Hi All,
I have a cluster that has the overseer leader gone. This is on Solr 4.10.3
version.
Its completely gone from zookeeper and bouncing any instance does not start a
new election process.
Anyone experience this issue before and any ideas to fix this.
Thanks,
Rishi.
rename and deletion of the
directories fails. If so we could monitor our logs to get a better idea for
the root cause. At present we can only react when things go wrong based on
disk space alarms.
Thanks,
Rishi.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multiple-index
of
assumptions which should usually hold good,
you can still come up with a
mechanism to drop existing files, but those
won't hold good in case of serious
issues with the cloud, you could end up
losing data. That's worse than using a
bit more disk space!
On 4 May 2015 11:56, Rishi Easwaran
rishi.easwa
Hi All,
Aol is hosting a meetup in Dulles VA. The topic this time is Solr/ Solr Cloud.
http://www.meetup.com/Code-Brew/events/53217/
Thanks,
Rishi.
are left with it is to clean up
the entire index to free up disk space, and allow a replica to sync from
scratch.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tue, May 5, 2015 10:55 am
Subject: Re: Multiple
Sadly with the size of our complex, spiting and adding more HW is not a viable
long term solution.
I guess the options we have are to run optimize regularly and/or become
aggressive in our merges proactively even before solr cloud gets into this
situation.
Thanks,
Rishi
it delete the old information and
replicate from scratch, not requiring more disk space.
Is the concern data loss (a case when both leader and follower lose data)?.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
To: solr-user solr-user
.
But what I am talking about is copy of a whole index as is into a new
directory. The new directory has no relation to the older index directory or
its segments, so not sure what merges are going on across directories/indexes,
and why solr needs the older index.
Thanks,
Rishi
by the replica.
I was searching around for optimize behaviour of solr cloud and could not find
much information.
Does anyone have experience running optimize for solr cloud in a loaded
production env?
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org
recovering.
Usually this requires a manual intervention of bouncing the instance and
wiping the disk clean to allow for a clean recovery.
Any ideas on how to prevent solr from creating multiple copies of index
directory.
Thanks,
Rishi.
space
usage may peak to 2x-3x of it's normal size until optimization
completes.
Is it a problem? Not if optimization occurs over shards serially and
your
index is broken to many small shards.
On Apr 18, 2015 1:54 AM, Rishi
Easwaran rishi.easwa...@aol.com wrote:
Thanks Shawn for the quick
reply
factor
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Mon, Apr 20, 2015 11:25 am
Subject: Re: Solr Cloud reclaiming disk space from deleted documents
On 4/20/2015 8:44 AM, Rishi Easwaran wrote:
Yeah I noticed
=maxMergeCount15/int
/mergeScheduler
ramBufferSizeMB64/ramBufferSizeMB
/indexConfig
Any suggestions on which which tunable to adjust, mergeFactor, mergeScheduler
thread counts etc would be great.
Thanks,
Rishi.
Thanks Shawn for the quick reply.
Our indexes are running on SSD, so 3 should be ok.
Any recommendation on bumping it up?
I guess will have to run optimize for entire solr cloud and see if we can
reclaim space.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey apa
.
Just one clarification, when you say ICUFilterFactory am I correct in thinking
its ICUFodingFilterFactory.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Burton-West tburt...@umich.edu
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wed, Feb 25, 2015 4:33 pm
Subject: Re: Basic
forward to trying out once its integrated to main.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Trey Grainger solrt...@gmail.com
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tue, Feb 24, 2015 1:40 am
Subject: Re: Basic Multilingual search capability
Hi Rishi,
I don't generally recommend
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the suggestions. These steps will definitely help out with our use
case.
