[spamdyke-users] Problem with RHSBL's

2010-10-29 Thread David Stiller
Hi all, by accident i have used the entry rhs-blacklist-entry=block.rhs.mailpolice.com in my config. That list is down sind June 2010, but spamdyke blocked all incoming mails. The list still responds to the subdomain rhs.mailpolice.com: ;; ANSWER SECTION: block.rhs.mailpolice.com. 80855 IN

Re: [spamdyke-users] Segfault with Spamdyke 4.1.0

2010-10-25 Thread David Stiller
It's more than i thought: [r...@plesk-mail 11:12:33:~] # grep segf /var/log/messages | grep "Oct 25" | wc -l 6768 # dmesg | wc -l 2655 I think it got so high as there's someone sending a newsletter. Am 25.10.2010 um 09:38 schrieb David Stiller: > Ok, so it

Re: [spamdyke-users] Segfault with Spamdyke 4.1.0

2010-10-25 Thread David Stiller
Ok, so it's another reason. I've let spamdyke run overnight and i now i have 97 Segfaults again. I think it's more than my config-dir, thats just a workarounf for the mail-sending problem. So sending mail works, but stillt some spammers get disconnected. :-D Sam just send me your IP to access my

Re: [spamdyke-users] Segfault with Spamdyke 4.1.0

2010-10-24 Thread David Stiller
I found a workaround how my server does not cause segmentation faults. I get them when i comment out the config-dir option wich i normally use. I commented it out, because i had problems with RBL false positives. Is it the same in your case Ken? Am 21.10.2010 21:36, schrieb Sam Clippinger: > A

[spamdyke-users] Clear values from options

2010-07-21 Thread David Stiller
Hi all! With Spamdyke v4.1 i think the three exclamation marks dont work anymore: Jul 21 11:13:32 plesk-mail spamdyke[18097]: ERROR: Bad or unparsable value for option reject-unresolvable-rdns: !!! Jul 21 11:13:32 plesk-mail spamdyke[18097]: ERROR: Bad or unparsable value for option reject-empt

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 4.1.0

2010-07-05 Thread david . stiller
Sehr geehrte Kundin! Sehr geehrter Kunde! Ich bin vom 05. Juli 2010 bis 16. Juli 2010 einschließlich im Urlaub. Bitte senden Sie Fehlermeldungen und Störungen an hi...@blackbit.de, dort wird Ihre Anfrage einem Mitarbeiter zugewiesen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, David Stiller Technischer Support

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 4.1.0

2010-07-05 Thread david . stiller
Sehr geehrte Kundin! Sehr geehrter Kunde! Ich bin vom 05. Juli 2010 bis 16. Juli 2010 einschließlich im Urlaub. Bitte senden Sie Fehlermeldungen und Störungen an hi...@blackbit.de, dort wird Ihre Anfrage einem Mitarbeiter zugewiesen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, David Stiller Technischer Support

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 4.1.0

2010-07-05 Thread david . stiller
Sehr geehrte Kundin! Sehr geehrter Kunde! Ich bin vom 05. Juli 2010 bis 16. Juli 2010 einschließlich im Urlaub. Bitte senden Sie Fehlermeldungen und Störungen an hi...@blackbit.de, dort wird Ihre Anfrage einem Mitarbeiter zugewiesen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, David Stiller Technischer Support

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 4.1.0

2010-07-05 Thread david . stiller
Sehr geehrte Kundin! Sehr geehrter Kunde! Ich bin vom 05. Juli 2010 bis 16. Juli 2010 einschließlich im Urlaub. Bitte senden Sie Fehlermeldungen und Störungen an hi...@blackbit.de, dort wird Ihre Anfrage einem Mitarbeiter zugewiesen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, David Stiller Technischer Support

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 4.1.0

2010-07-05 Thread david . stiller
Sehr geehrte Kundin! Sehr geehrter Kunde! Ich bin vom 05. Juli 2010 bis 16. Juli 2010 einschließlich im Urlaub. Bitte senden Sie Fehlermeldungen und Störungen an hi...@blackbit.de, dort wird Ihre Anfrage einem Mitarbeiter zugewiesen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, David Stiller Technischer Support

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 4.1.0

2010-07-05 Thread david . stiller
Sehr geehrte Kundin! Sehr geehrter Kunde! Ich bin vom 05. Juli 2010 bis 16. Juli 2010 einschließlich im Urlaub. Bitte senden Sie Fehlermeldungen und Störungen an hi...@blackbit.de, dort wird Ihre Anfrage einem Mitarbeiter zugewiesen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, David Stiller Technischer Support

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 4.1.0

2010-07-05 Thread david . stiller
Sehr geehrte Kundin! Sehr geehrter Kunde! Ich bin vom 05. Juli 2010 bis 16. Juli 2010 einschließlich im Urlaub. Bitte senden Sie Fehlermeldungen und Störungen an hi...@blackbit.de, dort wird Ihre Anfrage einem Mitarbeiter zugewiesen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, David Stiller Technischer Support

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 4.1.0

2010-07-05 Thread david . stiller
Sehr geehrte Kundin! Sehr geehrter Kunde! Ich bin vom 05. Juli 2010 bis 16. Juli 2010 einschließlich im Urlaub. Bitte senden Sie Fehlermeldungen und Störungen an hi...@blackbit.de, dort wird Ihre Anfrage einem Mitarbeiter zugewiesen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, David Stiller Technischer Support

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 4.1.0

2010-07-05 Thread david . stiller
Sehr geehrte Kundin! Sehr geehrter Kunde! Ich bin vom 05. Juli 2010 bis 16. Juli 2010 einschließlich im Urlaub. Bitte senden Sie Fehlermeldungen und Störungen an hi...@blackbit.de, dort wird Ihre Anfrage einem Mitarbeiter zugewiesen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, David Stiller Technischer Support

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 4.1.0

2010-07-05 Thread david . stiller
Sehr geehrte Kundin! Sehr geehrter Kunde! Ich bin vom 05. Juli 2010 bis 16. Juli 2010 einschließlich im Urlaub. Bitte senden Sie Fehlermeldungen und Störungen an hi...@blackbit.de, dort wird Ihre Anfrage einem Mitarbeiter zugewiesen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, David Stiller Technischer Support

Re: [spamdyke-users] skip RBL check for specific recipients or domains

2010-06-28 Thread David Stiller
Hi! If nothing ist going wrong, blacklisting should run before RBL: http://spamdyke.org/documentation/FAQ.html#FEATURE1 Am 25.06.2010 16:00, schrieb Daniel: Hi! Is it possible to skip RBL checks and automatically deny requests for a specific domain or addresses? I think the denial is wit

Re: [spamdyke-users] skip RBL check for specific recipients or domains

2010-06-26 Thread David Stiller
Hi Daniel, you can reset an option like this: To clear all values from a list, three exclamation points should be given instead of a value: |OPTION=!!!| For example, if the following line is given, the |sender-blacklist-file| option will be cleared and spamdyke will behave as though |s

Re: [spamdyke-users] question

2010-06-01 Thread David Stiller
Can you post the origin-rdns of that connection please? On 01.06.2010 12:20, David Stiller wrote: Blacklist all, Whitelist \b[a-z0-9._%+...@[a-z0-9.-]+\.[a-z]{2,4}\b :-D Don't use this! Was a joke ;-) Am 01.06.2010 um 11:20 schrieb Arvydas: Hello, Jun 1 12:16:41 sun spamdyke[

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke reject local users.

2010-05-15 Thread David Stiller
It looks like there's missing the authorization info. Did you follow our hint to blacklist all your local domains? If yes, check that auth is successfull. On 14.05.2010 09:57, Leszek wrote: Hi, I've search spamdyke_lists but didn't find the aswer. I'm using spamdyke on Plesk installed on Deb

Re: [spamdyke-users] Exchange server Webmail for Outlook and A records

2010-02-12 Thread David Stiller
rom outta space. ;-) Kind regards, David Stiller On 12.02.2010 16:02, Ulrich C. Manns wrote: Hi Faris, if they uses a firewall with nat/pat maybe... But this is not a generally problem, because many of our customers uses Exchange and they uses our spamdyke as frontend. I think they have to check thei

Re: [spamdyke-users] Allow country domains

2010-02-04 Thread David Stiller
mailing list > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users David Stiller Technischer Support Neues von Blackbit: aktuelle Projekte und Wissenswertes aus unserer Werbeagentur unter http://www.blackbit.de/tagebuch Blackbit neue Medien GmbH Erns

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke configuration finetuneing

2009-12-13 Thread David Stiller
Hi Eduard, would you please explain me, why you add .com and .net to the /etc/spamdyke/blacklist_keywords file? They are valid tld's to send mails from, or do i just miss anything? Eduard Svarc schrieb: > > Hello, > > I see you have two things out. 1st you using RBLS, that could give you > a lot

Re: [spamdyke-users] Qmail writes with wrong user to the maildir

2009-06-04 Thread David Stiller
ne > with the Plesk9 release) > mail_auth_view does exist, but I guess that’s not what we are looking for. If > I run strace on mail_auth_view it uses some libs and reads the > /etc/psa/psa.conf > > The psa.conf looks okay. > > Any other idea what I could strace? :) > &

Re: [spamdyke-users] Qmail writes with wrong user to the maildir

2009-06-04 Thread David Stiller
you try to run /usr/local/psa/admin/sbin/mchk? >> > > The thing is, that’s what (in my opinion) caused the problem in the first > place (besides emptying a few configuration files and rewriting other config > files with incorrect data :) ). > > -Original

Re: [spamdyke-users] Qmail writes with wrong user to the maildir

2009-06-04 Thread David Stiller
gt; > > -Original Message- > From: spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org > [mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of David Stiller > Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 7:23 PM > To: spamdyke users > Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Qmail writes with wrong user to the

Re: [spamdyke-users] Qmail writes with wrong user to the maildir

2009-06-04 Thread David Stiller
Hi Eric, check if the privileges of the files in /var/qmail/bin/ are set correctly. Plesk uses qmail-queue as the qmail-wrapper, wich needs the sticky-bit: -r-xr-xr-x 1 root qmail 24704 Aug 24 2008 qmail-lspawn [...] -r-s--x--x 1 drwebqmail 152436 Sep 17 2008 qmail-queue -r-s--x--x 1

Re: [spamdyke-users] Posibility to blacklist messages where sender and recipient are exactly same

2009-05-07 Thread David Stiller
; Yes, but in this case i am authenticated. > > -------- > *Von: *David Stiller > *Antworten an: *spamdyke users > *Datum: *Thu, 7 May 2009 11:03:49 +0200 > *An: *spamdyke users > *Betreff: *Re: [spamdyke-users] Posibility t

Re: [spamdyke-users] Posibility to blacklist messages where sender and recipient are exactly same

2009-05-07 Thread David Stiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ulrich C. Manns schrieb: > @Sam Clippinger > > Hi Sam, > > my whishes: > >1. A new parameter to reject emails if sender=recipient (because > we?re hosting many domains an Eduard method won?t work for us) Hi Ulrich, isn't it a quite usual

Re: [spamdyke-users] Monitor smtp

2009-04-14 Thread David Stiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nightduke, in my opinion it's not sufficient enough to check if a service is listening on the port 25. Because Spamdyke might answer, but the services behind, like qmail might be down. So we really check if a mail is sent and look for it's delivery

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS

2009-03-24 Thread David Stiller
For me it looks loka a local delivery and you probably authenticated - so Spamdyke doesn't need to block mails from you, to you. SCP should show another field, like "Auth", as my surface does. Am 24.03.2009 um 09:37 schrieb Ulrich C. Manns: As you can see in attached picture. Sometimes i f

Re: [spamdyke-users] blocking emails to a certain mailbox from all but 1 specified rDNS

2008-12-01 Thread David Stiller
. Is there a method to manipulate > SpamDyke's configuration parameters to allow for this? > > Thanks. > -- > > > > Erald Troja > ___ > spamdyke-users mailing list > spamdyke-users@spamdy

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke 4.05 whitelist

2008-11-26 Thread David Stiller
o! > * > Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=8433&d=26-11 > ___ > spamdyke-users mailing list > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users David Stiller Technischer Support Blackbit Neue Medi

Re: [spamdyke-users] graylisting domains

2008-11-13 Thread David Stiller
nightduke schrieb: > Hi i wish to know if it's possible to add a domain at graylisting > directory, if it's added every email from that domain will be > automactly added and people start receiving emails from that domain. > > I hope people can understand what i'm saying. > > Nightduke > ___

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE another issue

2008-11-11 Thread David Stiller
Looks like a temporarily problem, the RDNS can be found now: # host -r 65.55.111.96 96.111.55.65.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer blu0-omc2-s21.blu0.hotmail.com. David Stiller schrieb: > I think spamdyke doesn't find the origin_ip listed in the mx's of > hotmail.com: > >

