On 7/3/07, Daniel N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm very new to rspec, so if this is not the right forum please let me
know.
I'm starting to spec my models first in an existing rails app, porting from
a mix of Test::Unit, and simply_bdd amongst others.
I'm at the point where I want to
On 7/5/07, Daniel N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm very new to rspec so please be patient with me.
I've tried to take some of my tests out of the controller specs to check for
things that are rendered.
This has not worked so well, since my views have the controller method
current_user
On 7/6/07, Daniel N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/6/07, Daniel N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/6/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/5/07, Daniel N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm very new to rspec so please be patient with me.
I've tried to take some
On 7/9/07, Josh Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/9/07, Johan Sørensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way in RSpec to check for a specific hash key (or evaluating
other things along those lines) in the parameter expectation using the
should_receive(:find).with(...)
On 7/11/07, Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11 Jul 2007, at 15:00, Pedro Del Gallego wrote:
Thats my biggest problem with rspec, (I'm a non english speaker
working in a German/English environment) It would be great a guide or
a tips list to make our specs more readebles,
On 7/13/07, Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Jul 2007, at 17:20, Anthony Carlos wrote:
If you guys don't mind, I'm going to create a sample web page with
this concept on it, stealing from Ashley and David's writings. If
people like it, perhaps we can get it included in the
On 7/14/07, Daniel N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've just started to try and spec my application.html.erb layout as one of
the view specs but it totally barfs.
I'm guessing that it's due to the yield statements in the layout.
Any clues as to how to proceed?
Backtrace please? Could be
On 7/18/07, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rails model association collections allow you to do nifty things like:
article.comments.find(:all, :conditions = {:created_at 1.day.ago})
Has anyone found a good way to mock this up? I'm currently doing this:
@comment1 = mock_model(Comment)
On 7/18/07, Mikel Lindsaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
I think I have a rails related RSpec problem with a mock going out of
scope on a recursive call to a model.
The code is at: http://pastie.textmate.org/79821 if you want to see it
highlighted. I have pasted it below as well.
# + code from the original pastie
end
There are some other associations, but they are all belongs_to or
has_many, so I haven't bothered to put all the tables in here and have
removed the appropriate foreign keys from the nodes table.
Regards
Mikel
On 7/19/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL
On 7/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've answered my own question. I changed before :all do; to just before
do (which is the same as before :each do) and everything works fine. I'm
not overly concerned that stubbing has to occur prior to each example
method, but why is
On 7/27/07, Ingo Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to use autotest with rspec and rais, and it seems to work
fine when I run autotest -rails initially, but then autotest fails to
recognize file changes and run tests continuously. Did I skip a step?
Here is my setup:
rails
On 7/24/07, Eric Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to use rspec_on_rails in a Rails app that doesn't have a
database. so far I have just been faking it out by dumping in a
sqlite3 database just to make Rails happy.
Try deleting config/database.yml (or renaming it to
On 7/27/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/24/07, Eric Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to use rspec_on_rails in a Rails app that doesn't have a
database. so far I have just been faking it out by dumping in a
sqlite3 database just to make Rails happy
On 7/29/07, Russell Tracey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/07/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/29/07, Russell Tracey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm currently taking a Rails project management app I built when
learning Rails and adding specs to it. During the course
On 7/30/07, Daniel N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, Mikel Lindsaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find myself doing the same thing... the, open the model and type in
the it shoulds...
I ws thinking along the same line
On 7/30/07, Daniel N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, Daniel N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, Daniel N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL
On 7/30/07, Doug Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In most of my tests I'd like to be able to stub out the observers for my
models, but I'm not sure the best way to do this. I doesn't look like there
is a way to stub all instance methods, and I don't seem to be able to stub
early enough to stub
On 7/30/07, linojon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My helper specs were going ok until I added a call to a rails
DateHelper method in one of my helpers
http://api.rubyonrails.com/classes/ActionView/Helpers/
DateHelper.html#M000574
The helper runs fine from my view templates, just dies in the
On 7/31/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, linojon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My helper specs were going ok until I added a call to a rails
DateHelper method in one of my helpers
http://api.rubyonrails.com/classes/ActionView/Helpers/
DateHelper.html#M000574
On 7/31/07, Doug Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I'm not mistaken those stub them out always - I'd like to be able to stub
them out for most tests, but I would like to have them around when I want to
write tests for the observers themselves! I imagine this is a fairly common
use case for
On 7/31/07, Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been on CURRENT
I tried to switch to trunk but its not completing.
How do I install the trunk version? (for rails)
(I apologize in advance for being clueless)
Here's my steps:
First, I brought everything I have up to date:
On 7/31/07, Robby Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
On 7/31/07, Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been on CURRENT
I tried to switch to trunk but its not completing.
How do I install the trunk version? (for rails)
(I apologize in advance for being
On 7/31/07, Daniel N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/1/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I absolutely love the unimplemented spec idea, and tend to use it a
lot. But occasionally it gets in my way, when I rush to write a
spec, and then want to change it to a non-implemented spec.
On 7/31/07, Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I must be missing something obvious.
$ rm -rf vendor/plugins/rspec
$ script/plugin install svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/trunk rspec
Exported revision 2188.
Plugin not found:
On 8/1/07, Edward Ocampo-Gooding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to do the following in a controller spec?
@controller.should_receive(:render).with(:layout = false)
I've been trying this kind of thing and it looks like RSpec is messing
with the render calls, and requires you
On 8/2/07, Edward Ocampo-Gooding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
On 8/1/07, Edward Ocampo-Gooding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to do the following in a controller spec?
@controller.should_receive(:render).with(:layout = false)
I've been trying
On 8/2/07, Hussein Morsy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're working on getting the rbehave story runner merged into rspec
and able to integrate w/ rails, but that's probably a couple of months
away from reality.
nice to hear :-)
Right now I just use rails integration testing and
On 8/2/07, Jay Levitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was, for the first time, spec'ing a class that redefined ==. And my
spec was incorrect, so == was returning false.
The result was something like:
class C
def ==(other)
false
end
end
.. C.new.should == other...
expected
On 8/2/07, sinclair bain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Rails plugin 1.0.5]
Hi,
I am looking for some guidance.
When working on a partial which looks like this
div class=bug style=width: 100%; /
I have some examples which should fail - I think - but do not:
it ' should fail'
On 8/4/07, David Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a lot of controllers with virtually identical functionality for most
actions. I've been using shared behaviours to DRY things up a bit, but I
still have to create separate behaviours for each context before I can use
the shared behaviours
On 8/6/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some reason that pending() *MUST* take an argument?
There was no discussion of this when the feature was contributed.
Thinking about it now, to allow for no arg would require good default
messages - one for when there is a block and one
On 8/6/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 6, 2007, at 7:19 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On 8/6/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some reason that pending() *MUST* take an argument?
There was no discussion of this when the feature was contributed
On 8/6/07, aslak hellesoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@curr_odontogram.photos.should_receive(:[]).with(1).and_return(@photo)
Aslak
D'oh! Of course - that should do it.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
On 8/6/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to access the described class in a shared behavior? I'm
trying to do something like this:
describe Siberian feline, :shared = true do
described_class_instance_as
On 8/7/07, Shaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great Hi to everybody!
I am currently working on a project which tests the controllers using rspec.
I came across some methods in the controller which do not generate any
actions at all. However, they still need testing! Some of these methods do
On 8/7/07, Eivind Uggedal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to mock a object to raise a certain error. By doing so I
get a ArgumentError on ActiveRecord's save! method:
http://pastie.caboo.se/85628
I've tried to debug it but just can't seem to find what I'm doing
wrong. Any help is
On 8/7/07, Shaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning to everyone:
So weird!!
I got a method called apply_settings(arg1, arg2) in the controller to be
tested. In the controller spec, I of course called the method.
In the controller:
def apply_settings(arg1, arg2) #where arg1
, the solution to
this problem is:
@user.should_receive(:save!).and_raise(ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid.new(@user))
I guess the root of the problem is poor docs - I'm updating the rdoc
now and it will be published with the next release.
Cheers,
David
Eivind
On 8/8/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 8/8/07, Lance Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using helper the RESTfully generated helper methods in my views.
My routes are nested so the helpers appear to need arguments passed to
them, but it works without arguments. Say for example I have pages and
comments. If I do
)
@artist = mock_model(Artist)
assigns[:label] = @label
assigns[:artist] = @artist
end
def render_edit
render :template = 'artists/edit'
end
it should render the edit artist form do
render_edit
end
end
On 8/8/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED
in this thread, but in the browser. Using
edge rails, edge rspec.
-L
On 8/8/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/07, Lance Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just passed label_artist_path(@label.id, @artist.id) into the view
and it worked.. but I really don't want to have
On 8/8/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was working on the same issue David was (to fix autotest to work
for RSpec's trunk), only to find that David had modified it.
Sorry - I saw the RFE and was taking a look at solutions and it was
too easy to not just do.
I have refactored the
On 8/8/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 8, 2007, at 4:30 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On 8/8/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was working on the same issue David was (to fix autotest to work
for RSpec's trunk), only to find that David had modified it.
Sorry
On 8/8/07, Fischer, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1 def create
2 @user = User.new(params[:user])
3 @user.save!
4 self.current_user = @user
5 redirect_to user_path(@user)
6 flash[:notice] = Thanks for signing up!
7 rescue ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid
8
just have to use the parameters if you want
the specs to work with the same code with which your app works.
On 8/8/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/07, Lance Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just visited the action in my browser and i don't get any errors. I
am also
On 8/8/07, Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=10368
Came across this as a stub page browsing Amazon UK. This is good
news! I'm surprised it hasn't been discussed on the list before.
Was Chad keeping it a secret?
I hope it will have plenty
On 8/8/07, Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still waiting for that
magic book I can give to someone and say here - read this, it tells
you how to build software.
Have you read this one?
exactly. Any insight?
Not really more than what I said earlier in this thread.
On 8/9/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/9/07, Lance Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Were you able to come up with any solutions?
Nope. Anyone else?
On 8/8/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL
know this is a bug, would you
kindly report it in the tracker?
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=3149group_id=797func=browse
What is your s/n?
On 8/9/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/9/07, Lance Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible that rspec is not pulling
On 8/10/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 10, 2007, at 3:43 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On 8/7/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the following code, which yields instance eval's the block
given:
class Foo
def bar(blk)
instance_eval blk
On 8/10/07, sbellware [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I've posted to the simple example I'm working with as well as the spec code
and results here:
http://pastie.caboo.se/86750
I can't seem to get this to work. Any ideas?
As of some time ago, response.should redirect_to should come after
getting called
On Jun 27, 2007, at 1:31 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
Trunksters,
I just added a couple of methods to ActionView::Base in Spec::Rails
(as of r2136) that lets you do this in view examples:
describe '/things/index.html.erb' do
it should render _thing with a collection
On 8/12/07, rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just found myself stuck trying to rspec something so am hoping
someone more knowledgable can help.
I have a Connector class which has a class method 'results' that
yields results it get from a network service based on a set of
attributes that
Hi All - I released 1.0.6 this morning, but there is apparently a bug
related to rspec and autotest. I'll be fixing this today (but not
until tonight) so you have two options:
Wait until 1.0.7 (tonight)
Upgrade now to 1.0.6 but make sure you install the rspec gem.
Thanks,
David
On 8/14/07, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/07, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a warning on the web site about expect_render and stub_render:
WARNING: expect_render and stub_render, while very useful, act
On 8/15/07, Courtenay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/15/07, Priit Tamboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
describe ApplicationController do
it method login_required should redirect to home path without login do
heh. it is so out of place here :)
I agree. The goal is to describe behaviours of
On 8/17/07, Cody P. Skidmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings everyone. I'm learning RSpec and am pretty fresh to Ruby/Rails,
but am so excited I can't help jumping in. I'm running before I can walk
here. :-)
Yesterday I tried outputting test results to HTML instead of colorized
plain
On 8/21/07, Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have a simple controller method like this:
class StylesheetsController ApplicationController
layout nil
session :off
def gap
site = Site.find_by_hostname(request.host)
@colours = site.colours
respond_to do
On 8/24/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
describe Widget, class do
it should provide a list of widgets sorted alphabetically do
Widget.should_receive(:find).with(:order = name ASC)
Widget.find_alphabetically
end
On 8/24/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
describe Widget, class do
it should provide a list of widgets sorted
On 8/14/07, sbellware [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I'd like to spec the behaviors that I'm adding to ApplicationController.
