On 28 Aug., 15:20, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your comments, David. I am having some success:
The one thing I cannot get to work in the additive case is (for
example) 2*g where g is a group element. I have tried all possible
combinations of __lmul__, _lmul_,
Thanks Nils, I'll look at how you did that.
John
2008/8/29 Nils Skoruppa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 28 Aug., 15:20, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your comments, David. I am having some success:
The one thing I cannot get to work in the additive case is (for
example) 2*g
On Aug 29, 2:24 am, Nils Skoruppa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Hi Nils,
I cannot explain why this works, but if you want to have a
look:http://hg.countnumber.de/fqm-devel/file/98bb736f0c07/cn_group/finite_...
(and then line 2132 class
Nils, I hope you do -- I was certainly impressed by the presentation
of this which you gave at the Bristol meeting last week.
John
2008/8/29 mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Aug 29, 2:24 am, Nils Skoruppa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Hi Nils,
I cannot explain why this works, but if you
I wonder if a user can change the colours on the trac pages for
patches. Being green-red colour-blind, I would prefer to swap, say,
green for blue.
Sorry if this question is not really a sage-devel question...
Chris.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group,
On Friday 29 August 2008, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi David,
There appears to be a broken link at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/Teaching_with_SAGE
for Calculus 1. The broken link is
[1] http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/teaching/granville-calculus/
However, at the URL
Hello folks,
here is alpha2. We fixed another boatload of small and not so small
issues. The performance regression with plotting is fixed, but there
are still doctesting issues with the ghmm code. We will tackle that in
alpha3 which hopefully will be done before Doc Day 3. Aside from that
we
2008/8/29 chris wuthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wonder if a user can change the colours on the trac pages for
patches. Being green-red colour-blind, I would prefer to swap, say,
green for blue.
+1 from another red-green challenged developer.
John
PS Chris, I have nearly finished my
On Aug 29, 3:58 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/29 chris wuthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I wonder if a user can change the colours on the trac pages for
patches. Being green-red colour-blind, I would prefer to swap, say,
green for blue.
+1 from another red-green
The subject says it all really. Can anyone justify the following behaviour?
sage: A=AbelianGroup([])
sage: A
Trivial Abelian Group
sage: A.list()
[]
sage: list(A)
[]
sage: A.gens()
()
sage: B=AbelianGroup([1])
sage: B
Multiplicative Abelian Group isomorphic to C1
sage: B.list()
[1]
sage:
I agree AbelianGroups needs rewriting and has odd behavior in
some cases.
Incidently, here is what GAP does:
gap A := AbelianGroup([1,2,3]);
pc group of size 6 with 3 generators
gap GeneratorsOfGroup(A);
[ identity of ..., f1, f2 ]
gap A := AbelianGroup([2,1,3]);
pc group of size 6 with 3
2008/8/29 David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I agree AbelianGroups needs rewriting and has odd behavior in
some cases.
Incidently, here is what GAP does:
gap A := AbelianGroup([1,2,3]);
pc group of size 6 with 3 generators
gap GeneratorsOfGroup(A);
[ identity of ..., f1, f2 ]
gap A :=
On Aug 29, 2008, at 2:24 AM, Nils Skoruppa wrote:
On 28 Aug., 15:20, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your comments, David. I am having some success:
The one thing I cannot get to work in the additive case is (for
example) 2*g where g is a group element. I have tried all
The trouble was that I wanted common code for both additive and
multiplicative groups, which I can -- almost-- implement. Your way,
we have one type of element derived from some MultiplicativeElement
class and another from an Additive one, with a lot of duplicated code.
But I'll look at your
On Aug 29, 2008, at 5:01 AM, John Cremona wrote:
The trouble was that I wanted common code for both additive and
multiplicative groups, which I can -- almost-- implement. Your way,
we have one type of element derived from some MultiplicativeElement
class and another from an Additive one,
Build reports for 3.1.2.alpha2
32-bit still running
64-bit on
Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3-default ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 08:42:35
UTC 2007
Build ok, one doctest failed: sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/octave.py
Details:
On Aug 28, 7:19 pm, Stephen Hartke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding is that nauty is not intended to be built into a library,
and hence this is why -fPIC is not used. Is there any reason to not use
-fPIC for a statically linked executable (as nauty is normally used)?
Code compiled
On 29 Aug., 11:55, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Out of curiosity: Do you plan to submit the code to Sage eventually?
Cheers,
Michael
Hi Michael,
yes, I shall definitely do so within the next weeks.
---Nils
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group,
On Aug 29, 7:09 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Build reports for 3.1.2.alpha2
Hi John,
32-bit still running
64-bit on
Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3-default ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 08:42:35
UTC 2007
Build ok,
2008/8/29 mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Aug 29, 7:09 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Build reports for 3.1.2.alpha2
Hi John,
32-bit still running
Thanks for testing - let's hope 32 bit goes well, too.
The following tests failed:
sage -t
On Aug 29, 10:16 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/29 mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi John,
Thanks for testing - let's hope 32 bit goes well, too.
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx
sage -t
The patch as #3992 has a positive review now.
John
2008/8/29 mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Aug 29, 10:16 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/29 mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi John,
Thanks for testing - let's hope 32 bit goes well, too.
The following tests failed:
If f is a real polynomial then f.roots(RR) gives the real roots, and
f.roots(CC) gives the complex (including real) roots. Is there a
fool-proof way of getting at the non-real roots? (You may assume that
the coefficients of f are exact, perhaps they are rationals, so the
questions is certainly
On 29-Aug-08, at 11:47 AM, John Cremona wrote:
If f is a real polynomial then f.roots(RR) gives the real roots, and
f.roots(CC) gives the complex (including real) roots. Is there a
fool-proof way of getting at the non-real roots? (You may assume that
the coefficients of f are exact,
On Aug 29, 11:47 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If f is a real polynomial then f.roots(RR) gives the real roots, and
f.roots(CC) gives the complex (including real) roots. Is there a
fool-proof way of getting at the non-real roots? (You may assume that
the coefficients of f are
On Aug 29, 12:02 pm, Nick Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With a little work, Carl Witty's marvelous QQbar implementation could
help. His code will do the doubling precision part for you, and you
can ask if any particular root is real -- but I found some bugs doing
this, shown
Thanks, Nick and Carl, that is very helpful!
Now I am not sure whether to use QQbar just to determine which
embeddings are (and are not) real, and then revert to
RealField(precision) and ComplexField(Precision); or whether to try
to do everything using QQbar. That sounds worth a try, despite
I got pretty frustrated setting up vmware (workstation, have a license
through school) under Ubuntu linux for the purpose of building a
FreeBSD development image; lots of license issues, networking was a
pain to configure, and eventually I gave up after spending too many
weekend hours on it.
I'd
On Aug 29, 12:28 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Nick and Carl, that is very helpful!
Now I am not sure whether to use QQbar just to determine which
embeddings are (and are not) real, and then revert to
RealField(precision) and ComplexField(Precision); or whether to try
Hi dev team,
Some of you know that wednesday and thursday i made an official
presentation of Sage at the Maths' Teachers' Summer School (French
Educational System).
Notebook ended up on TV (well 3 seconds) i my respectable person too :-)
If you want to have a look at it :
Philippe Saade wrote:
Hi dev team,
Some of you know that wednesday and thursday i made an official
presentation of Sage at the Maths' Teachers' Summer School (French
Educational System).
Notebook ended up on TV (well 3 seconds) i my respectable person too :-)
If you want to have a
On Aug 29, 12:31 pm, bnewbold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got pretty frustrated setting up vmware (workstation, have a license
through school) under Ubuntu linux for the purpose of building a
FreeBSD development image; lots of license issues, networking was a
pain to configure, and
On Aug 29, 2:34 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philippe Saade wrote:
Hi dev team,
Some of you know that wednesday and thursday i made an official
presentation of Sage at the Maths' Teachers' Summer School (French
Educational System).
