Re: [freenet-support] Problems ...

2010-05-14 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 23 April 2010 07:09:53 arra...@gmx.net wrote: ... I do have not (at least with Freenet ;) ) Just wanted to let you know, that on my rig downloading, installing and running Freenet was absolutly painless. Even loading what must be the most popular pages worked within seconds!

[freenet-support] Problems ...

2010-04-23 Thread arralen
... I do have not (at least with Freenet ;) ) Just wanted to let you know, that on my rig downloading, installing and running Freenet was absolutly painless. Even loading what must be the most popular pages worked within seconds! I'm running Freenet Build #1244 rbuild01244 and freenet-ext

Re: [freenet-support] problems with internet

2009-10-11 Thread urza9814
I've had that problem before actually, though it was on Freenet 0.5. Is there still a way to set bandwidth limits? That's what I had to do. Freenet saturated the network so heavily that while it was running _nothing_ else would work. On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Juiceman juicema...@gmail.com

[freenet-support] problems with internet

2009-10-09 Thread lostserial
hi. Internet through a router. after installing freenet, lost internet in opera, mozila, ie8 emule and utorrent working properly. how to fix? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support

[freenet-support] Problems

2009-06-19 Thread Andrew Mathison
Browser does not open after install. I use Firefox. I have installed 4 times in English, all the same problems. I use Deutsch WinXP Pro. Grüß Andy Mathison +49-6008-92083___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org

Re: [freenet-support] Problems

2009-06-19 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 21:31:17 Andrew Mathison wrote: Browser does not open after install. I use Firefox. I have installed 4 times in English, all the same problems. I use Deutsch WinXP Pro. Ok. You installed Freenet using the windows installer (FreenetInstaller-1222.exe), the install

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with opening the browser

2009-06-04 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 29 May 2009 15:49:34 Walker Bohannan wrote: Dear Support, I recently downloaded and installed Freenet 0.7 so I can access certain sites on my laptop at school to do research for a paper we're doing and everything downloaded and installed fine but then when it opened up

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with opening the browser

2009-05-31 Thread Luke771
Edward Langenback wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Walker Bohannan wrote: Dear Support, I recently downloaded and installed Freenet 0.7 so I can access certain sites on my laptop at school to do research for a paper we're doing That reads to me like

[freenet-support] Problems with opening the browser

2009-05-30 Thread Walker Bohannan
Dear Support, I recently downloaded and installed Freenet 0.7 so I can access certain sites on my laptop at school to do research for a paper we're doing and everything downloaded and installed fine but then when it opened up Safari and tried to connect to http://127.0.0.1: it gave me

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with opening the browser

2009-05-30 Thread Edward Langenback
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Walker Bohannan wrote: Dear Support, I recently downloaded and installed Freenet 0.7 so I can access certain sites on my laptop at school to do research for a paper we're doing That reads to me like you're trying to use Freenet as a proxy

[freenet-support] problems with config

2008-02-12 Thread Matthew Toseland
So you installed Freenet, it opened a browser, you clicked on the link to go to http://127.0.0.1:/wizard/ ? Please send us your wrapper.log. On Monday 11 February 2008 14:42, Jean-Claude F?ret wrote: > Hi, > I guess you feel better if I do write in English ? > First of all, I'm on OS X

[freenet-support] problems with config

2008-02-12 Thread Darren Jones
I installed freenet on 10.5.1 and have had no issues during the install or using freenet, if that helps anybody track down this error. Darren On 11 Feb 2008, at 14:42, Jean-Claude F?ret wrote: > Hi, > I guess you feel better if I do write in English ? > First of all, I'm on OS X 10.4.10

[freenet-support] problems with config

2008-02-12 Thread Phillip Hutchings
On 12/02/2008, at 03:42, Jean-Claude F?ret wrote: > Hi, > I guess you feel better if I do write in English ? > First of all, I'm on OS X 10.4.10 and used upto now Azureus and > mlDonkey (occasionally LimeWire or Ants) > Having heard about freenet, I did download it, and followed the >

Re: [freenet-support] problems with config

2008-02-12 Thread Matthew Toseland
So you installed Freenet, it opened a browser, you clicked on the link to go to http://127.0.0.1:/wizard/ ? Please send us your wrapper.log. On Monday 11 February 2008 14:42, Jean-Claude Féret wrote: Hi, I guess you feel better if I do write in English ? First of all, I'm on OS X 10.4.10

Re: [freenet-support] problems with config

2008-02-12 Thread Darren Jones
I installed freenet on 10.5.1 and have had no issues during the install or using freenet, if that helps anybody track down this error. Darren On 11 Feb 2008, at 14:42, Jean-Claude Féret wrote: Hi, I guess you feel better if I do write in English ? First of all, I'm on OS X 10.4.10 and

[freenet-support] problems with config

2008-02-11 Thread Jean-Claude Féret
Hi, I guess you feel better if I do write in English ? First of all, I'm on OS X 10.4.10 and used upto now Azureus and mlDonkey (occasionally LimeWire or Ants) Having heard about freenet, I did download it, and followed the installation procedure (/by the way, and if it can be of any interest

Re: [freenet-support] problems with config

2008-02-11 Thread Phillip Hutchings
On 12/02/2008, at 03:42, Jean-Claude Féret wrote: Hi, I guess you feel better if I do write in English ? First of all, I'm on OS X 10.4.10 and used upto now Azureus and mlDonkey (occasionally LimeWire or Ants) Having heard about freenet, I did download it, and followed the installation

[freenet-support] problems with config

2008-02-11 Thread Jean-Claude Féret
Hi, I guess you feel better if I do write in English ? First of all, I'm on OS X 10.4.10 and used upto now Azureus and mlDonkey (occasionally LimeWire or Ants) Having heard about freenet, I did download it, and followed the installation procedure (/by the way, and if it can be of any interest

[freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-06 Thread toad
e: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 17:55:53 +> To: jeroen__1993 at hotmail.com; > > support at freenetproject.org> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] problems with > > Frost> From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> > You are running Frost on the > > same machine as Freenet? Yo

Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-06 Thread toad
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; support@freenetproject.org Subject: Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You are running Frost on the same machine as Freenet? You are running the most recent version of Frost from the frost website? On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:52

[freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-03 Thread Jeroen Veldt
yes i am. i have node 993 now but still not working don't have any clue i am still in need of help > Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 17:55:53 +> To: jeroen__1993 at hotmail.com; > support at freenetproject.org> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] problems with > Frost> From: toad at am

[freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-03 Thread toad
thanks> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:48:39 +> To: support at > freenetproject.org> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost> From: > toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> > There was a problem with *uploading* messages > from Frost, fixed in> 992...> > On Wed, N

[freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-02 Thread Jeroen Veldt
i am running node 992 but the problem still excistsany other suggestions are more then welcomethanks> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:48:39 +> To: support at freenetproject.org> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost> From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> > T

[freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread Jeroen Veldt
To: support at freenetproject.org> Subject: Re: > [freenet-support] problems with Frost> > One of the things to make sure is > that you don't set any downloads/inserts to the high> priority (and > definitely not emergency). If you do that then frost will always have to>

[freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread toad
There was a problem with *uploading* messages from Frost, fixed in 992... On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 01:18:46PM +0100, Jeroen Veldt wrote: > > Dear Sir, Ever since about 2 weeks i have problems with Frost. > Frost does not refresh any boards, no messages are shown nothing happens. I > can not

[freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread Volodya
One of the things to make sure is that you don't set any downloads/inserts to the high priority (and definitely not emergency). If you do that then frost will always have to wait until other stuff completes first. Alternatively you can do soft rather than hard priority setting.

[freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread Jeroen Veldt
Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost > > Please check your frost.log file for any error messages. If you want > you could send me the log files for analysis, but if you want to then > send them directly to me, NOT to the support list! > > rgds, bback, frost developer. >

[freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread bbac...@googlemail.com
Please check your frost.log file for any error messages. If you want you could send me the log files for analysis, but if you want to then send them directly to me, NOT to the support list! rgds, bback, frost developer. On 11/1/06, Jeroen Veldt wrote: > > Dear Sir, Ever since about 2 weeks i

[freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread Jeroen Veldt
Dear Sir, Ever since about 2 weeks i have problems with Frost. Frost does not refresh any boards, no messages are shown nothing happens. I can not upload any messages. When i am on Fproxy i can get to Indica and Darknet. They both work. I can access the freesites. It is frustrating me very

[freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread Jeroen Veldt
Dear Sir, Ever since about 2 weeks i have problems with Frost. Frost does not refresh any boards, no messages are shown nothing happens. I can not upload any messages. When i am on Fproxy i can get to Indica and Darknet. They both work. I can access the freesites. It is frustrating me very

Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread bbackde
Please check your frost.log file for any error messages. If you want you could send me the log files for analysis, but if you want to then send them directly to me, NOT to the support list! rgds, bback, frost developer. On 11/1/06, Jeroen Veldt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Sir, Ever since

RE: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread Jeroen Veldt
Thank you so much, i will send them tonight. I just have to so a search for frost.log and send you the content, right? Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:28:09 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: support@freenetproject.org Subject: Re: [freenet-support

Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread Volodya
One of the things to make sure is that you don't set any downloads/inserts to the high priority (and definitely not emergency). If you do that then frost will always have to wait until other stuff completes first. Alternatively you can do soft rather than hard priority setting.

Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread toad
There was a problem with *uploading* messages from Frost, fixed in 992... On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 01:18:46PM +0100, Jeroen Veldt wrote: Dear Sir, Ever since about 2 weeks i have problems with Frost. Frost does not refresh any boards, no messages are shown nothing happens. I can not upload

RE: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread Jeroen Veldt
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost One of the things to make sure is that you don't set any downloads/inserts to the high priority (and definitely not emergency). If you do that then frost will always have to wait until other stuff completes first. Alternatively you can do soft rather

RE: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread Jeroen Veldt
i am running node 992 but the problem still excistsany other suggestions are more then welcomethanks Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:48:39 + To: support@freenetproject.org Subject: Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] There was a problem with *uploading* messages from

[freenet-support] Problems when starting up

2005-10-27 Thread 4321fred1...@web.de
Hello! I run freenet on linux with newest Sun-JRE (PIII, 256 MB) and it often seems to have starting-problems: Sometimes it starts already after a few minutes to produce traffic and behaves as usual, but often it has for a long time only 9 to 11 threads, doesnt't react to the webinterface,

[freenet-support] Problems when starting up

2005-10-27 Thread Matthew Toseland
What build of freenet are you running? I don't recognize the problem below... On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 08:49:23PM +0200, 4321fred1234 at web.de wrote: > > Hello! > > I run freenet on linux with newest Sun-JRE (PIII, 256 MB) and it often seems > to have starting-problems: > > Sometimes it

[freenet-support] Problems when starting up

2005-10-27 Thread 4321fred1234
Hello! I run freenet on linux with newest Sun-JRE (PIII, 256 MB) and it often seems to have starting-problems: Sometimes it starts already after a few minutes to produce traffic and behaves as usual, but often it has for a long time only 9 to 11 threads, doesnt't react to the webinterface,

Re: [freenet-support] Problems when starting up

2005-10-27 Thread Matthew Toseland
What build of freenet are you running? I don't recognize the problem below... On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 08:49:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! I run freenet on linux with newest Sun-JRE (PIII, 256 MB) and it often seems to have starting-problems: Sometimes it starts already

[freenet-support] Problems with 5101; priorities

2005-02-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
I have many reports from users that 5101 sucks. Some of these seem fairly solid, reproducible results. On the other hand a few users seem satisfied with it. I have been trying to focus on 0.7 work lately. Now, should I try to debug 5101, in preference to 0.7 work? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-support] problems starting node

2004-12-07 Thread Toad
Hmm. Delete freenet entirely and then reinstall. This is a corrupt routing table, I think... On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 09:42:38PM +, Amir Kabil wrote: please find below error message what do i do next? node did work then stopped please help Dec 5, 2004 7:51:24 PM (freenet.node.Main, main,

[freenet-support] problems starting node

2004-12-05 Thread Amir Kabil
please find below error message what do i do next? node did work then stopped please help Dec 5, 2004 7:51:24 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Starting Freenet (Fred) 0.5 node, build #5100 on JVM Sun Microsystems Inc.:Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM:1.4.2_06-b03 INFO: Native CPUID library

RE: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a windows perspective.

2004-08-19 Thread Don Gregory
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 1:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a windows perspective. I recently installed a new node from scratch on a Windows XP SP2 box, and here are my observations. While there's lots of talk about

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a windows perspective.

