[sig-policy] Re: prop-161-v001: Using IPv6 for Internet of Things (IoT) -- correct version

2024-09-02 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-161,based on a meeting we organised on 28th Aug to discuss these proposals. This feedback is sent on my behalf, but please note that it is a summary of

[sig-policy] Re: prop-160-v001: Change IPv6 Initial assignment to /44 for Organizations Eligible for /23 IPv4

2024-09-02 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-160,based on a meeting we organised on 28th Aug to discuss these proposals. This feedback is sent on my behalf, but please note that it is a summary of

[sig-policy] Re: prop-159-v001: Reduction of minimum IPv6 allocation size form /32 to /36

2024-09-02 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-159,based on a meeting we organised on 28th Aug to discuss these proposals. This feedback is sent on my behalf, but please note that it is a summary of

[sig-policy] Re: prop-157-v003: Temporary IPv4 Transfers

2024-09-02 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-157,based on a meeting we organised on 28th Aug to discuss these proposals. This feedback is sent on my behalf, but please note that it is a summary of

[sig-policy] Re: New proposal: prop-158-v001: IPv6 auto-allocation for each IPv4 request

2024-02-07 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-158,based on a meeting we organised on 31th Jan to discuss these proposals. This feedback is sent on my behalf, but please note that it is a summary of

[sig-policy] Re: New proposal - prop-157-v001: Temporary IPv4 Transfers

2024-02-07 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-157,based on a meeting we organised on 31th Jan to discuss these proposals. This feedback is sent on my behalf, but please note that it is a summary of

[sig-policy] Re: New version: prop-156-v002 Assignment of Temporary IP Resources

2024-02-07 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-156,based on a meeting we organised on 31th Jan to discuss these proposals. This feedback is sent on my behalf, but please note that it is a summary of

[sig-policy] Re: New version: prop-154: Resizing of IPv4 assignment for the IXPs

2024-02-07 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-154,based on a meeting we organised on 31th Jan to discuss these proposals. This feedback is sent on my behalf, but please note that it is a summary of

[sig-policy] Re: New version: prop-148 Clarification - Leasing of Resources is not Acceptable

2023-09-03 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
r text in the address policy depending on its content. > > Could your provide a translation of that text, so we can better understand if > something may be adjusted from our side. > > > Regards, > Jordi > > @jordipalet > > > > El 1 sept 2023, a las 4:40, Sa

[sig-policy] Re: prop-155-v001: IPv6 PI assignment for associate members

2023-08-31 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-155, based on a meeting we organised on 30th Aug to discuss these proposals. Almostly support opinions were expressed about this proposal. (comment

[sig-policy] Re: prop-154-v001: Resizing of IPv4 assignment for the IXPs

2023-08-31 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-154, based on a meeting we organised on 30th Aug to discuss these proposals. Many Negative opinions were expressed about this proposal. (comment

[sig-policy] Re: prop-153-v001: Proposed changes to PDP

2023-08-31 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-152, based on a meeting we organised on 30th Aug to discuss these proposals. Almostly support opinions were expressed about this proposal. (comment

[sig-policy] Re: Prop-152-v001: Reduce the IPv4 delegation from /23 to /24

2023-08-31 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-152, based on a meeting we organised on 30th Aug to discuss these proposals. Almostly neutral opinions were expressed about this proposal. (comment

[sig-policy] Re: New version: prop-148 Clarification - Leasing of Resources is not Acceptable

2023-08-31 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to express my gratitude to Policy-Sig Chair/Co-Chair and the APNIC Secretariat. In the past, policy proposals were posted to the SIG-Policy ML in batches after the proposal deadline four weeks before

[sig-policy] Re: prop-151-v001: Restricting non hierarchical as-set

2023-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-151, based on a meeting we organised on 15th Feb to discuss these proposals. Many participants support the intent of this proposal, but do not believe

[sig-policy] Re: New version: prop-150: ROA/whois object with Private,,Reserved and Unallocated (reserved/available) Origin ASN

2023-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-150, based on a meeting we organised on 15th Feb to discuss these proposals. The Various opinions were expressed about this proposal. (comment

[sig-policy] Re: prop-149-v001: Change of maximum delegation for less than /21 total IPv4 holdings

2023-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-149, based on a meeting we organised on 15th Feb to discuss these proposals. Negative opinion were expressed on this proposal. (comment details

[sig-policy] Re: prop-147-v003: Historical Resources Management

2023-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-147, based on a meeting we organised on 15th Feb to discuss these proposals. Almost Japanese community members were expressed in favor of this proposal

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-09-02 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-132, based on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals. Please note that these discussion is based on the first Proposal, prop-132

Re: [sig-policy] prop-131-v001: Editorial changes in IPv6 Policy

2019-09-02 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-131, based on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a opposing for the proposal with reasons that the

Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: prop-130-v001: Modification of transfer policies

2019-09-02 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-130, based on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a neutral for the proposal with reasons that

Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments

2019-09-02 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-124,based on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a neutral for the proposal with reasons that the

Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update

2019-09-02 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-126, based on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a supporting for the proposal with reasons that

Re: [sig-policy] sig-policy Digest, Vol 177, Issue 4

2019-02-23 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
prefix size to "minimum" which will be never changed before IPv4 exhaustion. Thanks, Satoru Tsurumaki 2019年2月23日(土) 1:32 Md. abdullah Al naser : > Hi Satoru, > > I hope you are fine. It's really great to hear from you that, you have > already arranged a local dis

Re: [sig-policy] prop-129-v001: Abolish Waiting list for unmet IPv4 requests

2019-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-129, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Substantial support expressed for the proposal with the reason that as

Re: [sig-policy] prop-128-v001: Multihoming not required for ASN

2019-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-128, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Substantial support expressed, subject to not deleting the "it

Re: [sig-policy] Prop-127 announcement : Change maximum delegation size of 103/8 IPv4 address, pool to a /23

2019-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-127, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Almost half of participants were oppose the proposal and almost other half

Re: [sig-policy] Version 3 - prop-126 PDP Update

2019-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-126, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a supporting for the proposal. But a few

Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-version 5: Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

2019-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-124, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a neutral for the proposal with reasons that the

Re: [sig-policy] prop-126-v001 : PDP Update

2018-09-10 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
*Dear Colleagues,I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-126,based on a meeting we organised on 22nd Aug to discuss these proposals.* *Many supporting opinions were expressed about the point of confirming consensus on

Re: [sig-policy] prop-125-v001: Validation of "abuse-mailbox" and other IRT emails

2018-09-10 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
*Dear Colleagues,I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-125,based on a meeting we organised on 22nd Aug to discuss these proposals.Many supporting opinions were expressed on this proposal. - Agree, you should. - When mail

Re: [sig-policy] Prop124 version 4

2018-09-10 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
*Dear Colleagues,I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-124,based on a meeting we organised on 22nd Aug to discuss these proposals.Many supporting opinions were expressed on this proposal.However, also many concerning comment

Re: [sig-policy] A new version of the proposal "prop-118: No need policy in APNIC region"

2018-09-10 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
*Dear Colleagues,I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-118,based on a meeting we organised on 22nd Aug to discuss these proposals.Many supporting opinions were expressed on this proposal.However, many comments were expressed

Re: [sig-policy] prop-126-v001 : PDP Update

2018-08-16 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Proposer I have a question at STEP 1 of your proposal. It seems to mean that the proposer can submit their proposal one week before the start of OPM, but there will be no discussion or consensus call at the OPM if proposer submit the proposal after four-week deadline. Is it correct or typo

Re: [sig-policy] prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy

2018-02-13 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-123, based on a meeting we organised on 31st Jan to discuss these proposals. So please note that these comments are not reflect the discussion after 31

Re: [sig-policy] prop-120-v002: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan

2018-02-13 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-120, based on a meeting we organised on 31st Jan to discuss these proposals. Many supporting comment expressed on this proposal. Japanese community

Re: [sig-policy] sig-policy Digest, Vol 164, Issue 10

2018-01-30 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
p 2017 should be limited to one. Would you please give us your opinion ? BTW, About 60%+ 103/8 has already allocated. Therefore, the consensus of prop-123 means a substantial abolition of prop-116. We need re-think why prop-116 was consensus. Thanks, Satoru Tsurumaki 2018-01-29 20:09 GMT+0

Re: [sig-policy] prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy

2018-01-29 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
rect ? Regards, Satoru Tsurumaki JPOPF Steering Team (former JPNIC Policy Working Group) 2018-01-26 12:27 GMT+09:00 Bertrand Cherrier : > Dear SIG members, > > The proposal "prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy" has > been sent to the Policy SIG for review.

Re: [sig-policy] New proposal prop-121: Updating "InitialIPv6 allocation"

2017-09-13 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
retation of my proposal, is that I’m not changing that. I only > change the allocation size *in case* you request something bigger. But I’m > happy to “tune” the text to make it clear if needed. > > Regards, > Jordi > > > -Mensaje original- > De: Satoru Tsuruma

Re: [sig-policy] New proposal prop-121: Updating "InitialIPv6 allocation"

2017-09-13 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Hi Jordi, Thank you for your response. 2017-09-09 12:40 GMT+08:00 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ : > Hi all, > > See my comments below in-line as [Jordi]. > > Regards, > Jordi > > > -Mensaje original- > De: en nombre de Satoru Tsurumaki > > Responder a:

Re: [sig-policy] prop-119: Temporary transfers, to be discussed at APNIC 44 Polic y SIG

2017-09-13 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
feedback from the Japanese community. 2017-09-08 17:52 GMT+08:00 David Hilario : > Dear Satoru, > > Thank you for conveying the feedback here. > > > On 8 September 2017 at 09:32, Satoru Tsurumaki > wrote: >> Dear Colleagues, >> >> >> Satoru Tsurumaki,

Re: [sig-policy] New proposal prop-122-v001: Updating "Subsequent IPv6 allocation " policy

2017-09-07 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-122, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Many opposing comments were expressed with the same reasons as for prop-121

Re: [sig-policy] New proposal prop-121: Updating "InitialIPv6 allocation"

2017-09-07 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-121, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Many opposing comments were expressed on the proposal with reasons below

Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] prop-118: No need policy in APNIC region, to be dis cussed at APNIC 44 Policy SIG

2017-09-07 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-118, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Mixed opinions were expressed on this proposal. Some participants were against

Re: [sig-policy] New proposal prop-120: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan

2017-09-07 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-120, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Many support expressed on clarifying how IPv4 addresses should be distributed

Re: [sig-policy] prop-119: Temporary transfers, to be discussed at APNIC 44 Polic y SIG

2017-09-07 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, Satoru Tsurumaki, with Policy Working Group hat. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-119, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Many comments against this proposal were expressed. On the other hand, some expressed

Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block

2017-09-07 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-116, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Substantial support expressed for the proposal with reasons below. * Transfer of

Re: [sig-policy] prop-119: Temporary transfers, to be discussed at APNIC 44 Polic y SIG

2017-08-17 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
dly remove all the listing. REPEAT. agree. This proposal support the spammer and the LIR who support or earn income from the spammer. I'm afraid that those spammer and LIR can transfer the address resources more freely and frequency if both prop-119 and prop-118 will be a consensus. Satoru

Re: [sig-policy] prop-119: Temporary transfers, to be discussed at APNIC 44 Polic y SIG

2017-08-17 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
that, the source organization might be "laundering" the address from SPAM DB, then lease this address to another spammers. I think we should oppose the proposal which might support the spammer. regards, Satoru Tsurumaki 2017-08-09 15:16 GMT+09:00 chku : > Dear SIG members >