On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:20:40 +0100, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the seednodes, so upgrading should be relatively uneventful. You may be
able to use the update utility on Windows, or update.sh on Linux. If
this does not work, for example if your node connects to zero nodes
after startup, download
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 20:35:39 +0100, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freenet stable build 5095 is now available. Please upgrade, test, and
report bugs.
My log is filled with Too high a probability and Freenet doesn't respond
very well :/
Sep 5, 2004 10:22:38 AM
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:57:14 +0100, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other reports say it is working okay... Do you get RNFs?
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 02:29:43PM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
Symptoms: Very little content browseable outside what I suspect is in my
local datastore, but some content is
Hi,
I'm usually the last person to complain, but I'm a bit puzzled as to how
my 5091 node is feeling atm.
Symptoms: Very little content browseable outside what I suspect is in my
local datastore, but some content is definitely coming in, albeit slowly.
Frost: Nothing. No new posts. This one
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 09:20:24 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you run a freenet node you know it's doing something illegal
No. I've already explained this to you. Short memory?
Do you get paid to post FUD?
___/
_/
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 14:24:35 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And as I explained one does not need 100% certain knowledge of a crime
to fit the legal requirement of knowing. It only needs to be proven
that you had a good reason to suspect that it is so.
The very fact
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 14:35:00 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They do have a choice, nothing is forcing them to run freenet.
It doesn't matter that they can't see exactly what their node is doing,
but only the fact that they know what their node is probably doing.
If
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 15:02:52 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's because ISPs/Mail are protected by common carrier laws, you are
not. They pass laws that specifically say that if a company is
incorporated as a common carrier, then the items (or data) they
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:21:19 +0200, Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To say it clear, a fixed IP (even when it is only fixed for a week) is
something
special you have to pay for in germany, and no ISP will give you
something for
free if he can actually charge a good ammount of extra money
Saw this on /. - thought it might interest someone. Especially the part
about using the server JVM instead of client JVM when speed is an issue
(i.e, if you have plenty of ram but you feel Freenet use too much CPU)
http://www3.sys-con.com/java/rotate2.cfm
___/
_/
--
http://troed.se -
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 17:47:58 -0700 (PDT), MICHAEL BAKEMAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fuck the brits, free speach is what you make of it. Europe doesn't
know what free speach is. In my opinion, this idea will be forced upon
the
europeans by time.
I seriously hope you're kidding. There's more free
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 17:48:20 +0200, Newsbyte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Tell me what you think about it:
http://www.freenethelp.org/bux
He looks stoned.
A bit like Freenet itself - nice :)
___/
_/
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense?
On Fri, 28 May 2004 18:39:14 -0400, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's either not that speed, or not DSL!
ADSL is 1Mbit up, 8Mbit down; SDSL is a little faster for upload, but
slower for download (up=down)...
Even a dedicated T1 is not that fast, around 50Mbps!
Wrong list
On Tue, 25 May 2004 10:51:20 -0400, Jay Oliveri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Fred takes too much CPU and RAM because it's written in Java.
I hate this depate.
It's true that object orienting uses up (a few) more bytes than non-OO
programming, but that's trivial compared to the structuring you
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:41:56 -0700, Galen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking of P2P file transfer protocols. Bittorrent, gnutella,
fasttrack, etc. Uploading doesn't always work really great, but
downloading is quite decent. Bittorrent seems to have zero problems
saturating upstream
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:15:57 +1100, Craig Burton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Freenet,
:)
potentially use Freenet to transmit files. We are keen to adapt or
create a lightweight client, preferably an applet, that can talk to
Freenet seed nodes and post files. We are familiar with the
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:08:55 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wrong. It's quite possible to interface to freenet on the FNP level.
Have a look at freenet/client/FNPClient.java .
... in effect, creating an applet-Fred? But without a datastore and
history, how would those integrate with the
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:37:34 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. The last 3 or 4+ builds have gotten slower and dumber.
Why thank you for that informative, empirically backed and helpful bug
report.
My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
stable builds have
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:44:08 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They have? In what sense? All I hear are complaints... and I usually run
unstable, because it's what gets hacked on mostly...
The huge memory leak is fixed, and transfer speeds has gone up :)
Regarding RNFs .. well, maybe - I
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:22:31 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes (try 1), HTL=25
[2004-03-08 22:15:17] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in
insert
thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
This is strange. Why is FUQID trying to
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:15:27 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
be distributed more widely. Specifically, if the requestor cancels a
transfer, we should still transfer the data. Of course this means that
nodes can DoS the network by requesting data and then cancelling the
transfer; we
Hi all,
I think some will find this interesting.
I've run Freenet on a Duron 900 with 512Mb ram, Windows 2000, for quite
some time. The javaw process has consumed all available CPU, and the
computer has been quite sluggish due to Freenet. I've also seen very low
transfer speeds in FUQID
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:42:48 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Memory usage on both?
Roughly the same at ~150Mb (javaw process)
Knock down the xferrate a bit from 11kb/s, it dropped a while after I sent
that mess (I have no good explanation) but it's still a bit higher than on
the
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 02:31:14 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freenet stable build 5066 is now available. The snapshots have been
This is what 5066 did to my node vs 5065 (uptime 1 hour) :)
Couldn't connect to the network. Are you sure you have configured Freenet
correctly? Also make sure
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 12:53:38 +0100, Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No one in my routing table is usig 5066 .. are they incompatible
versions?
Yes, you have to reseed your node. Please read toads message again ;-).
Ah :) I always skip down to the details on what has been changed. Never
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:01:36 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any incoming connections? Go to the web interface, click on
Advanced mode if necessary, and click on Open Connections. If there are
no incoming connections after 2 days, something relatively obvious is
wrong.
Second, the
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:02:41 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any incoming connections? Please can we eliminate the obvious
causes first especially as others say it's not that bad? I know there's
a problem with RNFs, and all I can say is we are working on it on
unstable with the new
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:44:31 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
number of RNFs and increases the chance of finding data, but it may also
increase the overall network load.. we may have taken it too far in the
other direction in 5060. The only local cost is that it may take longer
for requests
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:36:38 -0500, Paul Derbyshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lastly, is this port being exposed to the Internet going to pose
a security risk, or is the fproxy service reasonably robust against
the usual things, e.g. buffer overflow exploits. The only thing I can
That's
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:56:22 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may redistribute, repackage, and modify freenet as much as you like
under the terms of the GNU General Public License;
I've thought about this since yesterday's mail debate regarding signatures:
Freenet will fail its purpose
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:17:04 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main change in this build is that multiplexing has been merged
after
weeks of development and testing. The network has been reset, so you
will need to reseed from
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref (save that
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 06:00:16 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main change in this build is that multiplexing has been merged after
weeks of development and testing. The network has been reset, so you
will need to reseed from
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref (save that
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 9:52:02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Things don't seem to be as straight forward on a windows machine. For
linux update, I just ran update.sh. What the heck to do I do to update
on a windows machine? Sorry for the dumb question, but I can't find any
simple
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 02:42:19 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was attempting to fix the problem of there being no stable seednodes
that actually work. In other words, any new nodes (unless installed by
someone who knows what they are doing) will immediately fail, not talk
to any other
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:28:58 +0800, Stupid C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
as i know, current Freenet cannot be searched yet.
Freenet is just as searchable as the regular world wide web.
regards,
Troed
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense?
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:08:27 -0800, Art Charbonneau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there an English language forum anywhere on the WWW (or elsewhere)
where Freenet users can assist each other?
That might be too anonymity-compromising for a lot of users. Why not use
Frost or maybe IIP?
regards,
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 20:05:52 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The one change in this build relative to 5047 is to fix a bug that was
causing the browser warning to not be sent if the user configured Opera
to identify as itself. We do check for Opera and IE, because by default
Opera ignores
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:57:49 +, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
freenet:// handled by Opera, Firebird etc. If Freenet isn't installed,
a redirection to http://freenet.sf.net where the download links are
more prominently displayed.
We have debated the whole freenet:xxx thing before and
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:03:33 +, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just how are you trying to get people to visit such links? Verbally? If
Thanks for calling Freenet advocates idiots - but the reaction is more
pity from my side than anything else. http://localhost:; is what
people
39 matches
Mail list logo
