On Sunday, November 15, 2009, 2:17:12 AM, Luke771 wrote:
Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Monday 09 November 2009 19:41:27 Ichi wrote:
First, I appreciate that Matthew had to ban Toni. Open discussion
of Freenet documents is just plain stupid, for obvious reasons.
Second, I'm sure that
Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Monday 09 November 2009 19:41:27 Ichi wrote:
First, I appreciate that Matthew had to ban Toni. Open discussion
of Freenet documents is just plain stupid, for obvious reasons.
Second, I'm sure that Freenet and this list are already illegal in
many countries. If
Ichi wrote:
First, I appreciate that Matthew had to ban Toni. Open discussion
of Freenet documents is just plain stupid, for obvious reasons.
Second, I'm sure that Freenet and this list are already illegal in
many countries. If Freenet ever becomes popular, it will undoubtedly
become
On Thursday 12 November 2009 14:04:08 Jonas Islander wrote:
Ichi wrote:
First, I appreciate that Matthew had to ban Toni. Open discussion
of Freenet documents is just plain stupid, for obvious reasons.
Second, I'm sure that Freenet and this list are already illegal in
many countries.
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 06:42:02 mih...@riseup.net wrote:
I'd also ask why it is physically based in the UK
Freenet is not based in the UK. I am based in the UK.
which is undoubtedly the
western country most repressive of internet use.
Definitely not true. A number of european
bimbek пишет:
Oh, with all the respect Matthew Toseland, you did not need to ban the
poor guy.
I hope that one day you will not ban all of us just because some US
court would say that using freenet is illegal...
Actually somebody will (whether or not it will be Matthew Toseland or not i
...why would this mailing list have to shut down if Freenet was deemed
illegal? Just because you can't run the software doesn't mean you
can't talk about it. We (supposedly) have freedom of speech here in
the US - I mean, murder is illegal, but you can still _talk_ about
murder. Hell you can even
VolodyA! V Anarhist a écrit :
bimbek пишет:
Oh, with all the respect Matthew Toseland, you did not need to ban the
poor guy.
I hope that one day you will not ban all of us just because some US
court would say that using freenet is illegal...
Actually somebody will (whether or not
urza9...@gmail.com пишет:
...why would this mailing list have to shut down if Freenet was deemed
illegal? Just because you can't run the software doesn't mean you
can't talk about it. We (supposedly) have freedom of speech here in
the US - I mean, murder is illegal, but you can still _talk_
We'll talk in Freetalk/FMS then :)
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:27 PM, VolodyA! V Anarhist
volo...@whengendarmesleeps.org wrote:
urza9...@gmail.com пишет:
...why would this mailing list have to shut down if Freenet was deemed
illegal? Just because you can't run the software doesn't mean you
Meh, it's no different from what television and movie producers do on
a daily basis...
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:27 PM, VolodyA! V Anarhist
volo...@whengendarmesleeps.org wrote:
urza9...@gmail.com пишет:
...why would this mailing list have to shut down if Freenet was deemed
illegal? Just
First, I appreciate that Matthew had to ban Toni. Open discussion
of Freenet documents is just plain stupid, for obvious reasons.
Second, I'm sure that Freenet and this list are already illegal in
many countries. If Freenet ever becomes popular, it will undoubtedly
become illegal everywhere,
I'd also ask why it is physically based in the UK which is undoubtedly the
western country most repressive of internet use.
Only yesterday the 'interception modernatization programme' which would
attempt to record all emails was dropped for 'tecnhical' reasons:
On Sunday 18 October 2009 11:24:08 Toni Bergman wrote:
...
I present you with my graph. I'm downloading music from freenet.
Thanks for your detailed bug report. However, based on your graph, which
contains clear evidence of copyright infringement (there *is* legal music on
Freenet, but the
Wow, that's a bit...extreme. I mean there's a _huge_ difference
between refusing to give someone support, which may or may not be
legal, and completely banning them. I mean just because _you_ can't
help him doesn't mean nobody else on this list can. Way to alienate a
rather significant percentage
Welcome to the USA. You need to be very careful these days in regard to
any discussion of file sharing. There are many legal pitfalls and many
with deep pockets just looking for an opportunity to sue. Like it or not
email lists are not a place to discuss illegal activities whether you
agree
Sorry, I was just trying to point out that some consider any mention of
sharing copyrighted material, however fleeting, as proof positive that
the whole purpose of the development of a technology is to steal their
intellectual property . Personally I think the whole notion of
copyright has
17 matches
Mail list logo
