This is not SNF specific, just a commentary:
I've noticed an uptick in "user stolen" passwords from domains hosted at
O365.
At first I thought these O365 users were simply infected with botNet malware
and spewing out spam to their contact lists, but I've become suspicious
after working with
Pete - and all,
Just a general observation. We've noticed a large amount of spam messages
over the past week that exceed 2MB in size (several thousand messages).
Our filtering engines were set to skip messages over 2MB since we all knew
that spammers would rarely waste their resources
McNeil
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 4:32 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Bad Matrix errors
On 8/22/2011 4:04 PM, Peer-to-Peer (Support) wrote:
Hello SNF,
I think something broke. I'm seeing a lot of Bad Matrix! warnings in
my logs. Likely started about
Hi everyone,
I've been thinking about the potential risk of IPv6 will have on filtering
spam. I suspect RBL's (real time blacklists) may become obsolete once IPv6
arrives.?.
From what I've learned, IPv6 has 340 undecillion (1 followed by 36 zeros) IP
addresses. And devices can refresh every 24
Just checking to see if anyone else is seeing a massive spike in volume.
Something started occurring around 9AM EST. Not yet sure what's happening.
Wondering if this is global attack or simply local on our system?
Anyone seeing unusual activity - high volume?
--Paul R.
: Rulebase updates increased by 25%!!!
On 3/22/2010 4:59 PM, Peer-to-Peer (Support) wrote:
Pete,
We're only seeing an about 1 update every hour (or so) as well.
I did some checking and sent you an email off list.
It looks like the UTC clock on your server is about an hour in the
future (compared
Our updates stopped around 4:45AM EST this morning (Sun 01-17-10)
We see an error 'unable to connect' (using Curl). Continuing to
investigate.
Anyone else experiencing the same?
--Paul
#
This message is sent to you because you
We saw the following error for about one hour this morning (6:30AM - 7:20AM
EST). Assume it was a bad update, and once a new update arrived all corrected
itself.
Could this be a local issue, something that we may have been able to prevent, or
something beyond our control.
Sat 2009-07-18
Not the same as you're describing below, but I can confirm we were slammed
with NDR's last night. Classic joe-job (i.e. millions of messages sent out
to unknown users using your return address).
--Paul
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf
Just following-up: We've been running the upper limit at 100mb for 3 weeks
now and have not seen any further St9bad_alloc errors. At 150mb we were
seeing the St9bad_alloc error daily.
Regards,
--Paul
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf
H sorry, just before posting my question last night I lowered the upper
limit to 100MB which is why you're now seeing more normal numbers on your
end. Six servers were at 150MB last night and today the numbers are 1/2 of
the size.
Here's an example from server#1 (LAST NIGHT)
gbudb
size
machine that's been up
for a while:
gbudb
size bytes=142606336/
records count=650314/
utilization percent=95.8431/
/gbudb
For information on reading your status reports:
http://www.armresearch.com/support/articles/software/snfServer/logFiles/stat
usLogs.jsp
Hope this helps,
_M
Hello,
Is there any common cause for the SNF headers to appear in the body of an
email?
We're running MDaemon.
We have a customer using a webform to receive their sales-orders via email.
When the message arrives in the customers mailbox the SNF headers appear at
the top of the message body, and
All appears to be working correctly here :-)
--PTP
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 4:34 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Upgraded Rulebase Delivery System
Hello Sniffer
(theory):
We're predicating an up-tick in spam over the coming months due to the
(Global) economy which is dramatically slowing. Small businesses are
feeling the pinch and business owners are beginning to panic (as you would
naturally expect). So to make up for lost revenue they will advertise,
Check to be certain your .snf rulebase is in the Mdaemon\SNF folder
--PTP
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of David Pearson
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:47 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Source
Yes, we're getting tons of these too.
Michael Stein
Computer House
- Original Message -
From: Greg Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 10:20 AM
Subject: [sniffer] .pdf Attachments
What is with all the .pdf
For those of us in the dark about this, can someone explain who Appriver is,
and what is has to do with Message Sniffer?
Thank you,
Michael Stein
Computer House
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent:
Dear Steve,
I have replied to you off-list regarding our discounted renewal services for
Mesage Sniffer.
