Hi Otis,
Thanks. Was thinking along those lines. But having two indexes will
hurt my search.
1 . Searching fields that belong only to the personal details should
result in 5 resumes begin shown for the guy (if he has 5). But now it
will only show 1 link to the personal details and no
Term vectors are, to some extent, the opposite of the inverted index.
They store term, position and offset (the latter two are optional) on
a per document basis, such that you can say give me the terms,
position and offsets for document X. In terms of MLT, they are used
to figure out
Hi people
First the typo on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/mySolr:
Production
Typically it's not recommended do have your front end
it should probably be ..recommended To have..
Second, I don't know much about Java, nor about Jetty/Resin/JBoss/
Tomcat. I went through the tutorial and was
Daniel:
As a fellow 'non-java' person I feel your pain (well, felt it anyway). A
lot depends on your load and the machine, but I successfully ran the stock
jetty system on a box last summer for work and didn't have performance
problems. The bigger issue was from the other java people
Hi. I am checking out solr after having some experience with lucene
using pyLucene. I am looking at the potential of solr to search over a
large index divided over multiple servers to collect results, sort of
what the parallel multisearcher does in Lucene on its own. From quick
scan of
Daniel Andersson wrote:
Hi people
First the typo on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/mySolr:
Production
Typically it's not recommended do have your front end
it should probably be ..recommended To have..
you can edit any of the wiki pages... fixing typos is a great contribution!
As a newbie,
You can always use the trunk build, but you'll have to check the
status of SOLR-303 to be sure it's in the trunk...
Here's a thread that discusses this...
http://mail.google.com/mail/?zx=wmtcqx3ngeupshva=1#label/Solr/11799e3704804489
Best
Erick
On Jan 21, 2008 10:55 AM, David Pratt [EMAIL
On Jan 21, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Daniel Andersson wrote:
Well, no. Immutable Page, and as far as I know (english not being
my mother tongue), that means I can't edit the page
You need to create an account first.
On Jan 21, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Michael Kimsal wrote:
As a fellow 'non-java' person I feel your pain (well, felt it
anyway). A
lot depends on your load and the machine, but I successfully ran
the stock
jetty system on a box last summer for work and didn't have performance
problems.
Hi Erick. Thank you for your reply. Unfortunately, I cannot access the
link you provided. It this message from the solr-user list? Many thanks.
Regards,
David
Erick Erickson wrote:
You can always use the trunk build, but you'll have to check the
status of SOLR-303 to be sure it's in the
I did try with the latest nightly build. The problem still exists.
I tested with the example data that comes with solr package.
1)with termsourcefield set to 'word' which is string fieldtype
q=iped nano returns 'ipod nano' which is good
2) with termsourcefield set to 'spell' (which is the
Is there any support for DisMax (or any search request handlers) in search components, or is that
something that still needs to be done? It seems like it isn't supported at the moment.
We want to be able to use a field collapsing component
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236), but
Yep, it's from the SOLR user list. Well, not really. I mistakenly copied
my gmail url when I was looking at the relevant post, which *of course*
you can't access
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk
or
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/version_control.html
Sorry 'bout that.
Erick
On 20-Jan-08, at 5:07 PM, anuvenk wrote:
when will this be released? where can i find the list of
improvements/enhancements in 1.3 if its been documented already?
see http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/solr/trunk/CHANGES.txt?
view=markup
We're not sure on a timeframe for release yet.
Would somone please consider marking a label on the Subversion repository
that says, This is a clean version? I only do HTTP requests and have no
custom software, so I don't care about internal interfaces changing.
Thanks,
Lance Norskog
-Original Message-
From: Mike Klaas
I am trying solrj to index.. using follwing code
String url = http://localhost:8080/solr;;
SolrServer server = new CommonsHttpSolrServer( url );
its giving error that undifined symbol for constructor(string). can somoen
tell me why this constructor thrwoing error while in source file i can
Hi, is it possible to have append like updates, where if two records of
same id's are posted to solr, the contents of the two merges and composes a
single record with the id? I am asking because my program works in a
multi-thread manner where several threads produces serveral parts of a final
Hi, I am using the SimplePostTool to post files to solr. I have encoutered
some problem with the content of xml files. I noticed that if my xml file
has fields whose values contain the character or or , the post
fails and I get the exception :
javax.xml.stream.XMLStreamException: ParseError at
You should encode those three characters, and it doesn't hurt to encode
the ampersand and double-quote characters too:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML#Entity_references
Peter
-Original Message-
From: zqzuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 2:24 PM
To:
Hello,
I just started to use solr and I experience strange behaviour when it comes
to wildcards.
When I use the StandardRequestHandler queries like eur?p?an or eur*an
work fine.
But garden?r or admini*tion do not bring any results (without wildcards
there are some of course).
All affected
Thanks for the quick advice!
pbinkley wrote:
You should encode those three characters, and it doesn't hurt to encode
the ampersand and double-quote characters too:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML#Entity_references
Peter
-Original Message-
From: zqzuk [mailto:[EMAIL
On Jan 21, 2008 5:18 PM, dojolava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just started to use solr and I experience strange behaviour when it comes
to wildcards.
When I use the StandardRequestHandler queries like eur?p?an or eur*an
work fine.
But garden?r or admini*tion do not bring any results (without
Thanks a lot!
I checked it, when I search for g?rden it works, only g?rdener does
not...
I will try the copyField solution.
On Jan 21, 2008 11:23 PM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008 5:18 PM, dojolava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just started to use solr and I experience
On Jan 21, 2008 10:23 AM, Doug Steigerwald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any support for DisMax (or any search request handlers) in search
components, or is that
something that still needs to be done? It seems like it isn't supported at
the moment.
I was curious about this, too ... If
The QueryComponent supports both lucene queryparser syntax and dismax
query syntax.
The dismax request handler now simply sets defType (the default base
query type) to dismax
-Yonik
On Jan 21, 2008 1:23 PM, Doug Steigerwald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any support for DisMax (or any search
We've found a way to work around it. In our search components, we're doing
something like:
defType = defType == null ? DisMaxQParserPlugin.NAME : defType;
If you add defType=dismax to the query string, it'll use the
DisMaxQParserPlugin.
Unfortunately, I haven't been able to figure out an
On Jan 21, 2008 9:06 PM, Doug Steigerwald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've found a way to work around it. In our search components, we're doing
something like:
defType = defType == null ? DisMaxQParserPlugin.NAME : defType;
Would it be easier to just add it as a default parameter in the
We don't always want to use the dismax handler in our setup.
Doug
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008 9:06 PM, Doug Steigerwald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've found a way to work around it. In our search components, we're doing
something like:
defType = defType == null ?
Sorting on a non-integer has space problems. As I understand it, sorting
creates an array of integers the size of the number of records in the entire
index. Sorting on a non-integer type also creates a separate array of the
same size with the field data copied into it. Thus sorting a non-integer
Hi.
I get OOE with Solr 1.3 Autowarm seem to be the villain in cojunction with
FieldCache somehow.
JVM args: -Xmx512m -Xms512m -Xss128k
Index size is ~4 Million docs, where I index text and store database primary
keys.
du /srv/solr/feedItem/data/index/
1.7G/srv/solr/feedItem/data/index/
To
30 matches
Mail list logo
