Hi,
I believe the way to go is through ZooKeeper[1], not property files or local
hacks. We've already started on this route and it makes sense to let ZK do what
it is designed for, such as leader election. When a node starts up, it asks ZK
what role it should have and fetches corresponding
A fuzzy query foo~ defaults to a similarity of 0.5, i.e. equal to foo~0.5
just as an FYI, this isn't true in trunk (4.0) any more.
the defaults are changed so that it never enumerates the entire
dictionary (slow) like before, see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2667
so,
Hi,
I have a case where I use DisMax pf to boost on phrase match in a field. I
use omitNorms=true to avoid length normalization to mess with my scores.
However, for some documents, the phrase foo bar occur more than one time in
the same field, and I get an unintended TF boost for one of them
Hi,
A fuzzy query foo~ defaults to a similarity of 0.5, i.e. equal to foo~0.5
I want to set the default to 0.8 so that if a user enters the query foo~ it
euqals to foo~0.8
Have not seen a way to do this in Solr. A param fuzzy.minSim=0.8 would do the
trick. Anything like this, or shall I open
Hi,
I made a MappingUpdateRequestHandler which lets you map country codes to full
country names with a config file. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2151
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 3. des. 2010, at 00.03, Adam Estrada wrote:
I can't see a way to do it without functionqueries at the moment, which
doesn't mean there isn't any.
If you want to use the suggested sort method, you could probably sort first by
score:
sort=score desc, num_copies desc, num_comments desc
To let the score be influenced by exact author match
You can also configure your logging framework to output the relevant logs to a
separate file:
log4j.logger.org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore=INFO, A1
This way you'll avoid too much noise from other componets, but you'll get all
update and admin requests as well, so you'll have to filter on core
Check out for instance www.twigkit.com which is a light-weight middleware (as
well as GUI framework) for Solr. It could speed up development time
considerably for your project. It has hooks to transform queries before they
are sent to Solr and process responses before displaying, if needed.
--
interesting.
Regards,
Lukas
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent
jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Check out for instance www.twigkit.com which is a light-weight middleware
(as well as GUI framework) for Solr. It could speed up development time
considerably for your project
Also this
http://search-lucene.com/m/hBnHH1Q4NVb2
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 15. nov. 2010, at 23.21, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
I've got a document with a type
field. If the type is 1, I want to boost the
document's relevancy, but type=1 is not a
Fixed the Wiki.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 12. nov. 2010, at 03.44, Deche Pangestu wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know where to download solr4.0 source?
I tried downloading from this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FrontPage#solr_development
Hi,
Added a link to the wiki to the latest stable 1.4 branch that will become
1.4.2. You should checkout and build this branch if you have a requirement to
use only a released version. 1.4.2 only contains critical bug fixes over 1.4.1
and is considered stable.
See here for a clarification of
Yes, the project is not good enough at communicating the roadmap clearly. We
often hide behind the fact that nobody knows since it's open source, but I
think the PMC would benefit from trying to maintain some sort of no-guarantee
roadmap clarifying to all what most people think will happen
Hi,
If your index is supposed to handle only public information, i.e. public RSS
feeds, then I don't see a need for multiple cores.
I would probably try to handle this on the query side only. Imagine this
scenario:
User A registers RSS-X and RSS-Y (the application starts pulling and indexing
, and you also get the benefit of transferring a smaller index
across the network.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 8. nov. 2010, at 23.50, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent
jan@cominvent.com
Cool, thanks for the clarification, Shalin.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 9. nov. 2010, at 15.12, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent
jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Not sure about that. I have
Note that using many facet.query= parameters may be expensive.
Another way to solve this is to pre-compute the ranges as plain strings in
another field during indexing.
This can be done in your app prior to indexing or by creating a new FieldType
for your range. Here's a field type that computes
How about hooking in Andrzej's pruning tool at the postCommit event, literally
removing unused fields. I believe a commit is fired on the slave by itself
after every successful replication, to put the index live. You could execute a
script which prunes away the dead meat and then call a new
How does the exclude=true option in elevate.xml perform with large number of
excludes?
