Re: [Rosegarden-devel] RG Blue birds eye view strip

2009-09-23 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Julie S msjuli...@yahoo.com wrote: We color put clefs, notes, rests, keys, text, measure lines etc. in black. But draw the staff first in a gray or translucent color. That would make items much more distinguishable without messing with scaling factors. Any

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] RG Blue birds eye view strip

2009-09-23 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Julie S msjuli...@yahoo.com wrote: Sorry, I don't quite understand what [default staff size for multi-staff views] affects, does it affect our RG screen or just the lily pond output? It affects the screen (and not the Lilypond output at all). Go to View - Size

[Rosegarden-devel] crashes wanted

2009-09-23 Thread Chris Cannam
Send me your crashes! I'd like to get as many as possible fixed in the near future. I've fixed several serious ones in the last few days, but I'd like to hear about more. Any time the current SVN bails out on you, please let me know, however briefly (follow up to this email privately, or even

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] RG Blue birds eye view strip

2009-09-23 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:10 PM, D. Michael McIntyre michael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: My only serious whine about the panner in general is that the white viewable area box really is very twitchy at the edges. Yes, it still sometimes gets stuck as well. Chris

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Taking stock of Thorn

2009-09-22 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Jani Frilander j.frilan...@gmail.com wrote: 0) update to latest version. 1) draw a segment in the beginning of track 1 and open in notation editor 2) insert notes 3) select them and delete 4) rewind and hit play Notes can be heard but not seen. Haha! Well,

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden:[10914] trunk/rosegarden/src

2009-09-20 Thread Chris Cannam
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 8:09 PM, D. Michael McIntyre michael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: On Sunday 20 September 2009, Chris Cannam wrote: On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 5:29 PM,  il...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Fixed a warning message about getTrack() which the compiler thinks

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Cursor Chaos

2009-09-14 Thread Chris Cannam
[sorry about the absence -- medical distractions] So, in the Classic notation editor we have two cursors. The blue one is the full height of the system and moves smoothly during playback (mostly!). The purple one is the height of a single staff and moves only when commanded to. It has two main

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Debugging with gdb may be broken due to our Makefile

2009-09-11 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:47 AM, D. Michael McIntyre michael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: They suspect the NetBeans points at the wrong line problem is related to problems in general trying to debug optimized binaries.  They suggest that it is standard practice to use non-optimized

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] trunk housekeeping question

2009-09-06 Thread Chris Cannam
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Julie Smsjuli...@yahoo.com wrote: My thought is to rename them with the Old prefix like in 'OldNotationView' and update OldNotationView to point to those. If I remember aright, the whole of OldNotationView is #ifdef'd out with a NO_LONGER_USED symbol. It only

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Structure of svn (trunk-branches-tags) is screwed up

2009-09-06 Thread Chris Cannam
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: $ svn checkout http://${userna...@rosegarden.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/rosegarden/trunk trunk-rebasing $ cd trunk-rebasing $ svn move rosegarden/* ./ $ svn move rosegarden/.*project ./ $ svn move

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Structure of svn (trunk-branches-tags) is screwed up

2009-09-04 Thread Chris Cannam
[I am only sort-of back -- will catch up properly in a day or so, but this came in while I was staring balefully at the inbox] On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: Seems like our svn tree does not fully obey the trunk-branches-tags pattern Right, this is

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Question about merging

2009-09-04 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Julie Smsjuli...@yahoo.com wrote: In the case of a conflict, there will be 'C' in the place of the file which contained conflicts. C  foo.c Such a file will be split into several parts. foo.c foo.c.r8115 foo.c.r8119 foo.c.working These files are

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] comments (wiki is locked)

2009-08-27 Thread Chris Cannam
I haven't yet had time to read the whole thread, but I'd like to put one fly in the ointment straight away: we shouldn't be using the Alt modifier with F-keys, as those are usually taken by the window manager. And actually, I notice that kwin in KDE4 also reserves Ctrl plus F-keys. I think our

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Good news, bad news from studio push

2009-08-27 Thread Chris Cannam
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:23 AM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: Bad news: The file came up with all the LEDs in the correct state for a running JACK, but JACK wasn't running, and audio was disabled.  This is probably a regression. Ah, thanks for the reminder.

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] new notation toolbars peculiarity

2009-08-26 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Julie Smsjuli...@yahoo.com wrote: Step recording isn't even here yet, I don't think, but anyway, it seems like the way to provide that hint would be to set the duration toolbar to that duration. So what was Heikki talking about then? I assume Heikki was

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] comments (wiki is locked)

2009-08-26 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:12 PM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: we'd have F2 select/edit F3 insert notes F4 insert rests F5 insert symbols F6 erase     (was F4) F7 text      (was F8) F8 fretboard (was F9) But F4 is erase everywhere else, so that's a bit

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] comments (wiki is locked)

2009-08-26 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:27 PM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Chris Cannam wrote: I would expect to just return to inserting notation (as opposed to annotational bits like text) and end up back in whatever state you were last

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Braches was Re: Pivotal Decision:...

2009-08-25 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: I do not want to commit if the code does not work properly. That is a dilemma. That is the nub of the problem, but I'm not sure that the right answer is (effectively) to make it easier for people not to commit publicly

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Branching and dreams was Re: Pivotal Decision...

2009-08-25 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Chris Fryerchrisf1...@googlemail.com wrote: My opinion? If it ain't broke. Don't fix it. I now see that I've got 20 emails to go through on the dev list and my guess is that not many of them are about fixing our stability problems. Indeed. Let me wrap up this

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] notation_toolbar_2 branch

2009-08-25 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Brett McCoyidragos...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know why everyone thinks subversion branching and merging is so difficult... I'm not sure that anyone thinks branching and merging is difficult per se -- what really is difficult is tracking merges, so that any

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] new notation toolbars peculiarity

2009-08-25 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Julie Smsjuli...@yahoo.com wrote: I've been trying to grasp what Heikki is wanting, and to say it concisely is difficult. This does seem to be a more difficult subject to talk about unambiguously than to think about. Without a tool to do this, in Classic and

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] new notation toolbars peculiarity

2009-08-25 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Julie Smsjuli...@yahoo.com wrote: The switch to stuff suggests a toggle and only works when already in note or rest mode. Right, but it's appropriate that this should be a toggle _once_ you are in an insert mode. What I mean is, I agree with the view that the

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden:[10762] trunk/rosegarden/src/gui

2009-08-25 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:15 PM, cjnfr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: The crash can be delayed by commenting out delete m_scene in ~MatrixWidget. RG will then crash next time you open the segment and try to draw a note. Perhaps just that the view deletes the scene without the scene being a

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Pivotal Decision: the future of toolbar-based notation entry

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:32 AM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: This really worked out well, I think.  An obscure release note bullet point well earned all around. Yes, definitely. Thank you for all that work. Can I just speak up in support of the branching and

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Deleting Matrix (and presumably Notation) windows

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Chris Fryerchrisf1...@googlemail.com wrote: OK. Set the flag. Open the matrix editor. Draw a note. Close the editor ... boom. Ho hum. Doesn't matter. Commit it anyway. It's got to be that way, we'll just have to fix the crashes afterwards. Chris

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Segment::normalizeRests problem

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Chris Fryerchrisf1...@googlemail.com wrote: One, fairly simple, fix would be to give the control events a duration. That sounds like a horrible hack that will cause all sorts of other troubles at some point. I assume that the sequencer would ignore this

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Segment::normalizeRests problem

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Chris Fryerchrisf1...@googlemail.com wrote: It's not obvious how to fix it yet (making normalizeRests completely ignore control events would require most of a rewrite as iterators are continually bumped up and down on the assumption that they're looking at

[Rosegarden-devel] new notation toolbars peculiarity

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
Just noticed that we have Switch to Rests (or notes) and Switch to Dotted Notes or Rests in the Tools menu, but that we also still have Switch between Notes and Rests and Toggle Dot in the Tools - Duration submenu. I assume this is because the latter actions still contain the shortcuts (which

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Braches was Re: Pivotal Decision:...

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: I recommend that we would switch to from svn to git: Why would that help? Chris -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Segment::normalizeRests problem

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Julie Smsjuli...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello All, I'm not certain what I'm looking at in Matrix view or what is causing what but this is what I found: Undo crash: --- * Draw a segment in the main window * open in matrix view * press Ctrl-Z a few times

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Braches was Re: Pivotal Decision:...

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Chris Cannamcan...@all-day-breakfast.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: I recommend that we would switch to from svn to git: Why would that help? Let me expand on this rather brusque question. I'm aware

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Pivotal Decision: the future of toolbar-based notation entry

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 7:04 PM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: There's a process here, with a lot of red tape and hoops involved in getting something like this through committee. Well, we like to sit around arguing over the fine points and a lot of possible

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Branching and dreams was Re: Pivotal Decision...

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Julie Smsjuli...@yahoo.com wrote: I think branching liberally is a good start. So do I, and since we started using Subversion in which branching is simple I've tried to encourage having lots of branches, but it hasn't been wholly successful. Probably nobody much

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Braches was Re: Pivotal Decision:...

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: (1) In git (not in svn!) you can ... ... commit to local, ... commit to local, ... commit to local, ... merge from the main repository, ... commit to local, ... commit to local, ... merge the five (5) changes

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] new notation toolbars peculiarity

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: My suggestions as shortcuts: From 'Nothing', Switch to Rests                   (Shift+Y) From 'Nothing', Switch to Notes                   (Y) From 'Nothing', Turn Dots On                     (. (picks also the

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Branching and dreams was Re: Pivotal Decision...

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: 1) Make a mastergit repository with no history Why with no history? Chris -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Braches was Re: Pivotal Decision:...

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/8/25 Chris Cannam can...@all-day-breakfast.com I can't help thinking, though, that if svn branching (which is blindingly simple if also troublingly simplistic) is too much for most developers and users

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Branching and dreams was Re: Pivotal Decision...

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: In svn, I hate creating branches and merging. This I think is the part I just don't get. It's not easy to merge if you have a persistent branch, but everything else works out straightforwardly enough. Creating a

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Branching and dreams was Re: Pivotal Decision...

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/8/25 Chris Cannam can...@all-day-breakfast.com On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: 1) Make a mastergit repository with no history Why with no history? I try

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Pivotal Decision: the future of toolbar-based notation entry

2009-08-23 Thread Chris Cannam
Cor, lumme... I go offline for a couple of days and the list gets all excitable again. I'd have suggested merging first and worrying about the details later, but if the branch is now working in a superior fashion, it's all good in the end. Is it worth my updating the branch and rebuilding (on

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Deleting Matrix (and presumably Notation) windows

2009-08-23 Thread Chris Cannam
[back on list] On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 6:19 PM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: On Sunday 23 August 2009, you wrote: My sentiments exactly. I had just assumed a close meant widget deletion. Apparently that's not the case. No, and I've noticed and mentioned

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Segment::normalizeRests problem

2009-08-23 Thread Chris Cannam
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Chris Fryerchrisf1...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 15:30 +0100, Chris Fryer wrote: I'm pretty sure it is a problem with normalizeRests. If you start off by putting a note at beginning and end of the segment then the problem doesn't occur. It's

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Segment::normalizeRests problem

2009-08-21 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Chris Fryerchrisf1...@googlemail.com wrote: Anyway, the reason I was looking at the code is that Segment::normalizeRests is causing the mystical resizing of segments (and generally messing them up) when I call it after modifying a segment. I'm not sure if I'm

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Matrix crash

2009-08-21 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Jani Frilanderj.frilan...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/8/21 D. Michael McIntyre michael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com I hate that your message has sat here this long ignored, but I can't do anything with it.  I'm hoping someone else will have something to say. Yeah,

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Pivotal Decision: the future of toolbar-based notation entry

