Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65591/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
**[Test build #65591 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65591/consoleFull)**
for PR 12819 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15149
**[Test build #65593 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65593/consoleFull)**
for PR 15149 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
**[Test build #65591 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65591/consoleFull)**
for PR 12819 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
**[Test build #65592 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65592/consoleFull)**
for PR 14731 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650
**[Test build #65594 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65594/consoleFull)**
for PR 14650 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15145#discussion_r79375663
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreDataSourcesSuite.scala
---
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ class MetastoreDataSourcesSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65592/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
**[Test build #65596 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65596/consoleFull)**
for PR 15051 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15149
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65593/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15149
**[Test build #65593 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65593/consoleFull)**
for PR 15149 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15149
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
I'm not concerned about people deleting partitions before messages have
been processed, because they can take care of that problem themselves, by
not deleting things until consuming has
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803
**[Test build #65595 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65595/consoleFull)**
for PR 14803 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
**[Test build #65592 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65592/consoleFull)**
for PR 14731 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14467#discussion_r79369158
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRDD.scala
---
@@ -866,11 +866,14 @@ class BytesToString extends
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
I think that's ok. We have similar restrictions in our cases.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650#discussion_r79376179
--- Diff:
mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/mesos/MesosClusterDispatcherArguments.scala
---
@@ -18,23 +18,43 @@
package
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650#discussion_r79376168
--- Diff:
mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/mesos/MesosClusterDispatcherArguments.scala
---
@@ -73,37 +94,55 @@ private[mesos] class
Github user phalodi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
@jerryshao ok i will change it as you suggested but then i think if UUID is
not a good name then we should also change it for spark session you see below
spark session generate UUID while not
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15140
cc @rxin @davies @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r79338430
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/lsh/LSH.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79335325
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/StatisticsColumnSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15053
Oh yes I agree that's a much smaller change - I was just explaining the
motivation behind my initial comment as mortada asked me to elaborate.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
@Yunni Please use a proper title as "[SPARK-5992][ML] ...".
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r79339839
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/lsh/LSH.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15146#discussion_r79340534
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ ctes
;
namedQuery
-
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15054#discussion_r79340506
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -246,30 +246,42 @@ class SessionCatalog(
}
Github user phalodi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
@sadikovi Yes it will, like if we will not define app name in SparkConf
object or spark-submit then it will generate exception , In this PR random UUID
is generated for app name if its not
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79331978
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -101,4 +101,47 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
In
[DataSource.scala](https://github.com/cloud-fan/spark/blob/9ab4b8ce3dd7c41edb0681ff903d218bad2e4225/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala),
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
**[Test build #65590 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65590/consoleFull)**
for PR 15131 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65590/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Fix the title please?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r79337558
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/lsh/LSH.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15146#discussion_r79340032
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ ctes
;
namedQuery
-
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79330943
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79331719
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -101,4 +101,47 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
In the
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
@phalodi we don't restrict user to have to set an app name either for
SparkContext or SparkSession. You could refer to this code in SparkSubmit:
```
// Set name from main class if
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79331568
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -101,4 +101,47 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79332105
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -101,4 +101,47 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user phalodi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
@jerryshao yeah you are right jerry for spark-submit and launcher its
works, but for many time user also have usecase to just locally using spark
like reading file with spark more fast even we run
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
My concern is that previously Spark will throw an exception if app name is
not set, while in 2.0 we bring in SparkSession which breaks the convention, so
do we need to let SparkSession to be
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79331169
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -101,4 +101,47 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
GitHub user Yunni opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Spark 5992 yunn lsh
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implement Locality Sensitive Hashing along with approximate nearest
neighbors and approximate similarity join based
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150#discussion_r79412313
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -580,7 +581,15 @@ class Word2VecModel private[spark] (
ind +=