Then you could have a separate elevate config for that client.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 3. nov. 2010, at 20.11, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010
Hi,
I think I have seen a comment on the list from someone with the same need a few
months ago.
He planned to make a new fieldType to support this, e.g. MinMaxRangeFieldType
which would
be a polyField type holding both a min and max value, and then you could query
it
q=myminmaxfield:123
I did
Hi,
I would aim for reindexing on branch3_x, which will be the 3.1 release soon. I
don't know if SOLR-1873 applies cleanly to 3_x now, but it would surely be less
effort to have it apply to 3_x than to 1.4. Perhaps you can help backport the
patch to 3_x?
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution
Hi,
You need to share relevant parts of your schema for us to be able to see what's
going on.
Try using fieldType=text. Basically, you need a fieldType which has the
lowercaseFilter included.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 25. okt. 2010, at
Do you want to use a field's content do decide whether the document should be
indexed or not?
You could write an UpdateProcessor for that, simply aborting the chain for the
docs that don't pass your test.
@Override
public void processAdd(AddUpdateCommand cmd) throws IOException {
Answering my own question:
The pf feature only kicks in with multi term q param. In my case I used a
field tokenized by KeywordTokenizer, hence pf never kicked in.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 14. okt. 2010, at 13.29, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent
You never get full control of commits, as Solr will auto-commit anyway whenever
the (configurable) input buffer is full. With the current architecture you
cannot really trust adds or commits to 100% certainly be successful, because
the server may have been restarted between an add and commit()
Juggling disk volumes does not sound like a logical responsibility for Solr to
me. Solr/Lucene expects to have enough room to live in.
Better to push this down to the OS level. There are all kinds of logical volume
managers around which lets you add new disks to the same logical volume,
Why don't you simply index the source content which you used to build index2
into index1, i.e. have your tool index to both? You won't save anything on
trying to extract that content from an existing index. But of course, you COULD
write yourself a tool which extracts all stored fields for all
Hi,
In an online bookstore project I'm working on, most frontend widgets are search
driven. Most often they query with some filters and a sort order, such as
availabledate desc or simply by score.
However, to allow editorial control, some widgets will display a fixed list of
books, defined as
Hi,
Have applied SOLR-1553 to 1.4.2 and it works great.
However, I can't get the pf param to work. Example:
q=foo barqf=title^2.0 body^0.5pf=title^50.0
Shouldn't I see the phrase query boost in debugQuery? Currently I see no trace
of pf being used.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jan
Høydahl / Cominvent
jan@cominvent.com
wrote:
I'm pretty sure the 2nd phase to fetch doc-summaries
goes directly to same server as first phase. But what if you
stick a LB in between?
A related point - the load balancing implementation that's
part
This is what FAST does in ESP. When a new version of a partition is built, it
is staged in its own process and co-exists alongside the old one. The
query-dispatcher sees both and routes traffic based on requested generation
id.
Should probably not invest in such a feature until there's a clear
This is a different issue. You are seeing the latency between master index
update and replication to slave(s).
Solve this by pointing your monitoring script directly to slave instead of
master.
What this thread is about is a potential difference in state during the
execution of a single
Hi,
I would advise you to get involved in the SolrCloud initiative (see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud) and start designing a native indexing
distributor component.
I envision something like an integration in UpdateHandler which knows about all
collections and shards from ZK config,
Correct. You get back what you push in.
Of course if your index is for users in one time zone only, you may insert the
local time to Solr, and everything will work well. However, if you operate an
index with international users, you'd want to make sure you convert to/from UTC
in your
Hi,
The first thing I would try is to go to the analysis page, enter your test
data, and report back what each analysis stage prints out:
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/analysis.jsp
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 8. okt. 2010, at 14.19,
There is a ticket for this request:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1980
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 5. okt. 2010, at 08.39, Maddy.Jsh wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 documents with following values.
