i use OSX too, i don't know how to browse a samba server, but i know to conect a share, may it help's u. you have to press "command +k" then u have to typ "smb://domain;username@samba/share". with jaguar it works great. ( better than win xp ;)
marcel
Am Mittwoch, 01.01.03, um 23:21 Uhr
Someone (who is on my email address list) said I sent an email with an
attachment saying something about Here is a game, I hope you should like
it.
If you receive any emails from me with an attachment be sure not to open it.
It's a virus of some sort.
Taylor
ÉîÛÚÍøÂçÊéµê×£ÄúÐÂÄêÓä¿ì£¡
µã»÷½øÈëÉîÛÚÍøÂçÊéµê£º¡¡http://www.szbookshop.com
---
ʹÓü«ÐÇÓʼþȺ·¢£¬ÎÞÐëͨ¹ýÓʼþ·þÎñÆ÷£¬Ö±´ï¶Ô·½ÓÊÏ䣬ËٶȾø¶ÔÒ»Á÷£¡
ÏÂÔØÍøÖ·£ºhttp://love2net.51.net/£¬¸ü¶àÃâ·ÑµÄ³¬¿áÈí¼þµÈÄãÀ´Ï¡¡
Samba 3 will not act as an active directory server. You need to use a win2k server for
that.
-
Kristyan Osborne IT Technician
Longhill High School
01273 391672
--
Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working properly if you open windows.
Win95: A 32-bit patch for
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 12:02, Petry Roman, ITS-IT wrote:
Hello,
we use Samba 2.2.7 in our company to serve files for nearly 800 people..
Sometimes they get errors within the netlogon script which asks them for
their passwords..
1 Minute later after a reboot everything works o.k.. no asking
Hi Peter,
I'm not really sure, but (depending on your domain environment) you
could need some of these lines:
template homedir = /home/%D/%U
template shell = /bin/bash
netbios name = my_computer
wins server = 123.123.123.123
security = domain
password server = *
encrypt passwords
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Carey Jung wrote:
Hi,
The release notes say 2.2.7a fixes some large file handling problems in
smbclient, but I think not all. I'm seeing the following problems still:
- large files in mounted filesystems (smbmount) report incorrect file sizes
with Unix 'ls' and
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, CHS wrote:
when I configured the samba packages, I used --with-libsmbclient
--with-ssl --with-smbmount --prefix=/usr
I verified that LFS support in the configure output messages was
detected as yes
any ideas?
http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/index.html
You
Hello and thanks four your mail,
i have just turned the debug level to 10 and set the log size to 10 mb..
stoped and started samba and the log was full..
changed the debug level now to 5 and after 10 minutes the 10 mb log is
full... a lot of infos..
i will try to fetch the problem with the help
Jim Carter wrote on Samba-digest:
Message: 17
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 20:10:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Jim Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Samba mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Printing with CUPS Samba...
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Brad wrote:
So this is on the
At 1.01.2003 on 21:08 CET +0100, wrote wing549:
help!im really confused, ...
i created the user Stealth on my Linux redhat 7.3 machine and when i
configure my smb.conf file, for path = /home/Stealth, the machine would show
up in Computers Near Me on my other windoez 2000 machine, but
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 16:21, Jim LaSalle wrote:
How do I map OSX to Samba file shares? I'm not new to Samba but OSX is a
puzzle. I can get the Mac OSX to see the Samba server but not the
shares. Maybe I'm so hung up on the Windows net use D: \\server\share
syntax I can see the forest for
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 16:21, Jim LaSalle wrote:
How do I map OSX to Samba file shares? I'm not new to Samba but OSX is a
puzzle. I can get the Mac OSX to see the Samba server but not the
shares. Maybe I'm so hung up on the Windows net use D: \\server\share
syntax I can see the forest for
Hello,
After some difficulties my samba pdc users can
change there smbpasswd and unix nis password in one go.
(They just use the ctrl-alt-del change
passwd.)
My setup:
A samba pdc running on host x (sunos) (Serving 3
TB, 500 users)
A YP NIS password server running on host y
(sunos)
The
Using Samba 2.2.3a with Redhat 7.3.
win2k and Winxp client.
I can map a samba share and use windows explorer to create files and
folders. In the dos window, I can map a drive via 'net use' command,
but when I try to do a directory listing, I get an error 'the system
cannont find the path
I seem to have a problem in a folder within a samba share. For some odd
reason it's ran out of space in the folder. But other folders within the
share aren't out of room. Can someone please help!
Thanks,
Roger Miranda
Sumac Clothing Company
49 Adelaide Street
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Canada, R3A 0V8
We have upgraded from NT Terminal Server to Wk2.
In Windows NT we set the registry MulitpleUsersOnConnection = false.
What is thier in equivilance for Windows 2000? Our Samba is running out of
free connections per Terminal Server. Currently that number is 128.
We have 5 terminal servers and
Command-K in the 'finder' (aka the desktop) or Go-Connect to Server
menu and then smb://servername will let you browse and connect. Or, for
unix-terminal freaks, you can use mount_smbfs (there is a man page for
it for usage details). Mounted shares will show up as an icon on the
desktop as
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Ronan Waide wrote:
On December 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Try adding to smb.conf [globals]:
interfaces = eth0 loOB
Check that this says:
interfaces = eth0 lo
where lo is whatever the loopback interface is called on your system. To
find it's name run
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Ryan oberto wrote:
howdie all i hope you enjoyed your xmass and new year
well i was just wondering if this is possible
i would like to use samba pdc with a acl, binded to 3 aliases
for 3 c class networks with dhcp is this possible
Yes.
thanks
Ryan Oberto
[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Wittenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I'd like to use the advanced ACL's, so was curious if anyone
has patches
for ACL's aginst a stock RH kernel?
Is there any particular reason you need to use a RedHat kernel? I've never
had any problems running
-Original Message-
From: Peter Milburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
and here is what the log.winbind is saying
Could not look up dc's for domain SPORTODDS
[2003/01/02 12:59:59, 3]
nsswitch/winbindd_cm.c:get_connection_from_cache(406)
Could not open a connection to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Javier Castillo Alcibar wrote:
SMB: R transact - NT error, System, Warning, Code = (5)
STATUS_BUFFER_OVERFLOW
so, is possible that samba fails to interpret the pdc's answer
because of the smb warning??
No. Please see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Romeyn Prescott wrote:
Now, when I type \\images on a command line I am asked to
authenticate!!!? Images is set to domain authenticate. I switched
everything back the way it was before and now it all works again. But I
Believe me, I have tried everytbing I can think of to solve this
problem.
I will work my tail off to resolve this but I am fresh out of ideas.
Any suggestions would be GREATLY appreciated. Here are the details...
problem: server can see machines/shares on clients but clients cannot
see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, John Tyner wrote:
I want to use a passwordless account on my windows box to connect to
from my linux box.
When I do a smbclient -L host -U name, smbclient always prints
Anonymous login successful even though I supplied a
hi,
what is the following sentence from WHATS NEW IN Samba 3.0 alpha21 means:
Active Directory support. This release is able to join a ADS realm
as a member server and authenticate users using LDAP/kerberos.
what I would like to do is a samba as domain
On January 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Check that this says:
interfaces = eth0 lo
where lo is whatever the loopback interface is called on your system. To
find it's name run 'ifconfig -a'
I'd realised that. I'm not exactly a newcomer to unix/samba :)
What is the output of 'netstat
Hello all:
Setup:
Novell Client 4.83 sp1
Windows 2000 sp2
Redhat 7.3 (Samba 2.2.3a)
Users are forced to change their password every 60 days by Novell. When
they log in it tells them that they need to change their password and they
agree to do so. While they are changing there is a dialog box
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Michael Munger wrote:
Believe me, I have tried everytbing I can think of to solve this
problem.
I will work my tail off to resolve this but I am fresh out of ideas.
Any suggestions would be GREATLY appreciated. Here are the details...
problem: server can see
Ok, this has been quite an experience. I have installed and set up Samba on a Linux
server (Red Hat 8.0), but I have not had any success connecting the other machines to
the server. There are a few Windows XP machines and a few OS X.2 machines that need to
use the server.
All of the machines
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Chris Dos wrote:
I've having a heck of time getting all of my Windows 2000/XP clients to
print. Some can print fine. Others get an error that it can't write to
the printer. I'm getting this message in log for someone
Happy new year samba supporters!!
I am new to samba. I am a UNIX admin and no little of MS shares.
I am trying to use samba to mount/share my unix home dir on my pc
running win 2000 pro. The samba server is running and I can smbclient to
my user id successfully on the server. I have tried
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Ronan Waide wrote:
On January 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Check that this says:
interfaces = eth0 lo
where lo is whatever the loopback interface is called on your system. To
find it's name run 'ifconfig -a'
I'd realised that. I'm not exactly a newcomer to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Ronan Waide wrote:
Well, yeah, my understanding of the manual page was that if I set bind
interfaces only, then it'll only respond on those interfaces. So even if
someone pokes at the dialup interface, they shouldn't get a
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Ronan Waide wrote:
On January 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Check the code for nmbd. You will see that it is essential that nmbd
listens on all interfaces. That means it can reply to requests also. It
will NOT broadcast on interfaces that are excluded from the interfaces
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Joe Sremack wrote:
Ok, this has been quite an experience.
Gald you are enjoying it! :)
I have installed and set up Samba on a Linux server (Red Hat 8.0), but I
have not had any success connecting the other machines to the server.
There are a few Windows XP machines and a
Thanks for the little work around David.
inthe password server I had the IP address changed it to the name of the
machine was abale to get users and groups from the nt domain conroller.
A problem I am having now is when I am trying ./wbinfo -r user Could not
get groups for user peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I had downloaded the samba 2.2.7a tarball, the pubkey and the
samba-2.2.7a.tar.asc files from your website.
The import of the samba-pubkey.asc works probably, but by the verify I get the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Norberto Bensa wrote:
# smbpasswd -w admin
Setting stored password for [EMAIL PROTECTED] in secrets.tdb
# smbpasswd -D 15 -a nbensa
.
.
.
Why??? Am I missing something here or is there a bug in smbpasswd when using
Hi
when I do a wbinfo -t I get this
Secret is bad
0x8005
how bad is that, and what problems would that cause me ?
Thanks
Pete
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I just update our server to solaris 8 and now have problem to print
there using samba.
Here are a few lines that of the log files that could help to understand
the problem:
unix_clean_name [OSCARXLOVE.f5aGki]
01/02/03 15:14:53 guest opened file OSCARXLOVE.f5aGki read=No write=Yes
(numopen=1
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 03:45, Joseph Kezar wrote:
We have upgraded from NT Terminal Server to Wk2.
In Windows NT we set the registry MulitpleUsersOnConnection = false.
What is thier in equivilance for Windows 2000? Our Samba is running out of
free connections per Terminal Server. Currently
I've had samba running cleanly on an HP-UX 11.0 system for many months, with
DOMAIN security and one-to-one account name mapping. A few days ago I
started getting password prompts on connection, and messages like this in
the log files...
[2003/01/02 15:46:36, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:(316)
hi all, am trying to get samba 2.2.7a to compile on redhat 7.2
running
./configure --with-winbind --with-smbmount --with-pam --with-pam_smb
I get this error checking configure summary... configure: error: summary
failure. Aborting config
when running just --with-winbind the configure
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Peter Milburn wrote:
hi all, am trying to get samba 2.2.7a to compile on redhat 7.2
Ok. Untar samba-latest.tar.gz.
tar xzvf samba-latest.tar.gz
Now:
cd samba-2.2.7/packaging/RedHat
sh makerpms.sh
Wait ...
cd /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386
I am in the process of configuring Samba on a Sun
box (Solaris Ver. 8). I am using the latest version of Samba (2.22),
which I down-loaded from sunfree.com. The problem
that I was having is that,when propagate the Unix passwd file to the
smbpasswd file, using the following command: cat
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Nate Grissom wrote:
I am in the process of configuring Samba on a Sun box (Solaris Ver. 8).
I am using the latest version of Samba (2.22), which I down-loaded from
sunfree.com. The problem that I was having is that, when propagate the
Unix passwd file to the smbpasswd
Good evening,
On the bottom of page 53, section 4.1.2.2 in the SNIA spec
(http://www.snia.org/tech_activities/CIFS/CIFS-TR-1p00_FINAL.pdf), it
states if the dialect is NT LM 0.12 and extended security is off (I.e.,
use traditional NTLMv2/NTLMv2 authentication w/o SecurityBlobs), the
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 13:28, Joey Collins wrote:
Good evening,
On the bottom of page 53, section 4.1.2.2 in the SNIA spec
(http://www.snia.org/tech_activities/CIFS/CIFS-TR-1p00_FINAL.pdf), it
states if the dialect is NT LM 0.12 and extended security is off (I.e.,
use traditional
Hi Ian,
I see what you're trying to do, and no your correct. I wanted to do a
similar thing such as placing it in to a log on script, however this is
not possible as you can't set up a user from SAMBA to log on as a
service. You would still have to visit every PC to set up the local
security
The path available to your startups scripts is not the same path available
to regular users. I would use /root/.credentials (Or where ever that file
is) instead of ~/.credentials.
Joel
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 05:50:42PM -0800, George, John wrote:
Joel,
Thanks for the script commands. The
HI all ,
Thanks to the fantastic support i got from the list
I am a proud user of samba. I would like to know a little more for network
browsing. I am able to access the windows and other samba boxes and access and
download the files using " Xfsamba" . But the problem with this is that it
gave 0 means the command was successful.
You might look at the printer log file for clues.
Maybe the guest user doesn't have the proper permissions to run the lp
command but your regular user does.
Joel
Running the command `/usr/bin/lp -c -dhplj5
/var/SMBtmp/OSCARXLOVE.g5aGki; rm
howdie all
how would i create a samba share that is accessable to everyone but doesnt require a
password or for you even to have to log on to the box
i have a 2000 and XP network and all the shares i make available asks for a password
any ideas
thanks
Ryan Oberto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
howdie all
sorry the other didnt make sense
how would i create a samba share that is accessable to everyone
a share that doesnt ask for username or passwd just gives everyone the same rights on
it but only for that share
i have a 2000 and XP network and all the shares i make available asks for
howdie all
i still have T-shirts available
5 slogans
escape the gates of hell run linux
Linux the choice of the Gnu generation
software is like sex better when its free
i read your email
get a grep on yourself
they come in
white
black
blue
Sizes
M L XL XXL
price
1 x R75.00
2 x
I've recently managed to install linux
which I'm pretty happy about :)
I've tried to set up my home network, now
this is what's giving me the head ache...
I can get my computers to ping eachother,
no problems, my XP and w2k computers can
see the linux box in the network
neighbourhod they
Hello all,
I've got a weird problem with a fresh install of Samba
from the FreeBSD ports collection (btw. the BSD-box is
also a fresh 4.7 Stable install).
Configured Samba 2.2.7a
- without cups
- with winbind
- with winbind-auth
- with audit
so far, the installation seemed to work fine...
Then
Hi all,
thanks to those who have been helping me so far.
I am having a problem compiling 2.2.7a with smb-mount. Has anyone had any
troubles in doing this ?
Thanks,
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
hi,happy new year
holly
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 21:35, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 01:01:19PM +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
My idea was this:
let make it so taht if unix extensions are enabled, then we NEVER
resolve the links if we permit link creation.
If we do not want to have it so rigid, we may
At 09:07 01.01.2003 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 02:44, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Hi *,
here are the parametric option changes of my big patch...
all lp_param_*() functions now take the default value as last parameter
this is usefull for all fn's and needed for
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 23:51, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
This doesn't seem right - why not just free and replace that talloc
context?
I only want to free one segment in the talloc context and all other
talloced memory in this talloc context should not be free'ed!
a also add a
At 00:10 03.01.2003 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
*** PGP Signature Status: good
*** Signer: Andrew Francis Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Invalid)
*** Signed: 02.01.2003 14:10:23
*** Verified: 02.01.2003 14:22:37
*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 23:51, Stefan (metze)
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 14:26, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
At 00:10 03.01.2003 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Talloc doesn't work that way, and should not be made to work that way.
If you want that, then you have malloc() and free().
I think it would be a nice (and usefull!) to have
Have people had a chance to look at these patches and consider
committing them to SAMBA? They're really simple and come with
documentation mods, and they'd make life easier for a lot of
sysadmins. Gerald had said back on 2002-09-25 that he wanted to get
these committed, but by then the patches I
Hello and Happy New Year!
I'm considering going to 2.2.7 version of Samba, but currently I'm at
3.0. Is it possible to do this smoothly without having to re-join all
client machines to the domain?
Any comments really appreciated!
Thanks!
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 01:01:19PM +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
My idea was this:
let make it so taht if unix extensions are enabled, then we NEVER
resolve the links if we permit link creation.
So if unix extensions are true, then all opens set O_NOFOLLOW.
Ok if O_NOFOLLOW is defined and exists in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yep, I think I changed the order of that test - because we use use the
'snum' attached to the vuid if possible, so as to avoid expensive
lookups. The correct fix would be to fix lp_add_home() not to overwrite
things when it finds that the home
Hello Samba folks;
For some time now, I've been patching smbpasswd to get rid of the
effective UID detection that it does. In 2.2.7a it simply tests if the
effective UID differs from the real UID, and if the effective UID is
'root' then it bails:
/* Check the effective uid - make sure we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Irving Carrion wrote:
I'm considering going to 2.2.7 version of Samba, but currently I'm at
3.0. Is it possible to do this smoothly without having to re-join all
client machines to the domain?
Probably will be painful. We
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:47:32AM -0700, Craig Kelley wrote:
For some time now, I've been patching smbpasswd to get rid of the
effective UID detection that it does. In 2.2.7a it simply tests if the
effective UID differs from the real UID, and if the effective UID is
'root' then it bails:
Thanks for the response!
IRV
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gerald
(Jerry) Carter
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Irving Carrion
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Going from 3.0 to 2.2.7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
I am using an experimental configuration of samba with ldap.
LDAP is used for linux login and imap authentication.
Samba is used for domain login and file sharing.
I have got the following ldap|pam|samba stuff installed on the system
pam-0.75-25mdk
samba-client-2.2.6-1.1mdk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi (metze)!
In HEAD and 3_0 log files I find that the debug messages from
pdb_get_set are a bit annoying. I would like to put them at debug
level 11.
Would that be ok with you?
Volker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 01:27:01PM -0700, Craig Kelley wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:47:32AM -0700, Craig Kelley wrote:
For some time now, I've been patching smbpasswd to get rid of the
effective UID detection that it does. In 2.2.7a it
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 01:27:01PM -0700, Craig Kelley wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:47:32AM -0700, Craig Kelley wrote:
For some time now, I've been patching smbpasswd to get rid of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Richard Sharpe wrote:
So, while it is clear that there are assholes in the world,
there are also those who make it all worth while.
Richard,
Why are you posting this to the list ? There could be any number of
reasons why
Hi,
I am trying to understand the state of Samba using Kerberos
authentication. I see from a search on the web that ADS support is now
available in Samba, and presumably this uses an encrypted password
communicated over the network rather than the behaviour that was
previously available
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 01:01:19PM +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
My idea was this:
let make it so taht if unix extensions are enabled, then we NEVER
resolve the links if we permit link creation.
So if unix extensions are true, then all
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 11:45:56AM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Richard Sharpe wrote:
So, while it is clear that there are assholes in the world,
there are also those who make it all worth while.
