I'm sorry: totally missed `The "function" method' :( So, it seems, that
the problem's solved. :)
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users ma
;compact", and because of this, the
better way - if possible - would be suggested completion of TCL API. Even
that I'm aware, that such external method will be slower.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbign
ocase_compare
#v-
Perhaps could be possible to add to that API something like external
"tolower/toupper" methods, that could be registered from within TCL?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
__
ould be such change introduced in new version?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Sorry, checked it again, and noticed now, that this kind of tarball seems
to be kinda abandoned: :(
"The Makefile and configure script in this tarball are not supported"
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew
sqlite-3.6.12.tar.gz package.
Is it possible to just use the Makefile from sqlite-3_6_12-tea.tar.gz
with sources provided by sqlite-3.6.12.tar.gz ?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
_
uot;;;
esac
cat <<\_ACEOF
[..]
sqlite configure 3.6.11
generated by GNU Autoconf 2.63
[..]
...and so on... (a few more)
Could the above have negative influence?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
ther compilation.
Perhaps I missed something(?)
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
ead
#v-
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
e has been
deleted before new compilation, the present one not yet installed). Is it
right?
If so - how should it be fixed? (BTW: gcc version 4.3.3)
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew
rds
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
| grep 3.6
/Programs/SQLite/3.6.11/lib
3.6.10
#v-
How could I fix it? Where's held the release number "3.6.10"?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sq
s well. :)
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Sorry for noise: the problem was in quite other place.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org
Any
ideas, what can be the reason?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
e file).
> Note that "PRAGMA quick_check" is currently an undocumented experimental
> feature. It has been present for almost a year though.
But will it be present for steady from now on?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Does there
exist any possibility to make a much shorter test, for just very obvious
cases, like incomplete database file (when f.e. there has been taken just
part of the database file during downloading)?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Wow, a whole lot of material... thanks. Starting to read it all...
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http
(Linux) could be considered as most convenient? Perhaps
there's a doc with explanation (in the context of SQLite-usage)?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite
/ regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
nces to "strcasecmp" (file
tclsqlite.c) fixed the problem (I guess).
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlit
just because of the limits forced by the storage?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
ing gives significant "boost" (for "sharp" conditions).
I'm afraid, one has just to wait in the case of all the LIKE-s,
unfortunately.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
_
ed. "Partial" -
because in the case of non-existence it has to scan the table to the end
anyway.
But still it's better than "count(*)".
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
record meeting given condition. Is it possible to make
it fast _not_ using count(*)? I need just a "boolean result" of 1/0 (yes,
there is at least one / there aren't any).
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zb
be inconvenient in the case of the larger table.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
OK, the mystery has been solved: didn't notice, that disk just reached
100% usage... :D
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite
e" Reiserfs?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
, SQLite 3.6.1, 256 MB RAM
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite
itestudio.one.pl/
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
ring FROM something"]
dbcomm eval {UPDATE something SET a_string=$a}
Of course, should have been:
set a [lindex [dbcomm eval "SELECT a_string FROM something"] 0]
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew
ving older libraries, than the ones used for pre-built
binaries.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlit
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:54:15PM -0500, John Stanton wrote:
> Install TCL
Another one? What for?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mail
t any cure?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
e"-d by tester.tcl?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
t;?
Actually... yes, one can live without that.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
e.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
nonstandard directory
LIBSlibraries to pass to the linker, e.g. -l
#v-
So, you can set it all *before*.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-user
es each) for
"binary-sort" variables (and not "niet", "nein", "off"...) - does it not?
Additional "f" / "t" can be added for PHP. So: no worries... ;)
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
s it does contain ("f",
"false", 0, "no"). Of course, only in the case, when "checkIt" has been
declared as "BOOLEAN", and not as "TEXT" for example.
What do you think?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
h$file", 0666, $error)
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
egards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
eems - "catch" won't return
a value > 0. There'll be following lines printed on the console instead:
database is locked
while evaluating {source ./main.tcl}
--
pozdrawiam / regards
uot;SELECT * FROM xyz") - where are, actually, any benefits from using SQL
database engine?