Doc1
Subject: Weekly transport
I think the parameter name is confusing. I have proposed renaming it to
processor.chain:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2105
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 30. sep. 2010, at 22.25, Markus Jelsma wrote:
Almost, you can define a
. 2010, at 10.44, Mike Thomsen wrote:
Interesting. So what you are saying, though, is that at the moment it
is NOT there?
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent
jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Solr will match this in version 3.1 which is the next major release.
Read this page
Hi,
Have anyone written any conditional functions yet for use in Function Queries?
I see the use for a function which can run different sub functions depending on
the value of a field.
Say you have three documents:
A: title=Sports car, color=red
B: title=Boring car, color=green
B: title=Big
Ok, I created the issues:
IF function: SOLR-2136
AND, OR, NOT: SOLR-2137
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 28. sep. 2010, at 19.36, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent
jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Have
Solr will match this in version 3.1 which is the next major release.
Read this page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud for feature descriptions
Coming to a trunk near you - see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1873
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS -
:-)
Also, that Wiki page clearly states in the very first line that it talks about
uncommitted stuff Solr4.0. I think that is pretty clear.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 22. sep. 2010, at 03.31, Lance Norskog wrote:
Developers, like marketers,
See this thread: http://search-lucene.com/m/FgbDS1JL3J1
Basically, what we normally do is to rename the fields with a language suffix,
so if you have language=en and text=A red fox, then you would index it as
text_en=A red fox. You would either have to do this outside Solr or write an
Hi Tommaso,
Really cool what you've done. Looking forward to testing it, and I'm sure it's
a welcome contribution to Solr.
You can easily contribute your code by opening a JIRA issue and attaching a
patch file.
BTW
Have you considered making the output field names configurable on a per
Hi,
You could simply create an autocomplete Solr Core with a simple schema
consisting of id, from, to:
Let the fieldType of from be String, and in the fieldType of to you can use
StandardTokenizer, WordDelimiterFilter and EdgeNGramFilter.
add
doc
field
Hi,
May you show us what result you actually get? Wouldn't it make more sense to
choose a numeric fieldtype? To get proper sort order of numbers in a string
field, all number need to be exactly same length since order will be
lexiographical, i.e. 10 will come before 2, but after 02.
--
Jan
As Erick points out, you don't want a random doc as response!
What you're looking at is how to avoid the 0 hits problem.
You could look into one of these:
* Introduce autosuggest to avoid many 0-hits cases
* Introduce spellchecking
* Re-run the failed query with fuzzy turned on (e.g. alpha~)
*
Just attended a talk at JavaZone (www.javazone.no) by Stephen Colebourne about
JSR-310 which will make these kind of operations easier in future JDK, and how
Joda-Time goes a great way of enabling it today. I'm not saying it would fix
your GAP issue, as it's all about what definition of month
there's a lull.
Thank you, - Scott
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent
jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Hi,
This smells like a job for Hadoop and perhaps Mahout, unless your use cases
are totally ad-hoc research.
After Nutch has fetched the sites, kick off some MapReduce
)
*
-Original Message-
From: Jan Høydahl / Cominvent [mailto:jan@cominvent.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 2:15 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to deal with virtual collection in solr?
Hi,
If you have multiple cores defined in your solr.xml you need to issue
Hi,
This smells like a job for Hadoop and perhaps Mahout, unless your use cases are
totally ad-hoc research.
After Nutch has fetched the sites, kick off some MapReduce jobs for each case
you wish to study:
1. Extract phrases/contexts
2. For each context, perform detection and whitelisting
3. In
?literal.collection=aaprivateliteral.id=doc1commit=true;
-F fi...@myfile.xml
Thanks so much as always!
Xiaohui
-Original Message-
From: Jan Høydahl / Cominvent [mailto:jan@cominvent.com]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 7:42 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to deal
(CompositeParser.java:119)
... 24 more
/pre
pRequestURI=/solr/lhcpdf/update/extract/ppismalla href=
http://jetty.mortbay.org/;Powered by Jetty:///a/small/i/pbr/
br/
***
-Original Message-
From: Jan Høydahl / Cominvent [mailto:jan@cominvent.com
Yes, this is really a pain sometimes.
I'd prefer a well defined base path, which could be assumed everywhere unless
otherwise documented.
SolrHome is one natural choice. For backward compat we could add a config in
solr(config).xml to easily switch to old behaviour.
Also, it makes sense to
1. Currently we use Verity and have more than 20 collections, each collection
has a index for public items and a index for private items. So there are
virtual collections which point to each collection and a virtual collection
which points to all. For example, we have AA and BB collections.
Hi,
Try a wildcard term with lower score:
q=title:work AND title:work*debugQuery=true
You will now see from the debug printout that you get an extra boost for
workload.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Training in Europe - www.solrtraining.com
On 22.
Check out the luke request handler:
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/luke?fl=my_ad_fieldnumTerms=100 - you'll find
topTerms for the fields specified
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Training in Europe - www.solrtraining.com
On 20. aug. 2010, at 11.39,
Yes, I forgot that strings support alphanumeric ranges.
However, they will potentially be very memory intensive since you dont get the
trie-optimization and since strings take up more space than ints. Only way is
to try it out.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS -
Høydahl / Cominvent jan@cominvent.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: 18/08/2010 23:16
Subject: Re: Missing tokens
Cannot see anything obvious...
Try
http://localhost/solr/select?q=contents:OB10*
http://localhost/solr/select?q=contents:OB 10
http://localhost/solr
It is crucial to MEASURE your system to confirm your bottleneck.
I agree that you are very likely to be disk I/O bound with such little
memory left for the OS, a large index and many terms in each query.
Have your IT guys do some monitoring on your disks and log this while
under load. Then you
Hi,
You can place Solr wherever you want, but if your data is veery large, you'd
want dedicated box.
Have a look at DIH (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler). It can both
crawl a file share periodically, indexing only files changed since a timestamp
(can be e.g. NOW-1HOUR) and
You can use the map() function for this, see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#map
q=a
foxdefType=dismaxqf=allfieldsbf=map(query($qq),0,0,0,100.0)qq=allfields:(quick
AND brown AND fence)
This adds a constant boost of 100.0 if the $qq field returns a non-zero score,
which it does
If you want to change the schema on the live index, make sure you do a
compatible change, as Solr does not do any type checking or schema change
validation.
I would ADD a field with another name for the tint field.
Unfortunately you have to re-index to have an index built on this field.
May I
Hi,
Can you share with us how your schema looks for this field? What FieldType?
What tokenizer and analyser?
How do you parse the PDF document? Before submitting to Solr? With what tool?
How do you do the query? Do you get the same results when doing the query from
a browser, not SolrJ?
--
Jan
Some questions:
a) What operating system?
b) What Java container (Tomcat/Jetty)
c) What JAVA_OPTIONS? I.e. memory, garbage collection etc.
d) Example queries? I.e. what features, how many facets, sort fields etc
e) How do you load balance queries between the slaves?
f) What is your search latency
Hi,
I'm afraid you'll have to post the full document again, then do a commit.
But it WILL be lightning fast, as it is only the updated document which is
indexed, all the other existing documents will not be re-indexed.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Use a tool to download a site to local disk, and ship the resulting HTML as a
folder or ZIP.
If that is not good enough, consider shipping the Reference Guide by
LucidImagination. It is one PDF and contains most of what you need. The
customer may be confused by LucidWorks specific chapters but
Hi,
Yes, this is normal behavior. This is because Solr is *document* based, it does
not know about *files*.
What happens here is that your source database (or whatever) has had deletinons
within this category in addition to updates, and you need to relay those to
Solr.
The best way to
Hi,
Which time zone are you located in? Do you have DST?
Solr uses UTC internally for dates, which means that NOW will be the time in
London right now :) Does that appear to be right 4 u?
Also see this thread: http://search-lucene.com/m/hqBed2jhu2e2/
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Hi,
Make sure you use a proper ID field, which does *not* change even if the
content in the database changes. In this way, when your delta-import fetches
changed rows to index, they will update the existing rows in your index.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS -
=mount OR mount* have different sorting order with q=mount for those
documents including mount.
Change to q=mount^100 OR (mount?* -mount)^1.0, and test well.
Thanks very much!
2010/8/10 Jan Høydahl / Cominvent jan@cominvent.com
Hi,
You don't need to duplicate the content into two
Have a look at www.splunk.com
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Training in Europe - www.solrtraining.com
On 11. aug. 2010, at 19.34, Jay Flattery wrote:
Hi there,
Just wondering what tools people use to analyse SOLR log files.
We're looking to
Your syntax looks a bit funny.
Which version of Solr are you using? Pure negative queries are not supported,
try q=(*:* -title:janitor) instead.
Also, for debugging what's going on, please add debugQuery=true and share the
parsed query for both cases with us.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution
Hi,
You can try Tika command line to parse your Excel file, then you will se the
exact textual output from it, which will be indexed into Solr, and thus inspect
whether something is missing.
Are you sure you use a version of Luke which supports your version of Lucene?
--
Jan Høydahl, search
Hi,
Try solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory.
However, in your case it looks as if you have certain requirements for
searching that requires tokenization. So you should leave the
WhitespaceTokenizer as is and create a separate field specially for the
faceting, with indexed=true, stored=false and
Hi,
You don't need to duplicate the content into two fields to achieve this. Try
this:
q=mount OR mount*
The exact match will always get higher score than the wildcard match because
wildcard matches uses constant score.
Making this work for multi term queries is a bit trickier, but something
Hi,
Beware that post.jar is just an example tool to play with the default example
index located at /solr/ namespace. It is very limited and you shold look
elsewhere for a more production ready and robust tool.
However, it has the ability to specify custom url. Please try:
java -jar post.jar
Hi,
Since EMAIL_HEADER_FROM is a String type, you need to specify the whole field
every time. Wildcards could also work, but you'll get a problem with leading
wildcards.
The solution would be to change the fieldType into a text type using e.g.
StandardTokenizerFactory - if this does not break
Check out slides 36-38 in this presentation for some hint on a possible
solution:
http://www.slideshare.net/janhoy/migrating-fast-to-solr-jan-hydahl-cominvent-as-euro-con
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Training in Europe - www.solrtraining.com
On 7.
What you are missing is a final
server.optimize();
Deleting a document will only mark it as deleted in the index until an
optimize. If disk space is a real problem in your case because you e.g. update
all docs in the index frequently, you can trigger an optimize(), say nightly.
--
Jan Høydahl,
Your use case can be solved by splitting the range into two int's:
Document: {title: My document, from: 8000, to: 9000}
Query: q=title:My AND (from:[* TO 8500] AND to:[8500 TO *])
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Training in Europe - www.solrtraining.com
Another way is to use DisMax parser, and give it a qf=field1 field2 field3...
parameter, and it will automatically search in all fields specified. It is more
powerful than having one default field, and saves that disk space. Buy you
sacrifice some extra resources during querying.
--
Jan
The Char-filters MUST come before the Tokenizer, due to their nature of
processing the character-stream and not the tokens.
If you need to apply the accent normalizatino later in the analysis chain,
either use ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory or help with the implementation of
SOLR-1978.
