Hi Massimo,
it is a more genera decission.
Scintific Linux, Apache etc have TCL 8.5 as default.
If we want to support them (with Rivet 3), it has to build here.
I may add a switch that TCL must have 8.6.1 minimum.
The current spec file says:
%define use_newer %(echo 'puts [package vsatisfies
On 02/16/2018 08:17 PM, Harald Oehlmann wrote:
Hi Massimo,
thank you for the reply !
About the compiler: the log file says:
gcc-4.8.2-16
You find most of this information at the top of the log file when
packages are installed.
You also have the configure options with a warning:
./configure
On 02/16/2018 08:17 PM, Harald Oehlmann wrote:
Hi Massimo,
thank you for the reply !
About the compiler: the log file says:
gcc-4.8.2-16
that's rather old, I haven't seen gcc 4.8 around for quite a long time,
but this package could not work properly (at least as a fully compatible
Hi Massimo,
thank you for the reply !
About the compiler: the log file says:
gcc-4.8.2-16
You find most of this information at the top of the log file when
packages are installed.
You also have the configure options with a warning:
./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
The error is correctly raised and I wonder why other builds didn't
notice it. What C compiler are they using? The good news is the whole
function could be removed because it's not used. It was meant to clean
up the resources of a thread but as long as Tcl interpreters cannot be
safely deleted
building apache2-mod_rivet.spec (user abuild)
[ 55s] -
[ 55s] -----
[ 55s] + exec rpmbuild -ba --define '_srcdefattr (-,root,root)' --nosignature
--define 'disturl
tcl
>>
>> # The default charset can be specified in the configuration
>> AddType "application/x-httpd-rivet; charset=utf-8" rvt
>>
>> # Add index.rvt to the list of files that will be served
>> DirectoryIndex index.rvt
>>
>> The full log is att
at will be served
DirectoryIndex index.rvt
The full log is attached.
Thanks for any help to the occacional worker...
Enjoy,
Harald
Am 09.02.2018 um 19:18 schrieb Massimo Manghi:
I just released rivet 3.0.1 and should be available soon from the ASF
distribution. This bugfix release b
I just released rivet 3.0.1 and should be available soon from the ASF
distribution. This bugfix release basically includes
* the namespace determination in librivet has been revised to
avoid to check for the module globals and therefore avoiding
the inclusion of mod_rivet.h
* a few
I just released rivet 3.0.1 and should be available soon from the ASF
distribution. This bugfix release basically includes
* the namespace determination in librivet has been revised to
avoid to check for the module globals and therefore avoiding
the inclusion of mod_rivet.h
* a few
Thank you Ronnie, I checked the patch and it's fine to menot for
laziness but I invite you to commit the patch yourself. I would be happy
you receive a full credit and have your name in one of rivet's ChangeLog
entries.
-- Massimo
On 02/08/2018 12:24 PM, Ronnie Brunner wrote:
Hi
ich | Switzerland | http://netcetera.com |
From: Massimo MANGHI [mailto:massimo.man...@unipr.it]
Sent: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 21:01
To: Ronnie Brunner <ronnie.brun...@netcetera.com>; Massimo Manghi
<massimo.man...@alice.it>; petas...@yahoo.gr
Cc: rivet-dev@tcl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rive
| 8040 Zürich | Switzerland | http://netcetera.com
On 7 Feb 2018, at 22:17, Massimo Manghi <massimo.man...@alice.it
<mailto:massimo.man...@alice.it>> wrote:
Dear Friends
this is the vote for releasing the artifact
http://www.rivetweb.org/~mxm/rivet/rivet-3.0.1rc2.tar.gz
as Rivet
ch | Switzerland | http://netcetera.com
>
> On 7 Feb 2018, at 22:17, Massimo Manghi <massimo.man...@alice.it
> <mailto:massimo.man...@alice.it>> wrote:
>
>> Dear Friends
>>
>> this is the vote for releasing the artifact
>>
>> http://www.r
e.it>> wrote:
Dear Friends
this is the vote for releasing the artifact
http://www.rivetweb.org/~mxm/rivet/rivet-3.0.1rc2.tar.gz
as Rivet 3.0.1 GA software
[ ] +1 OK
[ ] 0 abstain
[ ] -1 Needs more work
-- Massimo
-
+1.
Thank you Massimo.