Using plain file you can have about the same: open/read_all/close... done.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
It's OK, found a README... :]
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman
cvstrac/fileview?f=sqlite/ext/icu/icu.c
Yes, took that file - how to integrate that file with SQLite 3.5.4, to make
lower/upper/LIKE properly working?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
r than english. Any schedule
for a fix?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
ing the high water mark size (the size reflecting the largest
> amount of data it ever held).
Thanks, that's I was afraid of: that there's something subtle, I'm missing.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbi
me
...detaching it in the end: DETACH app
So, back to my question: do I need VACUUM at all?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
ve... is it really working the way, I'm
supposing - or I'm wrong about it?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
rk - does there
exist any need to perform VACUUM?
If I'm correct - attached database, when DETACH-ed, will be saved into real
database file "from the beginning to end", thus no fragmentation there at
all?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
ozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
rawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
something... ;)
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
tly going on there.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
.]
> Your usage fails, because the select list is no valid place to use
> application variables, so SQLite does expand it there.
How is the definition of the "valid place"?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
ntents of $columns (TCL variable) - because the
variable names are "compatible". So - that was my assumption - we've got now:
{ SELECT column1, column2, column3 FROM some_table }
...which seems to be quite legal SQL statement.
It seems, there's something I
hich is slowing down the entire
procedure.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
ill
talking about Postgres ;) - and you were asking about SQLite.
I'm trimming it all anyway... ;)
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
= 'str ';
?column?
--
f
(1 row)
Those are different strings, anyway. Can't recall now, does there any
setting to change this - but you can easily find out at their website.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
, where is a _real_ argument "it can break
compatibility".
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
egards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
opinion about this - I had to express my own first. It's all.
Thanks for all your efforts, which, of course, are greatly appreciated -
what I would do on this list otherwise?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbign
(not so well, still working on this) english is to blame, but
I'm not native speaker - consider this, reading any of my posts
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
ht to have my own opinion.
I can't understand all that people tryin' to start a flamewar here *after*
I ended the discussion *yesterday* already. Are they bored, and looking for
some doubtful "fun"? But why exactly here?
--
pozdrawiam / reg
h DB and
> leave us poor dumb Bas--rds using SQLite alone!
I gave it up yesterday already. What's your point, exactly?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
egards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
e should it going to, when I already wrote "OK, no problem".
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
eds. Besides: (almost) every introduced
feature makes the code more complex. Should the development of the
applications be stopped then?
OK, as I wrote already, it was just a proposal. The others may suggest this
or that - so I made use out of my freedom to make the same.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
or two years and the result *will* be a massive mess.
Keep your flamewar just to yourself, will you? Thank you.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigni
.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
;DB's job of storage" at all, anyway.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
a suggestion.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
need to escape them first (very
convenient! :)
7. It won't hurt anybody; as I wrote, it would be an option. But I'm pretty
sure, many can (and will) appreciate that. Never seen that in any other
database server (or engine).
--
pozdrawiam / regards
just "for those about to trimming". It could (perhaps even should)
be "off" by default.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
---
g "pragma") as "default" seems to be logical?
What do you think?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
anyway, right? And I'm wondering, if database could be "active" side, not
just "waiting for query".
Could be something like this possible at all?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
me "ORDER BY"-s, or can I skip it.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
me_ columns are covered by example1 anyway?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
5.4 [list load
/usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/sqlite3/libtclsqlite3.so sqlite3]
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
3.5.4
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
so: undefined
> symbol: sqlite3StrICmp
It looks for a libraries mismatch to me. It's very likely, that he cannot
proceed without compilation from the sources on his own.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
(TEXT)?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
more comfortable then. Less things to take care of.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
anything, that makes establishing
such limit on the field length reasonable?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe,
Yes, found it: no support for that in 3.3.8. :( Must compile newer version.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe
le?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 02:29:58PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_locking_mode
Oh, boy... missed entire set of "pragma" commands. Thanks.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
not just transaction. I mean: when I'm using a program
which is accessing the database - nobody else has access.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
filesystem assure
enough protection?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
rdHipp/drh.html
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
archive.com/sqlite-users@sqlite.org/msg18342.html )
Doesn't it mean, that database is protected enough already by it's internal
design, and there's no need to take care about that "dot locks"?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo