Yes, we tried that and it worked. We removed only for query analyzer and it
is working properly now.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:24 AM Dominique Bejean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you try to remove the RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilter ?
>
> Dominique
>
> Le mar. 8 sept. 2020 à 13:52, Manish Bafna a
> écrit
Hi,
Can you try to remove the RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilter ?
Dominique
Le mar. 8 sept. 2020 à 13:52, Manish Bafna a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We are using the following configuration:
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Schema: *
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="100"
Hi,
We are using the following configuration:
--
*Schema: *
*Managed Synonyms:* "abc implement", "bike", "xyz traders", "xyz
, 2019 04:42 AM
Subject: Re: Solr edismax parser with multi-word synonyms
This is not a phrase query, rather it’s requiring either pair of words
to appear in the title.
You’ve told it that “frozen dinner” and “microwave foods” are synonyms.
So it’s looking for both the words “microwave” and “foods
;
> Another option is to write your own custom query parser and use it as a
> plugin.
>
> Hope this helps!!
>
> kshitij
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:14 AM Sunil Srinivasan wrote:
>
>>
>> I have enabled the SynonymGraphFilter
tle:miccrowave title:food
(+title:frozen +title:dinner)))"
Another option is to write your own custom query parser and use it as a
plugin.
Hope this helps!!
kshitij
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:14 AM Sunil Srinivasan wrote:
>
> I have enabled the SynonymGraphFilter in my field configurat
I have enabled the SynonymGraphFilter in my field configuration in order to
support multi-word synonyms (I am using Solr 7.6). Here is my field
configuration:
And this is my synonyms.txt file:
frozen dinner,microwave food
Scenario 1: blue shirt
Thanks Andrea for the tip. I wasn't aware of the autoGeneratePhraseQueries
option for text fields, will definitely keep it in mind.
But I question if this is related to the fix on the query parser which
essentially introduces sow parameter and if false (looks like that is the
default in Solr 7),
Hi Roy, I think you miss the autoGeneratePhraseQueries=true in the field
type definition.
I was on a slightly different use case when I met your same issue (I was
using synonyms expansion at query time) and honestly I didn't understand
why this is not the default and implicit behavior. In other
I am not using edismax (eventually I would like to get there) but I'm just
testing with standard query right now. Original posting:
I'm trying to figure out why the multi-word synonym expansion is not
working correctly (or, at least what I'm misunderstanding). Specifically,
when I test a
Also share your fieldType settings for myfield as well from your schema
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 8:00 PM Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> Aside from the screenshot issue, one thing to check: are you searching
> with defType=edismax ?
>
> As in
>
Aside from the screenshot issue, one thing to check: are you searching
with defType=edismax ?
As in
q=lcd=myfield=false=edismax
?
Also sow=false should the the default on Solr 7 and above
Doug
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 6:27 PM Roy Lim wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out why the multi-word
Yes please. That way we’ll see the whole thing.
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 7:20 PM, Roy Lim wrote:
>
> I've subscribed, shall I re-post it then via email?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
I've subscribed, shall I re-post it then via email?
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Roy,
Not sure of the point of Nabble when it strips content before passing messages
on to the mailing list. I’ve emailed them about this problem in the past but
they have done nothing about it.
Updating a post on Nabble will never make it to the mailing list. If you want
us to be able to
Thanks, updated original post. It just removed what I surrounded with the
raw text markup, I've added it back without markup. Not sure of the point
of raw text if it's always removed
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
The mail server strips pretty much all screenshots and attachments, so
I think some of the data you're trying to provide is missing from the
e-mail.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Roy Lim wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out why the multi-word synonym expansion is not working
>
I'm trying to figure out why the multi-word synonym expansion is not working
correctly. Specifically, when I test a standard query with Solr Admin it is
still splitting on whitespace.
Here is my setup:
- Solr 7.2.1
- synonym LCD => liquid crystal display
- q=myfield:LCD
- added: sow=false
-
w.sease.io
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multi-word-synonyms-tp4326863p4326998.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Cheers
-
---
Alessandro Benedetti
Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director
Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multi-word-synonyms-tp4326863p4326998.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
t; > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 11:53 AM Sanjana Sridhar <
> > > sanjana.srid...@wishabi.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone have a good solution for working with multi word
> synonyms?
> &
>
> > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 11:53 AM Sanjana Sridhar <
> > sanjana.srid...@wishabi.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Does anyone have a good solution for working with multi word synonyms?
> > I've
> > > been reading a lot about t
delimiter filter factory before
> further processing
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 11:53 AM Sanjana Sridhar <
> sanjana.srid...@wishabi.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does anyone have a good solution for working with multi word synonyms?
> I've
> >
with
spaces or just toss over to the word delimiter filter factory before
further processing
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 11:53 AM Sanjana Sridhar <
sanjana.srid...@wishabi.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone have a good solution for working with multi word synonyms? I've
>
Hello,
Does anyone have a good solution for working with multi word synonyms? I've
been reading a lot about this online and haven't really found a great
solution to it. I use the SynonymFilterFactory at index time, but words
don't really get matched to the appropriate multi word synonyms, even
Solr _does_ have a query parser that doesn't suffer from this problem --
SimpleQParser chosen as the string "simple".
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-SimpleQueryParser
In this case, see the "WHITESPACE" operator feature which can be toggled.
Configure to
Steve and Shawn, thanks for your replies/explanations!
I eagerly await the completion of the Solr JIRA ticket referenced above in
a future release. Many thanks for addressing this challenge that has had
me banging my head against my desk off and on for the last couple years!
Cliff
On Thu, Feb
Hi Cliff,
The Solr query parsers (standard/“Lucene” and e/dismax anyway) have a problem
that prevents SynonymGraphFilter from working: the text fed to your query
analyzer is first split on whitespace. So e.g. a query containing “United
States” will never match multi-word synonym “United
On 2/2/2017 7:36 AM, Cliff Dickinson wrote:
> The SynonymGraphFilter API documentation contains the following statement
> at the end:
>
> "To get fully correct positional queries when your synonym replacements are
> multiple tokens, you should instead apply synonyms using this TokenFilter
> at
I've been eagerly awaiting the release of the new SynonymGraphFilter in
Solr 6.4. We have the need to support multi-word synonyms, which were
always problematic with the old SynonymFilterFactory. I've upgraded to
Solr 6.4 and replaced the old filter with the new one, but am not seeing
d the rate of indexing you need to
maintain. Depending on your experience, you can do this even if you are new to
Solr, as you've mentioned.
-Original Message-
From: Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 10:22 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multi word syn
: Multi word synonyms
I am new with solr . How i should solve this problem ?
Can we do something at query time ?
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Vincenzo D'Amore <v.dam...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> an update, reading the article I double checked if at least one of the
gt; It's not working out of the box, sorry.
>>>>
>>>> We're using this plugin:
>>>> https://github.com/healthonnet/hon-lucene-synonyms#getting-started
>>>>
>>>> It's working nicely, but can lead to OOME when you add many synonyms
>>
.com/healthonnet/hon-lucene-synonyms#getting-started
> > >>
> > >> It's working nicely, but can lead to OOME when you add many synonyms
> > >> with multiple terms. And I'm not sure whether it#s still working with
> > >> Solr 6.0.
> > >>
> > >
t;>
> >> It's working nicely, but can lead to OOME when you add many synonyms
> >> with multiple terms. And I'm not sure whether it#s still working with
> >> Solr 6.0.
> >>
> >> -Michael
> >>
> >> Am 15.11.2016 um 10:29 schrieb Midas A:
&
hether it#s still working with
>> Solr 6.0.
>>
>> -Michael
>>
>> Am 15.11.2016 um 10:29 schrieb Midas A:
>>> - i have to use multi word synonyms at query time .
>>>
>>> Please suggest how can i do it .
>>> and let me know it whether it would be visible in debug query or not .
>>>
>>
>
l
>
> Am 15.11.2016 um 10:29 schrieb Midas A:
> > - i have to use multi word synonyms at query time .
> >
> > Please suggest how can i do it .
> > and let me know it whether it would be visible in debug query or not .
> >
>
>
--
Vincenzo D'Amore
email: v.dam...@gmail.com
skype: free.dev
mobile: +39 349 8513251
15.11.2016 um 10:29 schrieb Midas A:
> - i have to use multi word synonyms at query time .
>
> Please suggest how can i do it .
> and let me know it whether it would be visible in debug query or not .
>
- i have to use multi word synonyms at query time .
Please suggest how can i do it .
and let me know it whether it would be visible in debug query or not .
o run it within the Solr search engine."
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Bernd Fehling <
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> As Doug said,
> you should really try to build your own solution for Multi-word Synonyms
> because every need is different and you can customize
FYI everyone, I've updated the README.md to be fully up to date for Solr
6.0 and the latest plugin release.
https://github.com/healthonnet/hon-lucene-synonyms/blob/master/README.md
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:34 PM, MaryJo Sminkey wrote:
> > OK - Slapping forehead now...
> OK - Slapping forehead now... D'oh!
>
> 1.2
> Float, not int!
>
LOL, we've all been there. I'm surprised I didn't notice that myself.
MJ
;
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Sent with MailTrack
>> > > <
>> >
>> https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature=en=mjsmin...@gmail.com=22
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:39 PM, MaryJo Sminkey &
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:15 PM, John Bickerstaff
wrote:
> If I do NOT add the last line and only have the line that sets
> synonyms=true, it appears to work fine.
>
> I see the dot notation all over the sample entries in solrconfig.xml... Am
> I missing something
; > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:39 PM, MaryJo Sminkey <mjsmin...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Joe Lawson <
> > >> jlaw...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> > >>
> >
As Doug said,
you should really try to build your own solution for Multi-word Synonyms
because every need is different and you can customize it for your special
use case, like adding a Thesaurus.
http://www.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/~befehl/base/solr/InsideBase_eurovocThesaurus.html
Regards
Bernd
Am
Thanks, added my vote (which threw an error but looks like it did get
added).
MJ
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> Here's a recently created ticket that covers this issue:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9185
>
> Let's hope we see some
Here's a recently created ticket that covers this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9185
Let's hope we see some traction on it soon, as many people suffer from
this issue.
Upayavira
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016, at 09:10 PM, MaryJo Sminkey wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Joe
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Joe Lawson <
jlaw...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> The auth-phrasing-token (APT) filter is a two pronged solution that
> requires index and query time processes versus hon-lucene-synonyms (HLS)
> which is strictly a query time implementation. The primary take
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has experience using the autophrasing solution on
> the Lucidworks blog:
>
>
> https://lucidworks.com/blog/2014/07/12/solution-for-multi-term-synonyms-in-lucenesolr-using-the-auto-phrasing-tokenfilter/
>
>
The auth-phrasing-token (APT) filter is a two pronged solution
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> Honestly half the time I run into this problem, I end up creating a
> QParserPlugin because I need to do something specific. With a QParserPlugin
> I can run whatever analysis, slicing and dicing of the
Mary Jo,
Honestly half the time I run into this problem, I end up creating a
QParserPlugin because I need to do something specific. With a QParserPlugin
I can run whatever analysis, slicing and dicing of the query string to
manually construct whatever I need to
I'm sorry I wasn't more specific, I meant we were hijacking the thread with
the question, "Anyone used a different method of
handling multi-term synonyms that isn't as global?" as the original thread
was about getting synonym_edismax running.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:24 PM, MaryJo Sminkey
> MaryJo you might want to start a new thread, I think we kinda hijacked this
> one. Also if you are interested in tuning queries check out
> http://splainer.io/ and https://www.quepid.com which are interactive tools
> (both of which my company makes) to tune for search relevancy.
>
Okay I
d keyword field boosts so that
> would
> >>> influence your search as well.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Yeah I definitely will have to play with the values a bit as we want the
> >> product name matches to always appear highest, whether original or
>> influence your search as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> Yeah I definitely will have to play with the values a bit as we want the
>> product name matches to always appear highest, whether original or
>> synonyms, but I'll have to figure out how to get that result
r
> synonyms, but I'll have to figure out how to get that result without one
> word terms that have multi word synonyms getting overly boosted for a
> phrase match while still sufficiently boosting the normal phrase match
> stuff too. With the normal synonym filter I was able to just
Yeah I definitely will have to play with the values a bit as we want the
product name matches to always appear highest, whether original or
synonyms, but I'll have to figure out how to get that result without one
word terms that have multi word synonyms getting overly boosted for a
phrase mat
Yeah I thought the scale of the boosts were off as well but got caught up
verifying that the plugin was working. My colleague suggested that it could
be that because small block is a phrase that it would get a higher score in
matching because you basically get a phrase match each time which causes
Oh thanks, yeah I did miss that one field which had a parent type with the
normal synonym filter. However, that's our product SKU field so really
doesn't even come into play. I verified that none of the other fields have
a synonym filter set and even removed the productumbertext just to make
sure
>
> Advice: make sure on the schema that none of the fields your are running
> queries against do any complex query operations, especially make sure they
> aren't doing additional synonym resolution against the same file.
>
BTW. I'd do this first before messing with MM
Mary Jo.
It appears to be working correctly but you have a very complex query going
on so it can be confusing. Assuming you are using the queryParser as
provided in examples your query would look like "+sbc" when it enters the
queryParser and would look like "+((sbc)^2.0 (sb)^0.5 (small
Yes, query parameters/modifications mentioned in the readme. Beyond those
I don't have useful advice at this point
On Jun 4, 2016 10:56 PM, "MaryJo Sminkey" wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 11:47 PM, John Bickerstaff <
> j...@johnbickerstaff.com>
> wrote:
>
> > MaryJo - I'm
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 11:47 PM, John Bickerstaff
wrote:
> MaryJo - I'm on vacation but can't resist... iirc there are some very
> useful query modifications suggested in the readme on the github for the
> plugin... can't access right now.
>
I'm assuming you mean the
MaryJo - I'm on vacation but can't resist... iirc there are some very
useful query modifications suggested in the readme on the github for the
plugin... can't access right now.
You may know about them already, but if it's been a while since you looked,
those may help...
On Jun 3, 2016 12:28 PM,
On some additional tests, it looks like it's the phrase matching in
particular that is the issue, if I take that out I do seem to be getting
better results. I definitely don't want to get rid of those so need to find
a way to make them work together.
Sent with MailTrack
Okay so big thanks for the help with getting the hon_lucene_synonyms plugin
working. That is a big load off to finally have a solution in place for all
our multi-term synonyms. We did find that the information in Step 8 about
the plugin showing "SynonymExpandingExtendedDismaxQParser" for QParser
Yes, I get that, thanks.
On Jun 1, 2016 6:38 PM, "Joe Lawson"
wrote:
> 2.0 is compiled with Solr 5 and Java 7. It uses the namespace
> solr.SynonymExpandingExtendedDismaxQParserPlugin
>
> 5.0.4 is compiled with Solr 6 and Java 8 and is the first release that
2.0 is compiled with Solr 5 and Java 7. It uses the namespace
solr.SynonymExpandingExtendedDismaxQParserPlugin
5.0.4 is compiled with Solr 6 and Java 8 and is the first release that made
it to maven central. It uses the namespace
Just to be clear, I got version 2.0 of the jar from github... should I be
look for something in a maven repository? A bit confused at this point
given all the version numbers...
I want the latest and greatest unless there's any special considerations..
Thanks for the assistance!
On Jun 1, 2016
Yup that was the issue for us as well. It doesn't seem to be throwing the
class error now, although I have not been able to successfully get back
results that seem to be using it, it's showing up as the deftype in my
params but the QParser in my debug is the normal edismax one. I will have
to play
Nothing up until 5.0.4 was distributed on maven central. 5.0 -> 5.0.4 was
just a bunch of clean up to get it ready for maven (including the namespace
change).
Being that nearly all docs and articles talking about the plugin reference
the old 2.0 one could reasonably get confused as to what config
On 6/1/2016 1:10 PM, John Bickerstaff wrote:
> @Joe:
>
> Is it possible that the jar's package name does not match the entry in the
> sample solrconfig.xml file?
>
> The solrconfig.xml example file in the test directory contains the
> following package name:
>
I mean the 5.0 namespace is different from the 2.0 not 3.0.
On Jun 1, 2016 5:43 PM, "Joe Lawson"
wrote:
2.0 is different from 3.0 so check the test config that is associated with
the 2.0 release. Ie
2.0 is different from 3.0 so check the test config that is associated with
the 2.0 release. Ie
https://github.com/healthonnet/hon-lucene-synonyms/blob/8f736da053510911517fcb8a712b1d8ca5c920d2/src/test/resources/solr/collection1/conf/example_solrconfig.xml
On Jun 1, 2016 3:10 PM, "John
@Joe:
Is it possible that the jar's package name does not match the entry in the
sample solrconfig.xml file?
The solrconfig.xml example file in the test directory contains the
following package name:
However, the jar file (when unzipped) has the following directory structure
down to the same
I tried this - it didn't fail. I don't know if it really started in
Denable.runtime.lib=true mode or not:
service solr start -Denable.runtime.lib=true
Of course, I'd still really rather be able to just drop jars into
/var/solr/data/lib and have them work...
Thanks all.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at
lt
> >> >> > > search
> >> >> > > > field in the /autophrase search handler
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > There isn't any explicit statement of "df=text_autophrase" in
> the
> >> >>
ent this,
>> >> > they're
>> >> > > > going to be disappointed in the results unless they:
>> >> > > > a. copy or otherwise get ALL the text they're interested in --
>> into
>> >> the
>> >> > > > "tex
So - the instructions on using the Blob Store API say to use the
Denable.runtime.lib=true option when starting Solr.
Thing is, I've installed per the "for production" instructions which gives
me an entry in /etc/init.d called solr.
Two questions.
To test this can I still use the start.jar in
Ahhh - gotcha.
Well, not sure why it's not picked up - seems lots of other jars are...
Maybe Joe will comment...
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 10:22 AM, MaryJo Sminkey wrote:
> That refers to running Solr in cloud mode. We aren't there yet.
>
> MJ
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at
That refers to running Solr in cloud mode. We aren't there yet.
MJ
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:20 PM, John Bickerstaff
wrote:
> Hi Mary Jo,
>
> I'll point you to Joe's earlier comment about needing to use the Blob Store
> API... He put a link in his response.
>
> I'm
Hi Mary Jo,
I'll point you to Joe's earlier comment about needing to use the Blob Store
API... He put a link in his response.
I'm about to try that today... Given that Joe is a contributor to
hon_lucene there's a good chance his experience is correct here -
especially given the evidence
So we still can't get this to work, here's the latest update my server guy
gave me: It seems to not matter where the file is located, it does not
load. Yet, the the Solr Java class path shows the file has loaded. Only
this path (./server/lib/hon-lucene-synonyms-2.0.0.jar) will work in that it
Thanks Shawn
Yup - I created a /lib inside my $SOLR_HOME directory (which by default was
/var/solr/data)
I put the hon_lucene. jar file in there and rebooted - same errors
about class not found.
Tried again in what looked like the next most obvious spot
server/solr-webapp/webapp/WEB-INF/lib
On 5/31/2016 3:13 PM, John Bickerstaff wrote:
> The suggestion on the readme is that I can drop the
> hon_lucene_synonyms jar file into the $SOLR_HOME directory, but this
> does not seem to be working - I'm getting class not found exceptions.
What I typically do with *all* extra jars
t;> >> > > > >> one token at a time, so in a synonym filter, multi-word
>> synonyms
>> >> can
>> >> > > > never
>> >> > > > >> match and add alternatives. See <
>> >> > > > >> https://issues.a
> > > b. somehow explicitly declare "text_autophrase" as the default
> search
> >> > > field
> >> > > > - either in the searchHandler or wherever else the default field
> is
> >> > > > configured.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
don't
>> > > know I
>> > > > don't know that bothers me...
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:57 AM, John Bickerstaff <
>> > > > j...@johnbickerstaff.com
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>
> > > > b. somehow explicitly declare "text_autophrase" as the default
> > search
> > > > > field
> > > > > > - either in the searchHandler or wherever else the default field
> is
> > > > > > configured.
&g
cess is correct and / or if I'm missing
> > > something?
> > > > > Yes - I get that I can set it all up and try - but it's what I
> don't
> > > > know I
> > > > > don't know that bothers me...
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, May 2
ohnbickerstaff.com
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thank you Steve -- very helpful.
> > > > >
> > > > > I can see that whatever implementation I decide to try, some
> testing
> > > will
> > > > > be in o
comment.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I’m working on addressing problems using multi-term synonyms at
> query
> > > >> time in Lucene and
; I recommend these two blogs for understanding the issues (the second
> one
> > >> was mentioned earlier in this thread):
> > >>
> > >> <
> > >>
> >
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2012/04/lucenes-tokenstreams-are-actually.html
> >
t;
> >> <https://nolanlawson.com/2012/10/31/better-synonym-handling-in-solr/>
> >>
> >> In addition to the already-mentioned projects, there is also:
> >>
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5379>
> >>
> &g
ady-mentioned projects, there is also:
>>
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5379>
>>
>> All of these projects try in various ways to work around the fact that
>> Lucene’s QueryParser splits on whitespace before sending text to analysis,
>> one token a
OLR-5379>
>
> All of these projects try in various ways to work around the fact that
> Lucene’s QueryParser splits on whitespace before sending text to analysis,
> one token at a time, so in a synonym filter, multi-word synonyms can never
> match and add alternatives. See &l
whitespace before sending text to analysis, one token at
a time, so in a synonym filter, multi-word synonyms can never match and add
alternatives. See <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2605>, where
I’ve posted a patch to directly address that problem - note that it’s still a
;
> -Chris.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "John Bickerstaff" <j...@johnbickerstaff.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:51 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr Cloud and Multi-word Synonyms :: synonym_edism
.
From: "John Bickerstaff" <j...@johnbickerstaff.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:51 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Cloud and Multi-word Synonyms :: synonym_edismax parser
Hey Jeff (or anyone interested in multi-wor
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo