>> I would go so far as to recommend
>> that we auto-email the logs each day to sage-devel.
>> Note that typically less than 20 people are logged into #sage-devel at
>> any time, and there is no posted log, so the people that benefit from
>> #sage-devel are about 2% of the subscribers to the sage-
I have mixed feelings but in general I think it would be good to log.
Knowing that it is logged will affect how I interact with it - I would
say fewer personal things - but I have learned a huge amount from
#sage-devel and it could be of great use to other people.
So, overall, +1 to a formal log.
On Sep 23, 2009, at 2:24 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Rob Beezer
> wrote:
>>
>> +/- 0 to logging. I can argue both sides.
>>
>> On the one hand, I know I have seen things on #sage-devel that I
>> think
>> would be better off not being posted and indexed - in
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> On Sep 23, 2:24 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> For the Sage project I think it would *best* if we changed our
>> behavior on #sage-devel and make the #sage-devel logs public and
>> searchable. The benefit to the project overall is that less g
On Sep 23, 2:24 pm, William Stein wrote:
> For the Sage project I think it would *best* if we changed our
> behavior on #sage-devel and make the #sage-devel logs public and
> searchable. The benefit to the project overall is that less gets
> discussed "in secret", process -- such as release man
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> +/- 0 to logging. I can argue both sides.
>
> On the one hand, I know I have seen things on #sage-devel that I think
> would be better off not being posted and indexed - in particular, a
> flamer and a naive-sage-support-poster being critiqu
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:18 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Harald Schilly
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 23, 10:23 pm, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
>>> #sagemath...
>>
>> about that channel, i registered it because it seems to be a good fit
>> in the name with sagemath.org and s
+/- 0 to logging. I can argue both sides.
On the one hand, I know I have seen things on #sage-devel that I think
would be better off not being posted and indexed - in particular, a
flamer and a naive-sage-support-poster being critiqued. Nothing
necessarily wrong with that, mostly folks blowing
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
>
> On Sep 23, 10:23 pm, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
>> #sagemath...
>
> about that channel, i registered it because it seems to be a good fit
> in the name with sagemath.org and similar. some are OPs (i.e. it is a
> moderated channel) there and
On Sep 23, 10:23 pm, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
> #sagemath...
about that channel, i registered it because it seems to be a good fit
in the name with sagemath.org and similar. some are OPs (i.e. it is a
moderated channel) there and we should discuss to make this the
official channel. i think it's b
William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:35 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>>> There are privacy issues at play here -- I would like some debate
>>> about this before we go ahead. Personally, I think #sage-devel should
>>> be logged, because it's a development channel, but there is a great
>>> dea
+1 for logging.
Any flames, we can use #sagemath, or a new channel for.
I would love to have at least see yesterday's logs posted. I saw a bit of
it, but I forgot to save my logs.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:14 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:35 PM, kcrisman wrote:
> >
>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:35 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> There are privacy issues at play here -- I would like some debate
>> about this before we go ahead. Personally, I think #sage-devel should
>> be logged, because it's a development channel, but there is a great
>> deal of personal information
> There are privacy issues at play here -- I would like some debate
> about this before we go ahead. Personally, I think #sage-devel should
> be logged, because it's a development channel, but there is a great
> deal of personal information exchanged in that venue.
-1. At least for me, I
On 23-Sep-09, at 9:40 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Tim Dumol wrote:
>>
>> Are there any IRC logs up for #sage-devel? If there isn't, then
>> perhaps we can have a bot (http://www.eggheads.org/) do logging
>> automatically, and have them automatically posted onli
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Tim Dumol wrote:
>
> Are there any IRC logs up for #sage-devel? If there isn't, then
> perhaps we can have a bot (http://www.eggheads.org/) do logging
> automatically, and have them automatically posted online. It will be
> helpful for people to catch up with any
16 matches
Mail list logo