Thank you,
Michael Stein
Computer House
609 652-5100
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Steve Guluk
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007
Is it me, or is there an unbelievable spam storm going on this
afternoon??
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
Dear Alberto,
Have you run your task manager to see what service is using the CPU?
Michael Stein
Computer House
- Original Message -
From: Alberto Santoni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 1:19 PM
Subject:
ORDB.org announced today (12/18/06) they will be shutting down (12/31/06).
The folks at AltN.com (MDaemon) sent out announcements to all their
customers and would like to pass this along to anyone who checks that RBL.
The site will disappear in 13 days.
You can visit ordb.org for details.
--Paul
Here Here! I second the motion. It would be great to be able to block these.
We use the Declude Country Filter which does a good job, but these Russian or
Arabic E-mails don't always originate in the subject country.
Thanks Steve for the good suggestion.
Michael Stein
Computer House
MDaemon 9.5 hidden warning:
If anyone is using the 'Gateway' features in MDaemon and plan to upgrade to
9.5, be aware you will now be required to purchase a user license equal to
the number of Gateways.
9.5 no longer offers unlimited gateways :(
--Paul R.
temporarily deferred -
4.16.50
I recall others encountering this
difficulty. What did you do or what did Yahoo! tell you was the
cause? It seems like every message sent to yahoo.com is being bounced with
that message. I cannot contact their abuse or support departments because
those emails
we seem to be having a drastic increase the last
couple of hours or so - it's now 12:30 EST - anyone else seeing the same
?
David Waller wrote: they don't respond to support emails from this
registered user...
Dear David,
I am curious to know if you have an active Service Agreement with Declude?
Among the hundreds of vendors that I deal with, I found their support to be
one of the best. I seldom wait more than
Dear Sniffer Folks,
As I mentioned in a previous post, we have been very happy
with the response from Declude Tech Support.
Feel free to use this E-mail address if you need
help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linda has been very good at responding, and she has given
permission for me to post her
David,
What sort of database does OFR use adn do you know if the expiration of
address's can be edited?
thanks
dodd
- Original Message -
From: David Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 6:14 AM
Subject:
We also use ORF by VamSoft on IIS to pre-process.
We do not use the grey listing. We tried it, and it is great at eliminating
spam, but it can delay mail for hours, which is a problems for most email
users.
Instead of grey listing, we have found ORF's tar-pitting very effective.
We set some
Thank you Pete,
We have successfully upgraded to version 2-3.5
Michael Stein
Computer House
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 12:25 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Version 2-3.5 Release
Matrosity
Hosting wrote: anyone getting
mailthrough yet?
It was suggested that we try this command: telenet
mx1.mail.yahoo.com 25
I have found that this fails about 4 out of 5 times.
If you keep trying it, it will eventually connect. I would sure like to
know what this is.
Anyone
oops I spelled Telnet wrong.
Sorry
- Original Message -
From:
Computer House Support
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 7:50
PM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail
problems
Matrosity
Hosting wrote: anyone getting
] FW: Retest (KMM38446283V14479L0KM)
Whatever, yahoo.
You can't just admit your system was hosed and actually still is.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: Yahoo! Customer Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18
Im sorry to post this here but we are desperately
looking for opinions quickly as this has becoming a real issue to us and I could
not think of any better place to find truly technical mail server folks J
We seem to be having multiple mail servers on multiple networks having
issues
I would recommend checking your mail server logs for a
more detailed description of the bounce error. You may find that it is a
DNS or spam blacklist issue. www.dnsstuff.com is a good
resource.
Michael SteinComputer House
- Original Message -
From:
Tech
Support
Thanks, but were not blacklisted and there
are no entries other than message has been deferred L
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Computer House Support
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006
11:54 AM
To: Message
Sniffer Community
Subject
We have had this issue intermittently for the last 2 days only on one
mail server.
Tech Support wrote:
I’m sorry to post this here but we are desperately looking for
opinions quickly as this has becoming a real issue to us and I could
not think of any better place to find truly technical
:
Tech
Support
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:52
AM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail
problems
Thanks, but were not
blacklisted and there are no entries other than message has been deferred
L
From:
Message Sniffer
retry frequency TTL may have expired
And so the process starts over with a new
MX1.mail.yahoo.com server
Not sure if this is all correct but it is
the best we can figure out as of yet
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Computer House Support
Support
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006
12:27 PM
To: Message
Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail
problems
Are those of us having this problem all running an Imail
server?
