Vincent Massol wrote:
I'd like to have the go ahead for making the changes to the struts directory
I think it is OK to commit those changes as long as they are tested
and the distribution builds.
Namely, I'd like to commit the following changes that I have locally on my
computer (step
Ted Husted wrote:
Martin Cooper has submitted several useful patches to Struts, has been
+1, Firmly agreed!
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
804 N. Kenmore Street +01-703-525-3580
Arlington VA 22201
as with the documentation.
In the CVS repository doc/uml/sequence-diagram-action.gif
This was generated by Gerry Chike. This does a good job
showing the sequence of steps struts goes through for login.
Maybe this could be used in the documentation ?
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
804 N. Kenmore
I have changed the default build.properties file to require,
cactus 1.3 as opposed to 1.2. I ran the unit tests and all
looked ok.
By using cactus 1.3 the new required API's exist,
along with the depreciated ones. This will give the
contrib code comitters a chance to make the small changes
Eddie Bush Screamed:
Just wanted to throw out an FYI - I don't have time to dig into it
right now.
Eddie it works for me, after doing a CVS get a clean copy, no sticky.
Do you have recient versions of the commons ?
-Rob
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Robert Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Small patch related to logic:empty for your consideration. The
intent of
Robert, best place to put this is in Buzilla:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
If you don't have an account it only takes a minute to fill out the
no-nonsense form.
-Rob
--
To
Anyone else having trouble running the dist target?
Mine is failing on the struts-el stuff (not compile error, but ant task
errors due to path settings and such), and I am working through it, but
wondering if I missed an email somewhere ?!?!?!?
It's a bug. I emailed the list but David
+1,
Sorry Eddie, David got more votes but that doesn't mean
we like him any better than you. ;-) !
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wasn't suggesting that was the way it had be.
Doing that would have *all* validator-related things living under
o.a.s.v though.
I really was agreeing with you, that it --could-- be beneficial.
I didn't feel strongly one way or the other.
It is possible that when Java Server Faces comes that
Demonstration:
(This is my text graphic of a HashMap ;)
This would make good documentation :-) !
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:struts-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
That correct, they need to be there as well.
James, this is getting to be alot of work, you must
be bucking for comitter :-D !
Under what circumstances will addIt after the while loop
be false ? I'll buy you a copy of Teds Book if
you can provide just one case. If you can't then you'll
own
I didnt mean inherited in the sense of the Java Language.
Ok, I understand now.
At the same time, please take the time to look at this code:
boolean addIt = false;
while (true) {
if (message != null) {
if (addIt)
messages.put(originalKey, message);
return (message);
}
addIt = true;
Should I make a new section about Understanding i18n with Struts?
I'll do it. Although is that more of a framework developers
documentation?
Your right, maybe it belongs in the main class description,
in the JavaDoc.
James Mitchell
Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
Joe Germuska wrote:
The problem being that Struts hasn't really switched over to
commons-resources yet. That would end up touching almost every
class! Who wants to take that on when the masses are clamoring at
the gates for a 1.1 final release!
If the API's are very similar then I could
Robert Leland wrote:
+1 except I think we should lose the 'Struts' part of the class names. We
know it's Struts, right? It's in a o.a.s package in the Struts jar
file...
;-) So we'd have:
I agree we should remove 'Struts' and or 'Validator' from the names
o.a.s.validator.Validator
+1
It seems like StrutsValidatorUtil StrutsValidator really
belong in o.a.s.validator
so I propose to deprecated
o.a.s.util.StrutsValidator
o.a.s.util.StrutsValidatorUtil
and copy them to
o.a.s.validator.StrutsValidator
o.a.s.validator.StrutsValidatorUtil
Only the
That is true, but it is needed with each iteration in order to
satisfy the
logic.
Could you please add those line back in?
I believe we were talking past each other !
addIt was never taken out of the while loop,
just --after-- the loop when addIt was always true.
-Rob
--
To unsubscribe,
Robert Leland wrote:
Eddie spoke and it was so:
Only the o.a.s.t.html.JavascriptValidatorTag uses the
StrutsValidatorUtil,
other than the o.a.s.validator. classes
We could move that too and update the TLD, couldn't we? ... if we're
moving ... (maybe put it in o.a.s.v.t.html? It might
Robert Leland wrote:
addIt = true; -Set to true.
if (underscore 0)
break;
}
If a break happens, addIt has already been set to true,
and is not needed.
