[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] sorry state of Zenodo integration

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:59 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Well, I'll try if I can trigger version 10.0. I also noticed there are two >> webhooks in the github repo. Not sure what to do, I'll leave it as it is >> for now. >> > > What webhooks? > > So, anyone who has access to the github repo

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] sorry state of Zenodo integration

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:51 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > OK, but we probably should not be running this on "all" releases, only > on the missing on Zenodo ones. > Also, it's you who has to run this script, most probably I can't (as > it's somehow "owned" by you). > Well, I'll try if I can

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] sorry state of Zenodo integration

Hi, I was indeed the one who set this up, but I vaguely remember someone else added files to the sources back then. In any case, I accessed zenodo and removed the link with zenodo from the archived version, and added the sagemath/sage repository. Let's see what happens, i.e. it says it is

Re: [sage-devel] web site from cocalc but in our domain

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:50 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >>> I have recently found: > >>> https://sage.sagemath.org/ > >>> which seems to be advertisment for cocalc. > > it used to be just a link to cocalc: > https://web.archive.org/web/20211021215731/https://sage.sagemath.org/ > (dated Oct 2021

[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: move Sage development to Github

+1 for GitHub, and GitLab mirror later On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 7:23:36 PM UTC+2 David Roe wrote: > Dear Sage developers, > Following extensive discussion, both recently > > (prompted > by issues upgrading the

Re: [sage-devel] 9.3 build: suppress "do you want to install" questions

ok, thank you On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 3:24 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 2:19 PM Harald Schilly wrote: > > > > Ok, yes, that's the sage install command. I should have added that I'm > > one step earlier. I did "./configure ... {--enable-

Re: [sage-devel] 9.3 build: suppress "do you want to install" questions

Ok, yes, that's the sage install command. I should have added that I'm one step earlier. I did "./configure ... {--enable-XYZ=yes|no about 90 times}" and then make. Or is there also some configuration switch I did miss?! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[sage-devel] 9.3 build: suppress "do you want to install" questions

I'm trying to build 9.3 for CoCalc. Well, this time again after 9.1,9.2 , there are these "Are you sure you want to continue [Y/n]" questions for optional packages. I'm also building with two threads at once. So, what seems to happen is that on thread stops and asks this question, while the

[sage-devel] Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Now Accepting GSoC 2021 Mentoring Organization Applications until Feb 19

Hi, a word from my side: I would really like to stop being admin as well and hope someone else can take over. I'm the one writing the application each year and I could this time around, but in general I want to focus on other things after all those years. Despite that, looks like there are

Re: [sage-devel] Re: incremental migration to github? [prompted by FUNDING issues!!!]

On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 9:23 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Harald - can you take care of this? > Uhm, what's happening? Could someone please summarize this for me? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [sagemath-admins] Re: [sage-devel] Trac notification emails

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 7:27 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Also, note that GCE has an option of sending emails via G-suite, > perhaps if someone already has G-suite it might come out better. > G-Suite has an email relay server, where the limit is 10k per day, more or less. It's not hard to set it

[sage-devel] SageMath part of GSoC 2020

SageMath was selected to be part of Google Summer of Code 2020. wiki: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2020 gsoc: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/organizations/4553430409936896/ timeline: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/how-it-works/#timeline (next important date: students apply mid

[sage-devel] Google GSoC 2020

Hello everyone, Google's GSOC 2020 is announced. The application period for organizations is January 14, 2020 - February 5, 2020. In the past, it was me who wrote it, but I'm worn down with that. Is there someone who wants to take over? Despite that, is there enough interest to apply? This

[sage-devel] 8.9: doc build error when _JAVA_OPTIONS is set

Hi, I'm trying to build the documentation for doc.sagemath.org on CoCalc. It happens that we set some java options, and they are spit out by java when you start it. Building dochtml/manifolds tries to parse the java version somehow, but that's not going to work. I have to admit, I haven't

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:36 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > So I just ran into this now that it is not in the "usual" place > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/notebook/sagenb/notebook/interact.html#sagenb.notebook.interact.interact > > > > Now where do we find the interact documentation?

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2019?