Richard,
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 02:23:09PM -0700, Craig Kelley wrote:
I consider confusing smbpasswd with the Unix passwd command a sign that
one doesn't really have that much knowledge, at least where smbpasswd
itself is concerned. It's easy to jump to the conclusion that smbpasswd
needs root
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 02:23:09PM -0700, Craig Kelley wrote:
I consider confusing smbpasswd with the Unix passwd command a sign that
one doesn't really have that much knowledge, at least where smbpasswd
itself is concerned. It's easy to jump
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 04:23, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yep, I think I changed the order of that test - because we use use the
'snum' attached to the vuid if possible, so as to avoid expensive
lookups. The correct fix would be to fix
Hi Kenneth,
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 03:38:47PM -0600, Kenneth Stephen wrote:
I am trying to understand the state of Samba using Kerberos
authentication. I see from a search on the web that ADS support is now
available in Samba, and presumably this uses an encrypted password
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 10:50, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Kenneth,
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 03:38:47PM -0600, Kenneth Stephen wrote:
I am trying to understand the state of Samba using Kerberos
authentication. I see from a search on the web that ADS support is now
available in Samba, and
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 06:28:48PM -0600, Kenneth Stephen wrote:
ADS-style Kerberos support only works when both client and server are
Kerberos-aware, so such Kerberos encrypted passwords support would be
limited to Win2K and WinXP clients. This is a question of technical
feasibility,
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 11:31, Kenneth Stephen wrote:
On 3 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 10:50, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Kenneth,
It appears that the --with-krb5 option is currently used in connection
with exactly this feature, and that the previous
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 11:39, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 06:28:48PM -0600, Kenneth Stephen wrote:
ADS-style Kerberos support only works when both client and server are
Kerberos-aware, so such Kerberos encrypted passwords support would be
limited to Win2K and WinXP
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 02:33, Irving Carrion wrote:
Hello and Happy New Year!
I'm considering going to 2.2.7 version of Samba, but currently I'm at
3.0. Is it possible to do this smoothly without having to re-join all
client machines to the domain?
Extract the domain sid, and place into a
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 04:29, Volker Lendecke wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi (metze)!
In HEAD and 3_0 log files I find that the debug messages from
pdb_get_set are a bit annoying. I would like to put them at debug
level 11.
Would that be ok with you?
You
hi,happy new year
holly
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Kenneth,
ADS-style Kerberos support only works when both client and server are
Kerberos-aware, so such Kerberos encrypted passwords support would be
limited to Win2K and WinXP clients. This is a question of technical
feasibility, not of
On 3 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 10:50, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Kenneth,
It appears that the --with-krb5 option is currently used in connection
with exactly this feature, and that the previous plaintext Kerberos
support has been dropped in 3.0.
It was
ÉîÛÚÍøÂçÊéµê×£ÄúÐÂÄêÓä¿ì£¡
µã»÷½øÈëÉîÛÚÍøÂçÊéµê£º¡¡http://www.szbookshop.com
---
ʹÓü«ÐÇÓʼþȺ·¢£¬ÎÞÐëͨ¹ýÓʼþ·þÎñÆ÷£¬Ö±´ï¶Ô·½ÓÊÏ䣬ËٶȾø¶ÔÒ»Á÷£¡
ÏÂÔØÍøÖ·£ºhttp://love2net.51.net/£¬¸ü¶àÃâ·ÑµÄ³¬¿áÈí¼þµÈÄãÀ´Ï¡¡
ÉîÛÚÍøÂçÊéµê×£ÄúÐÂÄêÓä¿ì£¡
µã»÷½øÈëÉîÛÚÍøÂçÊéµê£º¡¡http://www.szbookshop.com
---
ʹÓü«ÐÇÓʼþȺ·¢£¬ÎÞÐëͨ¹ýÓʼþ·þÎñÆ÷£¬Ö±´ï¶Ô·½ÓÊÏ䣬ËٶȾø¶ÔÒ»Á÷£¡
ÏÂÔØÍøÖ·£ºhttp://love2net.51.net/£¬¸ü¶àÃâ·ÑµÄ³¬¿áÈí¼þµÈÄãÀ´Ï¡¡
Hi.
As a new year gift, you can now download and use Samba-VMS in version
2.2.7a, at the usual site (http://www.pi-net.dyndns.org/anonymous/jyc/).
This is the latest stable (as they say) release available for Unix.
In addition, and from a strict VMS point of vue, this version gives some
As a new year gift, you can now download and use Samba-VMS in version
2.2.7a, at the usual site (http://www.pi-net.dyndns.org/anonymous/jyc/).
The links on the page still points to the 2_2_4 kits...
Jan-Erik Söderholm.
Hi.
If I exit smbpasswd with ctrl-C at any of the
password-prompts, I have to do SET TERM/ECHO
blind before I get any output back on my
terminal.
Is this expected ?
And another thing about the smdpasswd file...
I'v never realy understod if this file is a *must*
to use SAMBA. Doesn't SAMBA use
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