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE another issue

2008-11-11 Thread David Stiller
pointers of DNS are updated faster so i think your server asked a caching nameserver. But i also found that entry just some minutes ago. [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > Then... this must be caused for a timeout trying to resolve ? > > David Stiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrito: > &g

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE another issue

2008-11-11 Thread David Stiller
I think spamdyke doesn't find the origin_ip listed in the mx's of hotmail.com: # dig mx hotmail.com | grep "65.55.111.96" # host -r 65.55.111.96 96.111.55.65.in-addr.arpa has no PTR record [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > Hi > > > spamdyke is blocking emails like this: > > Nov 10 09:32:33 mail spam

Re: [spamdyke-users] Updated Spamdyke Statistics Script

2008-11-03 Thread David Stiller
no comment :-D David Stiller schrieb: Ok, if you can use PHP-CLI, try the attached scripts. Move arg_parse into /usr/lib/php-cli/ or change the path in the main-script. Then you can use it like this: ./spamdyke-domrep-cli -d example.com example.com

Re: [spamdyke-users] Updated Spamdyke Statistics Script

2008-11-03 Thread David Stiller
Peter schrieb: > Am Montag, den 03.11.2008, 16:06 +0100 schrieb David Stiller: > >> Yes, probably the log-file-format doesn't fit. That spamdyke-stats.pl parses >> the default-format of qmail. Plesk writes another. The qmail-SMTP-Logs >> normally >> begin wi

Re: [spamdyke-users] Updated Spamdyke Statistics Script

2008-11-03 Thread David Stiller
I think you had another. ;-) If you want, i can look if i can find my old one. Peter schrieb: > Am Montag, den 03.11.2008, 16:06 +0100 schrieb David Stiller: > >> Yes, probably the log-file-format doesn't fit. That spamdyke-stats.pl parses >> the default-format of qmai

Re: [spamdyke-users] Updated Spamdyke Statistics Script

2008-11-03 Thread David Stiller
Yes, probably the log-file-format doesn't fit. That spamdyke-stats.pl parses the default-format of qmail. Plesk writes another. The qmail-SMTP-Logs normally begin with: @400048ee184815c9cc04 and Plesk write human-readables: Nov 3 16:08:07 plesk-mail [...] Peter schrieb: > Hi folks! > Does

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE with reverse dns

2008-10-29 Thread David Stiller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > Hi > > > >> David >> > I had use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for example of mail, is not real mail. > Yes, thats why i didn't use a dig on that and said "i guess". > >> Peter >> > I check same too, 53-255-112-92.pool.ukrtel.net don't resolve to A > entry. But

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE with reverse dns

2008-10-28 Thread David Stiller
I guess 92.112.255.53 is not listed as a valid MX for mail.com in the "from:"-field? [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > Hi guys. > > > I'm fascianted with spamdyke, but i found issues like this > > Oct 28 13:15:11 myshost spamdyke[28940]: DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE from: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [spamdyke-users] Block some words on mail

2008-10-28 Thread David Stiller
Hi Rafael, Rafael Andrade schrieb: > How i can block emails, searching some Regex on ur body? > > Example: Searching Viagra, or Mercadolibre, Cialis, Xxx, Sex, whatever > some words on email send or receive. > It's not Spamdyke's Job to scan mails for contents. Spamdyke doesnt' "see" any word

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke +ip-in-rdns - per domain basis

2008-10-22 Thread David Stiller
would try. Regards, David <http://66.49.15.190> David Stiller schrieb: > Hi Linto, > > the per-domain basis you can create by using the config-dir option, > wich is well documented in the documentation: > > http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#CONFIGURATION_DIR

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke +ip-in-rdns - per domain basis

2008-10-22 Thread David Stiller
Hi Linto, the per-domain basis you can create by using the config-dir option, wich is well documented in the documentation: http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#CONFIGURATION_DIR Nearly any combination of sender and recipient can be configured with this option. This way i configure

Re: [spamdyke-users] config-dir

2008-10-21 Thread David Stiller
ain about it > and generate a lot of noise. For that reason, you might consider moving > the "testdomain.com" folder somewhere else. > > Other than that, it looks fine to me. > > -- Sam Clippinger > > David Stiller wrote: > >> Hi Sam and users! >>

[spamdyke-users] config-dir

2008-10-21 Thread David Stiller
Hi Sam and users! Do you think this is a usable structure to be used for per-domain-config's? domain_setup/ |-- _recipient_ | `-- com | `-- testdomain `-- testdomain.com |-- customer_blacklist_ip |-- customer_blacklist_rdns |-- customer_blacklist_sender |-- customer_whitel