Just FYI: I'll write an application and invite anyone who is interested to it. I've also started the page for project ideas: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2019 -- h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] Bad source tarballs for ipython-5.8.0 on some mirrors

That's definitely weird. The master is files.sagemath.org, and it's website says ipython-5.8.0.tar.gz torrent 4.75 MB 2018-09-29 15:52 MD5: 7014b8824981eef2cb893ea5398d6b8d and sha1: 987b66cc662db8bd2ae96eee2f2237266d0c92dc So, that's correct. Must be the faul of that mirror. My contact email

[sage-devel] GSoC 2019?

Hi everyone. This years Google Summer of Code 2019 just started. Should we write an application? Who is motivated to be a mentor? Everyone from last year still on board? Here is the timeline, such that everyone can orient: https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline For our

Re: [sage-devel] sage foundation ???

On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 3:12:12 PM UTC+2, kcrisman wrote: > > Certainly R and probably other similar mathematical FLOSS does have > foundations... > I just came across this thread. Many years ago I had the idea to setup an european "sage foundation" similar to the one of R. My main

Re: [sage-devel] Re: doctest in sage/repl/load.py broken due to http://wstein.org/loadtest.py

Ok, I made this commit: https://github.com/sagemath/website/commit/3e119757cf08ac8487351905f738bd6c31dcc216 to provide http://www.sagemath.org/files/test.sobj Does this help? On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 4:02 PM Sébastien Labbé wrote: > > > > I've no idea what "test.sobj" is. > > You may recreate the

[sage-devel] Re: doctest in sage/repl/load.py broken due to http://wstein.org/loadtest.py

Hi, I think that's due to some scraping protection by cloudflare. However, this file doesn't need to be there and I've put it in the "files" subdirectory of the website. I think that's a robust location and suiteable for this. E.g. here I'm downloading it via curl in linux, which I assume

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Suggestion for the SageMath website

On Thursday, June 21, 2018 at 5:09:13 PM UTC+2, Vincent Klein wrote: > > I have created a poll to help the decision > https://framadate.org/kxRhiWt1dx95MCr5. It include the option to say the > poll is a bad idea. > The poll has an option where it asks to add a comment here. My comment is to

Re: [sage-devel] 8.2: no links to PDF files from main documentation page

On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 5:18:04 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote: > > I really have no idea why this is or what would have changed. I doubt > it's anything that was done specifically or deliberately in Sage. > More likely it was a default setting that changed in Sphinx. > Hi, well, I tried to

Re: [sage-devel] 8.2: no links to PDF files from main documentation page

Hello. On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:12 PM Justin C. Walker wrote: > Sitting here on the left coast of the USA, kicking on the above link gets > me to the “Tutorials and FAQ” page of the 8.2 documentation on > doc.sagemath.org. (That points to the HTML page, not the PDF page; not >

[sage-devel] Re: Update README and doc on the mirrors for the format *.tar.bz2

On Sunday, May 6, 2018 at 9:27:36 AM UTC+2, Sébastien Labbé wrote: > > but maybe the webpages for the mirrors are elsewhere? > The "website" isn't the mirror, so that's not there. To change this, you have to edit the files on the master mirror. Regarding commands for extracting files, well,

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2018: mentor application and ideas list

Hello, thank you for everyone's interest. There are a few who are willing to mentor again, but we also need short outlines of potential summer projects. So far, there is just one here: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2018 for comparison, and maybe also as a source of inspiration, last year is

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2018: mentor application and ideas list

On Friday, January 12, 2018 at 6:26:02 PM UTC+1, Stefan wrote: > > Please register me as mentor again. >> >> >> Hi, thank you for the responses. Before I can add anyone sage as an organization needs to be selected, though. So, let's hope the application goes through again. I'll keep everyone

[sage-devel] GSoC 2018: mentor application and ideas list

Hello everyone. This year's Google Summer of Code started again. Are we applying again? Who wants to be a mentor for a student? First step is to get the application done and fill in this page of project ideas and adding yourself as a mentor. Also please contact me to register you as a mentor of

[sage-devel] Re: trac logo change ?

On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 at 5:17:04 PM UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > > Here is the original svg file, to be looked at in a browser. > > There is a font issue. > Hello, just two comments: you can render any font in an SVG to no longer depend on it. That's for example an option in

[sage-devel] Re: Sagemath mirrors security issues

Hi, I don't see how https helps with any such attack. What I always pointed out is to use checksums. e.g. the webseed torrent files here http://files.sagemath.org/torrents.html have checksums and what would be missing is to sign them. AFAIK there is no official public/private key for files on

[sage-devel] Re: [smc-intern] why does starting sage take twice as long as importing sage?

