Re: [spctools-discuss] Re: building ReAdW (fann.h?)

2010-10-12 Thread Brian Pratt
Given that I *do* build with MSVC as the code stands, it's some kind of a config issue and changing the code would probably be a Bad Thing. But yeah, we can let it slide if you're up and moving again. On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Jeffrey Milloy wrote: > It's true. At this point, we can drop

[spctools-discuss] Re: building ReAdW (fann.h?)

2010-10-12 Thread Jeffrey Milloy
It's true. At this point, we can drop the thread if no one cares if msconvert or readw builds in VC8, as I have a solution for my needs. And if we do care, maybe this discussion should be continued under a more appropriate title. On Oct 12, 2:44 pm, Jimmy Eng wrote: > To keep everyone on the sam

Re: [spctools-discuss] Re: building ReAdW (fann.h?)

2010-10-12 Thread Jimmy Eng
To keep everyone on the same page, even though this thread is referring to building ReAdW in VC, I'm pretty sure David's successful gcc/mingw builds refers to building the other TPP components and not the mzXML converter that you're interested in. On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Jeffrey Milloy

[spctools-discuss] Re: building ReAdW (fann.h?)

2010-10-12 Thread Jeffrey Milloy
>From what I can see, the folder structure in tpp/extern/gsl-1.14 doesn't match the include file paths anywhere in gsl. Any ideas why I have this discrepency? for example, in extern/gsl-1.14/linalg/balance.c: #include #include #include #include #include #include In the vc8 solution, gsl-1.

Re: [spctools-discuss] Re: building ReAdW (fann.h?)

2010-10-12 Thread Brian Pratt
Builds for me, anyway... but I do a mix of MinGW and MSVC coding so there may be some unpacking stuff that the linux-y side takes care of that the MSVC side is missing. (The MSVC side is something of a second class citizen in TPP-build-world). On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jeffrey Milloy wro

Re: [spctools-discuss] Re: building ReAdW (fann.h?)

2010-10-12 Thread David Shteynberg
Yes, build quite nicely for me using gcc under linux and mingw. -David On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jeffrey Milloy wrote: > Hi Brian > > Building is no longer essential for me, but I gave it a try anyways. > the fann libraries are sorted out, but the gsl project is a mess of > missing/moved

[spctools-discuss] Re: building ReAdW (fann.h?)

2010-10-12 Thread Jeffrey Milloy
Hi Brian Building is no longer essential for me, but I gave it a try anyways. the fann libraries are sorted out, but the gsl project is a mess of missing/moved header files. Does trunk build for anyone right now? On Oct 12, 10:36 am, Brian Pratt wrote: > Try building from trunk. > > That fann

[spctools-discuss] Re: building ReAdW (fann.h?)

2010-10-12 Thread Jeffrey Milloy
Thank you, the C# solution is rapid and easy. I'm new to C# and my code is already working. Hopefully it will work under wine... On Oct 12, 10:44 am, Matt Chambers wrote: > Regarding pwiz for extracting extra metadata: > Our rawfile wrapper is a better bet if you're tied to c++, but if you just >

Re: [spctools-discuss] Re: building ReAdW (fann.h?)

2010-10-12 Thread Matt Chambers
Regarding pwiz for extracting extra metadata: Our rawfile wrapper is a better bet if you're tied to c++, but if you just want to experiment with what's available in the com interface, your best bet is to access from managed code ala c#. Just add a reference to the xrawfile dll and you're set. -Mat

Re: [spctools-discuss] Re: building ReAdW (fann.h?)

2010-10-12 Thread Brian Pratt
Try building from trunk. That fann stuff came in to the build fairly recently and was probably pushed into the branch without the accompanying changes to the MSVC build files. - Brian On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Jeffrey Milloy wrote: > Thanks for the quick reply Natalie. I am looking into

[spctools-discuss] Re: building ReAdW (fann.h?)

2010-10-12 Thread Jeffrey Milloy
Thanks for the quick reply Natalie. I am looking into msconvert to replace readw. Does msconvert check if the RAW file is "in aquisition" before generating the mzXML? First, when I try to build msconvert, I have the same problem. Maybe I should have titled my thread "Buliding tpplib" because that