Notebook ended up on TV (well 3
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:53 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 29, 2:34 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philippe Saade wrote:
Hi dev team,
Some of you know that wednesday and thursday i made an official
presentation of Sage at the Maths' Teachers' Summer School
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philippe Saade wrote:
Hi dev team,
Some of you know that wednesday and thursday i made an official
presentation of Sage at the Maths' Teachers' Summer School (French
Educational System).
Notebook ended up on TV (well 3
Hi,
after many discussion with Sage potential users (this week, around
me), i get convinced that it would be great to use Blender Python APi
to rendre 3D scenes and animations.
I have done some 3D animations few years ago with Blender (all of
science facts, so mostly computed mesh) and even if
On Aug 29, 4:52 pm, Carl Witty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 29, 4:36 pm, Philippe Saade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
after many discussion with Sage potential users (this week, around
me), i get convinced that it would be great to use Blender Python APi
to rendre 3D scenes
Hi again,
to sum up the two days i spent at the Maths' Teachers' Summer School,
i must say that my presentation of Sage produced mainly two reactions
(understand : AND, not XOR) :
** real interest in the Software because of it's potentialities.
People were willing to use it.
** real need of
I've been playing around with learning blender, with the idea of
animating some 4-D projection/rotations of polytopes into 3D. But all
I really want is a nice compressed animation/movie format, and it
seems like there should be a lighter-weight way to do that. If I come
up with anything worth
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:31 AM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philippe Saade wrote:
Hi dev team,
Some of you know that wednesday and thursday i made an official
presentation of Sage at the Maths' Teachers'
I've been playing around with learning blender, with the idea of
animating some 4-D projection/rotations of polytopes into 3D. But all
I really want is a nice compressed animation/movie format, and it
seems like there should be a lighter-weight way to do that. If I come
up with anything worth
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Jaap Spies wrote:
Philippe Saade wrote:
Hi dev team,
Some of you know that wednesday and thursday i made an official
presentation of Sage at the Maths' Teachers' Summer School (French
Educational System).
Notebook ended up on TV (well 3 seconds) i my
On Aug 28, 3:43 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
September 1st is around the corner and we wanted to hit 60% coverage
by the end of August. The current coverage in my alpha2 merge tree is
Overall weighted coverage score: 57.2%
Total number of functions: 20912
Hi there,
I've got a couple of questions about Doc Day 3. Who is attending? There
doesn't seem to be Wiki page for it.
Also, the last bug day was underwhelming since as far as I can tell not that
many people showed up. I suspect this is related to the short notice with
which these days are
On Aug 29, 7:42 pm, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there,
Hi Martin,
I've got a couple of questions about Doc Day 3. Who is attending? There
doesn't seem to be Wiki page for it.
At least William, Mike Hansen, rlm and me will meet physically in
Seattle. We will probably do a
I talked briefly with William at Scipy2008 about being able to call
sage from mathematica. He said it would be useful. I don't have much
experience with python and none with sage and cython beside the nice
tutorials at the conference. I wanted to get your input on how I
should proceed. Most of my
On Aug 29, 7:57 pm, Jason Merrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jason,
I tried to install pynac on OS X 10.5, but it died. Here's an excerpt
of install.log
pynac-0.1
Machine:
Darwin jmerrill.local 9.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.4.0: Mon Jun 9
19:30:53 PDT 2008;
Hi,
I guess due to lack of interest we will make gp2c an optinal.spkg. I
need to investigate how that works out, but since I want to upgrade
pari anyway to the latest release I can integrate those changes needed
for gp2c in its spkg-install.
Cheers,
Michael
48 matches
Mail list logo