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Massimo Manghi <massimo.man...@alice.it>
wrote:
> Dear Friends
>
> this is the vote for releasing the artifact
>
> http://www.rivetweb.org/~mxm/rivet/rivet-3.0.1rc2.tar.gz
>
> as Rivet 3.0.1 GA software
>
Dear Friends
this is the vote for releasing the artifact
http://www.rivetweb.org/~mxm/rivet/rivet-3.0.1rc2.tar.gz
as Rivet 3.0.1 GA software
[ ] +1 OK
[ ] 0 abstain
[ ] -1 Needs more work
-- Massimo
-
To unsubscribe, e
@yahoo.gr
Cc: rivet-dev@tcl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rivet 3.0.1
Thank you Ronnie, still the discrepancy between my PC and yours bothers me
quite a bit. I would like to have more time to investigate, in the meanwhile
would you sent over your error_log and output? Thank you
-- Ma
<ronnie.brun...@netcetera.com>
Inviato: martedì 6 febbraio 2018 20:48
A: Massimo MANGHI; Massimo Manghi; petas...@yahoo.gr
Cc: rivet-dev@tcl.apache.org
Oggetto: RE: Rivet 3.0.1
Hi Massimo
Sorry, I haven’t noticed your answer w/ the rc2 earlier. Thought it referred to
George’s issue with the test
[mailto:massimo.man...@unipr.it]
Sent: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 18:33
To: Ronnie Brunner <ronnie.brun...@netcetera.com>; Massimo Manghi
<massimo.man...@alice.it>; petas...@yahoo.gr
Cc: rivet-dev@tcl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rivet 3.0.1
Hi Ronnie are your latest test results obtained from
to: RE: Rivet 3.0.1
Hi Massimo
My problem for the worker mpm is certainly not a blocker, as I never managed
(actually, really tried) to run the tests for that mpm. I always tested
exclusively against prefork, mainly because I thought the others aren’t
supported yet.
Also: The test result of
ra.com>; Massimo Manghi
<massimo.man...@alice.it>; petas...@yahoo.gr
Cc: rivet-dev@tcl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rivet 3.0.1
Should we consider this issue a reason for withholding 3.0.1? I think that as
long as 2.2 is supported we may exploit the compatibility with 2.4. When 2.2 is
de
be handy.
Can I start the vote for releasing 3.0.1?
-- Massimo
Da: Georgios Petasis <petas...@yahoo.gr>
Inviato: domenica 4 febbraio 2018 14:54
A: Massimo MANGHI; Ronnie Brunner; Massimo Manghi
Cc: rivet-dev@tcl.apache.org
Oggetto: Re: Rivet 3.0.1
Dear M
os Petasis [mailto:petas...@yahoo.gr]
Sent: Sonntag, 4. Februar 2018 14:54
To: Massimo Manghi <massimo.man...@unipr.it>; Ronnie Brunner
<ronnie.brun...@netcetera.com>; Massimo Manghi <massimo.man...@alice.it>
Cc: rivet-dev@tcl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rivet 3.0.1
Dear Massimo,
According
assimo MANGHI; Ronnie Brunner; Massimo Manghi
Cc: rivet-dev@tcl.apache.org
Oggetto: Re: Rivet 3.0.1
Dear Massimo,
According to the documentation:
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/developer/new_api_2_4.html
API Changes in Apache HTTP Server 2.4 since
2.2<https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/
ning the test suite
(including the compilation of rivet), the error_log and access_log
from rivet-3.0.1/tests after running the test suite.
I'm running a CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) os for these
tests, Tcl8.6.6 and httpd 2.4.27 with the worker mpm. The only
modification to runtests.tcl
Attached the output (stout and sdterr) of running the test suite
(including the compilation of rivet), the error_log and access_log
from rivet-3.0.1/tests after running the test suite.
I'm running a CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) os for these
tests, Tcl8.6.6 and httpd 2.4.27 with the worker
Hi Massimo
Attached the output (stout and sdterr) of running the test suite (including the
compilation of rivet), the error_log and access_log from rivet-3.0.1/tests
after running the test suite.
I'm running a CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) os for these tests, Tcl8.6.6
and httpd 2.4.27
That's sound like very bad news. I ran the test suite yesterday with the
worker bridge and it was OK (130 tests). What do you read in
tests/error_log ?
-- Massimo
On 02/01/2018 11:15 AM, Ronnie Brunner wrote:
Hi Massimo
Test suite works for prefork, but just for the fun of it, I checked
Zürich | Switzerland | http://netcetera.com |
-Original Message-
From: Massimo Manghi [mailto:massimo.man...@alice.it]
Sent: Donnerstag, 1. Februar 2018 00:43
To: rivet-dev@tcl.apache.org
Subject: Rivet 3.0.1
I just uploaded at http://www.rivetweb.org/~mxm/rivet/ a 3.0.1rc1
artifact
I just uploaded at http://www.rivetweb.org/~mxm/rivet/ a 3.0.1rc1
artifact for your evaluation. Basically, differences from 3.0.0 are
+ applied patch provided by George Petasis that correctly initializes
interpreters in the worker bridge
+ Documentation amended and expanded in various
31 matches
Mail list logo
