On Mon, Dec 24, 2018, 7:21 AM Andrey Novoseltsev On Sunday, 23 December 2018 19:23:27 UTC-7, William wrote:
>>
>> I didn't have anything to do with the change, but for what it is
>> worth, it was definitely not my intention that calling R() twice only
>> creates one interface.
>> When I designed a
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 5:37 PM Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
>
> This is what we had:
> ┌┐
> │ SageMath version 8.4, Release Date: 2018-10-17 │
> │ Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook interface.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 7:01 AM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> For those of you interested in following the Python 3 port of Sage,
> you'll be amused to learn that an effectively one line change [1] made
> startup time of Sage on Python 3 about 20 times faster, and almost as
> fast as on P
"COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS WITH SAGEMATH" is now in English and
published on paper by a traditional publisher.
http://bookstore.siam.org/ot160/
There's also a free online version.
http://sagebook.gforge.inria.fr/english.html #sagemath
Paul tells me that all royalties will be converted into book c
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:58 AM Maestro CaID wrote:
>
> Please i want to report a critical bug, Because it's dangereuse if public see
> it, That's why i'm looking for an email to send the details of this bug to
> the support team privately.
h...@sagemath.com
>Thanks,
>
> --
> You received th
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:58 PM Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> (2) interval should be redefined to give a list of Integers. Do you agree?
I wouldn't change it, because that code that depends on how it works
will break. And having a 1-year deprecation policy for this would be
very ugly. Also, it doesn't s
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 3:29 PM Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> So the bulk of the time is spent converting the Pari object back into a Sage
> object; mainly, this line:
>
> U = self.matrix_space(ncols = self._nrows)([v[0][i,j] for i in
> xrange(self._nrows-1,-1,-1) for j in xrange(self._nrows)])
>
Hi,
I wrote much of sagenb and am why sagenb is currently not optional.
I'm fine with removing it from sage and/or making it optional.
William
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:43 AM Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>
> I'm also in favor. Besides being more complicated, I think doing something
> different here fo
Nice -- updating it now.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 12:06 PM Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
>
> Could you please update to the latest beta release (8.4.rc0) so that people
> can enjoy the recent progress ?
>
> See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26212
>
> Frédéric
>
> Le lundi 8 octobre 2018 15:49:15 UTC+
Hi,
If you want to play around with a copy of Sage built using Python3
instead of Python2 (so 'export SAGE_PYTHON3="was"') without having to
build or install anything, send me an email (wst...@gmail.com) and
I'll add you to a CoCalc project [1] that has Sage built that way.
See how long until it
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:55 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> Many readers of this mailing list will be interested in
> https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.08062 :
>
> Machine-Assisted Proofs (ICM 2018 Panel)
> James Davenport, Bjorn Poonen, James Maynard, Harald Helfgott, Pham Huu
> Tiep, Luís Cruz-Filipe
> (Th
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 1:07 AM, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
> Apparently, people can "donate to the SAGE foundation" using this link :
> https://www.washington.edu/giving/make-a-gift/?page=make&Code=MATSAG
> Who is in charge ? How much money is collected (I would guess almost
> nothing) ?
Our math
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:14 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:35 AM Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>
>> On 2018-09-24 18:00, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> > Perhaps the most tricky is 2 (or perhaps not anymore, after out
>> > infamous CoC discussion fiasco we could agree it makes sense t
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 4:53 AM kcrisman wrote:
>
> The booth tends to be about three things:
>>
>> - Sage
>> - CoCalc
>> - the Univ of Washington math grad program
>>
>> See attached picture from the last booth, which has the CoCalc and Sage
>> banners.
>> People come by and often talk with
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
> 5) also might be harder than you think--or at least, even if we can
> come up with an uncontroversial list of names, it's a discussion that
> invites questions about project governance.
To make it easier, I would suggest that the three names are
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> 1, 3, 4 is there or very easy to set up. 5 should not be too hard either.
> Perhaps the most tricky is 2 (or perhaps not anymore, after out
> infamous CoC discussion fiasco we could agree it makes sense to get
> something in place; we can h
Sep 24, 2018 at 3:35 PM William Stein wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:12 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 1:18:50 AM UTC-4, rjf wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> I assume that oth
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On 2018-09-23, Andy Howell wrote:
>> I'd guess the word "tricks" was objectionable. What I meant was
>> techniques like locating the source using funcName? Now that I know that
>> exists, I can add it to my "practice". Discovering
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Andy Howell wrote:
> I vaguely remember some kind of python sandboxing system, the I'm not sure
> if that would apply here.
virtualenv. We don't use it for sage dev though. My advise is that
you just have a second copy of Sage, unless you are very low on disk
sp
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> IMHO it's better for a potential donor to see more info on how the
> money is spent, with the list of events/tasks on what the donations
> are spent. An Sage project outsider won't have a clue, and might have
> a feeling it goes into a sink
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 3:45 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:21 AM Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> Afair the Sage foundation is a US non-profit with the necessary accounting
>> busywork graciously provided by UW; So I'm sure there is similar reporting
>> thats either published
Since Travis answered, I'll also throw in some answers for variety (I
mainly going to mention things that are complementary)...
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Andy Howell wrote:
> How to setup a testing environment that won't interfere with my
> installed sage.
I would *always* install a compl
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018, 1:07 AM Frédéric Chapoton
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Apparently, people can "donate to the SAGE foundation" using this link :
> https://www.washington.edu/giving/make-a-gift/?page=make&Code=MATSAG
>
> which is advertised here : http://www.sagemath.org/development-ack.html
>
> Who i
-- Forwarded message -
From: Alex Clemesha
Date: Sat, Sep 15, 2018, 2:02 PM
Subject: Sage is currently #1 on Hacker News
To: William Stein
Just wanted to mention:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17995031
in case you were interested :)
-Alex
--
You received this message
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:04 AM, Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
> Dear sage-devel,
>
> A tentative "status of Sage packaging and distribution" posted on the
> sage-packaging mailing list is resulting in an interesting discussion at:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-packaging/ZJmJZi1Tawo/discussio
Indeed, that link is no longer valid. Please visit this one instead:
https://tinyurl.com/yac6cyzg
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 7:48 PM, saad khalid wrote:
> Hello:
>
> The link seems to be broken, I was hoping to take a second look at some of
> the items on the wishlist. is there any way you could re
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 1:43 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
> Some of you may remember this is not a first for Sage either: some
> time ago there was a similar experiment done with GitHub, but it fell
> unmaintained. If anyone has any lessons learned from that time,
> please add them.
I think Robert Brad
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 3:21 PM Erik Bray wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 7:07 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
>> They might
>> also be amenable to a patch. It might not even need to be
>> Sage-specific; for example maybe it would be go
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 7:04 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:23 PM Simon King wrote:
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 2018-08-09, Erik Bray wrote:
>> > But it got me thinking: Maybe it would actually be nice if most Sage
>> > classes--or at least those inheriting from SageObject, had some
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 6:20 AM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 2018-08-09, Erik Bray wrote:
>> But it got me thinking: Maybe it would actually be nice if most Sage
>> classes--or at least those inheriting from SageObject, had some
>> version of this .help() method. Although we already do a
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2018-07-30 18:31, Erik Bray wrote:
>>
>> This is a bit far-out, but what if we just didn't show tracebacks at
>> all by default?
>
>
> Sorry to say, but that would be a horrible idea. Even if the tracebacks are
> completely useless for o
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018, 9:31 AM Erik Bray wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:25 PM William Stein wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Jeroen Demeyer
> wrote:
> > > On 2018-07-29 17:27, William Stein wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2018-07-29 17:27, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Even disentangling the preparser would help a lot...
>
>
> That's the second-oldest open ticket:
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/71
>
Jeroen -- it
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018, 8:24 AM saad khalid wrote:
> On the topic of error messages, I would like to add that this issue has
> almost singlehandedly prevented any of my mathematics and physics
> professors from using Sage or Cocalc in a classroom setting. This of course
>
Yes. It greatly increases
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:03 AM jplab wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It is great to have a recent snapshot of the status of Sage and a wishlist!