Thanks for the idea about the lengthFilter to protect our system.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
To: solr-user solr-user
65]
0
7
1
ALNUM
1
Version 4.6
SF
text
raw_bytes
type
start
end
position
message
[6d 65 73 73 61 67 65]
ALNUM
0
7
1
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent
/How-to-implement-multilingual-word-components-fields-schema-td4157140.html#a4158923
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6492
Thanks,
Rishi.
to tokenize email addresses
(ex:he...@aol.com- i think standardTokenizer already does this), filenames
(здравствуйте.pdf), but maybe we can use filters to accomplish that.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
To: solr-user solr-user
://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Tokenizers#Tokenizers-ICUTokenizer)
This tokenizer processes multilingual text and tokenizes it appropriately
based on its script attribute.
or am I missing something?
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood wun
/UniversalLexer.jflex
From the looks of it the text is being indexed as a single token and not broken
across whitespace.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri, Feb 20, 2015 11:52 am
Subject: Re: Strange
: Strange search behaviour when upgrading to 4.10.3
On 2/20/2015 9:37 AM, Rishi Easwaran wrote:
We are trying to upgrade from Solr 4.6 to 4.10.3. When testing search 4.10.3
search results are not being returned, actually looks like only the first word
in a sentence is getting indexed.
Ex: inserting
,
Rishi.
All,
There is a tech talk on AOL Dulles campus tomorrow. Do swing by if you can and
share it with your colleagues and friends.
www.meetup.com/Code-Brew/events/192361672/
There will be free food and beer served at this event :)
Thanks,
Rishi.
@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sun, Mar 30, 2014 5:51 pm
Subject: Re: SOLR Cloud 4.6 - PERFORMANCE WARNING: Overlapping onDeckSearchers=2
On 3/30/2014 2:59 PM, Rishi Easwaran wrote:
RAM shouldn't be a problem.
I have a box with 144GB RAM, running 12 instances with 4GB Java heap each.
There are 9 instances
...@elyograg.org
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri, Mar 28, 2014 8:35 pm
Subject: Re: SOLR Cloud 4.6 - PERFORMANCE WARNING: Overlapping onDeckSearchers=2
On 3/28/2014 4:07 PM, Rishi Easwaran wrote:
Shawn,
I changed the autoSoftCommit value to 15000 (15 sec).
My index size
Hi Dmitry,
I thought auto soft commit was for NRT search (shouldn't it be optimized for
search performance), if i have to wait 10 mins how is it NRT? or am I missing
something?
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Kan solrexp...@gmail.com
To: solr-user solr-user
/
queryResultMaxDocsCached200/queryResultMaxDocsCached
I think still something is going on. I mean 15s on SSD drives is a long time to
handle a 4GB index.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri, Mar 28, 2014 3
maxDocs1/maxDocs
maxTime6/maxTime
openSearcherfalse/openSearcher
/autoCommit
autoSoftCommit
maxTime1000/maxTime
/autoSoftCommit
Any idea why its warning every second, the only config that has 1 second is
softcommit.
Thanks,
Rishi.
in, which is very small for a
server app.
One of our install script had changed.
I had to up the ulimits - -n,-u,-v and for now no other issues seen.
-Original Message-
From: Rishi Easwaran rishi.easwa...@aol.com
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tue, Jun 18, 2013 10:40
that solr community uses (preferably with jmeter),
we are write heavy so at the moment focusing on inserts only.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Yago Riveiro yago.rive...@gmail.com
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Mon, Jun 17, 2013 6:19 pm
Subject: Re: Solr Cloud
18, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Rishi Easwaran rishi.easwa...@aol.comwrote:
Shalin,
Just some thoughts.
Near Real time replication- don't we use solrCmdDistributor, which send
requests immediately to replicas with a clonedRequest, as an option can't
we achieve something similar form CloudSolrserver
at any given time should be pretty low. Why have tLogs if
all replicas on an update get the request anyway, In theory 1 replica must be
able to commit eventually.
NRT is an optional feature and probably not tied to Cloud, correct?
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Erick
the community would be great, I got some heap dumps and stack
dumps, but haven't found a smoking gun yet.
If I can provide anything else to diagnose this issue. just let me know.
Thanks,
Rishi.
Mark,
I got a few stack dumps of the instance that was stuck ssdtest-d03:8011
http://apaste.info/cofK
http://apaste.info/sv4M
http://apaste.info/cxUf
I can get dumps of others if needed.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
To: solr-user
FYI..you can ignore http4ClientExpiryService thread in the stack dump.