I mean to say it is not required --after-- the while loop.
-Rob
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe
James Homes wrote:
I just checked the latest nightly build and the
//-- is showing up on the Register and Logon pages
of the example app in IE. This is a problem.
I am using IE 6.0,Mozilla 1.1, NS 4.08, and didn't see the // --.
I also looked at the html generated and saw
paired 'html
Moral of the story -- please be sure that an ant dist runs successfully
before checking in changes to the XML source documents, so that you've
ensured all the XSLT transformations are successful.
I also run Cooktop, on the Windows platform, to edit/display/validate
the XML
using XSLT.
It's
+1 on your proposed approach, including not doing the deprecated
thing for
stuff that was added after 1.1b2.
Craig
Bugzilla, Please :-) !
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:struts-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
So, this is a long-winded case of asking why can't we do this?
The method
public ApplicationConfig ActionConfig.getApplicationConfig()
though this is only used 4 times in struts itself, it is public.
Which means we assume that others extending struts may rely on it.
So to remain
When I updated CVS for Struts and Commons from Work today
all my files were replaced.
Earlier when I updated CVS from Home this morning, every thing seemed
to be working OK. It looks like a router went down
right as I was doing a commit, the archive was updated by my local
copy's version wasn't
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14054] - Rename Application components
to Module
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002-11-04 18:04:41
[Download message RAW]
+1 on the ModuleConfig interface (Struts needs more of these).
I'm not sure about StandardModuleConfigImpl though.
See comments enclosed
James Mitchell wrote:
Not sure if you caught the thread on the users list, or the bug recently
posted by Kjeld Froberg:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14332
Here's the proposed code change:
RequestUtils.java
David Graham wrote:
Do people still use Tomcat 3.2? It's not like they have to pay to
upgrade to 4.1.12. Maybe this isn't such a big deal.
I agree that support for TC 3.2 isn't a big deal since we still have
Struts 1.0.2 which does run on TC 3.2 right ?
I have experience with SOME deployed
David Graham wrote:
Yes, I removed all the empty lines because it made the file very
long. I'm not sure why it would show up as a single line though with
^M. That character normally shows up from windows systems right? I
used Eclipse to make the changes and it shows up fine in my editor.
James Turner wrote:
Hi all,
We're finishing up the CD-ROM for the our Struts Book, and I want
to put a recent nightly build in addition to the 1.1b2 build. Can
anyone recommend a fairly stable recent nightly build that would be a
good candidate (i.e., not crashing all over the place,
James Holmes wrote:
Struts Console too.
-james
--- Emmanuel Boudrant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is time to start packaging tools and
generators with Struts to
help the developer
Thats a really good initiative
Easy Struts will be volunteer ;)
-emmanuel
Would the source
Next time the Nightly documentation is updated,
I'd like to request that the JavaDoc also be updated.
From what I can tell it hasn't been updated for at
least a month or so. I have read the directions for
updating the web site, but don't knoe if I myself
have access to do it ?
-Rob
--
To
I suggested a previous logo back in July but there wasn't any feedback,
every body must have been on vacation.
Take a look at the original post it contains some very interesting links
to the types of the logo's I had in mind.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-userm=102779133515796w=3
-Rob
David Graham wrote:
With all due respect Cedric, that code did not follow the java standard
coding guidelines so it was a candidate for reformatting. Under the
Jakarta rules code must meet those guidelines unless specified
differently for the project. AFAIK Struts has no specific rules so it
I suggested before having the code
automatically formatted when a checkin or
checkout happens.
This could be done in 2 places:
1) The Jakarta script that
checks to see if a user has access to one of
the Jakarta projects.
2)CVS provides hooks/calls to be made
before or after any check out, or
David Morris wrote:
One problem I had with Beta 3 is related to a change to the PlugIn
(http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/PlugIn.java.diff?r1=texttr1=1.6r2=texttr2=1.7diff_format=l)
that forces an update to any class that implements Plugin. Looking
David Graham wrote:
Couldn't you do it just on check-in? It seems like it would take
forever to check out the project if it's always formatting the code.
Yes, it could be done just for check-in. Then we would run into the
problem of doing cvs diffs would not be too usefull if
The version
Martin Cooper wrote:
In any case, I'd prefer to separate the discussion of a set of coding
conventions from the discussion on whether or not to automate them around
the checkout/checkin process.
+1, I'll table the auto discussion for now.
My only pet peeves on formatting is
no spaces between
David Graham wrote:
Member variables should be at the top if for no other reason
than that's where people expect them to be.
It's one of those acquired tastes. Like I said it's not on my list of
must haves, and that's ok! When I first saw variables at the bottom
of a class I cursed, and
James Turner wrote:
I'm the new fish in the pond here, but I wanted to put in my +1 for
sticking a fork in the puppy, 'cause it's done.
+1
Leave the Resources as is.
Delay any major changes to TagLibs until 1.2.
Fix any bugs remaining in the Controller/Module awareness of struts.
(I'll MAKE
Pablo Casado wrote:
Hi,
What version of commons logging should I be using?
Download the latest nightly binary build and use those jars
to build your patch against.
-Rob
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Graham wrote:
Can o.a.s.util.IteratorAdaptor be deprecated and replaced with a call to
the commons-collections' IteratorUtils.asIterator(Enumeration) method?
This class is only used in 3 places.
+0, since I was the one to contribute this originally anyway.
Dave
-Rob
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, David Graham wrote:
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 20:05:27 -0700
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ModuleConfigImpl holds reference to factory
ModuleConfigImpl implements Serializable but the
I apologize if this has been brought up reciently...
The Nightly Struts builds directory is empty
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/
Is this a bad link, know problem, or to
simply to force people to use 1.1b3 ? ;-) !
-Rob
So basically you want to get those values from a property file?
I'll see if I can replicate your changes since I don't have a diff.
-Rob
James Mitchell wrote:
Ok, couple of things:
After careful digging I think I've discovered the problem(s).
1. getServerPort in MockHttpServletRequest is
Martin Cooper wrote:
I prefer this second approach, because then we're testing the real behaviour
of the tags in a real container. Using a mock approach makes me nervous
because of the intricacies of tag lifecycles, and I wouldn't feel as
confident that the tags would work in the real world just
David Graham wrote:
Ideally, tests shouldn't rely on other components that could be broken
because then you don't know why the test failed.
I don't understand what you mean by other components that could be
broken.
snip
Simple tests are better than complicated ones.
How you ordered the
James Mitchell wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: New Tests
Martin Cooper wrote:
I prefer this second approach, because then we're testing the real
Ignore that last email I haven't
finished working out a digester example yet.
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Mitchell wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: New Tests
Martin Cooper wrote:
I prefer this second approach, because then we're testing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/**
+ * Commons Logging instance.
+ * @since Struts 1.1
+ */
+protected static Log log = LogFactory.getLog(MessagesTag.class);
By sharing thge logger errors will look like they are coming
from MessageTag instead of any derived class.
David Graham wrote:
Sorry, I don't follow what you're saying. Are you talking about the log
variable being protected, using the wrong class in getLog(), using the
wrong message key?
Close.
When I derive a class
class NewMessageTag extends Messagetag {
setMessage(String message) {
Gary Ashley wrote:
Otherwise, I'd ask that an important criteria in posting future releases
be considered. There should not be any dependencies upon nightly
builds. Two of my customers will not allow me to use nightly builds for
fear of bugs, and this prevents me from using either beta3 or RC1.
Also, this message would have better been posted on the
struts-user list.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am moving this over to the struts-user list
where it belongs.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Ted Husted wrote:
While *we all* put a lot of time and effort into getting 1.1 ready for
its first release candidate, it seems to me that David Graham really
came through for us over the last few weeks (months, even).
As a token of our appreciation, I'd like to nominate David for a Most
Martin Cooper wrote:
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As the topic comes up regularly, it strikes me that we haven't had any
formal discussions or decisions on what versions of our dependent packages
to include in Struts 1.1 final. Most of them are
asatrasala wrote:
Hello,
Is there any one place I can download all the dependent jars necessary
for compiling struts
Yes download a nightly build and use the included commons-* jars.
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
No, and here is why.
-Rob
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE, Struts, Web Application Development
804 N. Kenmore Street +01-703-525-3580
Arlington VA 22201
from a
commercial vendor.
-Rob
Steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED
there is not a bread crumb trail to follow
and it will cost use more work answering
questions on the users list than if we document it to start with. That
way when they don't read the release notes
we can cut and paste the URL to the release notes.
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED
Steve Raeburn wrote:
I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name.
[ ] ParameterDispatchAction
[X] MappingDispatchAction
[ ] ConfigDispatchAction
-Rob
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE, Struts, Web Application
adam kramer wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Joe Germuska wrote:
I'm pretty sure this was an explicit design intention, although the
main reason may have been to make backwards compatibility more
manageable (or maybe not -- I can't cite any place where this was
discussed; I just have vague
anyway.
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE, Struts, Web
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE, Struts, Web Application Development
804 N. Kenmore Street +01-703-525-3580
Arlington VA 22201
.
Craig
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE, Struts, Web
) {
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE, Struts
PROTECTED]
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE, Struts, Web Application Development
804 N. Kenmore Street +01-703-525-3580
Arlington VA 22201
a 'display-name' 'description' element
defined. Who Knew.
So I will be changing that.
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE, Struts, Web Application Development
804 N. Kenmore Street +01-703-525-3580
Arlington VA 22201
be so revolutionary, and painful. It may be that your
page flow could be just the ticket.
However if you would like to contribute to the chaining directly that
would be great !
-Rob
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE
:30 am for me when the checkin occured and I was just trying to
get it compiled quickly.
-Rob
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE, Struts, Web Application Development
804 N. Kenmore Street +01-703-525-3580
Arlington VA
# causes Buzilla to create a hyper link to the report.
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE, Struts, Web Application Development
804 N. Kenmore Street +01-703-525-3580
Arlington VA 22201
David Graham wrote:
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe at one time we were going to deprecate ActionErrors since it
is really a shell over ActionMessages. We could still keep the
error tag, just make it use ActionMessages directly.
It would be nice to get rid of it but I
the typical notation is PR# .
As long as you commit from the top level, you'll pick up the CVS template,
which provides the spaces for you to enter bug number and submitter.
--
Martin Cooper
Sounds like I should also use the command line version of CVS, to make
life easier.
--
Robert Leland
, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE, Struts, Web Application Development
804 N. Kenmore Street +01-703-525-3580
Arlington VA 22201
David Graham wrote:
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Graham wrote:
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe at one time we were going to deprecate ActionErrors since it
is really a shell over ActionMessages. We could still keep the
error tag, just make
should
be able to be turned off.
In fact once struts configuration is frozen then it should be able to
detect whether it needs
to search for wild card matches or not.
-Rob
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE, Struts, Web
]
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE, Struts, Web Application Development
804 N. Kenmore Street +01-703-525-3580
Arlington VA 22201
-u old new. I also like to use 'diff -u 5 old new'
just to be sure.
-Rob
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE, Struts, Web Application Development
804 N. Kenmore Street +01-703-525-3580
Arlington VA 22201
Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Robert Leland wrote:
Sgarlata Matt wrote:
What do you think? Would this be a reasonable enhancement request?
Can I post it in BugZilla with patches?
Since you have talked about it on the struts-user group, and it looks
like the existing system makes your
life harder
! (Pointing me
to a tag with the kind of preferred error handling that I should
emulate would be useful.)
Paul Sundling
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Robert
exception.because.it.does.not.exist/
following html and bunch of stuff...
So when I get a blank page, I just have to comment out the include to
see the errors. Sorry for the false alarm.
Paul
Thanks for the offer of a patch !
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Java, J2EE, Struts, Web Application Development
804 N. Kenmore Street +01-703-525-3580
Arlington VA 22201
James Mitchell wrote:
Did you guys check out the full page add that Oracle ran in the JDJ?
Oh My God
I don't get the Attendee Since 2002 though, why he keeps coming back. He
hasn't come back yet ! :-/ !