>>
>> This summer marks the 10th year when my brother showed me Sage for
>> the first time at the beginning
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 7:54 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 9:18 PM William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just wrote a short talk that I'm about to give at ICMS 2018 about a
>> sort of Sage status report and wishlist:
>>
>> htt
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Timo Kaufmann wrote:
> I really like your wishlist! The all-or-nothing nature of sage and the slow
> startup time
> (although it's actually more like 1.3 seconds with a warm cache
> on my machine)
Precisely how are you benchmarking this, and what is your machine?
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> You write in your wishlist
>
> Quaternion algebras over totally real fields
>
> What exactly do you want to do?
I want to compute Hilbert modular forms over totally real fields.
> PARI/GP has done a lot in that direction in
> recent years,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Since Erik is clamoring for a more calendar-driven release schedule, here is
> a quick A/B test:
>
> A) Keep the current process of releasing approximately every 3 months,
> longer if people insist on having their own pet tickets merged at the
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:11 AM, Julian Rüth wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback so far. It seems that there are pros and cons to all
> of the options.
>
> What about the following: We go with the somewhat random min(8, number of
> threads) and print a warning once if "number of threads" > 8 (telling
Back in 2005 I implemented a "rename" method on all parents as one way
to address this
problem. Basically:
sage: R. = PolynomialRing(GF(7)['y,z'])
sage: R
Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Multivariate Polynomial Ring in
y, z over Finite Field of size 7
sage: R.rename('R')
R
sage: R.rename("F7
,
William Stein
CEO, SageMath, Inc.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send ema
On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 7:18 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2018-06-09 11:12, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> But thats the thing about //, it is not natural wrt. embedding in a
>> larger ring. The whole point is that it throws away information, so you
>> cannot expect the diagram to commute:
>>
>> sage:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 10:23 AM 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel <
sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, 1 June 2018 18:02:35 UTC+2, Bill Hart wrote:
>>
>> hence my suggestion to randomise the shortlist or remove it.
>>
>
> Another technical solution, if the list is retained in any form o
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:46 AM, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel
wrote:
> I have a suggestion how this could be made more equitable for the many
> dependencies of Sage.
Regarding revamping the main landing page, i think it should be done
in a way in which all design decisions are focused around maximiz
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:22 AM, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel
wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, 1 June 2018 15:12:31 UTC+2, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>>
>> This seems very reasonable; the list probably dates to a much earlier time
>> when there were some "main" dependencies but now there are SO many ... Can
>> you m
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Ursula Whitcher wrote:
> On 5/25/2018 11:26 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> I can't / wont read it because of the paywall. Can you copy/paste the
>> paragraph that mentions Sage? (or screenshot it). Fair use of small
>> exce
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:47 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> Less relevant, but still ... Also probably behind a paywall ... anyway, this
> is a review of Barry Mazur and William Stein's book on the Riemann
> Hypothesis by someone who knows something about writing good books about
> analytic number theory
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 8:02 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> Unfortunately a paywall, but very interesting data and analysis relevant to
> mathematical software communities too - plus, Sage developer and co-author
> Ursula Whitcher of Math Reviews gives a shout-out to SageMath in the author
> bio :)
> https
ssue on the Sage
> Foundation Side, ODK could certainly pay now for the next couple
> years.
>
> Cheers,
> Nicolas
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 08:26:58AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>>It would of course be natural for Sage Founda
It would of course be natural for Sage Foundation to do this. Write to me
off list.
On Tue, May 22, 2018, 7:19 AM Erik Bray wrote:
> I would like to be able to sign future versions of the Sage for
> Windows installer. Not only does it just *look* more professional
> (users don't get a "Installi
this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
>
because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sagemath-admins" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sagemath-admins+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
-- W
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 12:53 PM Frédéric Chapoton
wrote:
> William Stein has given an interview to the notices:
>
> http://www.ams.org/journals/notices/201805/rnoti-p540.pdf
>
> You may find this an interesting thing to read..