Michael Stein
Computer House
- Original Message -
From: Matrosity
- Original Message -
From:
Tech
Support
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:18
PM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail
problems
This issue is
occurring for us with the following platforms
Windows with Imail,
smartermail
Telnet to mx1.mail.yahoo.com on port 25
likewise try mx2 3
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Computer House Support
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006
12:44 PM
To: Message
Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail
problems
their greylisting will work as they expect.
If you try it and it works, please let us
know.
Andrew 8)
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tech Support
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006
9:12 AM
To: Message
Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re
Thanks for the suggestion. I did the Telnet test to
MX1 and it fails from the mail server, but connects ok from my web
server.
Any ideas?
Michael SteinComputer House
- Original Message -
From:
Tech
Support
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Tuesday, October 17
ying about it and wait for them
to fix their problem. Agree?
Michael SteinComputer House
- Original Message -
From:
Tech
Support
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1:47
PM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail
problems
Its a variety
Of
Computer House Support
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006
2:44 PM
To: Message
Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail
problems
Here is the error we are getting now on any mail to
Yahoo: Unexpected connection response from server:
Out of curiosity, I ran yahoo.com through
Dear Pete,
I sent an E-mail to the Sniffer Community over an hour ago, and it has not
yet been received by anyone. I noticed that 2pm was the last sniffer mail
I got. Are these being held up for some reason?
Michael Stein
Computer House
Not really chances are a few tries several
seconds apart will yield the reverse on both servers
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Computer House Support
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006
3:00 PM
To: Message
Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer
Hi Sven,
My guess is that the plug-in is actually working but just not being logged
when MD is minimized (or Windows logged-off).
Check the MD Log Settings and enable Always log to screen.
Setup|Logging|Options - Enable Always log to screen
--Paul
-Original Message-
From: Message
Hi David:
There has been a rise in spam again and we just added some new rules to
our system. Lets give it a few days to see if they stop.
Have a great day.
Phil
David Moore wrote:
*Received: from PC05.4ueleoz.org [202.215.167.25] by romtech.com.au
with ESMTP*
* (SMTPD-8.22) id
Hi All,
We are migrating off of:
iMail with MXguard
to
Smarter Mail with
Declude
Needless to say we run sniffer and
will continue to, but we are having issues getting our filtering to work the way
we want it to and would like to find someone to help out as a consultant on the
Hi _M,
Do you mean like reverse PTR records, or HELO lookups, etc..?
--Paul R.
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 9:26 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer]A design question - how
I thought that having an SPF record would prevent a
spammer from forging your domain name, but our SPF record did not seem to help
with these odd numeric E-mails which appear to be coming from our
owndomain.
Does anyone have any info about SPF records and if they
really work to combat this
, but you have to both specify that email
for your domains only comes from your mail servers AND use a test in your spam
filtering that checks SPF and pushes fails over your hold limit.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Computer House Support
To: Message Sniffer Community
We have not noticed any today.
Michael Stein
Computer House
- Original Message -
From: Jim Matuska Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 2:46 PM
Subject: [sniffer]Ebay Phishing Emails getting through
Has anyone else
I also have got a lot of false positives with code 063 which are HOLD now.
Ik know it's not very nice to set email on HOLD when failing sniffer but
I've got a major problem with spam and until a few days ago this was going
well, at least a few false positives in a week.
03/07/2006 20:12:44.628
I second the motion. We have been submitting spam for over a year and I
don't know if a single one was received.
Thank you Jim, for the suggestion.
Michael Stein
Computer House
www.computerhouse.com
- Original Message -
From: Jim Matuska Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Dear Pete,
In the future, please let us know immediately when you become aware of this.
As it is, I will spend the next 3 hours picking out the fales positives from
the mailbox and forwarding them to the clients. If I could have put the
rulepanic in place an hour ago it would have saved me a
-
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Computer House Support sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 4:24 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Bad Rule - 828931
I do most humbly apologize,
It was my intention to do it immediately, however I became embroiled
in related support
another.