[spamdyke-users] Short question about config-dir

2008-10-21 Thread David Stiller
Hi Sam, in the FAQ you said, that the config-dir value should not be within configuration directories. Does that mean that the target shouldn't be in greylist-dir, or blacklist-rdns-dir, or something like that, right? ...so i just wonder why i'd set up "config-dir=/var/qmail/spamdyke/" in my f

Re: [spamdyke-users] High load avg

2008-10-15 Thread David Stiller
0x800CCC0F means CONNECTION_DROPPED http://support.microsoft.com/kb/813514/en-us In most cases my customers had a virus scanner dropping the connection. Paulo Henrique schrieb: One of my customers reported a problem like this, he could not send a message of 23MB. Outlook Express View the erro

Re: [spamdyke-users] High load avg

2008-10-15 Thread David Stiller
Yes, me also. Looks like this is one of the reasons, why Linux-tools are mostly developped for specific systems, when making RPM's. So Spamdyke 4.0.5 seems to be good for SuSE's, and maybe not on others? Just quick shot from me^^ :) Arne Metzger schrieb: > Hi, > > on my vm running Suse10.0 i can

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke GUI

2008-10-13 Thread David Stiller
"_recipient_/com/domain". When in doubt, read the > docs, don't take my word for anything. :) > > -- Sam Clippinger > > David Stiller wrote: > >> Yes i looked at the sources and as far as i saw, that's very >> complex analysis, wich isn't

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke GUI

2008-10-13 Thread David Stiller
a large audience for it (especially on the QmailToaster mailing list). -- Sam Clippinger David Stiller wrote: Hi all, i've written a Spamdyke GUI for Plesk for my customers, so that they all have their own responsibility, if they want to use greylisting and are able to maintain their

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke GUI

2008-10-13 Thread David Stiller
Hi Arthur, first of all - I won't beat anyone here, as i asked for others' opinions. :) If you ask me, i would prefer to let all go through, but my server wouldn't survive that high load then. Without spamdyke my server load goes up from a load average of 0.10 to over 30.0 and more. I tried that.

[spamdyke-users] Spamdyke GUI

2008-10-13 Thread David Stiller
Hi all, i've written a Spamdyke GUI for Plesk for my customers, so that they all have their own responsibility, if they want to use greylisting and are able to maintain their black-and whitelists. It's nice, as they all can see, what's really happening in the mailsystem and keep away spammers an

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke + ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-entry option

2008-10-13 Thread David Stiller
Maybe it's just the particular order spamdyke is running the filters? I would try to set the blacklist-ip by IP-Range, if it catches before the Greylist. Look at the FAQ wich says the following: Does spamdyke run its filters in any particular order? Yes. spamdyke evaluates its filters in

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 4.0.5

2008-10-13 Thread David Stiller
; Fixed a sequencing error that would cause qmail to exit prematurely, > even if valid recipients could still possibly be given. Thanks to David > Stiller for reporting this one. > Fixed the handling of unencoded null characters in messages > (technically not legal) so

Re: [spamdyke-users] Segfault spamdyke

2008-10-08 Thread David Stiller
; location to another in memory. Also, your server is crashing at address > 0 as well, it just prints it in a different format (""). > > I don't _know_ if this is the same bug, I just _hope_ that it is. :) > > -- Sam Clippinger > > David Stiller

Re: [spamdyke-users] Segfault spamdyke

2008-10-08 Thread David Stiller
tion, I would guess that these errors are very > likely caused by the same bugs that have been plaguing David Stiller on > SLES 10.1 64-bit. I've been working with David for several weeks to > identify the source of the crashes and I believe I've finally done it. > The la

[spamdyke-users] Greylist Clean-Up-Script

2008-10-08 Thread David Stiller
Hi all! I created a bash-script to analyze and clean up my greylist. Maybe someone needs one which reports what has been done or just check the greylist without deleting. I use this one, because a simple find over 90 Domains and 2k Mailaccounts caused high server load, this step-by-step proce

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.4 hanging after denied

2008-10-06 Thread David Stiller
Oh sorry, just misread... They cleaned up the processes... 8-) David Stiller schrieb: > Hi Kris, > > admins normally shouldn't "clean up" logs - you'd be lost, if someone > attacks your machine, or you'd have to > analyze something like this :-)

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.4 hanging after denied

2008-10-06 Thread David Stiller
Hi Kris, admins normally shouldn't "clean up" logs - you'd be lost, if someone attacks your machine, or you'd have to analyze something like this :-). Tell your co-admins to keep logs for a minimum of a week, with logrotate or something similar. Concerning the "hanging" Spamdyke process i bet i

Re: [spamdyke-users] Segmentation Faults on SuSE SLES 10.1

2008-09-12 Thread David Stiller
x27;d love to know what's causing this so I can fix it. -- Sam Clippinger David Stiller wrote: Hi all, does anyone else use spamdyke on a SuSE SLES 10.1-server? We have noticed, that it causes some segmentation faults daily. Sep 4 23:00:42 plesk-mail kernel: spamdyke[18838]: s

[spamdyke-users] Segmentation Faults on SuSE SLES 10.1

2008-09-10 Thread David Stiller
Hi all, does anyone else use spamdyke on a SuSE SLES 10.1-server? We have noticed, that it causes some segmentation faults daily. Sep 4 23:00:42 plesk-mail kernel: spamdyke[18838]: segfault at d3e314f8 rip 2b70d6f4279f rsp 7fffd3e2d418 error 4 Sep 4 23:55:12 plesk-mail kernel: s

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamassassin and spamdyke

2008-08-19 Thread David Stiller
Oh, sorry... missed the subject ;) I don't scan outgoing mails with spamassassin^^ nightduke schrieb: > Hi i wish to know if can be done bypass spamdyke if spamdyke accepts > smtp auth connection? > I would like to trust on customer who sign on correctly at smtp and > then starts the delivery... >

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamassassin and spamdyke

2008-08-19 Thread David Stiller
Spamdyke already does that on my system, like this: Aug 19 14:18:59 plesk-mail spamdyke[29178]: ALLOWED from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] origin_ip: 84.132.147.168 origin_rdns: ***.dip0.t-ipconnect.de auth: w.viertel Or do you mean, you want

Re: [spamdyke-users] 4.0.3 versioning 4.0.2

2008-08-18 Thread David Stiller
cked it) and uploaded a new tarball to the > website (with the same name). If you download again, it should compile > with the new version number. > > -- Sam Clippinger > > David Stiller wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> do i see that right, that the package >&

[spamdyke-users] 4.0.3 versioning 4.0.2

2008-08-18 Thread David Stiller
Hi all, do i see that right, that the package http://www.spamdyke.org/releases/spamdyke-4.0.3.tgz would compile as version 4.0.2? config.h: #define PACKAGE_VERSION "4.0.2" Makefile: install: spamdyke cp spamdyke /usr/local/bin/spamdyke-4.0.2 rm -f /usr/local/bin/spamdyke

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: 4.0.0

2008-07-15 Thread David Stiller
I agree. Great work! One thing i just noticed: Spamdyke gave me an error writing to the greylist. To a folder and file called "_none". Maybe it's a config- issue? It tried to write to my graylist like this: /var/qmail/spamdyke/greylist-dir//_none/_none Maybe it was an exception, but where did

Re: [spamdyke-users] Strage happend (time to time)

2008-07-10 Thread David Stiller
ble-rdns > reject-ip-in-cc-rdns > > BTW - spamdyke works with file "blacklist_keywords" not so good as > we need... > > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:50:24 +0200 > David Stiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> You could block "origin_rdns: (unknown)&qu

Re: [spamdyke-users] Strage happend (time to time)

2008-07-10 Thread David Stiller
__ > spamdyke-users mailing list > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users David Stiller Technischer Support Blackbit Neue Medien GmbH Ernst-Ruhstrat-Straße 6 - D-37079 Göttingen tel.: +49 [551] 50675-60 - fax.: +49 [55

Re: [spamdyke-users] IP Whitelist based on hostname/DNS-Name?

2008-06-12 Thread David Stiller
but hey, this works perfect . > > > > Finally i can spam my server again ^___^ > > > > --Stefan > > > > > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von David Stiller > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2008 10:10 > An: spamdyk

Re: [spamdyke-users] IP Whitelist based on hostname/DNS-Name?

2008-06-12 Thread David Stiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Stefan, dynamic IP's need a dynamic whitelist. For exampe write a 30-min-cron, looking for your dyndns-hostname's IP and refresh spamdyke's whitelist. Something like this should do the trick. #!/bin/bash WL=/var/qmail/spamdyke/whitelist_ip IP=$(

Re: [spamdyke-users] Implementation issue with Spamdyke 3.1.8, Plesk 8.0.1, FreeBSD 6.0

2008-06-03 Thread David Stiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I would try putting spamdyke between relaylock and qmail-smtpd: smtp stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/psa/qmail/bin/tcp-env tcp-env /usr/local/psa/qmail/bin/relaylock /usr/local/bin/spamdyke -f /etc/spamdyke.conf /usr/local/psa/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd

Re: [spamdyke-users] wishlist for RBL functions

2008-06-03 Thread David Stiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Snow schrieb: > Hi! > > I would have a wishlist for spamdyke, because it is a real gret software, > and I plan to use it in all of my installations. > > 1. It would be nice if I can quarantine everykind of message. I'm thinking > of the message

Re: [spamdyke-users] feature request spamdyke user interface

2008-04-30 Thread David Stiller
Another thing - did you figure out, how to implement an own programm into Plesk using the right template and check for logins? I think the way i did it, it may be a little insecure as it could be opened without any login by the direct url... David Stiller schrieb: > That's close to what i

Re: [spamdyke-users] feature request spamdyke user interface

2008-04-30 Thread David Stiller
So here you can see my first steps: http://www.php-schnippsel.de/archives/8 David Stiller schrieb: > That's close to what i've made. ;) > > Stefan Pausch schrieb: > >> I would love to get my hands on that package as well. I am working on >> a log analyzing scr

Re: [spamdyke-users] feature request spamdyke user interface

2008-04-29 Thread David Stiller
TED] *Im Auftrag von *nightduke > *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 29. April 2008 17:35 > *An:* spamdyke users > *Betreff:* Re: [spamdyke-users] feature request spamdyke user interface > > Well i prefer analyzing logs... > > Plesk is plesk, i mean some people use it and some don't use that

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_GREYLISTED never gets ACCEPTED

2008-04-29 Thread David Stiller
Hi Stefan, ich hatte mal ein ähnliches Problem, wo die Greylist-Files den falschen User hatten und Spamdyke diese nicht überschreiben konnte. Alle Greylist-Files sollten den passenden User haben. Bei mir ist das qmaild.nofiles. Gruß, David --- Hi Stefan, i had a similar Problem, where all greyl

Re: [spamdyke-users] feature request spamdyke user interface

2008-04-29 Thread David Stiller
> David i think it will be a great idea to have a php client and also > cron analyzing logs. > > Thanks a lot for your sugguestion, can you do that? > > Nightduke > > > > 2008/4/28, David Stiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: >

Re: [spamdyke-users] feature request spamdyke user interface

2008-04-28 Thread David Stiller
Hi, i made a full Programm for that incl. an overview for Plesk. If you're interested i would like to give it to you. I'm using PHP-CLI and a cron analyzing the logs. Regards, David Marcin Orlowski schrieb: > Jake Briggs wrote: > > >> But seriously, getting simple rough stats from the logs re

Re: [spamdyke-users] SMTP AUTH Question

2008-04-01 Thread David Stiller
Hi Chris, Port 587 ist the Port using TLS. Spamdyke will should on both ports. >From the offical FAQ: As of version 2.6.0, spamdyke supports TLS (which is just another name for SSL). spamdyke will detect TLS and pass it through seamlessly. Obviously, none of its post-connect filters will work (e.

Re: [spamdyke-users] Best dnsRBL?

2008-03-05 Thread David Stiller
, though - I'm only trying to > resolve > them, not ping them. > > This command, for example, returns nothing: >host sbl.spamhaus.org > > If there is no dns, how can spamdyke resolve it to use it? > > > > > - Original Message - > From: &

Re: [spamdyke-users] Best dnsRBL?

2008-03-05 Thread David Stiller
Hi Marc, most RBL's block ICMP/PING-Packages, thats not necessary to use them. Turn on your log-level to a high priority, like let me say, log- level=4 and look wich RBL's are used actually. You'll see, most of them work. Don't forget to reduce the log-level after checking that, or your log b

Re: [spamdyke-users] Best dnsRBL?

2008-03-04 Thread David Stiller
Hi Marc, i can't say wich are best, but i can tell you wich we're using: check-dnsrbl=sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org check-dnsrbl=list.dsbl.org check-dnsrbl=zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net check-dnsrbl=dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net check-dnsrbl=bogons.cymru.com And also don't forget to block the unresolvable reverse-lookups