>
Frédéric, thanks for posting. I mention S
And just for fun, a Jupyter notebook version (just curious if this
would "just work", and it does):
https://cocalc.com/share/4a5f0542-5873-4eed-a85c-a18c706e8bcd/support/2018-05-02-nemo.ipynb?viewer=share
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Samuel Lelievre
wrote:
> For comparison, Nemo gives an erro
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 12:25 PM, kcrisman wrote:
> http://sagecell.sagemath.org/?z=eJyryE5O0TC0tDDXBAASWQLV&lang=sage
CoCalc version:
https://cocalc.com/share/4a5f0542-5873-4eed-a85c-a18c706e8bcd/support/xkcd.sagews?viewer=share
and on CoCalc we really do have probably a dozen different python
n which
>> of both ("is_prime_number" or "is_prime_element") should keep the name
>> "is_prime"? I found contributions for both possibilities!
>>
>> Best,
>> Sebastian
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscrib
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Thursday, March 29, 2018 at 10:37:03 AM UTC-7, William wrote:
>>
>>
>> It's surprisingly easy to implement this, due to how Robert Bradshaw
>> rewrote this part of the Sage preparser.If you define this
>> function in a notebook or comman
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:01 PM, saad khalid wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 1:52:17 AM UTC-5, Simon King wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrey and Saad,
>>
>> On 2018-03-28, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 18:03:48 UTC-6, saad khalid wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Why not assume by defau
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/27/2018 12:22 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> There are similar examples in MATLAB, involving rational numbers,
>> implicit floating point, etc.
>>
>
> Does multiplication by a positive scalar chang
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 10:48:34 AM UTC-7, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>>
>> Nils,
>>
>> See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21067
>>
>> for a rational factor_list().
>
>
> I don't think that helps casual user's API at all. If I have to write
>
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 9:59 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
>
> On 27 March 2018 at 17:43, Nils Bruin wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 9:35:34 AM UTC-7, William wrote:
>>>
>>> Just curious -- does that have the *potential* to break Magma library
>>> code? E.g., maybe deep in some package co
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 12:07:41 AM UTC-7, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> I thought I'd try Sage for a casual computation. I was interested in which
>> numbers of the form (2^n - (-1)^n)/3 are prime. I first tried out n=23:
>>
>> sage
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 9:21 AM Michael Orlitzky
wrote:
> On 03/27/2018 12:18 PM, William Stein wrote:
> >
> > I don’t consider that a bug.
> >
>
> I know, but ask anyone without a PhD in math.
>
There are similar examples in MATLAB, involving rational numbers
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
-- William Stein
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On 25 March 2018 at 10:03, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Apparently Volker does not agree with what was a kind of agreement here
>>
>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24903#comment:3
>> https://trac.sagemath
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Thierry
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 08:32:23AM -0700, Nils Bruin wrote:
>> On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 8:04:07 AM UTC-7, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >- Some functions (mostly inherited from Maxima) *do* already create
>> >new symbol
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 4:42 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
> It looks like, just from reading the Jupyter docs, this where we can
> control what '?' returns at the kernel level:
> http://jupyter-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/messaging.html#introspection
>
> So if Sage could just return a snippet of the a
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Thursday, March 15, 2018 at 7:43:45 AM UTC-7, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>>
>> Two chronic offenders are Maxima's solver and differential equation
>> solver(s), which routinely add new symbolic constants as required by their
>> inputs. In th
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
> [...] However, most CASes now available do away without this mandatory
> declaration.
And hence Sage should have automatic_names as a non-default *option*.
See the mission statement, which is to create a viable alternative to
Maple,
nd stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
> > For more options, visit https://gro
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
> I opened a ticket to make JupyterLab a standard package:
>
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24904
>
> Any opinions?
There is a murky discussion about making JupyterLab Python3-only maybe
as part of the 1.0 release, with the argument partl
Congrats! And thanks to all the great mentor project ideas!
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> yes!
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Google Summer of Code"
> Date: 12 Feb 2018 17:10
> Subject: GSoC 2018: Sage Mathematical Software System has been accept
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
[...]
>
> Anyways, speaking of comments, if you wanted to debug a specific
> package you could, as William suggested, copy the example and comment
> the package out from NORMAL_PACKAGES, thus excluding it from the macro
> expansion.
If you add a n
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 6:46 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2018-01-31 14:37, Erik Bray wrote:
>>
>> All that's changed is how they're presented.
>
>
> But that is a very important change! It's like "all I changed is replacing
> your car by instructions on how to build a car".
>
>> I'm replacing
There is a generic (unknown) mailing list for organizing Sage Days:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/sage-days
I just made Miguel and Travis owners, so they can add anybody else,
make them owners, etc.
William
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 7:56 AM, Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.c
post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
-- William Stein
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
Relevant to recent discussion on sage-devel...
Forwarded conversation
Subject: [IPython-dev] display of dicts?
From: Chris Barker
Date: Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM
To: ipython-...@python.org
As Guido has just declared that dicts will now officially preserve order:
ht
gle Groups
> "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/gro
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, William Stein wrote:
>
>>> I know. But there is still no notebook sharing in other choises, and that
>>> is
>>> what are used here for teaching.
>>
>>
>> CoCalc has a c
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Maarten Derickx wrote:
>
>> Maybe not a direct answer to your question. But if you plan on setting up
>> an ldap authenticated sage
>> server these days and you are planning on actually maintaining it for some
>> time in
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
> We have currently 115 such positive-reviewed tickets waiting for inclusion,
Maybe the release manager could use some assistance? Or we could
rotate to more release managers like we used to do for many years...
> see
>
> https://trac.sage
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 7:09 PM, David Cousens wrote:
> Hi
>
> Has anyone considered making the menu section of the sage Web interface non
> scrolling and only making the worksheet cell part of the interface
> scrollable.
What is " the sage Web interface"?
> I find myself often scrolling back thr
ribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https:/
John Cremona:
> Please can we just use "mathematics" and not argue about abbreviations? --
> John
+1000
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Matthew Schroeder
wrote:
> Dear John,
>
> Thank you for your interest in resolving this problem.
>
> To answer your question I am referring to
> http://www.
r Sage, is one of the people who works at Amazon on
SageMaker, so maybe there is hope.
-- William
--
-- William Stein
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it
to
being blocked, don't hesitate to post...
>
>
> On 10/11/2017 21:26, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using "William Stein2 (karma: 2069, badges: ● 1)". Please
>> unblock me.I'm not a spammer :-)
>>
>> Wi
Hi,
I'm using "William Stein2 (karma: 2069, badges: ● 1)". Please
unblock me.I'm not a spammer :-)
William
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> which account are you using? "William Stein" (wst...
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
> I tried to anwer this question, hinting at makestatic.py (part of SageTeX).
> It turns out that this script is indeed unmaintained and currently not
> working. The bug(s) aren't obvious to me...
>
> I have edited my ask.sagemath.org ans
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
> Can you show the output of the crash on CoCalc?
Also, the crash could just be running out of memory...
>
>
> On Saturday, November 4, 2017 at 3:46:01 PM UTC-7, Mark Bell wrote:
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> I'm not sure if this is the right place to
om/group/sage-devel.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
-- William Stein
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an emai
ail to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
-- William Stein
--
You rece
el@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
-- William Stein
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscri
t of objects, unless you are sure to keep the specific version of
sage you used around. We should say that we gave up and decided not to
put even the slightest effort into making save/load work over time.
William
>
> Best,
> Travis
>
>
> --
> You received this message because
hat we
> send to Mathematica and what it returns could be a useful first step...
>
Emmanuel, you really understand Sage...
William
--
-- William Stein
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
a sage-user's computer, and you would own all their data.
>>>
>>> It is irresponsible of us (me) to distribute Sage without full
>>> https/openssl support, at a minimum. I really appreciate everybody's help
>>> to resolve this...
>>>
>>&
and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
e you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group a
not be
> forked, but that seriously limits its usability in complex environments.
>
> Sage is a complicated piece of software. @parallel is implemented using
fork. Sage can be forked, but certain steps must be taken, as is done in
the @parallel code.
Good luck,
William
--
-- William Stei
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:49 AM, Sebastiano Vigna
wrote:
>
>
> Il giorno lunedì 23 ottobre 2017 10:45:31 UTC+2, Sebastiano Vigna ha
> scritto:
>>
>> I am trying to use multiple sage instances on a Linux machine using GNU
>> parallel. sage works perfectly from the command line, but gets stuck (ps
>
201 - 300 of 9551 matches
Mail list logo