They just wanted a pretty face !!!
-Rob
Rick Hightower wrote:
What were your thoughts on JSTL EL validator rule?
You commented on BSF and OGNL, but not the JSTL EL validator rule, which I
actually wrote. The others just seem like a good idea.
Sorry, For not commenting on that. I agree that a JSTL EL expression
makes sense.
For now
Steve Raeburn wrote:
I'm not singling Vic out for this (honest) but...
The standard advice we are now giving everyone is use JSTL, which I
wholeheartedly agree with and have said myself. However, I think we need to
make sure that we still adequately support non-JSTL solutions and continue
to
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Vic,
Please go away.
I didn't take this as being negative, just an effort to help Ted.
I did get upset when the status was changed to WONTFIX for some items.
It --did-- get me to read the Bugzilla request which I see as
a positive. There are a number of good patches
James Mitchell wrote:
Someone posted a link on another thread that might actually help in
situations like this:
http://www.originalicons.com/smile
Not funny.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Commons Validator 1.1.0 Alpha is now available for testing.
Please refer to http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/validator/tasks.html
that details some of the changes that have taken place since the 1.0.2 release.
Downloads:
http://jakarta.apache.org/~rleland/ValidatorAlpha/
be sure to update your
Steve Raeburn wrote:
I have committed the first step in transitioning the web site documentation
to valid XHTML.
As far as I know we were planning to move over to Maven or forrest.
I have been working on Mavenizing items as I can.
Instead of doing the stylesheets maybe your efforts
could be
Robert Leland wrote:
Steve Raeburn wrote:
I have committed the first step in transitioning the web site
documentation
to valid XHTML.
As far as I know we were planning to move over to Maven or forrest.
I have been working on Mavenizing items as I can.
Instead of doing the stylesheets maybe
site [was: Re: Conversion of web site docs to
XHTML]
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Leland wrote:
Do we want to hold a formal vote/lazy consensus on what doc
system we are moving to ?
Don already put the Struts SourceForge site on Forrest, so I would lean
in that direction
Joe Germuska wrote:
At 14:23 -0400 9/6/03, Robert Leland wrote:
We can always start a struts-2 web site and tweak it until we like
what we have,
or until it works, which ever comes first ! I also wouldn't want to
maintain a seperate
look and feel except to move the blasted [powered
David M. Karr wrote:
Is there a good reason for the tiles classes ImportAttributeTag and
UseAttributeTag to be final classes? I can't implement tiles-el if those
are final classes.
+1, for removing final. Since struts is a framework there is no good
reason for
marking a class as final.
Joe Germuska wrote:
At 14:53 -0400 9/6/03, Robert Leland wrote:
Thanks, I was hoping you would chime in ! It looks like you used
maven for your site,
and I prefer your color scheme over the standard...
You can set a lot of stuff in project.properties -- it should be in a
source distribution
Ted Husted wrote:
Joe Germuska wrote:
It will be some mildly tedious work to move the current doc to xdocs,
but nothing too bad, and if they are valid xhtml, it will be much
easier.
The documentation is all XML now. Steve was just tweaking the XLS.
There's a bit of HTML/XHTML in the sample
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
I thought you were going to back this out ?
-Rob
dgraham 2003/08/19 16:20:46
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action Action.java
Log:
Added version of saveMessages() that saves them into the session
instead of the request.
Revision Changes
David Graham wrote:
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
I thought you were going to back this out ?
The conversation was left with me proposing a solution and asking for
Martin's thoughts on it. He hasn't responded so I haven't backed it out
David Graham wrote:
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Graham wrote:
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
I thought you were going to back this out ?
The conversation was left with me proposing a solution
Use Cases: I am not familar with the particular use cases where the
ActionMessage needs
to hang around in the session. So these suggestions might not fit.
Questions:
Would managing the life cycle through the struts-config.xml, like the
ActionForm work ?
or
How about a PlugIn that has the
David Graham wrote:
Contributors List
I think it's important to keep the contributors list on those pages
because it's a recognition of volunteers' effort. I agree that it gets in
the way so maybe the list should be at the bottom of the page in a smaller
+1, absolutely it's through those
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