Specifically, I'm adding:
def authenticated?
session[:username] != nil
end
I described ApplicationController, but couldn't figure out how to call the
On 8/31/07, Shaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone:
Right now I am writing spec on modules, which are provided by my
colleagues. Some of the modules actually contain action methods. I tried
very hard to spec those action methods in modules. But it seems that the
rspec does not
On 8/31/07, Peter Marklund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I would really like to find a way to allow me to write RSpec
specifications for code that use database transactions. I know I can set
config.use_transactional_fixtures = false
in my spec_helper.rb. That works, and that's great, but it
On 8/31/07, Edgar Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got the resource Llamadas nested in:
- Operadores
- Productos
- Centros
Here is part of my routes http://pastie.caboo.se/92767
I want to spec that the routes for Llamadas, I tried several approachs:
- route_for(:controller =
On 9/2/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
describe Widget, class do
it should provide a list of widgets sorted
On 9/2/07, Wilson Bilkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/1/07, rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1 Sep 2007, at 10:04, Tom Stuart wrote:
On 1 Sep 2007, at 09:31, rupert wrote:
Are we planning on dumping the mock framework in favor of using
Mocha
The idea has been bandied
On 9/2/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 2, 2007, at 12:55 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On 9/2/07, Wilson Bilkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/1/07, rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1 Sep 2007, at 10:04, Tom Stuart wrote:
On 1 Sep 2007, at 09:31, rupert wrote
On 9/2/07, Jay Levitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/2/2007 12:43 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
The problem we face is that AR promises huge productivity gains for
the non TDD-er, and challenges the thinking of the die-hard TDD-er.
I've gone back and forth about whether it's OK to test
Here's an excellent blog post on Story Runner, which will be part of
the next release and is undergoing active development in trunk:
http://evang.eli.st/blog/2007/9/1/user-stories-with-rspec-s-story-runner
___
rspec-users mailing list
On 9/3/07, Peter Marklund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a very useful guideline in TDD that says test YOUR code, not
everyone elses. The validation library we're testing here is
ActiveRecord's. It's already tested (we hope!).
Personally, I don't have the courage to assume Rails code is
On 9/3/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 3, 2007, at 7:59 AM, Ashley Moran wrote:
Hi
Easy one - I just wondered why all spec files for rspec_on_rails end
_spec.rb instead of just .rb? They are all inside the spec
folder so surely the fact they are specs is implicit?
Hi all,
I've talked this over w/ a couple of the other committers and we've
decided that we will NOT be deprecating the mock framework, at least
for the foreseeable future. If/when we do, it will happen with plenty
of notice and a clear, painless (as much as is possible) upgrade path.
To be
On 9/3/07, Shane Mingins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
We are looking at moving a project over from 1.05 to 1.08 but have a problem
with some of our helper specs
They work fine in 1.05 but error in 1.08 and it is the calls to route helper
methods that seems to be the problem.
I did some
On 9/4/07, Lance Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the general opinion about fixtures versus mocking and stubbing
in model specs? I heard from agile on IRC that they save the database
testing for integration testing, but I also see that the caboose
sample applicaiton uses fixtures. I
On 9/4/07, Geoffrey Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having used JUnit and Test::Unit, I'm quite used to having the ability to
insert a failure message, which helps when tests fail.
For instance, the example RSpec that is generated for a model class
specifies that the model class is valid.
On 9/4/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'd been running gem releases of rspec for the past several months,
and I installed edge rspec so that I can use Story Runner.
I'm running into a problem because I've got a couple rake tasks that
reference spec/rake/raketask. If I try to run
On 9/4/07, Geoffrey Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I come from the same background as you, so I hear where you're coming
from. We made a conscious decision, however, not to support custom
messages almost two years ago and I'm not sure if its ever even come
up before. If it has, it was a
On 9/4/07, Shane Mingins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/09/2007, at 3:44 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
I am going to guess that it's something like this:
You have a nil object when you didn't expect it!
You might have expected an instance of Array.
The error occurred while evaluating
On 9/5/07, Geoffrey Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
False Positives
I just discovered how easy it was to create a false positive when I, trying
my first RSpec test, did this:
ob.should eql?('foo')
instead of:
ob.should eql('foo')
or:
ob.should == 'foo'
As far as I can see, this
On 9/5/07, sudara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I'm just a caveman with some caveman questions.
I've been parsing Rspec for quite a while, and I'm writing my first series
of specs. My initial impressions are Verbose, but understandable. Helpful
and intuitive, but so much to digest. I
On 9/8/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/8/07, Wincent Colaiuta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El 8/9/2007, a las 2:15, Pat Maddox escribió:
* Descriptions should be broken up based on the required fixture. I
don't split them up until I actually have to. For example, if I'm
On 9/8/07, Jeremy Stell-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of :
expected ul\n lired/li\n liblue/li\n/ul, got ul\n
lired/li\nliblue/li\n /ul (using ==)
could we make rspec exceptions look more like :
expected ul\n lired/li\n liblue/li\n/ul,
got ul\n lired/li\n
On 9/8/07, Leslie Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to make use of template.expects_render, is outlined in
David's post(http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/articles/2007/06/28/
template-expects_render). I get an undefined method error on
expects_render. I made sure I had the
Hi all, I got some help from James Edward Gray II on the RSpec
TextMate bundle. For those of you who don't know James, he runs the
Ruby Quiz and also maintains the official TM bundle.
Per a couple of patches from him and some advice that I acted on, many
of the shortcuts have changed.
The bad
On 9/8/07, Ben Mabey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What was the motivation behind taking that tutorial down, BTW? I really
like and benefited from it when I was starting to learn rspec. Was it
just a maintenance issue as far as updating the tutorial to the current
API (DSL)?
That was part of
On 9/5/07, Tor Norbye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I'm working on Ruby support for NetBeans, and we're bundling RSpec
(along with JRuby).
One thing I'd really like to fix is having content assist (code
completion / intellisense / code insight, it has many names) work
inside your spec
On 9/10/07, bruce zuo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am new to rSpec. I tried to search in the list, but could not find
the answer, please forgive me if somebody already answered this. Here
is my question:
I have a stub in setup:
before(:each) do
@current_user = mock(devsu)
On 9/10/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happened to pending (with and without the block)?
Uh my dog ate it?
I don't think it was in there. Or perhaps it wasn't in there
correctly, because James found some errors in the bundle related to
items that had no names.
Feel free to
On 9/11/07, Geoffrey Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/9/07, Priit Tamboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder does anybody planning to go beyond the default html
formatter/report?
Two things on that subject came up today, during some RSpec work. It would
be nice if:
The report
On 9/12/07, Evan David Light [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Granted that I'm new too; however, assigns[:hash] creates a member
variable @hash that is made available to the view. Maybe that's the
problem? Modify your view to use @hash instead.
On 9/12/07, Geoffrey Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/12/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like to start w/ integration tests before anything exists at all.
You can do that w/ Rails' Integration Tests or Story Runner (if you're
using RSpec's trunk).
Next, I hit a view
On 9/12/07, Evan David Light [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 12, 2007, at 7:35 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
Story Runner is a new one for me. I'll have to look it up. Thanks!
(Halfway through writing this, I realized, courtesy of Google,
that it's a
recently integrated piece
the symbols rather than instance variable.
Huh? Symbols in the partials that are supposed to magically transform
to some value? I don't get it. What am I missing?
David Chelimsky-2 wrote:
On 9/12/07, Evan David Light [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Granted that I'm new too; however, assigns[:hash
reading more documentation
now.
Hopefully we could figure it out shortly.
David Chelimsky-2 wrote:
On 9/12/07, Shaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, I am not supposed to change the code inside the partial.
That's why I posted this message. I am trying to find a way
it is really returning an array, so ...
and_return([val1, val2])
See if that works.
Thanks for investigating this question.
David Chelimsky-2 wrote:
On 9/12/07, Shaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also feel puzzled. But that's what my colleagues do, and it works. The
thing is they use
On 9/13/07, Evan David Light [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My immediate impression was Story == Use Case.
Story == User Story
User Stories are not the same thing as Use Cases. You may want to
google around for some writing on that.
Cheers.
___
rspec-users
this:
response.should have_tag(form[action=?][method=post], foo_path(@foo))
HTH
Another problem is the tag does not have id or class sometimes, does it mean
that is no way of selecting it?
David Chelimsky-2 wrote:
On 9/13/07, Shaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can not find much
information about
On 9/13/07, Shaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can not find much
information about the should have_tag syntax in Rspec.
http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rdoc-rails/classes/Spec/Rails/Matchers.html#M11
___
rspec-users mailing list
. What is wrong?
David Chelimsky-2 wrote:
On 9/13/07, Shaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I have gone through the documentation before, and I read the
reference
of 'assert_select' as well. But I still can not figure out a way of
testing
attributes in a tag. What I know is we can use
1 - 100 of 2985 matches
Mail list logo