Its a dummy executor service, i created to test out something, unrelated to
this issue.
-Original Message-
From: Rishi Easwaran rishi.easwa...@aol.com
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Mon
of my index.
I understand from the previous discussions, that it was intended for update
durability and realtime get.
But, unless I am missing something an ability to disable it in SOLR cloud if
not needed would be good.
Thanks,
Rishi.
writes and acknowledge. durability should be
high.
Peer-Sync and Recovery - Can we achieve that merging indexes from leader as
needed, instead of replaying the transaction logs?
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com
To: solr-user solr-user
://www.linkedin.com/jobs?viewJob=jobId=6073910
If interested, send your current resume to rishi.easwa...@aol.com.
I will take it to my Director.
This position is in Dulles, VA.
Thanks,
Rishi.
and easily reproducible issue on SOLR cloud.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Yago Riveiro yago.rive...@gmail.com
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Mon, Jun 17, 2013 5:15 pm
Subject: Re: Solr Cloud Hangs consistently .
I can confirm that the deadlock
can use select?q=xyzshard.keys=uniquekey to focus your search to hit only
the shard that has your shard.key
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Joshi, Shital shital.jo...@gs.com
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org' solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wed, Jun 12, 2013 10:01 am
prevent us from creating and storing an
extra field.
Thanks,
Rishi.
,
docid).
I used the standard Solr example schema, so I used dynamic fields for the
two ids, but use your own field names.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Rishi Easwaran
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 11:12 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr Composite Unique key from
compositeId1-12345.
If I reverse the input
field name=userid12345/field
field name=docid1/field
I get the following compositeId 12345-1 .
In this case the compositeId is not unique and I am getting duplicates.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky j
in the ID should be purely dependent on the order of the field
names in the processor configuration:
str name=sourcedocid_s/str
str name=sourceuserid_s/str
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Rishi Easwaran
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 2:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
schema.xml, would
like to avoid the overhead of storing this field in my index.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tue, May 28, 2013 4:33 pm
Subject: Re: Solr Composite Unique key from existing
Sure Shalin, hopefully soon.
-Original Message-
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sat, May 18, 2013 11:35 pm
Subject: Re: Upgrading from SOLR 3.5 to 4.2.1 Results.
Awesome news Rishi! Looking forward to your
We use commodity H/W which we procured over the years as our complex grew.
Running on jdk6 with tomcat 5. (Planning to upgrade to jdk7 and tomcat7 soon).
We run them with about 4GB heap. Using CMS GC.
-Original Message-
From: adityab aditya_ba...@yahoo.com
To: solr-user
pm
Subject: Re: Upgrading from SOLR 3.5 to 4.2.1 Results.
Hi Rishi,
Have you done any tests with Solr 4.3 ?
Regards,
Cordialement,
BOUHLEL Noureddine
On 17 May 2013 21:29, Rishi Easwaran rishi.easwa...@aol.com wrote:
Hi All,
Its Friday 3:00pm, warm sunny outside and it was a good
are looking at prototyping SOLR Cloud for our search
system, upgrade java and tomcat, tune our application further. Lots of fun
stuff :)
Have a great weekend everyone.
Thanks,
Rishi.
distributed, what is the determining criteria.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tue, May 14, 2013 9:42 pm
Subject: Re: SOLR Cloud Collection Management quesiotn.
Hi Rishi,
If you have your
replicas (1 leader 1 replica) for
each shard.
Now I want to add extra replicas to each shard in my cluster without
out changing the replicationFactor used to create the collection.
Any ideas on how to go about doing that.
Thanks,
Rishi.
/solr/admin/cores?action=CREATEname=testCloud1_shard2_replica3collection=testCloud1shard=shard2collection.configName=myconf
Is there an easier way to do this.
Any ideas.
Thanks,
Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Rishi Easwaran rishi.easwa...@aol.com
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
54 matches
Mail list logo