Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
LGTM except a very minor style comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
**[Test build #69476 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69476/consoleFull)**
for PR 15843 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16093
LGTM except one minor point about test case.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69476/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16100
[SPARK-18674][SQL] improve the error message of natural join
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current error message of USING join is quite confusing, for example:
Github user techaddict commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15831
@sethah @yanboliang I've started with migrating `IDF`, can you review the
WIP and if i'm going in the right direction
https://github.com/techaddict/spark/pull/2/files
there is some code
GitHub user techaddict opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16101
[WIP] Migrate IDF to not used mllib
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/techaddict/spark migrate-idf
Alternatively you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90447908
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -498,7 +498,8 @@ object ScalaReflection extends
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
Build started: [CORE] `org.apache.spark.JavaAPISuite`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
**[Test build #69477 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69477/consoleFull)**
for PR 15219 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
**[Test build #69480 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69480/consoleFull)**
for PR 12004 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16100#discussion_r90460053
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/joinTypes.scala
---
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ case class NaturalJoin(tpe: JoinType)
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16100
cc @rxin @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089#discussion_r90468563
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/CodecStreams.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90447815
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/JavaTypeInference.scala
---
@@ -396,12 +396,14 @@ object JavaTypeInference {
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079
Merged to master/2.1. This doesn't actually affect earlier versions because
it seems to be introduced by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11653
I didn't realize the 'local' would have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
**[Test build #69475 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69475/consoleFull)**
for PR 16098 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
**[Test build #69476 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69476/consoleFull)**
for PR 15843 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
**[Test build #69478 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69478/consoleFull)**
for PR 15219 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16100
**[Test build #69481 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69481/consoleFull)**
for PR 16100 at commit
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089#discussion_r90468858
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/text/TextFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -132,39 +128,17 @@ class
Github user techaddict closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16101
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086#discussion_r90452307
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -275,36 +308,43 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
val numCols =
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15480#discussion_r90454770
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateOrdering.scala
---
@@ -118,7 +118,42 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994
**[Test build #69471 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69471/consoleFull)**
for PR 15994 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69480/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
**[Test build #69480 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69480/consoleFull)**
for PR 12004 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #69482 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69482/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90446944
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -171,15 +171,18 @@ case class StaticInvoke(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086#discussion_r90449169
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -236,6 +238,37 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
}
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
**[Test build #69478 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69478/consoleFull)**
for PR 15219 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69478/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086#discussion_r90448773
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -236,6 +238,37 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
}
+
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16056
I will update the comment again after #15780 is merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69477/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
**[Test build #69477 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69477/consoleFull)**
for PR 15219 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086
**[Test build #69483 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69483/consoleFull)**
for PR 16086 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
**[Test build #69475 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69475/consoleFull)**
for PR 16098 at commit
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
close is idempotent - simply close it before
'committer.commitTask(taskContext)' and you should be done. The second close in
finally will become no-op in case of successful commit, and will handle
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15480#discussion_r90474669
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateOrdering.scala
---
@@ -118,7 +118,42 @@ object
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086#discussion_r90451294
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -275,36 +308,43 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
val numCols =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69471/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user techaddict commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
@jkbradley @holdenk @viirya PR updated
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69475/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69473/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
**[Test build #69474 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69474/consoleFull)**
for PR 16098 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086#discussion_r90451485
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -275,36 +308,43 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
val numCols =
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
**[Test build #69479 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69479/consoleFull)**
for PR 15780 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
The latest patch
1. keeps the cloud package separate from hadoop-2.7. This is important
avoid outstanding problems related to org.json licensed artifacts in the aws
SDK JARs. The
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086#discussion_r90465622
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -275,36 +308,43 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
val numCols =
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
**[Test build #69473 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69473/consoleFull)**
for PR 15780 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90482686
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -498,7 +498,8 @@ object ScalaReflection extends
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086#discussion_r90482897
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -236,6 +238,37 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
}
+
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15910
I found the ```summary``` of ```spark.logit``` return incorrect result when
reviewing this PR. Actually it should return ```coefficients``` rather than
binary logistic regression summary that R
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16104
[SPARK-18675][SQL] CTAS for hive serde table should work for all hive
versions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before hive 1.1, when inserting into a table, hive
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089
AFAIK, the big thing the FileOutputFormat really adds is not the
compression, but the output committer and the stuff to go with that (working
directories, paths, etc etc). If you aren't going
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998#discussion_r90503688
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClient.scala ---
@@ -155,6 +155,25 @@ private[hive] trait HiveClient {
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
**[Test build #69474 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69474/consoleFull)**
for PR 16098 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086
**[Test build #69486 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69486/consoleFull)**
for PR 16086 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086#discussion_r90482959
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -236,6 +238,37 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
}
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086
**[Test build #69487 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69487/consoleFull)**
for PR 16086 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16104
cc @yhuai @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089#discussion_r90497882
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonGenerator.scala
---
@@ -194,4 +194,8 @@ private[sql] class
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089#discussion_r90499765
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -147,6 +147,17 @@ public void writeTo(ByteBuffer buffer) {
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089#discussion_r90501927
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonGenerator.scala
---
@@ -194,4 +194,8 @@ private[sql] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69483/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15910
The summary returns the same as scala side summary, including roc,
areaUnderROC, pr, fMeasureByThreshold etc. I think we can add `coefficients` as
additional item.
---
If your project is set
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
By the way this same issue may also impact the `ml` optimizers that use
L-BFGS. We should check the various gradient aggregators for
`LogisticRegression`, `LinearRegression`, `MLP` etc. cc @sethah
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Thank you for approving, @srowen !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
**[Test build #69479 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69479/consoleFull)**
for PR 15780 at commit
Github user a-roberts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15713
Performance results against the Spark master branch on a 48 core machine
running PageRank with 500k pages follow
**Vanilla CompactBuffer, no changes, run time and throughput (bytes per
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16100
**[Test build #69481 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69481/consoleFull)**
for PR 16100 at commit
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16103
[SPARK-18374][ML]Incorrect words in StopWords/english.txt
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently English stop words list in MLlib contains only the argumented
words
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089#discussion_r90503024
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/CodecStreams.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
**[Test build #69485 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69485/consoleFull)**
for PR 15219 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16102
**[Test build #69484 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69484/consoleFull)**
for PR 16102 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90482546
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -969,6 +972,53 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLContext
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90482655
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/JavaTypeInference.scala
---
@@ -396,12 +396,14 @@ object JavaTypeInference {
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90482617
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -171,15 +171,18 @@ case class StaticInvoke(
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
+1 for 2.1!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69479/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16104
**[Test build #69490 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69490/consoleFull)**
for PR 16104 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69485/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
**[Test build #69485 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69485/consoleFull)**
for PR 15219 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089#discussion_r90502669
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonGenerator.scala
---
@@ -194,4 +194,8 @@ private[sql] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16103
**[Test build #69489 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69489/consoleFull)**
for PR 16103 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16103
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16103
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69489/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 686 matches
Mail list logo