Inside sage -sh: (sage-sh) ...@compute8-us:build$ time echo "print()" | ipython > /dev/null real0m1.122s user0m0.812s sys 0m0.080s (sage-sh) ...@compute8-us:build$ time echo "print()" | python > /dev/null real0m0.014s user0m0.008s sys 0m0.004s (sage-sh)

[sage-devel] Re: [smc-intern] why does starting sage take twice as long as importing sage?

Can we try to isolate how long it takes to start the interactive ipython shell? (your lib example is pure python only). Here are two runs, alternating between them to get some statistical sampling. Notice, the entire difference is one little "i"! ~/build$ time sage -python -c "import sage.all;

[sage-devel] Re: No responde to account request.

Hello, I'll have a look. We need help with trac account creation, but not much ever happened in the past years. Hence there could be a backlog. -- h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [CoCalc] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Crystals not displaying

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > right, sorry, I mean a sagews notebook running Sage. > I did not try other SMC Sage interfaces. Yes, there is probably somewhere this "show" function involved, which has the same name but a different implementation --

Re: [CoCalc] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Crystals not displaying

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > By the way, this example does work on SMC, so they must be doing something > non-standard here. > What is that? Hi, you need to be more precise, since CoCalc has a rather large feature surface. In case you mean "sagews"

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [CoCalc] Re: Crystals not displaying

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > oops, it does work after I install dot2tex by doing > > sage -i dot2tex Well, I can only confirm, that dot2tex is installed on CoCalc... Better error messages and sanity checks FTW :-) -- harald -- You received this

Re: [sage-devel] broken: http://old.files.sagemath.org/src-old/

Hi, yes, the url is correct and file is hosted at http://old.files.sagemath.org/src-old/ The only problem was the server wasn't running. I don't know why, something bad must have happened on the server. @william, yes, those old tarballs are stored on GCS, too. It's too expensive to use it for

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 accepted SageMath

y best to use this email address: santaph...@gmail.com > > Best, > Johan Rosenkilde > > Harald Schilly writes: > >> Hi, a follow up for mentors: I thought mentors can ask to register, >> but no, please contact me to be invited (and if not clear, tell me >> which emai

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 accepted SageMath

Update: There are 29 proposals, some of them are junk, but I think there are also good ones. If you can, please help reviewing them. We have until April 24th. https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline -- harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[sage-devel] Fwd: Thanks and citation of Sage

-- Forwarded message -- From: 王晴睿Qing-Rui Wang Date: Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:08 AM Subject: Thanks and citation of Sage To: harald.schi...@gmail.com Dear Harald, I'm sending you this email to tell you our appreciation of using Sage in our recent work:

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat.sagemath.org

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Matthew Rennekamp wrote: > What are we going to do for the files and other publications? publications will be on the main sagemath.org page, it's just that there are two links in the menu missing. -- h -- You received this message

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat.sagemath.org

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'll report back when this is working. Ok, modulo some global dns changes and updates, things like this work: combinat.sagemath.org/Installation -> wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/Installation -- har

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat.sagemath.org

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 2:02 AM, Anne Schilling wrote: >> https://github.com/sagemath/publications > Is just pushed a couple of updates to the references to the repository. > I hope you can see them. Unfortunately no ... but ok, I see what's going on. What's missing is

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat.sagemath.org

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > All we > need is to have http://combinat.sagemath.org redirect to > https://wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/ for "backward compatibility" with > references in e.g. published papers. Uhm ok, I'll try to create a

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat.sagemath.org

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Anne Schilling wrote: >> http://www.sagemath.org/library-publications-combinat.html >> >> ? > > Yes, thank you! I see that some references are outdated and some new > can be added. I will add those soon. Well, a while ago nathan cohen

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat.sagemath.org

On Thursday, March 23, 2017 at 5:48:20 PM UTC+1, Matthew Rennekamp wrote: > > Could we set up another repo, use it as a "project site" (as they call > it), and then use the www.sagemath.org/combinat as URL forwarding or > something else? > >> >> Yes, sure, see [1]. I think we can also have

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 accepted SageMath

Hi, a follow up for mentors: I thought mentors can ask to register, but no, please contact me to be invited (and if not clear, tell me which email address) There is also a little bit of activity here: https://groups.google.com/group/sage-gsoc/ -- harald -- You received this message because you

[sage-devel] GSoC 2017 accepted SageMath

Just got word: > Congratulations! Sage Mathematical Software System has been selected as a > Google Summer of Code 2017 mentor organization. Further steps: Starting now: mentors and students should get in contact, exchange ideas about which project can be done, are there projects from the past

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] Fwd: documentation: activate button?

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Luca De Feo wrote: > The "activate" button DOES appear in local installations, if they are > served by the local HTTP server (through the jupyter notebook). Try > it, it's cool. ... well, ok. but what about using the sage cell server

Re: [sage-devel] Re: documentation: activate button?

On Friday, February 24, 2017 at 2:17:20 PM UTC+1, Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote: > In principle, the activate button > (which transforms examples into cells) should appear when the doc is > browsed from jupyter, not from the online doc. I see, thank you for the pointer, I got it. The

[sage-devel] documentation: activate button?

Hello, I just got an issue for the doc.sagemath.org page that there is an "Activate" button at the top right and well, I assume it should make the cells alive -- which is really cool -- but it's broken. I haven't seen this before and I have no idea what this is about, though. Issue:

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

Hello, in 3 days is the deadline regarding the project application. I'm working on the application itself, but a list of suggested projects is *vital* to getting approval. I saw a few ideas here, but so far not a single proposal was added to https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2017 Please compare it

[sage-devel] GSoC 2017 kickoff

Hello, this year's Google Summer of Code 2017 just started. I assume we will try again to be part of it, and therefore I've started the registration process. The most important aspect is to have mentors and project proposals. For that, I've started this year's wiki page as a copy of last year:

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-trac-account] Corrections about the function "is_prime" for graphs

This came in via the trac account request. I don't know the sender's email address ... -- h -- Forwarded message -- From: 'Jamel Dammak' via sage-trac-account Date: Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:01 PM Subject: [sage-trac-account] Corrections about

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Jack Dyson wrote: > any idea ? ​The error is: NoSuchKernel: No such kernel named ir ​ That means, that the "ir" kernel for R (and many others) aren't available in that image. I mean, you're running a local version of smc with some

[sage-devel] Re: A 404 in the Download Source page

I've made this ticket: https://github.com/sagemath/website/issues/97 and yes, the changelog is simply missing because the script generating it is lost. -- h On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:56 AM, TB wrote: > Dear sagemath.org website admins, > > In

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] http://macappstore.org/sage/ ?

I've no idea, but searching for this tool took me to https://github.com/caskroom/homebrew-cask/blob/master/Casks/sage.rb looking at blame/log reveals some names … -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group

[sage-devel] Re: Issue with figures in doc.sagemath.org

On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 11:39:55 AM UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > Hi, > > Some 3D figures of the inline reference manual are not displayed on > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/ > They are replaced by something like > That's taken care of, just an oversight by me …

[sage-devel] Re: Issue with figures in doc.sagemath.org

Thanks for reporting that, I'll check what's going on. It's probably some issue with symlinks ... -- h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE hit tab key for autocomplete

On Monday, October 3, 2016 at 5:00:17 PM UTC+2, Pjl Zaldívar wrote: > > When hitting the key tab to auto-complete the attribute of an object (see > below for an example) I have found that it does not show the window that > should appear. > > for example: > a=501/7 > a.d > You have to evaluate

[sage-devel] Re: In the preview only one page is loading?

Hello, I don't think this is a Sage development question? If it is about SageMathCloud, please email h...@sagemath.com On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 9:17:45 AM UTC+2, Bharath Krishnan wrote: > > Hello I need help with my paper that needs to be published as quickly as > possible. I have

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> we can't, because there are filesize limits. > how about git-lfs ? (which is probably not cheap to use) I don't think we need any of that, a normal CDN is fine, too. Problem with using a commercial one is that the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:39 PM, William Stein wrote: > no volunteers to migrate files/build/rsync.sagemath.org... We should > just switch to GitHub. we can't, because there are filesize limits. -- h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > this really has to be documented properly. just added to your ticket a comment, repeating it here: it's not only the git-trac page, but also the "the hard way" page:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Jonathan Bober wrote: > tracgit://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git (fetch) > tracg...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git (push) As a random idea, since several others were also asking me about this: Did you try setting both trac remotes to

[sage-devel] Re: didn't got the trac account.

This is taken care of. On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 12:29:06 PM UTC+2, B Krishnan Iyer wrote: > > Hello folks!. Actually I had applied for the trac account few days back > and I didn't got any response. Can anyone tell me how can I inquire about > it. > -- You received this message

[sage-devel] Re: 404 in Sage Installation Guide

On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 12:16:36 AM UTC+2, leif wrote: > > The link to README.txt ("Be sure to read the file ..." [!]) > > http://www.sagemath.org/mirror/win/README.txt > > referenced in > > > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/binary.html#microsoft-windows > > gives a

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] Re: missing emails from trac

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > besides changing the provider (sendgrid) hmm, are you sure it's related to sendgrid? maybe there is some setting that can be tweaked? I don't know anything about this "Milter" thing or what it is really supposed to be

Re: [sage-devel] missing emails from trac

Hi, I've no idea, I've not setup that server and never did something for DKIM before. To me, it sounds like a configuration issue. Top hit I got is this SE page, which is most likely what needs to be done:

Re: [sage-devel] missing emails from trac

m, but with a significant lag time. >> >> Best, >> Travis >> > -- Harald Schilly -- SageMath, Inc. https://cloud.sagemath.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and sto

[sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

>> age/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring_element.html >> >> but nope. >> >> -- >> William (http://wstein.org) >> > -- Harald Schilly -- SageMath, Inc. https://cloud.sagemath.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to t

[sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

Btw, try http://www.bing.com/search?q=sage+Elements+of+Quotients+of+Univariate+Polynomial+Rings https://yandex.ru/search/?text=sage%20Elements%20of%20Quotients%20of%20Univariate%20Polynomial%20Rings

[sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

8 > > and they now **all** go to combinat.sagemath.org.I had expected to > find links such as > > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/polynomial_rings/ > sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring_element.html > > but nope. > > -- > William (http://ws

[sage-devel] Re: Connect to sage kernel

What exactly do you try to do? Probably, the easiest way is to use SageMath as a library. -- h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-devel] Re: Developer map not showing pins on developer locations

Fixed. On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 12:16:07 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I can also add that the devs list here needs work, too (outdated links etc > there). >> >> Yes, there hasn't been much activity. However, the place to go is in the "conf"iguration section, and that file:

[sage-devel] Re: Developer map not showing pins on developer locations

On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 10:46:28 AM UTC+2, Jan Groenewald wrote: > > Map contains no pins... > > Problem is, that a file about "MarkerClusterer" in the google maps library is missing. It's probably deprecated (similar to the sagemath search page was broken for some time) and also needs

Re: [sagemath-admins] Re: [sage-devel] Re: patchbot server not responding

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Samuel Lelièvre wrote: >> I can log in. Andrew Ohana was the one to give me access. >> He told me the other people with access were himself, Harald and Volker. >> I asked about adding more people, he said fine as long as Harald agrees,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: libtinfo.so.5: no version information available

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:25 AM, leif wrote: > Could you track this down? > > I'm really curious. well, so far no chance. there is definitely nothing LD* related set by me, but my hunch is, that it might be a side effect of building R as part of sagemath -- but it could be

[sage-devel] Re: libtinfo.so.5: no version information available

On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 2:49:12 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > do you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH or LD_PRELOAD set? > No, nothing like that is set. I also tried to clean up and start building again, but it did appear again. It's also a bit strange, because this error seems to come and go

[sage-devel] libtinfo.so.5: no version information available

Hi, when I'm compiling sage (either from develop or 7.2), I'm getting lots and lots of error lines like: /bin/sh: /ext/sage/7.2/local/lib/libtinfo.so.5: no version information available (required by /bin/sh) It's in a docker container, running normal recent ubuntu, and I have no real clue

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-marketing] Manual de cálculo científico en SageMath

yes, made this a ticket On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed this reference, which might be useful to Spanish-speaking > users: > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] What is the best time for Trac downtime?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Erik Bray wrote: > Is Wednesday morning OK? yes, sounds good. just email me and wst...@gmail.com and one of us will do it ASAP -- harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] What is the best time for Trac downtime?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Erik Bray wrote: > > Would you like to coordinate a time to do the migration? Since we are > (I think?) in the same time zone that might be easiest. I'm UTC+2 (CEST), so sure, I'm happy to switch around DNS entries during my day … and if

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] What is the best time for Trac downtime?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Erik Bray <erik.m.b...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Would GitHub be a good place to put such a repository? Bitbucket? Anywhere >> as long as it's private and no