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15041#discussion_r79416925
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/Utils.scala
---
@@ -30,10 +34,22 @@ private[spark] object Utils {
* Returns the first
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65600/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
@yanboliang What went into the decision to use RDD based aggregation? Just
curious, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r79415724
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2420,6 +2420,44 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150
**[Test build #65601 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65601/consoleFull)**
for PR 15150 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
@yhuai The suggestions are for purely testing purposes, to make sure that
StructuredStreaming doesn't check for file existence twice.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14784#discussion_r79363809
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/sparkR.R ---
@@ -369,6 +372,24 @@ sparkR.session <- function(
overrideEnvs(sparkConfigMap, paramMap)
}
--- End diff
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14784#discussion_r79363920
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/sparkR.R ---
@@ -369,6 +372,24 @@ sparkR.session <- function(
overrideEnvs(sparkConfigMap, paramMap)
}
+ #
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650#discussion_r79376216
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -40,12 +40,12 @@ import org.apache.ivy.plugins.matcher.GlobPatternMatcher
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150#discussion_r79412206
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -580,7 +581,15 @@ class Word2VecModel private[spark] (
ind +=
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15149#discussion_r79412702
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/ProbabilisticClassifierSuite.scala
---
@@ -56,6 +56,21 @@ class
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650#discussion_r79417055
--- Diff:
mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/mesos/MesosClusterDispatcherArguments.scala
---
@@ -18,23 +18,43 @@
package
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650#discussion_r79417214
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Executable.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r79419642
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Task.scala ---
@@ -54,7 +54,10 @@ private[spark] abstract class Task[T](
val partitionId:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
**[Test build #65600 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65600/consoleFull)**
for PR 1 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15145#discussion_r79413782
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreDataSourcesSuite.scala
---
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ class MetastoreDataSourcesSuite
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15041#discussion_r79413763
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/Utils.scala
---
@@ -30,10 +34,22 @@ private[spark] object Utils {
* Returns the first
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65599/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15041#discussion_r79419305
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/Utils.scala
---
@@ -30,10 +34,22 @@ private[spark] object Utils {
* Returns the first
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14827
Go ahead and close this one but I think you deserve 'credit' for the JIRA
change, if that makes any difference.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15115
The only difference was that you're also making 2.7 the default, which
isn't bad or anything. Otherwise i think it was just an oversight. There's way
too much traffic to keep track of unfortunately,
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15041#discussion_r79416074
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/Utils.scala
---
@@ -30,10 +34,22 @@ private[spark] object Utils {
* Returns the first
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15145
**[Test build #65602 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65602/consoleFull)**
for PR 15145 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
**[Test build #65599 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65599/consoleFull)**
for PR 12819 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r79419042
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala
---
@@ -42,7 +42,10 @@ import org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD
*
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r79421792
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2420,6 +2420,44 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65601/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
@petermaxlee Thank you for the suggestions for testing. I will try out
Option 1, since 2 is a bit much work for a minor PR as this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803
**[Test build #65623 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65623/consoleFull)**
for PR 14803 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65623/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14834
Merged into master. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15147
@nbeyer Thanks for your investigation. I think that sounds reasonable
though I think it might be arguable because adding more cases virtually means
more time and computation to parse/infer
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15126
Since @frreiss hasn't updated the pr yet, I'm going to merge this one and
assign the jira ticket to Fred.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15126
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15067
@frreiss can you close this now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
A few high-level comments/questions:
* Should this go into the `feature` package as a feature
estimator/transformer? That is where other dimensionality reduction techniques
have gone and
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803#discussion_r79526950
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FileStreamSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -608,6 +608,34 @@ class FileStreamSourceSuite extends
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15146
@hvanhovell This is for analyzer change and adds CTE in CTE feature. I
don't expect there is performance improvement.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65628/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
**[Test build #65628 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65628/consoleFull)**
for PR 13513 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15146
I guess if using the same analyzed plan increases the chance to reuse
exchange, then it may improve the performance. Anyway, it is not the purpose of
this change. Because the analyzed subquery plan
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14784
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15146
**[Test build #65630 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65630/consoleFull)**
for PR 15146 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15158
[SPARK-17603] [SQL] Utilize Hive-generated Statistics For Partitioned Tables
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For non-partitioned tables, Hive-generated statistics are
1 - 100 of 480 matches
Mail list logo