2009-08-21 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Jani Frilanderj.frilan...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds good, since I almost never personally use dotted notes. Instead I use a lot of tuplets. Could you post a screenshot, because I'm too lazy to recompile? I don't think a screenshot will really help all that much,

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Pivotal Decision: the future of toolbar-based notation entry

2009-08-21 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:13 AM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: It works fine here.  Very clean and snappy.  Is it an improvement? I think it probably is, at least when you know the keyboard shortcuts. It's very natural to use the . key instead of the mouse to

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Pivotal Decision: the future of toolbar-based notation entry

2009-08-21 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Julie Smsjuli...@yahoo.com wrote: But without the purple marker everything acted as if it were in chord mode.   There was no easy way to advance to the next location via keyboard and inserting a note did not advance the marker.  Hmmm...  I guess that purple

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Segment::normalizeRests problem

2009-08-21 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Chris Fryerchrisf1...@googlemail.com wrote: Thanks Chris. What exactly is going wrong for you with this code? Sometimes (quite often really) it's mangling the segment, changing it's length and generally upsetting it (it doesn't show in the matrix view

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] std::vector vs. QVector

2009-08-20 Thread Chris Cannam
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: One of the most distinct differences between qt and c++ is std::vector vs. QVector. If you take .size() function, the former returns size_t while the latter returns int. The sanity of Qt developers shines through

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] size_t conversion

2009-08-19 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: I found this kind of beast in lines 1512-1582 in ./src/sound/AlsaDriver.cpp : for (size_t i = 0; i m_alsaPorts.size(); ++i) {   ...   for (size_t i = 0; i m_devices.size(); ++i) {     ...   } } I know it is

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [OT] New (?) rosegarden build, for what it's worth...

2009-08-19 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Gary Lawrence Murphyga...@teledyn.com wrote: Rosegarden 1.2.4? have I missed something about version numbers? Not really -- 1.2.4 is a very, very old version. It's just that it happens to be the version that the Glasgow team worked from at the time they

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [OT] New (?) rosegarden build, for what it's worth...

2009-08-19 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:44 PM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: 1.0, 1.2.3, 1.2.4, 1.5.0, 1.5.1, 1.6.0, 1.6.1, 1.7.0, 1.7.2, 1.7.3 off the top of my head.  That puts 1.2.4 in some perspective. Possibly too much -- it's only three years old. The gap from 1.0 to

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] size_t conversion

2009-08-19 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: There is second case which seems similar, but is actually much worse one. In ./src/sound/AudioProcess.cpp, please see the bufferSamples variable in lines 347-35 and 1333-1344:     size_t bufferSamples = m_blockSize;

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] std::vectorint::size_type

2009-08-18 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: I agree. I have suspicion that historically 16 bits int [-32,768 to +32,767] was not big enough to handle the 16 bits memory and unsigned int [0 to 65535] was invented to be used as a pointer. The you have this load

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] std::vectorint::size_type

2009-08-17 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Heikki Johannes Juneshju...@gmail.com wrote: I was looking what is the correct type for the index 'i' in   for (int i = 0; i m_segments.size(); i++) [...] Should the type be size_t instead? Much as I wish it were int -- yes, it should be size_t. Tread

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Notes, rests and durations.

2009-08-14 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:37 AM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: On Sunday 09 August 2009, Heikki Johannes Junes wrote: I will drop out separate duration menus for notes and rests. This seems like a very dangerous thing to do while Chris is on vacation.  The

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Tuplets

2009-08-14 Thread Chris Cannam
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:02 AM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: On Saturday 08 August 2009, Jani Frilander wrote: 2. Recycling of old code in NotationView. We are not going to have a statusbar in notation window, are we? I think we will, and it just hasn't been

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Newer version detector works

2009-08-07 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:31 PM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: I hard coded an assortment of version numbers to sanity check whether the code would be able to resolve our new scheme. current:    newest:    pass: 1.7.3       10.02      y 10.02       10.04      

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Newer version detector works

2009-08-07 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:43 PM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: On Friday 07 August 2009, Chris Cannam wrote: What are the big categories of missing things?  Instrument management is the most obvious to me, but I have a clear plan for that. This isn't

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden:[10640] trunk/rosegarden

2009-08-06 Thread Chris Cannam
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 5:26 AM, dmmcin...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: merge warning_widget branch Very nice! (On first glance.) Chris -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Ilan's crash

2009-08-05 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Ilanilan@gmail.com wrote: I installed qt-creator. NetBeans is nice that it builds a project from the makefile. Qt-creator doesn't seem to do this. When I tried it, I just used the import Makefile-based project function (or something similarly named) on the

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Ilan's crash

2009-08-04 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Ilanilan@gmail.com wrote: You can correct me here if I don't understand something, but from what you say, if I set the pointer to null and for some reason Qt fails to garbage collect, then at worst that is a memory leak, but it won't crash. Qt doesn't do

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Ilan's crash

2009-08-04 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Ilanilan@gmail.com wrote: I was thinking of checking m_tracks == 0 at the entry of the routine which crashes. That would still crash, because accessing m_tracks at all is illegal -- the object in which this method resides (the owner of m_tracks) is the one

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Ilan's crash

2009-08-04 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Ilanilan@gmail.com wrote: If you check if( m_tracks == 0) then return 0; // or return -1; as the first statement in getTrackByPosition it will certainly avoid the crash. In this case that won't compile at all, because m_tracks is not a pointer. The

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden:[10630] trunk/rosegarden/src/gui

2009-08-04 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:31 PM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: On Tuesday 04 August 2009, Chris Fryer wrote: I'll turn it off ... but would prefer that there wasn't trailing white space cluttering the place up ... invisibly ... I just did a test sample, and

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden:[10630] trunk/rosegarden/src/gui

2009-08-04 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Chris Fryerchrisf1...@googlemail.com wrote: Anyway, anyone who knows what vi is is too old to comment. Anyone who knows how to use it ... you're kidding! ... you don't!! ... do you??? Actually no, I don't really. But that's nothing to do with age; I'm just not

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden:[10630] trunk/rosegarden/src/gui

2009-08-04 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Chris Fryerchrisf1...@googlemail.com wrote: You see, Eclipse will only show me the first few lines of a method's source code if I hover over it using a mouse (you should get one of these at least, I'm sure there'd be an adapter for your VT100). I tried one of

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden:[10630] trunk/rosegarden/src/gui

2009-08-04 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Chris Fryerchrisf1...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 22:34 +0100, Chris Cannam wrote: I tried one of those, but the two little X and Y wheels on the bottom of the thing kept clogging up with dirt from my cave floor. Trackball? I'm thinking some

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Ilan's crash

2009-08-03 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Ilanilan@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure the error message doesn't make sense. I think what it is trying to say is that m_tracks is damaged. If it is damaged, it can't build an iterator, therefore it is not known. That would be a runtime problem, not something

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Ilan's crash

2009-08-03 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Ilanilan@gmail.com wrote: I stopped the program when it crashed. It is far past the point of compile time. It is definitely runtime. But the error the IDE is showing you is not a runtime error. If that error were valid, the program would not compile at

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Ilan's crash

2009-08-02 Thread Chris Cannam
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:35 PM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: Ilan's file and that one from the old bug report are both crashing in: #0  0x0045f6d8 in Rosegarden::Composition::getTrackByPosition (this=0x1c726c0, position=0) at

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Ilan's crash

2009-08-02 Thread Chris Cannam
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Ilanilan@gmail.com wrote: When I put the cursor on the iterator, it seems to say something is wrong with it. I tried looking at the code defining the structure and its iterator, but I don't have enough experience to understand it. There is an iterator and

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Remember to wrap user-visible strings in tr() calls!

