository configured in your git
repository as `upstream`, you can checkout your branch for this PR and `git
pull --rebase upstream
Github user YanjieGao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1115#issuecomment-46755267
Thanks a lot , I will do it as you said .I once submit it as I fork spark
reposity on the web ,and I write the code and run it on intellij .Then i edit
the scala
Github user tmalaska commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/566#issuecomment-46755792
I'm going to have to make a new pull request, because I had drop the repo
that belonged to this pull request. I will update the ticket with the
information when it's
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/735#issuecomment-46759314
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/735#issuecomment-46759318
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/735#issuecomment-46760188
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15984/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/735#issuecomment-46760187
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1167#issuecomment-46761293
We do have a circular buffer that holds the command output already. We
could probably just add a command to clear it before each command and then
optionally use it as
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1167#issuecomment-46761327
This is currently failing for unrelated GraphX MIMA issues.
```
[info] spark-graphx: found 0 potential binary incompatibilities (filtered
17)
[error] *
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1127#discussion_r14051069
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -245,6 +245,73 @@ case class LeftSemiJoinBNL(
}
}
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1151#discussion_r14051137
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -204,3 +204,18 @@ case class ExistingRdd(output:
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1151#discussion_r14051147
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -204,3 +204,18 @@ case class ExistingRdd(output:
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1151#issuecomment-46761858
Thanks for working on this!
A few remaining tasks:
- [ ] Add a new logical operator in `basicOperators.scala` in
`catalyst/...`.
- [ ] Hook that new
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1166#issuecomment-46761937
I'm going to merge this since only MIMA is failing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1166#issuecomment-46761957
Merged into master and 1.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1166
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1147#discussion_r14051239
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Projection.scala
---
@@ -124,4 +128,6 @@ class JoinedRow extends Row {
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1147#discussion_r14051257
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Projection.scala
---
@@ -81,6 +81,10 @@ class JoinedRow extends Row {
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1147#discussion_r14051261
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -25,26 +25,6 @@ import
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1147#discussion_r14051271
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -114,48 +94,27 @@ object HashFilteredJoin extends
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1147#discussion_r14051287
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkStrategies.scala ---
@@ -29,30 +29,25 @@ import
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1147#discussion_r14051296
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -36,158 +37,211 @@ case object BuildLeft extends BuildSide
case
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1147#discussion_r14051297
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql.execution
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1147#discussion_r14051302
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -249,12 +297,15 @@ case class LeftSemiJoinBNL(
* :: DeveloperApi
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1147#issuecomment-46762746
I think it would be much better if this PR just added support for LeftOuter
(and maybe RightOuter too?) to HashJoin.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
GitHub user tmalaska opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1168
SPARK-1478.2: Upgrade FlumeInputDStream's FlumeReceiver to support
FLUME-1915
SPARK-1478.2: Upgrade FlumeInputDStream's FlumeReceiver to support
FLUME-1915
You can merge this pull request
Github user tmalaska commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/566#issuecomment-46763419
New Pull request https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1168
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1168#issuecomment-46763507
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1168#issuecomment-46763617
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1168#issuecomment-46763622
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1168#issuecomment-46763649
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1168#issuecomment-46763650
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15985/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
GitHub user orikremer opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1169
spark-ec2: quote command line args
To preserve quoted command line args (in case options have space in them).
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1169#issuecomment-46763973
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#discussion_r14051518
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -243,16 +242,25 @@ object HiveMetastoreTypes extends
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734#issuecomment-46764177
Closing in favor of: #1163
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user marmbrus closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/734
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#discussion_r14051536
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Projection.scala
---
@@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ class Projection(expressions:
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1169#issuecomment-46764293
Jenkins, test this please. Thanks this LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46764347
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46764340
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46764649
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46764653
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1163#issuecomment-46764715
Regarding testing we will probably want to pull all of our various join
tests out into a separate test suite that can be run with various options
turned on an off so we
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1169#issuecomment-46765273
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1169#issuecomment-46765274
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15986/
---
If your
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/906#issuecomment-46765270
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46765275
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15987/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/906#issuecomment-46765330
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/906#issuecomment-46765328
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/906#issuecomment-46765353
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46765537
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15988/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46765536
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46765859
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46765864
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46765886
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46765887
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15990/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1170
SPARK-1996. Remove use of special Maven repo for Akka
Just following up Matei's suggestion to remove the Akka repo references.
Builds and the audit-release script appear OK.
You can merge this pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1170#issuecomment-46766169
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1170#issuecomment-46766174
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1170#issuecomment-46766197
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15991/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1171
SPARK-1675. Make clear whether computePrincipalComponents requires centered
data
Just closing out this small JIRA, resolving with a comment change.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1170#issuecomment-46766196
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1171#issuecomment-46766279
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1171#issuecomment-46766302
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1171#issuecomment-46766283
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1171#issuecomment-46766303
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15992/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46766392
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46766386
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46766437
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1170#issuecomment-46766456
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/906#issuecomment-46766447
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1171#issuecomment-46766462
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1170#issuecomment-46766505
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1170#issuecomment-46766513
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46766508
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/906#issuecomment-46766509
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1171#issuecomment-46766514
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1171#issuecomment-46766504
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/906#issuecomment-46766516
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-46766515
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1064#discussion_r14051999
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/hash/HashShuffleReader.scala ---
@@ -31,10 +31,24 @@ class HashShuffleReader[K, C](
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1064#discussion_r14052024
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ShuffleSuite.scala ---
@@ -78,8 +81,11 @@ class ShuffleSuite extends FunSuite with Matchers with
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1064#discussion_r14052020
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ShuffleSuite.scala ---
@@ -56,8 +56,11 @@ class ShuffleSuite extends FunSuite with Matchers with
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1064#issuecomment-46767244
Hey Saisai, I noticed one thing that got lost in the move, which is the use
of InterruptibleIterator. We need to bring that back to allow cancellation of
reduce tasks.
Github user tmalaska commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1168#issuecomment-46767307
Thanks tdas I messed that one. I just updated. It should be good now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1172#issuecomment-46767349
@mengxr - do you mind reviewing this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