2004-08-19 Thread Jay Oliveri
Transient isn't that relevant anymore; the current build in CVS has all traces of the Transient property removed. So you won't notice much of a difference using this property on stable (build 5091). On Thursday 19 August 2004 03:05 am, Don Gregory wrote: Well, I HAVE bumped into the half-open

RE: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a windowsperspective.

2004-08-19 Thread Don Gregory
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a windowsperspective. Transient isn't that relevant anymore; the current build in CVS has all traces of the Transient property removed. So you won't notice much of a difference using this property on stable (build

[freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a windows perspective.

2004-08-18 Thread Michael DeLisle
I recently installed a new node from scratch on a Windows XP SP2 box, and here are my observations. While there's lots of talk about SP2 limiting TCP connections, I haven't see any real issues with it. On the negative side, freenet-java-webinstall.exe is configured to install Sun JRE

[freenet-support] Problems with OS X

2004-07-29 Thread Alexander Fornell
I have downloaded freenet and I removed the line that makes java choke on start 128 MB thingy, anyway I can't go to 127.0.0.1: I only get connection refused... I did a lsof -i ~/freenet % lsof -i | grep java java 997 isbiten6u IPv6 0t0 TCP can't read in6pcb at

[freenet-support] Problems following loss of Internet connection

2004-07-10 Thread Nicholas Sturm
I don't know if my experience using the Windows version of Freenet will apply when using any other operating systems. I've tested the result of loss of Internet connection, both spontaneously and intentionally, enough times that I am confident Freenet cannot recover to effectively use the

[freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Daniele
Hi! I've downoloaded freenet some days ago. I istalled it on two machines: one is running Windows XP, the other is running Linux Mandrake 9.2. I've encountered some problems in both the installations. In Windows XP i've correctly installed freenet, and it seems to be happily running. But there

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Toad
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:02:45PM +0100, Daniele wrote: Hi! I've downoloaded freenet some days ago. I istalled it on two machines: one is running Windows XP, the other is running Linux Mandrake 9.2. I've encountered some problems in both the installations. In Windows XP i've correctly

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:01:36 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any incoming connections? Go to the web interface, click on Advanced mode if necessary, and click on Open Connections. If there are no incoming connections after 2 days, something relatively obvious is wrong. Second, the

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Max Moritz Sievers
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 15:16, Troed Sångberg wrote: Toad, Since re-introducing NGR into stable at least my node has grinded almost to a halt with similar symptoms. A very small amount of connections, almost none transferring data, very little data going through at all - and I often

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Toad
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:06:46PM +0100, Max Moritz Sievers wrote: On Wednesday 04 February 2004 15:16, Troed S?ngberg wrote: Toad, Since re-introducing NGR into stable at least my node has grinded almost to a halt with similar symptoms. A very small amount of connections, almost none

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:02:41 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any incoming connections? Please can we eliminate the obvious causes first especially as others say it's not that bad? I know there's a problem with RNFs, and all I can say is we are working on it on unstable with the new

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Toad
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:21:16AM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote: On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:02:41 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any incoming connections? Please can we eliminate the obvious causes first especially as others say it's not that bad? I know there's a problem with

[freenet-support] problems with rate limiting

2004-02-02 Thread Fwolff33
After upgrading to 6459 I got this situation: Current routingTime 18ms Current messageSendTimeRequest 0ms Pooled threads running jobs 22 (20%) Current upstream bandwidth usage 211 bytes/second (2,1%) Estimated external pSearchFailed (based only on QueryRejections due to load):

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with tech mailing list?

2004-01-21 Thread Ian Clarke
Did you send the email from the same email address you used to subscribe? Ian. Victor Denisov wrote: Hello, I've subcribed to the tech mailing list, received a confirmation and then (a couple of hours later) sent an e-mail to it. Contrary to my expectations, I've received a reply telling me

[freenet-support] Problems with freenet 2

2002-10-29 Thread Boom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 To follow on from this here's a sample of the logfile - is this normal? vletContainer, QThread-32): I/O error in servlet 29-Oct-2002 18:20:38 (freenet.interfaces.servlet.MultipleHttpServletContainer, QThread-48): I/O error in servlet 29-Oct-2002

[freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Boom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there :) Nice software.. I totally think this is an excellent idea for protecting peoples freedom of speech and expression, if too radical for many people from the US to deal with ;) At any rate, I am running as a 24/7 node with port 2 as

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:33:52PM -, Boom wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there :) Nice software.. I totally think this is an excellent idea for protecting peoples freedom of speech and expression, if too radical for many people from the US to deal with ;)

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Mike
. :P laters. - Original Message - From: Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there :) Nice software.. I totally think this is an excellent idea

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Josh Steiner
my uniformed guess is that since all routing of data is done totally peer to peer, the network is going to be pretty flakey for the next few hours while all these new slashdot nodes come online. its just a matter of dillution... suddenly there is a massive flood of nodes that dont know how to

RE: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread William_dw -- Sqlcoders
] [mailto:support-admin;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Mike Sent: 28 October 2002 13:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet sorry, matthew, but your replies come to me as garbeled attachments. my server stips attachments, as a virus security precaution. can

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:45:42PM -0800, Mike wrote: sorry, matthew, but your replies come to me as garbeled attachments. my server stips attachments, as a virus security precaution. can you re reply to this thread. thanks. Your server is fscked. My client does not send HTML attachments, it

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Mike
: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:45:42PM -0800, Mike wrote: sorry, matthew, but your replies come to me as garbeled attachments. my server stips attachments, as a virus security precaution. can you re reply to this thread. thanks. Your server is fscked. My

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Greg Wooledge
Mike ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: actually, it comes to me as attachments. anf the attachments are 1 txt and 1 DAT That's how PGP signed e-mails look. Your e-mail client is Outlook Express -- it can't handle MIME properly. (Or your MTA has been broken beyond repair.) most likely because of

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Mike
yeah... castrated.. lol - Original Message - From: Greg Wooledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:34 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-18 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:08:13AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: simple. when trying to download a fec from freenet: Is this a new node? It's possible that there is crud in your config file that is no longer valid for new builds. yes, it is, in fact 517 am i missing some config

Re: [freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-18 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 01:09:07AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: simple. when trying to download a fec from freenet: Is this a new node? It's possible that there is crud in your config file that is no longer valid for new builds. yes, it is, in fact 517 am i missing some

Re: [freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
simple. when trying to download a fec from freenet: Is this a new node? It's possible that there is crud in your config file that is no longer valid for new builds. yes, it is, in fact 517 am i missing some config lines? splease be so nice and prompt them into the support ml :)

Re: [freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-18 Thread Matthew Toseland
alright, 519 is up i d/l the tgz, stopped the node, extracted freenet.jer and ext.jar to the freenet directory, overwriting the old files i did NOT touch the config file and despite i'm running windows (no new start of the installer) a splitfile upload actually SUCCEEDED with the first

[freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
simple. when trying to download a fec from freenet: 16.10.2002 22:58:16 (freenet.client.http.FproxyServlet, FThread-1): Error sending data to browser: freenet.client.http.filter.FilterException: Unknown mime type snip/snip Couldn't get decoder! java.lang.NullPointerException at

Re: [freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-16 Thread the bishop
... java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) (tested with 1.3.0, too, but no changes) ... first of all, 1.4.0 is a beta version. try 1.4.1 or later, or use IBMs JDK. second:

Re: [freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-16 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:11:02PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: simple. when trying to download a fec from freenet: Is this a new node? It's possible that there is crud in your config file that is no longer valid for new builds. 16.10.2002 22:58:16 (freenet.client.http.FproxyServlet,

Re: [freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
simple. when trying to download a fec from freenet: Is this a new node? It's possible that there is crud in your config file that is no longer valid for new builds. yes, it is, in fact 517 am i missing some config lines? splease be so nice and prompt them into the support ml :)

[freenet-support] problems with automatic webinstaller

2002-10-15 Thread zbalevsk
this has been reported before. the webinstaller that is linked to from the front page still doesn't update the java settings correctly. It searches for jvm on the disk, finds it and when I click on update settings a box comes up saying settings have been updated succesfully. however after

[freenet-support] Problems with 0.5pre1 setup

2002-10-05 Thread Roger Hayter
I went through the new node setup process with 0.5pre1, and found the following easily remediable problems with the automatic configuration, in the order they are encountered: 1. fcpHosts The instructions do not make it plain that if you enter a list it has to include localhost, if you omit

[freenet-support] Problems with Java?

2002-06-04 Thread Mariusz
Hi I can not execute start-freenet under my Slackware 8.0 Linux. I have j2re1.4.0 and jdk1.2.2. When I wish to start freenet, i have message like this: Exception in thread main java.lang.NullPointerException at freenet.node.Main.seedRoutingTable(Main.java, Compiled Code) at

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet under Mac OS X 10.1

2001-11-01 Thread Zachary Copley
On Saturday, October 20, 2001, at 05:52 PM, Zachary Copley wrote: I'm having terrible trouble gettting Freenet 0.3.9.2 to work with Mac OS X 10.1. The node starts up, but then I can't retrieve any keys. Well, since the latest release of Freenet doesn't work with Mac OS X 10.1 (even thought

Re: [freenet-support] problems w\ .4 snapshot on win95

2001-10-31 Thread Sebastian Spth
Muzzle wrote: I recently tried to install the oct 28 and oct 24 snapshot of the developing freenet on a p120, win95, 24mb of ram, jre 1.3.1, with an ISDN internet connection. Both snapshots come out w\ the same error. When the installer tried to exec the configuration program win answered

RE: [freenet-support] problems w\ .4 snapshot on win95

2001-10-31 Thread tech
Hi, I tried it too. All the seeds node are bad. Would you please send me a mainstream seed node to start? Also, I suggest getting the seed.ref file encrypted. Otherwise, some authorities will block the seed nodes immediately, and will track down who is using freenet just by monitoring who is

[freenet-support] problems

2001-07-04 Thread spitfir3
ihave a problem: when i start freenet.exe there is the ms internet explorer and in the window is the text: Connection refused ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support

[freenet-support] problems

2001-07-02 Thread Felix Puetsch
a) I installed freenet, it runs, but I cannot receive foreign keys, I get e.g. Network Error Couldn't retrieve key: MSK@SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh- Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/homepage// Hops To Live: 100 Change Hops To Live I'm behind a router and a firewall... b) what is cation.positive-internet.com that is

[freenet-support] Problems with KeyIndexClient

2001-06-30 Thread Thomas Formella
When I try to retrieve a input key by: java -classpath ... Freenet.client.KeyIndexClient -serverAddress tcp/127.0.0.1:19335 -list 30062001test (I inserted a test key before: java -classpath ... Freenet.client.KeyIndexClient -serverAddress tcp/127.0.0.1:19335 -insert 30062001 -key freenet:[EMAIL

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with KeyIndexClient

2001-06-30 Thread Rob Cakebread
On Saturday 30 June 2001 04:55 pm, Thomas Formella wrote: When I try to retrieve a input key by: java -classpath ... Freenet.client.KeyIndexClient -serverAddress tcp/127.0.0.1:19335 -list 30062001test (I inserted a test key before: java -classpath ... Freenet.client.KeyIndexClient

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with KeyIndexClient

2001-06-30 Thread Thomas Formella
Rob Cakebread wrote: You might try upgrading to JDK 1.3 as I think HashSet has only been around since JDK 1.2. It also looks like you aren't trying to retrieve the same key you inserted, or am I missing something? You are inserting the key: test300601.html but trying to retrieve it

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with KeyIndexClient

2001-06-30 Thread Thomas Formella
Rob Cakebread wrote: I'm waiting until XML-RPC is fixed in an upcoming release of Freenet. When that is working I'll have a command line client that doesn't rely on KeyIndexClient. It is written in Python. For now you can download keys with it, but the inserting part doesn't work because of

[freenet-support] problems galore

2001-06-06 Thread BigYin
I am useing version 0.3.9.1: I have just install'd the program but am getting the message that it couldnt find the java runtime.It directed me to the jave.sun.com site but i didnt find much joy there.Pressed the update button but it didnt do much. Thank you. Jim MItchell

Re: [freenet-support] problems galore

2001-06-06 Thread mark . humphrey
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:29:30PM +0100, BigYin wrote: I am useing version 0.3.9.1: I have just install'd the program but am getting the message that it couldnt find the java runtime.It directed me to the jave.sun.com site but i didnt find much joy there.Pressed the update button but it

[freenet-support] Problems

2001-06-02 Thread Rahmani Vanterpool
Error opening file for writing C:\programfiles\Freenet\freenet.exe Java runtime problem need Java interpreter These are the two problems I had loading up. Wouldn't work.