I downloaded freenet on my macbook v10.5.8 however safari cant find
site http://127.0.0.1
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mail
Uriel Carrasquilla writes:
> I am able to upload and download files using the browser but
> Thaw is not doing the trick.
...
> Thaw had some trouble using Direct Disk Access.
...
> I am running Thaw under Windows/XP.
Same problem here, running under Mac OS 10.6 on opennet setup.
Also, I'm us
Matthew Toseland wrote:
Everything sounds great, and I really think that freetalk may make 0.8 a
real hit.
Thanks for your hard work.
> BUILD 1240
>
> Our last stable build, 1239, was in November. We have just released a new
> one, 1240. This has many changes (opennet stuff, optimisations, all
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 1:22 PM, bqz69 wrote:
> I have been following the discussions on this freenet mailing list for
> months,
> and it seems to be more and more active, and new ideas pup up :-)
>
> I was then struck by the thought, to make the whole internet into a
> freenet,
> and to let all
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Michael Yip wrote:
> Dsoslglece wrote:
> > Michael Yip a écrit :
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> My name is Michael and I'm currently studying the source code of
> Freenet.
> >>
> >> I have found that the object reference for all PeerNode objects has the
> >> IP address of th
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Dsoslglece wrote:
> Michael Yip a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> My name is Michael and I'm currently studying the source code of Freenet.
>
> I have found that the object reference for all PeerNode objects has the
> IP address of the peer associated with it. How is anonym
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 6:40 AM, David R. wrote:
> I've just found Freenet, and it looks really great. I've always considered
> freedom of speech pretty much the most important thing you can have, so I
> love what this is doing. Anyway, I've had what seems to be a good idea -
> set up people at
The only problem that I can see here (and it may be kind of serious)
would be: what if your bosses realize that you use resources, work
hours, etc to catch Freenet users, and then you don't actually ban them?
If you don't have a good excuse for that, may be better just forget the
whole idea.
Dude,
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:59 AM, VolodyA! V
> > > Anarhist wrote:
> > >> Luke771 wrote:
> > >>> Alex Pyattaev wrote:
> > >>>> Ok people, I'll try to adopt my own freenode to track the users that
> > >>>> try to connect to fr
> He has stated that the network does not allow "P2P applications" running
> Freenet
> as pure darknet will technically be "F2F", now we can start arguing whether
> F2F
> is a subset of P2P or a distinctly different thing. But if we accept that
> F2F
> and P2P are different, then people who haven't
asymmetrical bursty traffic).
Alex.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Victor Denisov wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'd suggest detecting Freenet nodes by their UDP traffic usage. No
> amount of VoIP or gaming activity will generate a near-constant
et users in the LAN=)
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Søren Bredlund Caspersen <
soeren@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hopefully the answer to Alex's question is: It can't be done.
>
> If he can detect freenet nodes on his network, you must assume that
> governments and the li
I'm a system administrator of a private home network, providing internet to
subscribers via ethernet. The corporate policy prohibits the use of ANY p2p
network by subscribers. The question is - is it possible to detect freenet
nodes on my LAN? I could indeed use connection statistics, but this is n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Run the command:
DISPLAY="" java -jar selfextractpack.jar
That will run the text only version of the installer.
BlueStar88 wrote:
> I'm back after a break.
>
> Now i see only java-autoinstall packages to download. And the linux
> variants seem to b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Run the command:
DISPLAY="" java -jar selfextractpack.jar
That will run the text only version of the installer.
BlueStar88 wrote:
> I'm back after a break.
>
> Now i see only java-autoinstall packages to download. And the linux
> variants seem to b
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> (snip of already discussed stuff)
>>In practice you will have a big opennet unsuitable for
>>your test purposes and some small darknets, maybe unknown to you, and
>>probably so small to be of no value to your intention of testing the
>>global scalable darknet. Aren't WAS
[Ian]
Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is
"clusters of isolated dark nodes", which is worse?
>>>
[Matthew]
>>>There would be no real reason to grow the darknet, that's the
>>>point. If
>>>the only way to connect (easily) is by growing the darknet, it wil
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> (snip of already discussed stuff)
>>In practice you will have a big opennet unsuitable for
>>your test purposes and some small darknets, maybe unknown to you, and
>>probably so small to be of no value to your intention of testing the
>>global scalable darknet. Aren't WAS
[Ian]
Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is
"clusters of isolated dark nodes", which is worse?
>>>
[Matthew]
>>>There would be no real reason to grow the darknet, that's the
>>>point. If
>>>the only way to connect (easily) is by growing the darknet, it wil
daniele wrote:
I think it is indifferent.
Personally I have Debian. But any other distro would support Java, and
Freenet needs only java.
Yep, Mandrake 10.1 here and no worries.
[Anon] Anon User ha scritto:
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext
It sounds like
Matthew Toseland wrote:
How do you suggest we fix the problem? If freenet was compilable that
might help I suppose. Hopefully 0.7 will be.
This means that compability with gjc is a feature of 0.7?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 07:56:42PM +0400, Danila Medvedev wrote:
Under win2k Freenet (latest v
Ken Snider wrote:
I've recently obtained long-term access to a Linux server sitting on a
100MBit link that I intend to devote (mostly) to freenet.
To this end, I have some questions:
3 - Are there known limitations to running with larger settings? for
example, one would assume that threading
Kevin Steen wrote:
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 13:49, Todd Walton wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:35:45 +0100, Alex R. Mosteo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Interesting, I will try to start with a clean freenet.ini. Thought I
haven't changed any setting (directly nor with the configtool) when
fre
Constantine Dokolas wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like possibly an error in the config file rather than an
error in
the datastore...
I'd suggest *not* using the windows configtool at any time. I've noticed
it
inserting bad character sequences into the config file
Todd Walton wrote:
Freenet was running fine. I rebooted my computer into Windows and
Freenet won't run. To repeat: it was running fine before, and I
didn't change anything. I've uninstalled Freenet (keeping the store
and route data) and reinstalled it. It didn't work.
When I start Freenet I jus
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/DFI//
I just completed my first successful insert of DFI today since returning to
freenet just yesterday. Please try using it so that it will begin to
propagate again as quickly as possible.
Due to the fact that I'm just starting back with freenet, th
If you want to make sure the webinstaller hasn't been messed with, just sign
it with something like gpg.
Explorer has caused a general protection fault in module kernel32.dll. I'm
sick of Winblows!
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November
Um, and this pertains to freenet how?
Explorer has caused a general protection fault in module kernel32.dll. I'm
sick of Winblows!
- Original Message -
From: "changelog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:19 PM
Subject: [freenet-support] Bullet p
Hi.
Has anyone gotten freenews to work recently? I get an error in the freenews
log that says something like request successfull but no data sent.
Does anyone no what I could do to solve this problem?
Explorer has caused a general protection fault in module kernel32.dll. I'm
sick of Winblows!
__
Hi All,
How do I let other people connect to fproxy? I tried adding the line listed
in the faq entry for this problem, I think it was something like
fproxy.bindaddress=* but still nothing. I can access it from the local
machine using loopback but no one else can access it. Anyone have any
ideas?
30 matches
Mail list logo