--
Jan
Hi,
SolrJ uses slf4j logging. As you can read on the wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj#Solr_1.4 you need to provide the slf4j-jdk14
binding (or any other log framework you wish to bind to) yourself and add the
jar to your classpath.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS
Hi,
I would rather go for the boolean variant and spend some time writing a query
parser which tries to understand all kinds of input people may make, mapping it
into boolean filters. In this way you can support both navigation and search
and keep both in sync whatever people prefert to start
Hi,
I think I would look at a hybrid approach, where you keep adding new synonyms
to a query-side qynonym dictionary for immediate effect. And then every now and
then or every Nth night you move those synonyms over to the index-side
dictionary and trigger a full reindex.
A nice side effect of
Have you had a look at www.twigkit.com ? Could be worth the bucks...
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Training in Europe - www.solrtraining.com
On 1. juli 2010, at 00.59, Peter Spam wrote:
Wow, thanks Lance - it's really fast now!
The last piece of
Hi,
I have chosen the same approach as you, indexing content into text_language
fields with custom analysis, and it works great. Solr does not have any
overhead with this even if there are hundreds of languages, due to the
schema-less nature of Lucene.
And if you know which language is being
Hi,
I had the impression that the StreamingUpateSolrServer in SolrJ would
automatically use the /update/javabin UpdateRequestHandler. Is this not true?
Do we need to call
server.setRequestWriter(new BinaryRequestWriter()) for it to transmit content
with the binary protocol?
--
Jan Høydahl,
Hi,
Check out the new eDisMax handler (src) and the new pf2 parameter. Also
available as path SOLR-1553.
Another option to avoid match for doc2 is to add application specific logic in
your frontend which detects car brands and years and rewrite the query into a
phrase or a filter.
--
Jan
Hi,
You need to use HTTP POST in order to send those parameters I believe. Try with
curl:
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/update?commit=true -H Content-Type: text/xml
--data-binary deletequeryuid:6-HOST*/query/delete
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Hmm, nice one - I was not aware of that trick.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Training in Europe - www.solrtraining.com
On 30. juni 2010, at 18.41, bbarani wrote:
Hi,
I was able to sucessfully delete multiple documents using the below URL
Hi,
In DisMax the mm parameter controls whether terms are required or optional.
The default is 100% which means all terms required, i.e. you do not need to add
+. You can change to mm=0 and you will get the same behaviour as standard
parser, i.e. an OR behaviour, where the + would say that a
Hi pal :)
Unfortunately copyField works only BEFORE analysis and you cannot chain
them...
The simplest solution would be to duplicate your copyField's:
copyField source=title dest=textanayzemethod2 /
copyField source=body dest=textanayzemethod2 /
copyField source=title dest=textanayzemethod1
AS - www.cominvent.com
Training in Europe - www.solrtraining.com
On 29. juni 2010, at 14.02, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 29.06.2010, at 13:38, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 29.06.2010, at 13:24, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent wrote:
Hi,
In DisMax the mm parameter controls whether terms are required
Hi,
You might also want to check out the new Lucene-Hunspell stemmer at
http://code.google.com/p/lucene-hunspell/
It uses OpenOffice dictionaries with known stems in combination with a large
set of language specific rules.
It handles your example, but it is an early release, so test it
Hi,
Sometimes I do both. I put the defaults in solrconfig.xml and thus have one
place to define all kind of low-level default settings.
But then I make a possibility in the application space to add/override any
parameters as well. This gives you great flexibility to let server
administrators
Or simply use add(), because setParam overrides existing hashMap key:
solrQuery.setParam(stats.facet, fieldA);
solrQuery.add(stats.facet, fieldB);
solrQuery.add(stats.facet, fieldC);
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Training in Europe -
Hi,
Is there a token filter which do the same job as MappingCharFilterFactory but
after tokenizer, reading the same config file?
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Training in Europe - www.solrtraining.com
Standard DisMax does not fully support explicit AND/OR.
You can prove that by trying to say q=fuel+OR+cell and see that the score stays
the same (given mm=100%)
It appears that DisMax does SOME intelligent handling of AND/OR/NOT, because it
adds the + on the AND and a - on the NOT. But adding a
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
