Bill Marquette wrote:
We're at .86.4 (which is on mirrors). There should be a .87 in the
next day or two after it's had a final chance at testing by the devs.
RC1, not sure where you heard we were there yet :) The fact that the
tree has been tagged for version 1 means that we're just about r
We're at .86.4 (which is on mirrors). There should be a .87 in the
next day or two after it's had a final chance at testing by the devs.
RC1, not sure where you heard we were there yet :) The fact that the
tree has been tagged for version 1 means that we're just about ready
for beta.
--Bill
On
I was wondering when RC1 will be released, nothing above 66.4 has been
posted on the serveres yet they are already at 67 and RC1
When will those be available on mirrors?
Thx,
Dwabraxus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/16/05, John Cianfarani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not sure if this is something you care about since you really don't want packages installed on the wrap or not.
I haven't voiced this opinion yet, but this is an opportune moment.
Due to the relatively inexpensive prices, I was conside
On 10/16/05, Eric Masson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> > Look at how OpenVPN works. Hint, you'll probably end up doing
> > something along the lines of copying those files and doing a
> > s/OpenVPN/ssltunnel VPN/ and changing the commands
Any chance of someone writing this up as a faq at
http://faq.pfsense.org/index.php?sid=1615&lang=en&action=add ? That
would be really helpful!
Thanks for the follow up stephan.
Scott
On 10/16/05, stephan schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i am trying to get a (NATed) connection to an ext
Scott Ullrich wrote:
I access SQL, RDP and many other items through my ipsec tunnel and I
never change the MTU on the client. Thats a bad idea.The
solution is to find out why the packets are getting frag'd. Active
directory traffic does not work across my IPSEC tunnell but RDP and
friend
After installing a bunch of packages on the wrap (Got my
nagios-plugins/nrpe to work)
I noticed that it doesn’t keep a record of installed packages
in /var/db/pkg like it does on the pc.
I’m guessing this is because /var/db/pkg gets mounted
on /dev/md0
# df /var/db/pkg
Filesystem 1K-
The problem is that it SHOULD have been working the way it generated
the config. Isn't it working for you?
For some reason, for me, the local net conflicted with the ACL given
in squid/advanced/acls/*
For a fast fix, in case you got the same problem (just check squid output):
- remove the "acl pf_n
Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill,
> Look at how OpenVPN works. Hint, you'll probably end up doing
> something along the lines of copying those files and doing a
> s/OpenVPN/ssltunnel VPN/ and changing the commands to run it to
> whatever brings up your ssltunnel ppp connection.
> i am trying to get a (NATed) connection to an external VPN using
> > the cisco vpn client. Unfortunately it just doesn't work -
> > no connection. I added the port 500 (isakmp) and allowed ESP to pass
> > the firewall. But I think there's more to do to get NAT-Traversal
> > to work :-(
Got the
I enabled a new rule to route all port 1723 traffic from my OPT1
interface (for PPTP clients). But when I try to connect to my VPN server
at work - it comes back with an error stating I should enable GRE 47
protocol on the firewall. How do I do this?
Pardon me for so many emails - but I am so
Make sure all the clients are pointed to the DNS Forwarder. If the
correct DNS servers are entered in each firewall then it should query
upstream properly.
On 10/16/05, Manuj Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did enable it - but it did not make a difference.
>
> When I set the DNS to 4.2.2.
I did enable it - but it did not make a difference.
When I set the DNS to 4.2.2.2 and uncheck the "Allow DNS server list to
be overridden by DHCP/PPP on WAN" it works fine.
Any ideas?
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Use the built in DNS forwarder. This will force it to use the upstream DNS.
Scott
O
Or simply add another nic and don't use the onboard nvidia if this is
the case. After doing a google search there are a few cases of
reported problems with nvidia ethernet.
On 10/16/05, Michael Lednev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Michał.
>
> On 16 îęň˙áđ˙ 2005 ă., 18:26:38 you wrote:
>
>
Hello, Michał.
On 16 îęň˙áđ˙ 2005 ă., 18:26:38 you wrote:
MD> Here is my hardware:
MD> CPU: AMD Athlon 2500+
MD> MB: Asus A7N8X Deluxe
MD> RAM: 2x256DDR TwinMOS
MD> Graphic card: something on PCI
MD> HDD: PATA Seagate 6,4 GB (also tried SATA WD 120GB)
MD> LAN: 3Com 3c2000 1Gbit (in PCI slot)
MD>
iam kinda bad at the squid conf... what line did you remove?
regards // Johan
Szasz Revai Endre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2005-10-15 11:26
Please respond to
support@pfsense.com
To
support@pfsense.com
cc
Subject
Re: [pfSense Support] squid
It seems to be working now, though I did have to e
Use the built in DNS forwarder. This will force it to use the upstream DNS.
Scott
On 10/16/05, Manuj Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since my last email about trying to setup a dual WAN setup - I have
> found that there is a problem how PFSense configures DNS settings. It
> uses WA
OK, the entry is approved now.
http://faq.pfsense.org/index.php?action=artikel&cat=10&id=53&artlang=en
--Bill
On 10/16/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just answered this in the FAQ, but it needs to be approved still :)
> Short answer is, you want to do a Port Forward for this.
I just answered this in the FAQ, but it needs to be approved still :)
Short answer is, you want to do a Port Forward for this.
--Bill
On 10/16/05, Manuj Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to run a webserver behind PFSense.
> Is there a way to allow incoming connections for a cer
was just gonna ask if you run on an nvidia chipset mobo (then i saw the
integrated lan)
had some weird problems with almost the same setup, right now iam running
on an old p3 setup instead...
// Johan
Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2005-10-16 18:49
Please respond to
support@pfsense.com
Hi
Since my last email about trying to setup a dual WAN setup - I have
found that there is a problem how PFSense configures DNS settings. It
uses WAN1s DNS settings as global DNS settings for the whole system. My
ISPs do not support DNS queries from another network. So when a request
which is
Hi
I want to run a webserver behind PFSense.
Is there a way to allow incoming connections for a certain PC on my
network? e.g all incoming requests on port 80 should be served by PC
with IP 10.0.0.155
Thanks
Manuj
-
To unsu
Generally when this happens its FreeBSD and hardware issues. Make
sure you have plug and play turned off in the bios and try to allocate
the IRQ's manually to make sure that there is no sharing going on.
This is really good hardware so I would think that if you play around
in the BIOS some you
Thank you very very much!! ( I forgot to mention I am developing on version 0.84...)
Thanx again!On 10/16/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Reinstall from scratch on the latest version. Your IPFW module iswrong. It should say rule based forwarding enabled.On 10/16/05, Tommaso Di Dona
Reinstall from scratch on the latest version. Your IPFW module is
wrong. It should say rule based forwarding enabled.
On 10/16/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a question.. I would like to ask one more thing: "rule-based forwarding
> disabled" in dmesg (ipfw2 (+ipv6) ini
Not yet.
--Bill
On 10/16/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a newer release than 0.86.4 ... been
> waiting for a mirror update to get the newest
> 0.86.8 or 0.87 release but haven't seen anything
> newer than 0.86.4
>
> Just looking forward to getting the
> webConfigurator use
Is there a newer release than 0.86.4 ... been
waiting for a mirror update to get the newest
0.86.8 or 0.87 release but haven't seen anything
newer than 0.86.4
Just looking forward to getting the
webConfigurator username update implemented.
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
Just a question.. I would like to ask one more thing: "rule-based
forwarding disabled" in dmesg (ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert
loadable, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to accept, logging
disabled)
means that pfsense kernel is compiled without this option (IP-FIREWALL_FORWARD)?
Maybe
Hi,
I've set up few pfsenses and I have problem with one of them.
Installation of version 0.86.4 went without any problems, system boots
properly, works fine (right now it's serving 3 clients connected to OPT1
interface) but after few hours (2-5h) it just hangs. I can't access
pfsense via
On 10/16/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Got it, now I understand the problem (makes sense, I was wondering howit did transparent proxy w/out access to the destination IP:) ). Sobasically, it does a state lookup on the socket connected to it and
figures out what the original IP was
On 10/16/05, Manuj Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have 2 WAN connections. The first WAN is ADSL (PPPoE). The second
> connection is a high speed cable modem. I wanted to set cable modem as
> the first WAN connection - but since OPT1 does not support PPPoE I was
> forced to set it up
On 10/16/05, stephan schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Folks,
>
> i am trying to get a (NATed) connection to an external VPN using
> the cisco vpn client. Unfortunately it just doesn't work -
> no connection. I added the port 500 (isakmp) and allowed ESP to pass
> the firewall. But I thi
On 10/16/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Module probably isn't loaded (it's only loaded if CP is in use I
> > believe).
> Mmmh, I think it is (I loaded it by hand with "kldload ipfw.ko"):
>
> # kldstat
> Id Refs AddressSize Name
> 14 0xc040 68cca0 kernel
On 10/16/05, Eric Masson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've managed to install and setup ssltunnel-client on my 0.84.6 embedded
> image (should I upgrade to 0.86.4, I didn't find any changelog on the
> website)
>
> Tunnel goes up, additionnal routes are triggered by ppp, everything's
> fi
You are very kind, in responding so fast!!
Module probably isn't loaded (it's only loaded if CP is in use Ibelieve).
Mmmh, I think it is (I loaded it by hand with "kldload ipfw.ko"):
# kldstat
Id Refs Address Size Name
1 4 0xc040 68cca0 kernel
2 16 0xc0a8d000 55fdc acpi.k
On 10/16/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/15/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Not sure I follow with the "redirection" part. But if I understand
> > correctly, yes we can use both ipfw and pf in conjunction for
> > different tasks. This is how our shap
On 10/15/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not sure I follow with the "redirection" part. But if I understandcorrectly, yes we can use both ipfw and pf in conjunction fordifferent tasks. This is how our shaper code used to work - define
the queues in PF and assign the traffic in IPFW
Hello,
I've managed to install and setup ssltunnel-client on my 0.84.6 embedded
image (should I upgrade to 0.86.4, I didn't find any changelog on the
website)
Tunnel goes up, additionnal routes are triggered by ppp, everything's
fine 'til this point.
I can't use ppp0 tunnel as pf drops traffic,
I forgot
Firewall>NAT>Outbound: Enable IPSec passthru is enabled - don't know
if that option has an influence on the problem
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Folks,
i am trying to get a (NATed) connection to an external VPN using
the cisco vpn client. Unfortunately it just doesn't work -
no connection. I added the port 500 (isakmp) and allowed ESP to pass
the firewall. But I think there's more to do to get NAT-Traversal
to work :-(
According to
Hi
I have 2 WAN connections. The first WAN is ADSL (PPPoE). The second
connection is a high speed cable modem. I wanted to set cable modem as
the first WAN connection - but since OPT1 does not support PPPoE I was
forced to set it up this way.
My SMTP server and NEWS servers are available fro
42 matches
Mail list logo