John
T
eServices For
You
-Original
Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peer-to-Peer
(Support)Sent:
Wednesday, December 28,
2005 5:41
PMTo: sniffer@SortMonster.comSubject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Last chance
, and they all have special
things to offer that you may need. Purchasing from us directly also
has some benefits (the additional funds help speed up RD), but
ultimately, if you use and support SNF, through us or through one of
our partners, you are still supporting SNF and that's a good thing
/benefits and more to come are as follows:
* In the past 6 months we have more than doubled the number of updates
per day and we will continue to increase our bandwidth and the speed of
our updates.
* We have more than tripled our staff to improve our monitoring,
support, and rule generation
Dear Pete,
Thank you for the beautifully-written and very informative treatise on how
the spammers operate. The time you put into the writing is greatly
appreciated. We also appreciate the work and research you are doing to
combat the Blackhats!
On another subject, this weekend we are
Pete,
What do we need to do up increase our rulebase strength
I dont know if its just a larger amount of
spam messages in general or a larger % of them getting through but I have
customers complaining
Thanks
Dodd
_M,
_M said will create a default installation that emits headers and puts
a .cf file in place for SA to interpret them.
Not sure if this is relevant to your thought process, but we feel that SA
(SpamAssassin) does more harm than good. Under moderate loads it bogs-down
MDaemon so we always have
Dear Darin,
Thanks for the heads up. It's going to take me about
45 minutes to check the 9000 messages that were blocked by Sniffer last night,
but I'll let you know if we experienced the same thing.
Michael SteinComputer House
www.computerhouse.com
- Original Message -
For what it's worth, we have not see a major increase in spam this week
either. Things seem pretty normal.
We did recently upgrade to the Pro version of Declude Junkmail, and now it
is much easier to block mail from certain countries (like .cz .ru etc.) as
well as header and subject content,
Hi Pete,
I don't believe that I received an answer to my question (below)
Thank you.
Dear Pete,
Are we ready to switch to the POP method of submitting spam, or are we
waiting for an official announcement/instructions from you?
Mike Stein
Computer House
www.computerhouse.com
This
Dear Pete,
Are we ready to switch to the POP method of submitting spam, or are we
waiting for an official announcement/instructions from you?
Mike Stein
Computer House
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Darin Cox sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Tuesday,
Dear Pete,
We had to reinstall Imail, and now I am not seeing any more TMP files in the
spool folder. Everything seems to be working OK, but I miss those sweet
little TMP files. Should I be concerned? What may have changed?
Thank you,
Michael Stein
Computer House
This E-Mail came from
Sheldon,
Saturday, June 4, 2005 you wrote:
The SquirrelMail web interface is not bad although it is PHP 4.
The web admin interface is pretty good, too, and can be php 5.
SK Does this really matter for us non programmers?
It does actually. Just make sure to install the PHP 4 version
Hi Joe,
Yeah, we had talked about buying the low cost Declude Virus/JM
versions and then letting Sniffer hook into those as well as then
hooking with SmarterMail...
That's an option for you too.
-jason
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 7:02:30 PM, you
Joe,
Wednesday, June 1, 2005 you wrote:
JW If there's a better option than SmarterMail I'd love to hear it,
JW but I can't compare a $4000+ server to a $600 one.
hMailServer is free and open source.
Once I finish the script work for calling Sniffer and the
work-around for ClamDscan
Dear Pete,
Does anyone look atthe mail that is forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED], or is it a 100%
automatic process?
Thank you,
Michael SteinComputer House[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.computerhouse.com
What's going on over there?
Our FTP process has been failing since yesterday
afternoon, and when I go to the main website it prompts me for an ID and
PW.
Darin.
Looks fine now. I couldn't get there earlier this morning through two
different ISPs, though, and updates from 7pm last night through this morning
failed. Maybe a temporary routing or DNS issue.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Hosting Support
Whew! Just got done forwarding 90 false positives to mail clients. Sure
glad you caught it!
Michael Stein
Computer House
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:27 AM
Subject: [sniffer] Rule 353039 -
Mail from Comcast is still getting caught, even with the panic rule in
place. Any suggestions?
Mike Stein
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net
See my message below...restart your Sniffer service and it should work.
Matt
Computer House Support wrote:
Mail from Comcast is still getting caught, even with the panic rule in
place. Any suggestions?
Mike Stein
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer
Shame on you for being on the road... you should know better than to leave
your machines alone...you never know what trouble they might get into while
you're gone grin.
I was out for 2 hours over lunch today, and sure enough, IIS stops
responding on one of our hosting servers right after I leave.
Tip for MDaemon plug-in users.
Sniffers .cfg file has an option 'not' to scan files larger than 'X'. If
this option is set than no sniffer headers will be placed into the message
(if the message is larger than 'X').
Beware, if you use MD's Content Filter to instruct where to send messages
based
. These efforts are usually reserved for larger
systems such as small ISPs and filtering service providers.
As always we want to support any third party efforts to provide
automation tools also. So far we haven't seen much in the way of GUI
automation, probably for the same reasons we haven't tackled
Hi Steve,
You wrote:
We are going to be moving to another mail package (you know why)...
I would very much like to hear your comments about Imail and any
difficulties you've encountered and why you feel the need to switch. You
can write to me offline if you'd prefer.
Thank you,
Michael
Dear Pete,
Our rulebase file grew from 11 meg to 17.5 meg since the last download a few
hours ago. Is this right?
Michael Stein
Computer House
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
Correction, make that 23 meg!
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Computer House Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 12:33 AM
Subject: [sniffer] RuleBase ktk82hrr
Dear Pete,
Our rulebase file grew from 11 meg to 17.5 meg since
Katie,
Take a copy of the failed message and submit it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with your lcinese base ID and they will tell you why it failed and setup a
whiterule to prevent it from being tagged in the future.
Darrell
be made relatively easily in
java/perl/whatever.
I asked MDaemon support about possible import
tools, and they suggested using a pop retrieval program on the individual
mailboxes. Unfortunately that solution falls short in a few areas for
us.
1. For a large number of mailboxes
Hello Sniffer folks,
Want to know why I have not renewed my Ipswitch Support Agreement?
Here is their response to a serious bug that I reported. (Which has yet to
be fixed).
Mike,
Our Development Team has looked into this issue and has verified it as a
defect that was introduced in Imail
John Tolmachoff wrote: What is the bug?
The bug in Imail was that the Control Panel for the Mail-to-Fax feature
stopped functioning properly.
We are heavy users of Mail-to-Fax, and the loss of the ability to work with
the fax spool files has made things difficult for us.
Mike Stein
This
Yes, I would also like to know how you generated that nice
spam report.
Michael SteinComputer Housewww.computerhouse.com
- Original Message -
From:
Herb Guenther
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 11:46
AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] spam leakage
up
Are there step-by-step upgrade instructions posted anywhere? Our
configuration is Windows 2000 server with Declude. I don't quite understand
what needs to be done to enable the Persistent Instance option.
Thank you,
Michael Stein
Computer House
www.computerhouse.com
609 652-3222
This E-Mail
I am not sure that I have received any emails today about any updates
either. Is there something wrong with the emailing out of updates?
Sincerely,
Grant Griffith
EI8HT LEGS Enhanced Web Management
http://www.getafreewebsite.com
877-483-3393
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have also seen some slow downloads here, but we are currently on a 256k
connection from CoreComm/Voyager, but we are updating to a full T1 in the
next couple of weeks thru someone different.
03/26/04 10:20:37 Fast traceroute sortmonster.com
Trace sortmonster.com (216.88.37.62) ...
1
20040324200117 De90c923a00284b5b.SMD 422 0 ERROR_BAD_MATRIX 71
0
0
What is a Bad Matrix?
Sheldon
Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications 360-457-9023
Nationwide access, neighborhood support!
Whenever you find yourself
Hello All,
I am running Sniffer with Declude and was wanting to get some ideas on how
everyone has Declude setup. Currently I just have the basic setup as
follows.
SNIFFER external nonzero d:\imail\declude\sniffer2_2\winx\snifferprog.exe
sniffer auth 10 0
I hold anything with a weight of 10m
96 matches
Mail list logo