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] What is the best time for Trac downtime?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com> wrote: > private repo at github ok, wait, I thought that private repos at github are free now, but it doesn't seem like that. -- h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] What is the best time for Trac downtime?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Erik Bray wrote: > Would GitHub be a good place to put such a repository? Bitbucket? Anywhere > as long as it's private and not actually on any of Sage's infrastructure > itself. I could start a private repo at github, where we have our

Re: [sagemath-admins] Re: [sage-devel] Re: http://trac.sagemath.org vs https://trac.sagemath.org

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:53 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Of some relevance -- Harald Schilly was recently in the process of > putting a CloudFlare 'pro subscription' in front of all *.sagemath.org > domains, for caching yes, I'm still pursuing that. The last missi

[sage-devel] Re: Build failure Sage 7.3.beta3 on Mac OS 10.9 with binary-pkg

On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 8:20:49 PM UTC+2, Harald Schilly wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Karl-Dieter Crisman wrote: > > What I meant was of course for someone to take the binaries kindly > mentioned ... > ok, files landed, and one of them is 7.1 which see

[sage-devel] Re: Build failure Sage 7.3.beta3 on Mac OS 10.9 with binary-pkg

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Karl-Dieter Crisman wrote: > What I meant was of course for someone to take the binaries kindly mentioned > earlier in this thread (at http://unhyperbolic.org/sage/) and put them to > the general place, not any particular mirror. I don't have

[sage-devel] Re: Build failure Sage 7.3.beta3 on Mac OS 10.9 with binary-pkg

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:32 PM, kcrisman wrote: > > Harald, could you do that? We could use more binaries for various versions > of OS X. I'm not building any osx binaries and I don't think anyone has push capabilities for the mit mirror. In doubt, just use the main

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Copyrights

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Erik Bray wrote: > But if there were a contributor agreement I > could give the Sage project permission to copy / use my code under its > license without explicitly putting my name on it The problem here is very simple: which legal entity

[sage-devel] Re: Copyrights

On Thursday, May 26, 2016 at 12:16:11 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote: > > I don't want to > claim copyright ownership under my own name > you cannot do that legally, and in some countries of the world this would even lead to a situation where your contribution cannot be used at all. I'm

Re: [sage-devel] Re: print to python3

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Nils Bruin wrote: > In that case it might be worth considering if we can integrate our preparser > steps into the lib2to3.refactor framework: I'm by far not an expert on parsers, but I think forking that 2to3 part in the standard library could work

Re: [sage-devel] Re: print to python3

On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 at 5:48:59 PM UTC+2, John Cremona wrote: > > We seem to be stuck. > I haven't read all the posting here, but just to throw in an idea that might not have been mentioned before: we could use this 2to3 utility in the preparsing step. I.e. an extended pipeline like

[sage-devel] Re: Does any repository at github.com/sagemath accept Github pull requests?

On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 11:54:11 PM UTC+2, paulmasson wrote: > > Are all of these repositories used merely for hosting files? > > Does any active development take place purely on Github, i.e., outside of > the Trac system? > > Yes, website and publications. -- h -- You received

Re: [sage-devel] Pythonics

On Friday, April 1, 2016 at 1:24:30 AM UTC+2, Justin C. Walker wrote: > > > Just because a method is callable doesn't mean that it can't raise > > exceptions, including NotImplementedErrors. There's no reasonable way > to > > tell if a method will raise an exception or not without calling

Re: [sage-devel] mails from trac marked as spam?

Ah! Thank's for checking this out. I don't really know how that came there, maybe an error by me. But for example I have no idea about the DKIM key. However, now this is txt and spf is gone: $ dig +short sagemath.org txt "v=spf1 a:trac.sagemath.org ?all" and the site verification ... I hope

Re: [sage-devel] mails from trac marked as spam?

On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 3:39:47 PM UTC+1, Daniel Krenn wrote: > > On 2016-03-18 14:55, Harald Schilly wrote: > > I have no idea about trac's email setup, can you forward me the source > > code of one of such emails? My guess is, that it doesn't properly sign

[sage-devel] Re: online documentation and "long time"

On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 9:49:29 AM UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > > Shouldn't the "long time" stuff appear anyway in the online documentation? > Well, do you have any idea how to do that? -- harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-devel] Re: documentation changed in 7.1?

Well, never mind. I think it still works and I see that there are more plots. Would have been nice to have a heads up about this … -- h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >