Hi Med,
See comments inline:
Med: This is why I asked for a big picture view rather than a single solution.
Please refer to my previous messages, I included links to
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-miles-behave-l2nat-00 or
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-dual-stack-extra-lite-00 for
Hi Yiu,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Lee, Yiu [mailto:yiu_...@cable.comcast.com]
Envoyé : mardi 18 mai 2010 21:58
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed NCPI/NAD/TIP; Sri Gundavelli
Cc : softwires@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
Hi Med
Hi Yiu,
Hi Ahmad,
I am not a MIP expert. Please forgive me if I am
wrong.
This draft merely specifies that the gateway is the B4 element and
describes
how a CID can be constructed to tunnel the packets to AFTR. That's
it. The
draft didn't alter the MH. If the MH decides to use CMIP,
[mailto:yiu_...@cable.comcast.com]
Envoyé : mardi 18 mai 2010 03:07
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed NCPI/NAD/TIP; Sri Gundavelli
Cc : softwires@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
Hi Med,
Med: If the network is IPv6-only (likely the major base of UEs would be
IPv6-enabled, right
Hi Yiu,
-Original Message-
Since Sri is one of the author of RFC5213, I will let him explain the
details.
[Ahmad]
Good idea. Thanks!
Cheers,
Yiu
___
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
Hi folks,
just a minor non-technical remark.
We all know that there are lots of mobile operators out there, each with a
special network infrastructure and a special IPv6 integration/migration
strategy. From that perspective it seems logical that we will never find the
global-galatctical all
]
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Mai 2010 14:45
An: Bonneß, Olaf; mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Betreff: RE: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
Hi Olaf,
Please see inline.
-Original Message-
From: softwires-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:softwires-boun
: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
Hi Mohamed:
Sorry for the late response. We were not inclined to take the draft adoption
call to a discussion thread and hence the silence. Please see below.
You asked number of questions and all of those points were analyzed during
the IPv6 migration
Hi Mohamed,
Please see inline.
Med: Since the request come from 3GPP, the applicability of the solution
SHOULD NOT be beyond that scope. Furthermore, the draft should at least
provide a background on the main recommendations of 3GPP SI: DS and IPv6-only
and that the proposal can be used
Re-,
Please see inline.
Cheers;
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Sri Gundavelli [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 12 mai 2010 09:12
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed NCPI/NAD/TIP
Cc : softwires@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
Hi Mohamed,
Please see
Hi Behcet,
Please see inline.
Regards,
Ahmad
- Original Message
From: Ahmad Muhanna ahmad.muha...@ericsson.com
To: Alain Durand adur...@juniper.net
Cc: softwires@ietf.org softwires@ietf.org
Sent: Tue, May 11, 2010 9:49:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working
@ietf.org; BINET David NCPI/NAD/TIP
Subject: Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
Hi Joel,
On 5/11/10 3:25 PM, Joel M. Halpern j...@joelhalpern.com wrote:
I am somewhat confused by this description.
You seem to be saying that the primary need for gi-ds-lite
is mobile
: Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
Hi Joel,
On 5/11/10 3:25 PM, Joel M. Halpern j...@joelhalpern.com wrote:
I am somewhat confused by this description.
You seem to be saying that the primary need for gi-ds-lite
is mobile.
But the MIP related working groups don't seem
Dear Alain, all,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Alain Durand [mailto:adur...@juniper.net]
Envoyé : vendredi 7 mai 2010 18:19
À : Behcet Sarikaya
Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed NCPI/NAD/TIP; softwires@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item
10, 2010 1:37:12 AM
Subject: RE: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
Dear Alain, all,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Alain Durand [mailto:adur...@juniper.net]
Envoyé : vendredi 7 mai 2010 18:19
À : Behcet Sarikaya
Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed NCPI/NAD/TIP
Hi Alain all,
I support to adopt this a WG item. I believe 3GPP is also expecting to
see it progress.
Regards,
--
Hidetoshi
Dear WG,
At the 3GPP-IETF interim meeting, there was strong interest in GI
DS-lite, and
the recommendation was the IETF should take on its standardization.
There was
On May 7, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
(c) N:1
model: a single CGN serve a group of PGW/GGSN. Indeed, having +16M of
customers
is a valid case. **BUT** which Service Provider will accept to service this
huge
amount of UEs with the same node (if we suppose that a mega
I support to adopt this as a WG item. This is also required for the IPv6
migration work currently underway in 3GPP.
Thanks,
Parviz
___
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
(c) N:1
model: a single CGN serve a group of PGW/GGSN. Indeed,
having +16M of customers
is a valid case. **BUT** which Service
Provider will accept to service this huge
amount of UEs with the
same node (if we suppose that a mega centralised CGN
implementation
is found in the
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2010 23:57
An: softwires@ietf.org
Betreff: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
Dear WG,
At the 3GPP-IETF interim meeting, there was strong interest
in GI DS-lite, and the recommendation was the IETF should
take on its standardization. There was similar
-DS-lite draft.
B. R.
Tina
http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html
- Original Message -
From: olaf.bonn...@telekom.de
To: adur...@juniper.net
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
I'm in favor of adopting
;softwires-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:
href=mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org;softwires-boun...@ietf.org] Im
Auftrag von Alain Durand
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2010 23:57
An: href=mailto:softwires@ietf.org;softwires@ietf.org
Betreff:
[Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
Dear WG
I support to adopt this a WG item.
On 5/5/10 5:57 PM, Alain Durand adur...@juniper.net wrote:
Dear WG,
At the 3GPP-IETF interim meeting, there was strong interest in GI DS-lite, and
the recommendation was the IETF should take on its standardization. There was
similar interest shown during
Alain Durand
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2010 23:57
An: softwires@ietf.org
Betreff: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
Dear WG,
At the 3GPP-IETF interim meeting, there was strong interest
in GI DS-lite, and the recommendation was the IETF should
take on its standardization
2010 23:57
À : softwires@ietf.org
Objet : [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
Dear WG,
At the 3GPP-IETF interim meeting, there was strong interest in GI DS-lite,
and the recommendation was the IETF should take on its standardization. There
was similar interest shown during
Dear WG,
At the 3GPP-IETF interim meeting, there was strong interest in GI DS-lite, and
the recommendation was the IETF should take on its standardization. There was
similar interest shown during the last IETF meeting and an informal show of
hands demonstrated large support to take GI DS-lite
26 matches
Mail list logo