2009-07-30 Thread Chris Cannam
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Alexandre Prokoudinealexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote: If you wish :) My impression is that Rosegarden/Qt4 is like Scribus/Qt4: porting to Qt4 triggered refactoring and this is going to take ages to get the thing done You're only about a year late with that

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] NetBeans strange errors

2009-07-29 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:36 AM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Ilan wrote: http://www.nabble.com/file/p24706659/sigsegv.png I just got the same crash loading a file attached to an old bug report I was about to mark as obsolete and

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] NetBeans strange errors

2009-07-29 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Chris Cannamcan...@all-day-breakfast.com wrote: Which RG file? ... it's OK, I think I see the one you mean (though I haven't tried it yet). Chris -- Let Crystal Reports handle the

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden crashes on loading example .rg files

2009-07-29 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Colin Fletchercol...@axicon.com wrote: Sorry I've been out of touch for a few days: I haven't been ignoring you all, I was just unable to reply to any email. That's quite all right -- it was the same with me last week. Anyway, svn r10602 seems to work for me

[Rosegarden-devel] British translations missing

2009-07-28 Thread Chris Cannam
I've just noticed that the British English translations are missing in current SVN. There is an en_GB.ts, but it has no translations in it. Anyone got any clue how this happened, and whether there's some trivial way to get them back? I don't know whether there ever were any valid translations

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Tuplets

2009-07-28 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Jani Frilanderj.frilan...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/7/27 Chris Cannam can...@all-day-breakfast.com The only difference between the percussion and normal matrix editors, then, would be the shape of the symbols (durationless diamonds or bars). This was the main

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] RG About Box

2009-07-28 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:18 AM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: I'd remove the final /. from the end, just finishing with go to http://rosegardenmusic.com/p  (Pet peeve of mine.  If you can't find an unambiguous way to punctuate the end of a sentence that

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] RG About Box

2009-07-28 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:37 PM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Chris Cannam wrote: (This could be our most inconsequential discussion on this list for some time.) The URLs are currently clickable and behaving nicely Actually (perhaps

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Tuplets

2009-07-28 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Jani Frilanderj.frilan...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/7/28 Chris Cannam can...@all-day-breakfast.com mappings in it.  If the key mappings were always shown when you opened a normal matrix on a segment whose instrument had some mappings, then you would be satisfied

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden crashes on loading example .rg files

2009-07-27 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Colin Fletchercol...@axicon.com wrote: Colin Fletcher wrote: Chris Cannam wrote: Can you run under valgrind and see what it says? [ Replying to myself. Snipped most of the valgrind output ] ==7746==  Address 0x5e75880 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 40

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Tuplets

2009-07-27 Thread Chris Cannam
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Jani Frilanderj.frilan...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/7/27 D. Michael McIntyre michael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com Fair enough.  So what do you think about my last suggestion? Keep a normal matrix and a percussion matrix, but a view you open as either one could

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] /tmp garbage collection in a multi-instance world

2009-07-23 Thread Chris Cannam
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:09 PM, D. Michael McIntyremichael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: On Wednesday 22 July 2009, Julie S wrote: Sounds pretty elegant.  Always keeps cleans up ever even if it bombs.  We are assured that the next run would tidy up its last mess Sounds fine, but

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] /tmp garbage collection in a multi-instance world

2009-07-22 Thread Chris Cannam
I suggest creating a uniquely-named temporary directory and putting all the files associated with a single run of Rosegarden into that. Then deleting the whole directory on exit. The directory could also contain a pid file for the owning instance of Rosegarden; if RG finds on startup any existing

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] checking Ave verum corpus

2009-07-17 Thread Chris Cannam
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Chris Cannamcan...@all-day-breakfast.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:08 PM, D. Michael McIntyrerosegarden.trumpe...@gmail.com wrote: Oops, it included the first note of bar 2... I tried this on other bars and generally it makes the error, but not always

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden crashes on loading example .rg files

2009-07-17 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Colin Fletchercol...@axicon.com wrote: I was just having a quick play with current svn trunk (r10533), and it crashes for me whenever I open a .rg file, even the ones in data/examples/. Is that expected? No -- though it isn't very surprising either. If you can

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden crashes on loading example .rg files

2009-07-17 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Colin Fletchercol...@axicon.com wrote: Here you go. It SEGVs in RosegardenMainWindow::setDocument (). Thanks. Is this one of the example files? Which one? Chris -- Enter the

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rosegarden crashes on loading example .rg files

2009-07-17 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Colin Fletchercol...@axicon.com wrote: #0  0x in ?? () #1  0x082e7309 in Rosegarden::RosegardenMainWindow::initView (this=0x8cea990)    at src/gui/application/RosegardenMainWindow.cpp:1021 Ugh, that's a destructor call for a complex Qt widget (with

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] checking Ave verum corpus

2009-07-11 Thread Chris Cannam
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:08 PM, D. Michael McIntyrerosegarden.trumpe...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday 11 July 2009, Ilan wrote: It seemed strange to me that almost every note is tenuto. It seems like the sensitivity for setting it is too high. Rosegarden tends to write tenutos where it

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Lilypond print preview doesn't work in Ubuntu 9.04

2009-07-10 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Ilanilan@gmail.com wrote: Sorry that I'm back sooner than expected. What is aclocal? I looked in the Synaptic package manager and I don't see it. It's in the automake package in Ubuntu (for some reason). Chris

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Lilypond print preview doesn't work in Ubuntu 9.04

2009-07-10 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Ilanilan@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Chris. Can I be so bold as to ask for some more help? The config isn't working. I looked in the log and there was a ton of files where it failed. Try also installing the following Ubuntu packages (or meta-packages):

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Lilypond print preview doesn't work in Ubuntu 9.04

2009-07-10 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Ilanilan@gmail.com wrote: Thanks again Chris. It doesn't yet work and I'll include the config.log file. First of all it complains about a missing header file: conftest.cpp:8:28: error: ac_nonexistent.h: No such file or directory I put in all of what you

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Rulers Was: Thorn Rev. 10476 compile error

2009-07-09 Thread Chris Cannam
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Julie Smsjuli...@yahoo.com wrote: Good argument.  But if these are easy to turn off, then the user who only needed them for one segment can easly turn them off and be done with it.   Let's look at the efficiency of both cases. I like the idea of using

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Ruler comments

2009-07-05 Thread Chris Cannam
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 10:08 PM, D. Michael McIntyrerosegarden.trumpe...@gmail.com wrote: I'd almost vote for that after I just worked on a chunk of code with QColor here, Colour from one of our classes there, and Color from another one of our classes spread around in the middle.  I used Colour

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden:[10457] trunk/rosegarden

2009-07-04 Thread Chris Cannam
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 2:33 AM, D. Michael McIntyrerosegarden.trumpe...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday 03 July 2009, Julie S wrote: So, a nice shortcut to open it would be nice or having it open by default, would be be preference. I don't think I'd vote to have it open by default, but I've

[Rosegarden-devel] About box

2009-07-04 Thread Chris Cannam
We still have no About box, I think? Any takers to remedy that? Could be a fun little project for someone not too deeply involved in coding at the moment. It could probably just be a single simple dialog showing an HTML text. It could include some or all of the following, and this is partly a

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] About box

2009-07-04 Thread Chris Cannam
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Julie Smsjuli...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear Rg Team, You started with dear RG team but sent the email only to me, so I've got to assume that was probably unintentional -- sending back to the list now. We still have no About box, I think?  Any takers to remedy that?

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] About box

2009-07-04 Thread Chris Cannam
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 10:36 PM, D. Michael McIntyrerosegarden.trumpe...@gmail.com wrote: I'm on the list because I make the list baby, and you make the list because I have to put you on it or you'll actually use a smiley face in an email You mean me? I did try using a smiley once. It felt

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Compile with debug issue

2009-07-03 Thread Chris Cannam
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Chris Fryerchrisf1...@googlemail.com wrote: It seems that rerunning sh ./bootstrap.sh then ./configure --enable-debug fixes this problem. I don't know what bootstrap does. Is this normal? bootstrap.sh regenerates the configure script from configure.ac and

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >