I know I did this before, but can't figure out now, how it was done!
Sorry for asking again. Anyway, I can't figure out how to get into that
part of PrefBar where you can add in new user agents, such as FF, or
whatever you want. Help...?
___
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/28/10 11:59 PM, Cedar wrote:
I know I did this before, but can't figure out now, how it was done!
Sorry for asking again. Anyway, I can't figure out how to get into that
part of PrefBar where you can add in new user agents, such as FF, or
whatever you want. Help
I recently got a new computer, but was unaware I should have backed up
my address books to the ldif format, all I have is the .mab files. Is
there any way to import/move them from the .mab backups into the new
computer?
___
support-seamonkey mailing
Does SM usually ask before it applies an update? For example, the
update to version 2.0.3. The reason I'm asking is because when I
started it up today, it refused to load until I let it install this
updatewhich was obviously already on my computer and I have no idea
how or when it even
chicagofan wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Cedar wrote:
I'm just taking a wild guess here! Is there such a thing as a time-out
setting for SM (or FF, for that matter), that would tell the browser to
keep looking for a website for a longer time before telling me to try
again, etc., etc.? Is that what
Does SM Mail work on Windows Live? My ISP is switching over to Windows
Live and from what they are telling me, it can only be accessed through
a browser, and, with no way to download the e-mails to why
computer!!Please.tell me it's not true! ???
chicagofan wrote:
Cedar wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Cedar wrote:
I'm just taking a wild guess here! Is there such a thing as a time-out
setting for SM (or FF, for that matter), that would tell the
browser to
keep looking for a website for a longer time before telling me to try
I'm just taking a wild guess here! Is there such a thing as a time-out
setting for SM (or FF, for that matter), that would tell the browser to
keep looking for a website for a longer time before telling me to try
again, etc., etc.? Is that what a time-out even is? If there is such
a
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Cedar wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Cedar wrote:
Martin Freitag wrote:
Cedar schrieb:
/snip/
Have you tested it by allowing cookies and seeing if the slowdown goes
away?
Lee
Yes, now I have, and no, it makes no difference. I've tried lots of
different things like
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Cedar wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Have you tested it by allowing cookies and seeing if the slowdown
goes away?
Lee
Yes, now I have, and no, it makes no difference. I've tried lots of
different things like using the default profile, safe mode, making a
new profile
chicagofan wrote:
Cedar wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Cedar wrote:
Martin Freitag wrote:
Cedar schrieb:
On a dialup connection, would it be normal to suffer extreme
slowdowns
and pauses in the internet connection because of blocking cookies?
Nope.
Really!? What
Martin Freitag wrote:
Martin Freitag schrieb:
Cedar schrieb:
Actually, ya, I'm using FF now, and it's much better, although it does
suffer from some of the same symptoms. If I went back to SM 1.1.18,
would my mail folder survive intact?
SM2.0 has migrated your mails to a new profile, your
NoOp wrote:
On 12/14/2009 12:08 AM, Cedar wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
...
Any chance this is just seasonal traffic increase due to Christmas
shoppers online? I remember when I was on dial up with ATT, December
was always a miserable month for me. However, that was a long time ago,
so things may
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Cedar wrote:
Martin Freitag wrote:
Cedar schrieb:
On a dialup connection, would it be normal to suffer extreme slowdowns
and pauses in the internet connection because of blocking cookies?
Nope.
regards
Martin
Really!? What then? This is in the extreme...I
On a dialup connection, would it be normal to suffer extreme slowdowns
and pauses in the internet connection because of blocking cookies?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
What would be the correct path for the cache file, if there is one?
Does it make a difference to SM's performance if it is in a different
spot? Is it supposed to be in the same folder as the rest of each
profile? I see all my caches for various profiles have been in a
different place than
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Cedar a couché sur son écran :
What would be the correct path for the cache file, if there is one?
Does it make a difference to SM's performance if it is in a different
spot? Is it supposed to be in the same folder as the rest of each
profile? I see all my caches
NoOp wrote:
On 12/07/2009 01:02 PM, Cedar wrote:
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Cedar a couché sur son écran :
What would be the correct path for the cache file, if there is one?
Does it make a difference to SM's performance if it is in a different
spot? Is it supposed to be in the same folder
Is there a normal way to get the mail folder from SM 1.1.18 to SM 2?
I also have one subfolder from 1.1.18 that will not show up in the new
mail folder. Any ideas why this may be happening?
Is there a way to just open the old mail folders to read them?
Cedar wrote:
My SM 2.0 and FF 3.0.10 are extremely slowno matter what I'm trying
to do. Like 10 to 20 minutes (dialup) to open a webpage! IE,
however, gets there lickety-split! Any ideas what might be happening?
Running SM in safe mode seems to speed things up somewhat, but still
Cedar wrote:
Cedar wrote:
My SM 2.0 and FF 3.0.10 are extremely slowno matter what I'm trying
to do. Like 10 to 20 minutes (dialup) to open a webpage! IE,
however, gets there lickety-split! Any ideas what might be happening?
Running SM in safe mode seems to speed things up somewhat
My SM 2.0 and FF 3.0.10 are extremely slowno matter what I'm trying
to do. Like 10 to 20 minutes (dialup) to open a webpage! IE,
however, gets there lickety-split! Any ideas what might be happening?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Would somebody mind telling me what this browser sniffing thing is all
about?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Wow! You guys are fantastic! That actually workedI can even click
on the e-mail newsletter links and get there now! Holy Cow! (haha)
But now, should I leave this new string in about:config permanently?
Are there any possible circumstance/websites where this change may cause
problems?
Bush wrote:
Cedar wrote:
Why am I seeing at least 2 copies of every message in this newsgroup?
Could not Resist Asking you When was the last time you had your Eyes
Checked .
Seriously I do not have an Answer for you
Hmmm...darn! Oh welltoday all the headers disappeared from
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Cedar:
[www.cattlenetwork.com]
Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind as
to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated.
Well, using http://validator.w3.org/:
Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0
When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the
following error message:
XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta.
Location: http://www.cattlenetwork.com/
Line Number 36, Column 449:meta name=google-site-verification
chicagofan wrote:
Cedar wrote:
From my previous post Sep. 11, 09:
On WinXP sp2, ZA suite, AVG free, SM 1.1.16, MTS (Propel) Accelerator. I
can't remember just when all these problems started, but has been
happening
for several months now, not sure if it started with SM 1.1.16 or not.
How
From my previous post Sep. 11, 09:
On WinXP sp2, ZA suite, AVG free, SM 1.1.16, MTS (Propel) Accelerator.
I can't remember just when all these problems started, but has been
happening for several months now, not sure if it started with SM 1.1.16
or not. Anyway, when trying to access certain
And it still happens in a different profile, and the cookies were set to
Allow all cookies and Accept cookies normally.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Cedar Lane wrote:
On WinXP sp2, ZA suite, AVG free, SM 1.1.16
https connections can be intercepted in all SeaMonkey versions before
1.1.18, please upgrade if you want to make sure that secure sites are
secure.
Robert Kaiser
I did the upgrade, but the problem
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 11.09.2009 01:32, Cedar Lane wrote:
--- Original Message ---
On WinXP sp2, ZA suite, AVG free, SM 1.1.16, MTS (Propel) Accelerator.
I can't remember just when all these problems started, but has been
happening for several months now, not sure if it started with SM
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Cedar Lane wrote:
On WinXP sp2, ZA suite, AVG free, SM 1.1.16
https connections can be intercepted in all SeaMonkey versions before
1.1.18, please upgrade if you want to make sure that secure sites are
secure.
Robert Kaiser
OMG!!! Is there any way to tell
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Cedar wrote:
Win XP and SM 1.1.16. I've been having a lot of problems logging in
to various sites, one being my bank site, another is ebay!,
etc...almost any site that requires a login gives me problems, usually
involving booting me back to the login screen over
Cedar wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Cedar wrote:
Win XP and SM 1.1.16. I've been having a lot of problems logging in
to various sites, one being my bank site, another is ebay!,
etc...almost any site that requires a login gives me problems,
usually involving booting me back to the login
Daniel wrote:
Cedar wrote:
Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new
version of sm doing this? or would it more likely be avg antivirus or
something?
Cedar, when you say Something is marking some of my e-mails with
[spam], what do you mean??
The others have told
My (newly acquired) antivirus found a virus in one of my folders where I
keep the stuff that I want to keep. It then deleted the entire folder!
Ouch! The filename in the virus vault is named 0021_body.html: what
does this 0021 mean? Is that a number that defines which e-mail was
infected?
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Cedar wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Cedar wrote:
Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new
version of sm doing this? or would it more likely be avg antivirus
or something?
Cedar, when you say Something is marking some of my e-mails
Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new version
of sm doing this? or would it more likely be avg antivirus or something?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Martin Feitag wrote:
Cedar schrieb:
I recently had to format my hard drive and am now re-installing
everything. Is there a way to get my old additional address book back?
I copied the Personal Address Book into the new profile and it is
working fine, but the other one does not show up now
40 matches
Mail list logo
