It might just be a typo (targetObj? Replace with ticketObj?)
Jok
On Nov 22, 2012, at 10:57 AM, vmos pcbad...@gmail.com wrote:
Good afternoon, as I'm sure you know RT has a feature wherby if somebody
replies to a ticket that has already been resolved, it gets automatically
re-opened.
That's
On 11/6/12 7:56 AM, Dominic Hargreaves dominic.hargrea...@it.ox.ac.uk
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 10:39:18AM -0500, testwreq wreq wrote:
checking for gcc... no
checking for cc... no
checking for cl.exe... no
configure: error: in `/rt/rt-4.0.8':
configure: error: no acceptable C compiler
RT-Extension-LDAP-Import
This will import in bulk not only users, but also groups (if you specify
it)
Thanks,
Jok
--
| Joachim Thuau | IT Systems Engineer - Linux / SpaceX |
On 8/22/12 12:51 PM, Tom Perrine tperr...@scea.com wrote:
Can you pull user's True Name or other data from LDAP/AD
It searches from the base down (subtree). Sadly, it looks like his base
are not under a single container. (limit less, correct me if I
misunderstood).
You might be able to defined more auth services, each one identical,
except with different bases, to auth against.
Thanks,
Jok
--
| Joachim
...@lists.bestpractical.com [mailto:rt-users-
boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] De la part de Joachim Thuau
Envoyé : lundi, 30. juillet 2012 17:20
À : 'ML - rt-users'
Objet : Re: [rt-users] How to automatically disable user account
This should get you started:
((objectClass=user)(!(objectClass=computer))(mail
a perl script that go over every user in your RT db,
and checks them against this filter via LDAP and updates the users that are
disabled in AD...
Thanks,
Jok
--
| Joachim Thuau | IT Systems Engineer - Linux / SpaceX |
From: Kriegers Horst horst.krieg...@loro.chmailto:horst.krieg...@loro.ch
Date
On 7/27/12 5:36 AM, Matthias Henze li...@mhcsoftware.de wrote:
Hi,
I've to things I'm unable to find out how to get them:
1. I want to see in 10 highest priority tickets I own when there is a
new message waiting for a response.
There are setting for that in RT4 (look for UnRead in the RT
suggestions welcome ! :)
Thanks,
Jok
--
| Joachim Thuau | IT Systems Engineer - Linux / SpaceX |
Use an alias in your apache config:
Alias /favicon.ico /some/place/where/you/have/your/favicon.ico
Jok
On Jun 26, 2012, at 3:33 AM, Jonathan Khattir
jonathan.khat...@mobiquithings.netmailto:jonathan.khat...@mobiquithings.net
wrote:
try your second solution, it's works but i all my images
Coming in late to the party, but wouldn't apache auth do what you are talking
about? Combined with ldapimport, you can import users over ldap, but not
groups. Then you can define your group for authorization as you wish within rt.
At that point you should be able to have both internal and AD
need to describe a little more what it is you
are trying to accomplish.
Jok
--
| Joachim Thuau | IT Systems Engineer - Linux / SpaceX |
From: Arthur Rance arthur_ra...@hotmail.commailto:arthur_ra...@hotmail.com
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 6:52 AM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.commailto:rt
I would also strongly recommend you look at the rt-extension-ldapimport,
which will allow you to sync groups and users from AD using ldap.
Thanks,
Jok
--
| Joachim Thuau | IT Systems Engineer - Linux / SpaceX |
| Cell: 310-890-7937 | Office: 310-363-6153 |
From: Kenneth Crocker kenn.croc
Oops -- this was intended for Rabin, as a reply to his active directory
integration questionŠ
Jok
--
| Joachim Thuau | IT Systems Engineer - Linux / SpaceX |
On 5/29/12 8:47 AM, Joachim Thuau jth...@spacex.com wrote:
I would also strongly recommend you look at the
rt-extension-ldapimport
You can either
A) combine the two scrips into one (you probably have one for owner, and
one for cc)
This would send only one email
Or
B) update the template and/or the scrip's condition to not do anything if
the owner is in the cc list.
Thanks,
Jok
--
| Joachim Thuau | IT Systems
/whatever) is configured properly for the NoAuth bits…
Thanks,
Jok
--
| Joachim Thuau | IT Systems Engineer - Linux / SpaceX |
From: Evan Soward
esow...@remotedbaexperts.commailto:esow...@remotedbaexperts.com
Date: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:19 AM
To: RT Users
rt-users@lists.bestpractical.commailto:rt
Chris,
You probably should have searched for status=deleted and find the ticket
you wanted to bring back those (bulk update for example).
With the actual DB change underneath, I'm not sure if this would actually
workŠ
Jok
--
| Joachim Thuau | IT Systems Engineer - Linux / SpaceX |
| Cell: 310
?
Thanks,
Jok
--
| Joachim Thuau | IT Systems Engineer - Linux / SpaceX |
| Cell: 310-890-7937 | Office: 310-363-6153 |
Oops -- missed attaching the patch.
