Jim Matuska wrote:
What is everyone's opinion of
Mdaemon for Email/Groupware as well as integration with Sniffer. We
are looking at the possibility of switching from Imail to Mdaemon,
anyone have an opinion on this or any thoughts, suggestions?
MDaemon is a great piece of
: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 10:26
AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] MDaemon Opinion
OT
Jim Matuska wrote:
What is everyone's opinion of Mdaemon for
Email/Groupware as well as integration with Sniffer. We are looking at
the possibility of switching from Imail to Mdaemon
Also does anyone know if MDaemon has
a way users can modify their spam settings independent of a global
policy or administrator set rules. It would be nice to let our users
that complain about false positive lower their spam setting and those
that complain about anything getting through
On Monday, November 8, 2004, 6:45:01 PM, Jim wrote:
JM Has anyone noticed a influx of email messages with spam type
JM content that seems to link to a 1639 port on a remote webserver.
JM I have had several reports of these in the last half hour, some
JM appear to be fake paypal scams, one was
On Sunday, November 7, 2004, 3:29:18 PM, Heimir wrote:
HE Pete,
HE
HE I have forwarded many (50+) porn spam that we get from
HE EarthLink to [EMAIL PROTECTED] we get this every day.
HE
HE Anything you can do to stop them?
One thing we can definitely do for you if you are on the latest
: Sunday, November 07, 2004 5:47 PM
To: Heimir Eidskrem
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Earthlink Porn Spam
On Sunday, November 7, 2004, 3:29:18 PM, Heimir wrote:
HE Pete,
HE
HE I have forwarded many (50+) porn spam that we get from EarthLink to
HE [EMAIL PROTECTED] we get this every day.
HE
HE
I have checked your license - it is current and is recompiling
regularly.
Never mind. I found this on my log today:
ob3gpi2s20041104060505-INITIALIZING-00
ERROR_RULE_AUTH730000
ob3gpi2s20041104060546-INITIALIZING-00
ERROR_RULE_AUTH
That would explain the extra spam.
This probably has to do with the error I sent you earlier...
--
Jorge Asch Revilla
CONEXION DCR
www.conexion.co.cr
800-CONEXION
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to
I tracked down a message from you in the spam corpus - the top of the
message asks why the message got through. I'm guessing it got captured
on this end due to the filter that _should_ have captured it on your
end. Does that make sense?
Nope. Because as far as I know the filter that should
On Thursday, November 4, 2004, 8:39:20 PM, Jorge wrote:
JA Pete, just as a comment, that the new Mdaemon version has a custom plug
JA in support. Perhaps you should take a look and see how easy/difficult it
JA would be to integrade Message Sniffer at all, if that's desired.
I didn't know that
Message-
From: Andy Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 11:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Persistent Server setup with SrvAny Resource Kit tool
I suspect you typed your application startup parameters into the services
control panel window
: RE: [sniffer] Persistent Server setup with SrvAny Resource Kit tool
Oh, and yes, net start shows the Sniffer service running and I have a
LicenseID.persistent.stat fine on both of my IMail/Declude/Sniffer servers
and it is periodically updated (cat or type the file and you will see
Hi Keith,
It's pretty straightforward:
A) Download the Windows 2000 Server Resource Kit utilities.
B) Locate the path to srvany.exe.
C) run:
instsrv Sniffer c:\path-to-resource-kit\srvany.exe
Sniffer is just the name that will appear in the services applet later
D) Start RegEedit and
See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;137890 for
simplified instructions.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Andy Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 6:26 AM
To: 'Keith Johnson'
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Your Sniffer Setup
Hi Keith,
It's
(Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Landry William
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 11:03 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Your Sniffer Setup
See http
: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Landry William
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 11:03 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Your Sniffer Setup
Andy, these simplified instructions work just fine with Sniffer, as I can
certainly attest.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Andy Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Your Sniffer Setup
Hi Landry
River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Landry William
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 01:23 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE
Andy, Bill, et al.
When the persistent Sniffer was first offered, I typed up the attached
directions that I cribbed from the KB when alerted to it by Bill. I am
forwarding this as a message attachment since the archives are down
currently.
I haven't yet upgraded to the latest version, but at
, 2004 02:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Your Sniffer Setup
Looks like both work. If you examine the difference you'll probably see why.
One (just with the Application setting specifies all of the parameters in
the SZ string.
The other specifies the .exe in the App string
it for a day, you can slow your mail
server down by letting sniffer append new log lines to an ever-growing 800+
MB text file!
Andrew ;)
-Original Message-
From: Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 6:27 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [sniffer] LogRotate no longer working?
Oh
On Sunday, October 31, 2004, 9:18:48 PM, Andy wrote:
AS Hi,
AS After 10/28 the log files have not been rotation. I even logged into the
AS server and executed the send-rotate - but the current log files just
AS continues to grow:
AS 10/24/2004 11:00p 1,324,321 x.log.20041025040052
]
Application:REG_SZ:m:\imail\declude\tpa\sniffer\LicenseID.exe AuthCode
persistent
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Andy Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 10:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Persistent Server setup with SrvAny Resource Kit tool
Hi
201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Landry William
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 02:15 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Persistent Server setup with SrvAny Resource Kit tool
Hmmm, that's strange, since I use
: Sunday, October 31, 2004 11:15 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Persistent Server setup with SrvAny Resource Kit tool
Hmmm, that's strange, since I use SrvAny, as well. And it has worked with
all Sniffer updates since the first persistent version was released. Also,
my Parameters
Title: Message
Bill,
you the man!
I was
just polishing my own script based on comments made by you and Bonno at the end
of the week! My modest efforts are attached as a .txt
file.
A few
comments from my own efforts:
The
wget compress optionto save me and Pete some bandwidth isn't
]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 5:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Rulebase download script
You will need to rename the script file from .txt to .cmd in order
to use (used .txt in order to bypass filter rules and virus
scanners). You can then schedule the script to run
John Tolmachoff wrote: What is the bug?
The bug in Imail was that the Control Panel for the Mail-to-Fax feature
stopped functioning properly.
We are heavy users of Mail-to-Fax, and the loss of the ability to work with
the fax spool files has made things difficult for us.
Mike Stein
This
Hi,
I have a support contract. Can you tell me what I need to do to
upgrade? Is there a step by step somewhere?
Thanks,
Andrew Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Thursday, October 28, 2004, 1:28:21 AM, you wrote:
Hello Sniffer Folks,
This is the official
We dropped Imail completely after we tried v8.x. They have the crappiest
webmail interface, support is slow and non-responsive
and they want everyone to pay big bucks for anti-virus. We moved over to
smarterMail from smarterTools.com its way better
than smarter mail by far.
This E-Mail came
This will continue to grow I'm afraid --- though later versions will
deal with the file directly at some point. All of the rules that are
included in the rulebase file are live patterns that have seen recent
activity. The system automatically removes anything below your rule
strength threshold so
Take a look at Mdaemon from altn.com instead of Imail? Great product, great
support, great attitude. Oh and works very well with le sniffer :)
Matt D
MaxNett Ltd
t.08701 624 898
f.08701 624 889
www.maxnett.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Matt Day wrote:
Take a look at Mdaemon from altn.com instead of Imail? Great product, great
support, great attitude. Oh and works very well with le sniffer :)
I agree. But to answer the original question, I had the notion that ICS
is the same IMail with other bundled software/services and
On Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 11:30:27 AM, Jim wrote:
JM Is there a way to integrate message sniffer directly with the new Imail
JM Collaboration Suite. We are currently using it with Imail via declude, but
JM that may change soon due to this latest Imail fiasco. If we decide to
JM migrate to
...
-Original Message-
From: Pete McNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 8:52 AM
To: Jim Matuska
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Integrating Sniffer with new Imail Collaboration
Suite
On Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 11:30:27 AM, Jim wrote:
JM Is there a way to integrate message
, if SpamAssassin has a way to shell out to call Sniffer ... hm
...
-Original Message-
From: Pete McNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 8:52 AM
To: Jim Matuska
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Integrating Sniffer with new Imail Collaboration
Suite
On Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 11
Pete,
2-3.0i9 seems to be fine for me.
John
-
John W. Enyart
EAI, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 7:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about
Since we've been running it our Queue monitors have stopped alerting.
This is a good thing as that means the queues are no longer hitting 100%
between 5 min. sample periods.
So, me thinks it's pretty well optimized now.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
On Monday, October 25, 2004, 1:58:49 PM, Mark wrote:
MES I just noticed a huge increase in SPAM today and noticed that none of them
MES were being trapped by the Message Sniffer rules.
MES I did an upgrade to the new test version the other day and am guessing
MES that's what's going on.
MES
I am particularly interested to hear from MDaemon users who should
realize a multi-fold improvement in processing speed by using this
new version of persistent server. This is one of the critical goals
of these modifications and preliminary responses support that we
have achieved this goal.
But did you run the persistent version also?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jorge Asch
Sent: woensdag 20 oktober 2004 22:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published.
If you fire up Task Manager
)
-Original Message-
From: Michiel Prins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 1:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published.
But did you run the persistent version also?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Does this version have speed improvements over the previous official
release, when NOT using the persistent option (with Mdaemon)?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: zondag 17 oktober 2004 21:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Michiel Prins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sniffer] New test version 2-3.0i7
Does this version have speed improvements over the previous official
release, when NOT using the persistent
Let me know when it is safe to run this on a production server
Thank you
Harry Vanderzand
inTown Internet Computer Services
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 1:10 AM
To: [EMAIL
Link not working
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11:55 AM
Subject: [sniffer] New beta v2-3.0i4
Hello Sniffer Folks,
I have a new version of Message Sniffer ready for wide beta testing.
* This version has
It works for me.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Frederick Samarelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sniffer] New beta v2-3.0i4
Link not working
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED
:-)
On Thursday, October 7, 2004, 5:34:15 PM, Andrew wrote:
CA A member of my company with an important title complains
CA about mail being slow, and that her business associates can't
CA reach her. It goes up the corporate ladder until it peaks and
CA comes much further down to my level.
CA
, September 21, 2004 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Today
On Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 6:13:23 PM, Jorge wrote:
JA Something happened today? I've had a couple of quiet days lately,
today
JA I've received over 40+ message of spam that went undetected by
JA MessageSniffer...
Spam storm
On Wednesday, September 22, 2004, 10:06:29 AM, Faustino wrote:
FB Hi there,
FB We're having a problem with somes of our clients and Sniffer.
FB For example: All the messages to a specific domain are marked
FB as spam, even if the text message only contains 'Test'.
FB Sniffer return the code 52.
Hi there,
Thanks a lot for your message.
The rule that is causing the problem is : 40102.
qdq1414z 20040915192710 fileuJgh6T 20 0 Match 40102 52 142 156 53
qdq1414z 20040915192710 fileuJgh6T 20 0 Final 40102 52 0 1220 53
I stopped the problem by blocking the rule 40102 in the cfg
When can I
On Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 6:13:23 PM, Jorge wrote:
JA Something happened today? I've had a couple of quiet days lately, today
JA I've received over 40+ message of spam that went undetected by
JA MessageSniffer...
Spam storm - We've been pounding new rules for about two days.
We're still
On Monday, September 20, 2004, 5:46:00 AM, Roger wrote:
RM Since the content-type multipart must specify a boundary, I suggest you
RM filter all mail that have the content type multipart without boundary=.
RM Currently PARMACIA.BIZ sends hundreds of spams daily to our domain and
RM probably to
On Monday, September 20, 2004, 10:40:28 AM, Dan wrote:
DS For whatever reason I don't think I've been running the latest version of
DS sniffer as I don't even recall having updated to version 2. So I downloaded
DS the latest version and copied renamed the .exe the .cfg files.
DS Is there
On Sunday, September 19, 2004, 10:11:27 AM, Landry wrote:
LW Pete, I am wondering why Sniffer has such a problem detecting
LW the so-called NIGERIAN types of spam. It seems that I have been
LW forwarding several of them daily to the spam@ address for weeks,
LW but Sniffer still consistently
Matt Matt Matt.
Then everyone would have to make sure
they made the relevant changes on their systems.
As we have seen on the Declude Junkmail list, there will
always be those who set up their systems and then forget about them. Making a
change like that would cause problems.
John,
If you read this more carefully, I was not suggesting that action be
taken that would affect everyone's system in such a way that it would
require modifications. The 60 result code was recently changed from
Gray rules to IP rules, and that change may or may not suggest a
modification to
Thanks Pete, but let me just stress the largest issue that I see and I
think you already are aware of it. The new IP classification is the
most likely to produce false positives and it's result code of 60 places
precedence of that over General, Experimental and Obfuscation hits.
There is a
On Friday, September 17, 2004, 12:42:26 PM, Steve wrote:
SF I am having problems downloading the starter scripts to automate updates
Responded off list.
_M
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
Nope, all is working as expected here.
Regards,
Michiel Prins
Reject.nl
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 16 september 2004 16:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [sniffer] rules file?
Has anyone else out
Nope, we have seen this when using Imail w/ mxGuard and smarterMail.
We rolled back to a older rules file and now we are seeing clean emails again for the
various other domains
we host.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go
On Wednesday, September 15, 2004, 2:06:22 AM, Landry wrote:
LW I have seen a fairly substantial increase on false positives
LW today. I have submitted several FPs to the false@ address. Has
LW there been a big change in the core rulebase today? I wouldn't
LW think that upgrading to the new
-Original Message-
From: Pete McNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LW I have seen a fairly substantial increase on false positives today.
LW I have submitted several FPs to the false@ address. Has there been
LW a big change in the core rulebase today? I wouldn't think that
LW upgrading to
Perce Tribe
Information Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Landry William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 11:42 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Increase in FPs
On Wednesday, September 15, 2004, 2:06:22 AM, Landry wrote:
LW
_M:
I recommend that you review your weights using a combination of
your current experiences and the spam test quality analysis found
here:
http://www2.spamchk.com/public.html
Is the code to make these graphs avail? I saw a thread before about
this before but do not recall the
Are you sure the useradd executable is in the directory you are running the
script from.
bash: useradd: command not found
I would think would simply indicate that either useradd is not in the
directory, or maybe it is not set executable.
Jim Matuska Jr.
Computer Tech II
CCNA
Nez Perce Tribe
oh, never mind,
i figured it out,, can't be done via telnet,, i logged in ssh, and it worked
fine:-)
-Ken
- Original Message -
From: Ken Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:05 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Sniffer setup
Hello,
I'm setting
Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 4:29 PM
To: Agid, Corby
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam
On Monday, September 13, 2004, 7:22:03 PM, Corby wrote:
AC Hello,
AC I was surprised recently by some spam that got through without
AC getting caught by the sniffer
D]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MattSent: Monday, September 13, 2004 5:25 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [sniffer] Surprising missed
spam
Corby,Personally, I'm a fan of leaving the generic stuff
out due to the potential of false positives. Those of us that are using
On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 12:40:43 PM, Jorge wrote:
JA What is Group 62? Is there anywhere I can get a list of all group types?
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/ResultCodesHelp.html
62 - Abstract patterns for spam structures.
This group also contains some domain rules that
l government agency, it causes
problems.
Corby
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 5:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam
Corby,
Personally, I'
On Monday, September 13, 2004, 7:22:03 PM, Corby wrote:
AC Hello,
AC I was surprised recently by some spam that got through
AC without getting caught by the sniffer. We've been getting some
AC plain text messages that have obvious spam words in the subject
AC line. For example, a plain text
Corby,
Personally, I'm a fan of leaving the generic stuff out due to the
potential of false positives. Those of us that are using Sniffer in
addition to other spam blocking mechanisms can afford to lose some
Sniffer hits on such phrases because they will be picked up by other
means almost all
Pete,
I take it this can be run without the persistent mode? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Pete McNeil
Sent: Mon 9/13/2004 9:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [sniffer]
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
Anyone at Sortmonster to kill this list to vacation bounce???
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I will be on vacation beginning Tuesday 9-7 through Friday 9-10, returning on Monday
9-13. If you have an emergency, please contact Lisa Parker or Sheryl Yowl at
504-734-8000.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
601 - 700 of 1018 matches
Mail list logo
