On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Memory usage was plateauing = memory usage was constantly at the
> (low) maximum, and it was using 100% CPU in a vain attempt to reclaim
> the last byte of memory. This is the most likely explanation by far
Right. (Is it just me, or
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Memory usage was plateauing = memory usage was constantly at the
(low) maximum, and it was using 100% CPU in a vain attempt to reclaim
the last byte of memory. This is the most likely explanation by far
Right. (Is it just me, or does
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:49:58 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 05 February 2009 00:43, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:26:40 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:49:58 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 05 February 2009 00:43, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:26:40 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thursday 05 February 2009 00:43, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:26:40 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic
On Thursday 05 February 2009 00:43, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:26:40 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:26:40 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:26:40 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > > Give it more memory. If you can't give it more
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Give it more memory. If you can't give it more memory,
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > Give it more memory. If you can't give it more memory, throw the box
> > > out the window and buy a new one. If you
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Give it more memory. If you can't give it more memory, throw the box
> > out the window and buy a new one. If you can't do that wait for the
> > db4o branch.
>
> Or, more
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Give it more memory. If you can't give it more memory, throw the box
> out the window and buy a new one. If you can't do that wait for the
> db4o branch.
Or, more likely, throw freenet out the window :|.
> Seriously, EVERY time I have
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Give it more memory. If you can't give it more memory, throw the box
out the window and buy a new one. If you can't do that wait for the
db4o branch.
Or, more likely, throw freenet out the window :|.
Seriously, EVERY time I have
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Give it more memory. If you can't give it more memory, throw the box
out the window and buy a new one. If you can't do that wait for the
db4o branch.
Or, more likely, throw
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Give it more memory. If you can't give it more memory, throw the box
out the window and buy a new one. If you can't do
On Thursday 22 January 2009 12:59, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 22 January 2009 03:58, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > > My main point in my last post was a suggestion to have the error
> > > > message more informative. As another example, have it output it's
> > > > memory/cpu usage before it
On Thursday 22 January 2009 03:58, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > My main point in my last post was a suggestion to have the error
> > > message more informative. As another example, have it output it's
> > > memory/cpu usage before it shuts itself down, in the case of the
> > > deadlock I mentioned.
>
On Thursday 22 January 2009 03:58, Dennis Nezic wrote:
My main point in my last post was a suggestion to have the error
message more informative. As another example, have it output it's
memory/cpu usage before it shuts itself down, in the case of the
deadlock I mentioned.
How do
On Thursday 22 January 2009 12:59, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 22 January 2009 03:58, Dennis Nezic wrote:
My main point in my last post was a suggestion to have the error
message more informative. As another example, have it output it's
memory/cpu usage before it shuts itself
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:33:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 January 2009 18:16, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 21 January 2009 03:01, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:52:26 +0100, bqz69
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 18:16, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 January 2009 03:01, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:52:26 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > Now my freenet is running on my fit-pc - has
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 03:01, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:52:26 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> >
> > > > Now my freenet is running on my fit-pc - has been running properly
> > > > the last week.
> > > >
> > > > I did following (I am using ubuntu 8.04):
> > > >
> > > > 1. Created a
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 January 2009 03:01, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:52:26 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Now my freenet is running on my fit-pc - has been running
> > > > > properly the last week.
> > > > >
> > > >
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 03:01, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:52:26 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
Now my freenet is running on my fit-pc - has been running properly
the last week.
I did following (I am using ubuntu 8.04):
1. Created a text file /etc/cron.allow
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 03:01, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:52:26 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
Now my freenet is running on my fit-pc - has been running
properly the last week.
I did following (I am
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 18:16, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 03:01, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:52:26 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
Now my freenet is running on my fit-pc - has been running
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:52:26 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
>
> > > Now my freenet is running on my fit-pc - has been running properly
> > > the last week.
> > >
> > > I did following (I am using ubuntu 8.04):
> > >
> > > 1. Created a text file /etc/cron.allow containing my username.
> >
> > That might
> > Now my freenet is running on my fit-pc - has been running properly
> > the last week.
> >
> > I did following (I am using ubuntu 8.04):
> >
> > 1. Created a text file /etc/cron.allow containing my username.
>
> That might explain why your wrapper's wrapper (your crontab-run script)
> wasn't
> > > I do not know much about the freenet internals, so I do not know.
> >
> > http://www.minihowto.org/4/
> >
> > Here you can see my wrapper log from november, when the problem began?
>
> Okay, we may be able to fix the part about the wrapper failing to start a
> new JVM. Try adding this to
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:31:46 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
>
> > > > I do not know much about the freenet internals, so I do not
> > > > know.
> > >
> > > http://www.minihowto.org/4/
> > >
> > > Here you can see my wrapper log from november, when the problem
> > > began?
> >
> > Okay, we may be able to fix
I do not know much about the freenet internals, so I do not know.
http://www.minihowto.org/4/
Here you can see my wrapper log from november, when the problem began?
Okay, we may be able to fix the part about the wrapper failing to start a
new JVM. Try adding this to your
Now my freenet is running on my fit-pc - has been running properly
the last week.
I did following (I am using ubuntu 8.04):
1. Created a text file /etc/cron.allow containing my username.
That might explain why your wrapper's wrapper (your crontab-run script)
wasn't working. Though
> His wrapper stopped at
> 33minutes past the hour, while his own cronjob wrapper is set to run
> every ten minutes... so even after 7minutes, "run.sh status" still said
> it was running, or something.
My freenet just stopped again, here is my freenet.loggc after the stop:
On Friday 09 January 2009 22:05, bqz69 wrote:
> > His wrapper stopped at
> > 33minutes past the hour, while his own cronjob wrapper is set to run
> > every ten minutes... so even after 7minutes, "run.sh status" still said
> > it was running, or something.
>
> My freenet just stopped again, here
His wrapper stopped at
33minutes past the hour, while his own cronjob wrapper is set to run
every ten minutes... so even after 7minutes, run.sh status still said
it was running, or something.
My freenet just stopped again, here is my freenet.loggc after the stop:
On Friday 09 January 2009 22:05, bqz69 wrote:
His wrapper stopped at
33minutes past the hour, while his own cronjob wrapper is set to run
every ten minutes... so even after 7minutes, run.sh status still said
it was running, or something.
My freenet just stopped again, here is my
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:40, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:22:52 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 16:56:16 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > Do you have the
> > > most recent freenet-ext.jar?
> > Yes
> >
> > Here is my newest wrapper log from 6. jan 2009:
> >
On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:30, bqz69 wrote:
> On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:52:48 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
> > > > > But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet
On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:52:48 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
> > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
> > > > But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly.
> > > > Are you sure you need another wrapper around
On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:13:41 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:01:25 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
> > > > But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet
> > > > properly. Are you sure you need another wrapper around that
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
> > > But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly.
> > > Are you sure you need another wrapper around that wrapper? :)
> >
> > I do not know much about the freenet
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:52:48 +, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
> > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
> > > > But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet
> > > > properly. Are you sure you need another wrapper around
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:01:25 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
> > > But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet
> > > properly. Are you sure you need another wrapper around that
> > > wrapper? :)
>
> My freenet stopped again, in spite of my
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
> > But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly.
> > Are you sure you need another wrapper around that wrapper? :)
My freenet stopped again, in spite of my .crontab, here is the wrapper.log
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:01:25 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet
properly. Are you sure you need another wrapper around that
wrapper? :)
My freenet stopped again, in spite of
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly.
Are you sure you need another wrapper around that wrapper? :)
I do not know much about the freenet internals, so I do
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:52:48 +, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet
properly. Are you sure you need another
On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:13:41 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:01:25 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet
properly. Are you sure you need another wrapper around
On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:52:48 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly.
Are you sure you need another wrapper around that
On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:30, bqz69 wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:52:48 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet
properly.
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:40, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:22:52 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 16:56:16 Dennis Nezic wrote:
Do you have the
most recent freenet-ext.jar?
Yes
Here is my newest wrapper log from 6. jan 2009:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
> > But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly.
> > Are you sure you need another wrapper around that wrapper? :)
>
> I do not know much about the freenet internals, so I do not know.
>
http://www.minihowto.org/4/
Here
> But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly.
> Are you sure you need another wrapper around that wrapper? :)
I do not know much about the freenet internals, so I do not know.
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:22:52 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 January 2009 16:56:16 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> Do you have the
> > most recent freenet-ext.jar?
> Yes
>
> Here is my newest wrapper log from 6. jan 2009:
>
> http://www.minihowto.org/6/wrapper.log
Toad, this problem, of "hanging
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:46:52 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 January 2009 16:32:17 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:42:56 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 02:53:19 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1
> > > > wrote:
> > >
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 02:53:19 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1 wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 wrote:
> > > > Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running
>
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:42:56 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 January 2009 02:53:19 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1 wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 02:53:19 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote:
Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:42:56 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 02:53:19 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 16:32:17 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:42:56 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 02:53:19 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:46:52 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 16:32:17 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:42:56 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 02:53:19 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 16:56:16 Dennis Nezic wrote:
Do you have the
most recent freenet-ext.jar?
Yes
Here is my newest wrapper log from 6. jan 2009:
http://www.minihowto.org/6/wrapper.log
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:22:52 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 16:56:16 Dennis Nezic wrote:
Do you have the
most recent freenet-ext.jar?
Yes
Here is my newest wrapper log from 6. jan 2009:
http://www.minihowto.org/6/wrapper.log
Toad, this problem, of
But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly.
Are you sure you need another wrapper around that wrapper? :)
I do not know much about the freenet internals, so I do not know.
___
Support mailing list
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly.
Are you sure you need another wrapper around that wrapper? :)
My freenet stopped again, in spite of my .crontab, here is the wrapper.log
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 wrote:
> > Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running
> > steady (has been running for the last couple of days).
> >
> > I did following:
> > [cut]
>
> That's an ugly[1] hack
Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running steady (has
been running for the last couple of days).
I did following:
***
First I created a bash shell script "/home/user1/freenet_status_test.sh" with
the following contents (please remember to make it executable):
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1 wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 wrote:
> > > Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running
> > > steady (has been running for the last couple of days).
> > >
Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running steady (has
been running for the last couple of days).
I did following:
***
First I created a bash shell script /home/user1/freenet_status_test.sh with
the following contents (please remember to make it executable):
#!/bin/bash
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote:
Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running
steady (has been running for the last couple of days).
I did following:
[cut]
That's an ugly[1] hack :). And, doesn't your run.sh start a wrapper
that should do
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote:
Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running
steady (has been running for the last couple of days).
I did following:
[cut]
That's an ugly[1] hack
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote:
Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running
steady (has been running for the last
On Monday 27 October 2008 07.23.41 Luke771 wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:04:49 +0100
>
> bqz69 wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 October 2008 13.07.56 bqz69 wrote:
> > > I am running freenet 1165 on a fit-pc using ubuntu 8.04.
> > >
> > > Freenet is installed with autostart property set.
> > >
> > >
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:04:49 +0100
bqz69 wrote:
> On Sunday 26 October 2008 13.07.56 bqz69 wrote:
> > I am running freenet 1165 on a fit-pc using ubuntu 8.04.
> >
> > Freenet is installed with autostart property set.
> >
> > When I check fit-pc the next morning, freenet has stopped running (fms
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:04:49 +0100
bqz69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 26 October 2008 13.07.56 bqz69 wrote:
I am running freenet 1165 on a fit-pc using ubuntu 8.04.
Freenet is installed with autostart property set.
When I check fit-pc the next morning, freenet has stopped
On Monday 27 October 2008 07.23.41 Luke771 wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:04:49 +0100
bqz69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 26 October 2008 13.07.56 bqz69 wrote:
I am running freenet 1165 on a fit-pc using ubuntu 8.04.
Freenet is installed with autostart property set.
When I
I am running freenet 1165 on a fit-pc using ubuntu 8.04.
Freenet is installed with autostart property set.
When I check fit-pc the next morning, freenet has stopped running (fms works
ok).
I run ./run.sh status, and is told freenet is not running.
Then I run ./run.sh start, and freenet
I am running freenet 1165 on a fit-pc using ubuntu 8.04.
Freenet is installed with autostart property set.
When I check fit-pc the next morning, freenet has stopped running (fms works
ok).
I run ./run.sh status, and is told freenet is not running.
Then I run ./run.sh start, and freenet
On Sunday 26 October 2008 13.07.56 bqz69 wrote:
I am running freenet 1165 on a fit-pc using ubuntu 8.04.
Freenet is installed with autostart property set.
When I check fit-pc the next morning, freenet has stopped running (fms
works ok).
I run ./run.sh status, and is told freenet is not
80 matches
Mail list logo