This is my first real contribution in perl. Code feedback is welcome! :)
Thanks,
Jok
--
| Joachim Thuau | IT Systems Engineer - Linux / SpaceX |
| Cell: 310-890-7937 | Office: 310-363-6153 |
ldap-import-privileged-filter.diff
Description: ldap-import
On 11/11/11 8:32 AM, Lars Reimann l.reim...@metaways.de wrote:
Hi all,
sorry for sending it again, but so far our issue has not been discussed:
on 29.03.2011:
when sending an email to RT 3.8.8 we have the following problem:
Situation:
Queue address: service-...@example.org
Sender address:
On 11/8/11 3:55 PM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@jokefire.com wrote:
I have devised an LDAP query that successfully retrieves information
that could be used to log into RT.
ldapsearch -x -p 389 -h ldap01.example.com -b dc=example,dc=com -D
uid=dunphy,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com -w 'secret'
-I/opt/rt4/perl5/lib/perl5
I expect you can use something like perlbrew to setup the whole toolchain
to do the same...
Thanks,
Jok
--
| Joachim Thuau | Linux Systems Administrator / SpaceX |
| Cell: 310-890-7937 | Office: 310-363-6153 |
RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com
You should be able to, in the worst case scenario, to use rt-crontool to
make it happen.
That being said, there are probably better ways to do this.
Jok
--
| Joachim Thuau | Linux Systems Administrator / SpaceX |
| Cell: 310-890-7937 | Office: 310-363-6153 |
On 10/24/11 2:42 AM, Laurent
On 10/14/11 6:12 PM, Kevin Falcone falc...@bestpractical.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:21:41AM +, Joachim Thuau wrote:
Hello List,
We have setup RT4.0.2 on a debian host from source, against Pg 8.0.4,
with
apache2/mod_perl2 over SSL with kerberos auth in apache.
RTFM seems
add the Custom Fields you want to each class.
This was the step I missedŠ
Thanks,
Jok
--
| Joachim Thuau | Linux Systems Administrator / SpaceX |
| Cell: 310-890-7937 | Office: 310-363-6153 |
RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* San Francisco
---8===
Thanks,
Jok
--
| Joachim Thuau | Linux Systems Administrator / SpaceX |
| Cell: 310-890-7937 | Office: 310-363-6153 |
RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011
* Washington DC, USA October 31 November
Carl,
The message below is to tell you that your exchange server is not allowing
relaying. it is doing that because it has been abused in the past (not you
specifically, but “out there”).
There are 2 ways you can solve that problem:
· The first is to, like suggested by someone else,
# Does authentication depend on group membership? What group name?
'group' = 'staff',
# What is the attribute for the group object that determines
membership?
'group_attr'= 'ou=group,dc=ucsc,dc=edu',
I
Try
sudo open me a ticket
:)
Happy Monday...
Jok
-Original Message-
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Giuseppe Sollazzo
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 2:16 AM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject:
Are you suggesting that asking the user to login once (the very first time) is
a problem?
As long as the user has logged into the system with a valid password once, you
can send him/her a link without using credentials in the URL and it will get
them directly there (unless they close all their
the parameters as needed ... same as above)
Does this make more sense?
Jok
From: George Simpson [mailto:simpsongeorg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 11:28 AM
To: Joachim Thuau
Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Configure Fetchmail to create tickets
I apologize
-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf
Of Joachim Thuau
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 11:35 AM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice
I'm a little on the fence about this. I obviously want
, February 25, 2009 11:30 PM
To: Jesse Vincent
Cc: Joachim Thuau; rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Jesse Vincent
je...@bestpractical.com wrote:
On Wed 25.Feb'09 at 12:25:39 -0800, Joachim Thuau wrote:
Hello
Hello,
I have RT-3.6.1, postgres backend, apache with mod_perl.
We just stumbled upon a funny situation. I'm hoping one of you is going
to be able to help me sort it out.
A few minutes ago, 2 helpdesk techs used the take button, at pretty
much the same time. Upon closer inspection, here are
I believe it has been migrated to a google code/project. At least the code is
there, along with a wiki with some docs. Maybe someone with write access to the
wiki should update the link on the main rt wiki... :)
Jok
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
i have a setup like this.
the ldap/AD integration is two fold.
one piece gives you all the "info" part (fill up all the
user's details on logon to RT from ldap)
one piece takes care of the authentication.
it looks like you have taken care of one of the two pieces,
but not the other. the
Hello,
We deployed a RT3.6.0 recently here. Today one user used the web interface
to create a ticket. Once he had his ticket created, he left that window open
for a while, and came back, wanting to check on his ticket, hit refresh, got
prompted about postdata by firefox, to which he said OK,
I just went through the step to setup the auth from the wiki, using LDAP.
following all the steps (and now that my exchange and AD are sync'ed
throught the exchange connector), gave me the ability to logon with my AD
password, and have users registered the same way.
If a user send an email, their
Actually, the directory is available through ldap (maybe not in the
default install, but it can be enabled).
see,
for example,http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/55/reskit/exc00.mspx
Now,
that doesn't actually solve the problem. Ian, i would suggest you get something
like
38 matches
Mail list logo