So have I. The problem is, that they are moving their file server away
from YAHOO. If you don't change it before they move their servers, 1 day
you will just not get your mail.
Neil
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Neil Marcus wrote:
AT is changing from non-secure to secure login. They prefer
Jim, when I went to the att.com website, they said to use Port 993 for
the incoming mail. You are correct on the outgoing.
Also, I have setup Connection Security "SSL/TLS" and Authentication
Method "Encrypted Password".
Neil
Jim Dell wrote:
Neil Marcus wrote:
In case
Walt, Only sort of. I did delete the ONLY email passwords for ATT.net
that I could find. BUT it didn't ask me to reenter any passwords.
NOTE: I didn't delete my att.COM login, which shows my att.NET email as
my login name.
Neil
WaltS48 wrote:
On 11/29/19 8:57 AM, Neil Marcus wrote
In case I wasn't clear. I DO have my secure mail key, I just can't enter it.
Neil
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Neil Marcus wrote:
Thanks Paul, I'm now 2.49.5 but the Authentication Methods still don't
show 0Auth as an option for Incoming Mail. Its still only available on
Outgoing Mail. So
missed???
Neil
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Neil Marcus wrote:
Thanks Paul, I'm now 2.49.5 but the Authentication Methods still don't
show 0Auth as an option for Incoming Mail. Its still only available on
Outgoing Mail. So how do I put in my "Secure Mail Key"?
Neil
You don't
Thanks Paul, I'm now 2.49.5 but the Authentication Methods still don't
show 0Auth as an option for Incoming Mail. Its still only available on
Outgoing Mail. So how do I put in my "Secure Mail Key"?
Neil
WaltS48 wrote:
As Paul points out the current version of SeaMonkey is 2.49.5 wh
You are correct, it SHOULD be 0Auth, but the only options that I see
are:1) Normal Password; 2) Encrypted Password; 3) Kerberos / GSSAPI & 4)
NTLM
BTW I'm in Seamonkey Version 2.49.3 which is the latest version.
Neil
WaltS48 wrote:
Neil Marcus wrote:
AT is changing from non-secure to se
enter the
encrypted "Secure Mail Key" or change my password even. Any help will be
appreciated
Neil Marcus
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
ee there's an ongoing
thread on the TB forum:
<http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=39=3032257> so I'm
guessing it's a Mozilla mail thing.
--
Neil
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozi
NoOp wrote:
Is this a bug or the way the new version will appear from now on?
By design, I'm afraid.
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Philipp van Hüllen wrote:
1.5 days at work (Win7) and 3rd day at home (MacOS10.10): No problem
seen, some fixes observed, and it actually feels faster/smoother at
some points. Nice job. :-)
This might be because this is using the newer VS2013 compiler rather
than the previous release that
EE wrote:
I am not seeing the vertical lines. Of course, I use third-party
themes, but I would still expect to see them.
SeaMonkey 2.33 didn't show the lines at all because of bug 1083501
(fixed in bug 1105105). Otherwise the lines are drawn by the theme, so
it's vaguely possible that your
Brian Mailman wrote:
What issue regarding the viewing of binary files in newsgroups?
Firefox has a new cache subsystem. Unfortunately the newsgroup code is
not compatible with it and so images in HTML news posts do not display.
As an interim measure we've disabled the new cache so that
NoOp wrote:
Any chance that this bug fix is implemented in SeaMonkey versions above 2.35?
(it is not available/working in 2.35)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659285
From the target milestone it looks as if you'll need to wait for
SeaMonkey 2.38 for this.
--
Warning: May
David E. Ross wrote:
How can I translate between pixels (the settings for fonts in SeaMonkey) and
points (the font-size unit commonly used with CSS)?
Actually points aren't that commonly used with CSS except for print
stylesheets, but on a standard Windows setup you'll find that 16px = 12pt.
Dave Yeo wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
Latest SeaMonkey 2.35γ contributed builds are now up on
http://seamonkey.callek.net/contrib/
Which source/trees are you building these from?
FYI in the unpacked/installed download you can also get the information
from application.ini (comm) and
NoOp wrote:
On 02/02/2015 11:21 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
Only the beta versions of Lightning are compatible with SeaMonkey releases.
SourceRepository=https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-beta
...
SourceRepository=https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta
...
Ant wrote:
Are you saying I would have to be a coder to change to tweak it?
As far as I know, there are no end-user controls for the behaviour, sorry.
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Ant wrote:
Is there a way to have SeaMonkey not use the e-mail address to
autocomplete?
Thunderbird is still tweaking autocomplete, but you'd have to try a
trunk nightly to see whether it works better for you.
The long answer is that the autocomplete search backend is a component,
so if
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
Can someone test the JPG attachment issue in newsgroups
Is there a bug# for this?
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Geoff Welsh wrote:
But a comment in bug 558931 says fix for bug 970456 will be in
Thunderbird 31.0 .
Thunderbird only actually ships ESR releases; only beta testers see the
intervening versions. In this case the latest ESR is the Thunderbird 31
series. Important fixes get cherry-picked to
Geoff Welsh wrote:
seems the fix for Bug 970456 that has landed in TB nightlies, has not
drifted over yet.
I assume that this is currently fixed as of SeaMonkey 2.33; you could
make the case to get the patch uplifted to 2.32 but it might be too late
to get it into 2.31 though.
--
Warning:
Daniel wrote:
So Paul, it would seem that I can confirm your problem with SM 2.29
*on Win7* at least.
If it's a difference between 2.26.1 and 2.29 then the most likely cause
is bug 858337, but that's just a wild guess.
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
The autocomplete feature of the mail address field is very convenient,
unless the typist is slow. Since I have never cleared the Collected
Addresses list, I have thousands of entries, so if I type one
character in the mail address field, SeaMonkey immediately begins
Philip Chee wrote:
On 07/09/2014 02:25, Edwar Cifuentes wrote:
Interesting. That very same reason is why many people come back to Firefox after trying
Seamonkey. It's a good feature nevertheless and it should made easier to dissable in
Seamonkey (and then brought into Firefox, just as
Ray_Net wrote:
Neil wrote, On 09/09/2014 10:41:
Philip Chee wrote:
On 07/09/2014 02:25, Edwar Cifuentes wrote:
Interesting. That very same reason is why many people come back to
Firefox after trying Seamonkey. It's a good feature nevertheless
and it should made easier to dissable
Daniel wrote:
On 29/08/2014 10:01 PM, Daniel wrote:
Here I am, in my Win7 installation, and at Edit-Preferences -
Browser - Downloads, in the top section (When starting a download) I
have Open the download manager selected (and Just Flash as
well) and they both happen,, and in the
Daniel wrote:
Why didn't I get the choice in Win7??
In Preferences - Browser - Downloads there's an option to automatically
save to your last downloaded folder. You need to change it back to
always ask you where you want to save files.
(Sorry if this is a duplicate but I'm not subscribed
window to open automatically at program start.
I have uninstalled and reinstalled, though without a reboot.
Under VIEW, all of the Toolbars are CHECKED EXCEPT for the sidebar toolbar.
Thanks in advance for any and all help and advise!
Neil Marcus
Well, I uninstalled it, shut it down, and after 5 minutes brought it
back up, before reinstalling it. Still no Toolbars!!
Neil Marcus wrote:
Hi all! Everything was going along fine, when all of a sudden, all of my
toolbars, other than the Navigation Toolbar is missing/gone. The Menu
Thank You, Thank You, Thank You!!
That Worked!
Neil
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Neil Marcus wrote:
Hi all! Everything was going along fine, when all of a sudden, all of my
toolbars, other than the Navigation Toolbar is missing/gone. The Menu
toolbar is simply hidden, and can
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Neil Marcus wrote:
Hi all! Everything was going along fine, when all of a sudden, all of my
toolbars, other than the Navigation Toolbar is missing/gone. The Menu
toolbar is simply hidden, and can be brought up momentarily by using
ALT-F11, but as soon as you use
NoOp wrote:
I reckon that you devs should know this already...
http://vpncreative.net/2014/08/02/thousands-developer-credentials-lost-mozilla-hack/
https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2014/08/01/mdn-database-disclosure/
Does any of this affect users?
It affects anyone who created an account
Daniel wrote:
On 25/06/14 02:35, Neil wrote:
Daniel wrote:
I'm thinking the Threads Pane right across the top of the M N screen
Not what you asked for, but I achieve this by collapsing the accounts
pane (F9) and customising the Location drop-down on to my toolbar.
What Location drop
Daniel wrote:
On 25/06/14 19:16, Neil wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 25/06/14 02:35, Neil wrote:
Daniel wrote:
I'm thinking the Threads Pane right across the top of the M N screen
Not what you asked for, but I achieve this by collapsing the
accounts pane (F9) and customising the Location
Daniel wrote:
I'm thinking the Threads Pane right across the top of the M N screen
Not what you asked for, but I achieve this by collapsing the accounts
pane (F9) and customising the Location drop-down on to my toolbar.
Cross-posted to m.d.a.seamonkey and m.s seamonkey with F/up set to
Bob Henson wrote:
Bob Henson wrote:
As Mozilla are intent on ruining both Firefox and Thunderbird, I
though I'd give Seamonkey a try. However, I hit a problem almost
immediately. It installed just fine on my Linux test system, so I
tried it on my main Windows 7 system. Any attempt to set up
?
Neil in Miami
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
David E. Ross wrote:
Windows 7 (x64)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.23
Is this a 32-bit or 64-bit version of SeaMonkey?
32-bit running on a 64-bit OS says WOW64; 64-bit running on a 64-bit OS
says Win64; x64; (or Win64; IA64; for an Itanium version,
NoOp wrote:
Is there a way to script this so that I only have to click an icon/button? Would be
helpful for both linux windows (my brother has the same issue on his windows
xp system).
I believe you can use the Custom Buttons extension to achieve this.
(Note that you should remove the
NoOp wrote:
Got this response:
Timestamp: 11/14/2013 03:32:42 PM
Error: TypeError: top.opener.msgWindow.openFolder.server.nsIPop3IncomingServer
is undefined
Source File: javascript:
top.opener.msgWindow.openFolder.server.nsIPop3IncomingServer.pop3CapabilityFlags
|= 0x30;
Line: 1
What
Daniel wrote:
andré wrote:
Due to an important (to me) bug being rejected as WONTFIX, I have
been making a cludge patch to Seamonkey for several years, to remove
a useless display that takes up a large part of screen space.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions :)
Cross-posted to
Daniel wrote:
As noted in sig file, I've just installed SM 2.22b1 on my Linux
x86_64, and when I started, it came up on the Mail News screen, as
it should, but is showing a TABS line between the Get Msgs
Compose Reply line and the actual Accounts/Threads panes.
As I say, minor
NoOp wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to have a look Neil. I still have it in the same state
will leave it like that for a few more hours. I have 3 other pop3 accounts that use the
same pop servers they aren't having issues.
What you can try is a complete hack to reset the server's
NoOp wrote:
On 09/30/2013 01:21 AM, Neil wrote:
NoOp wrote:
The POP3 mail server (pop.att.yahoo.com) does not support UIDL or XTND XLST,
which are required to implement the ``Leave on Server'', ``Maximum Message
Size'' or ``Fetch Headers Only'' options. To download your mail, turn off
NoOp wrote:
The POP3 mail server (pop.att.yahoo.com) does not support UIDL or XTND XLST,
which are required to implement the ``Leave on Server'', ``Maximum Message
Size'' or ``Fetch Headers Only'' options. To download your mail, turn off these
options in the Server Settings for your mail
EE wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
So, I will be in brussles as of Oct 2, planning to be a tourist for
a bit. And since most of you will be arriving on Oct 3 sometime, I'm
hoping to gather us all for dinner outside of the official Summit
event for food, a few drinks, and chat! (I'm
Edmund Wong wrote:
I like our current account configuration and wizard. Of course, it
can be improved upon; but, does it mean it should be rewritten? If
so, what would/should it look like? If not, does this mean we should
WONTFIX this?
There are some incremental improvements we could
seam...@taz.de wrote:
let identities =
this.accountMgr.allIdentities.QueryInterface(Components.interfaces.nsICollection);
allIdentites probably changed from an nsISupportsArray into an nsIArray.
(I've no idea why you are trying to QI it to nsICollection though.)
--
Warning: May
When I added Private Browsing to SeaMonkey I copied the key Firefox
uses, which is Ctrl+Shift+P.
Unfortunately Thunderbird uses that key for Check Spelling, which means
that it no longer works for that purpose in SeaMonkey, nor can we change
that key.
This means that we have to change or
Bohgosity BumaskiL wrote:
What's a private window without HTTPS, anyway?
The about:privatebrowsing page does indirectly reference that private
browsing only affects the application, not the rest of the Internet.
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
Basic support for the feature has landed, but there are probably all
sorts of places were we're inadvertently leaking information. (I think I
spotted one already...) Assuming we have some builds out there
(2.18a2/2.19a1) then please help finding bugs, thanks!
--
Warning: May contain traces of
MCBastos wrote:
Neil wrote:
Basic support for the feature has landed, but there are probably all sorts of
places were we're inadvertently leaking information. (I think I spotted one
already...) Assuming we have some builds out there (2.18a2/2.19a1) then please
help finding bugs, thanks
Neil wrote:
The Per-Window Private Browsing that Firefox is switching too has been
turned on for all applications in nightly builds. We'll need to add
some UI for it so that people will be able to try it out; if we can't
get it working in time, we can always hide it later.
So far I know
Philip Chee wrote:
On 31/01/2013 06:34, Neil wrote:
The Per-Window Private Browsing that Firefox is switching too has been turned on for all applications in nightly builds. We'll need to add some
How does PWPB affect Thunderbird, I wonder?
Not a lot, as it only applies once you
The Per-Window Private Browsing that Firefox is switching too has been
turned on for all applications in nightly builds. We'll need to add some
UI for it so that people will be able to try it out; if we can't get it
working in time, we can always hide it later.
So far I know will need some
Neil wrote:
switching too
Bah, I spotted this just as I hit Send...
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Onno Ekker wrote:
Is it only a matter of moving the code to toolkit interfaces and are there no
functional changes in the LDAP autocomplete?
Sadly it's not that simple; rather than tweaking the existing
autocomplete code we've gone for rewriting it in JavaScript. We've had a
basic
Wayne wrote:
On 11/16/2012 5:08 AM, Neil wrote:
Onno Ekker wrote:
Is it only a matter of moving the code to toolkit interfaces and
are there no functional changes in the LDAP autocomplete?
Sadly it's not that simple; rather than tweaking the existing
autocomplete code we've gone
The code for this has been landed in the tree but hasn't yet been
switched on. Is it worth releasing a try build with the code enabled so
that interested people can test it before it works its way to them
through the normal channels? (Do we even know how many people use LDAP
autocomplete?)
NoOp wrote:
You'd neglected to mention the nightly build in your OP, so I didn't know if
you'd left anything off regarding testing.
I wasn't requesting testing, I just wanted to warn people that it was
going to pop up a dialog that SeaMonkey has never had before on Linux.
--
Warning: May
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
Neil wrote:
Today I checked in the remaining parts of the GNOME shell service.
When those of you running Linux update tomorrow you may find that it
prompts you to set it as your default browser and mail client. (It
can also be set as your default news and RSS client
Today I checked in the remaining parts of the GNOME shell service. When
those of you running Linux update tomorrow you may find that it prompts
you to set it as your default browser and mail client. (It can also be
set as your default news and RSS client.)
--
Warning: May contain traces of
) hard drive.)
Neil in Miami
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Does anyone use Live Bookmarks? They have been broken for a few months
(even betas are now affected) because Firefox rewrote them to improve
startup time, and I've very recently landed a frontend patch that will
at least get them working again. (They don't show up as
unvisited/visited yet, but
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 12:24:56 +, Neil wrote:
Recently Bugzilla didn't display wrapped text at all, so you had to
ensure that your window was 80 characters or wider (which is how it
was wrapped internally). Now however unquoted text will wrap to your
window (although
Daniel wrote:
As a by-the-by, is the bugzilla page supposed to fill the screen, left
to right, or is this a case of, because my screen resolution is set to
1280 pixels (or whatever), but the bugzilla screen set to 640 (or
whatever) pixels, so, to me, it's only half screen?? (except, of
Daniel wrote:
Just checking now, in Bug 43278, at comment 37, the quoted text
extends past the grey bugzilla screen. Same with the quoted text in
comments 39 and 43.
Recently Bugzilla didn't display wrapped text at all, so you had to
ensure that your window was 80 characters or wider (which
for me, and yes, I do use IMAP.
Neil
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
that this works only for the POP3 protocol. I use
IMAP so only the headers are downloaded to my computer.
Is this correct please? And if so is there an easy way to delete old
emails when using IMAP?
Thanks
Neil
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
NoOp wrote:
On 09/13/2011 07:35 AM, Neil Winchurst wrote:
There has been a lot of talk on this list about upgrading to the
latest version, especially re vulnerabilities in v 2.0.14. So I have
upgraded to the new version.
I downloaded the new version and placed it in a different location
from
have
struggled a bit.
Thanks for all the hard work from the developers,
Neil
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Neil Winchurst wrote:
I have now tested sending an email with an attachment only, no text.
Same error. As long as there is no attachment I can forward emails
successfully. It is obviously the attachments which cause the
problem.
FWIW, I've forwarded hundreds
: ...
None
Neil
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
I don't think this has anything to do with Seamonkey per se,
Neil. The error message you are seeing is almost certainly
generated by the distant end (i.e., the receiving mail server)
which is operating in paranoid mode.
Philip Taylor
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
I don't think this has anything to do with Seamonkey per se,
Neil. The error message you are seeing is almost certainly
generated by the distant end (i.e., the receiving mail server)
which is operating in paranoid mode.
Philip Taylor
Thanks
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 21 Aug 2011 09:18:02 +0100, /Neil Winchurst/:
I can send an email with an attachment without any problem. However if
I receive an email with an attachment and then try to forward it on to
someone else it appears to go all right. Then I get a message
that both Thunderbird *
Seamonkey are configured to forward in an identical way.
Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:28:18 +0100, /Neil Winchurst/:
Thanks for the quick reply. I did another test. I tried the same thing
using Thunderbird. That is to say, I sent an email with an attachment
to myself. This worked
Neil Winchurst wrote:
I can send an email with an attachment without any problem. However if I
receive an email with an attachment and then try to forward it on to
someone else it appears to go all right. Then I get a message that the
email failed to be delivered. Here is the error message
Michael Gordon wrote:
Neil,
Check your anti-Virus configuration for scanning outgoing messages. Turn
off scanning outgoing messages.
BTW most Anti-Virus applications will flag and block .zip attachments.
Michael G
___
Well, well. Guess what? I
On 21/08/11 17:00, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:50:29 +0100, /Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)/:
Neil Winchurst wrote:
Well, well. Guess what? I was looking through the preferences and I
came across Edit -- Preferences -- Composition where I noticed that
the Forwarded
Original Message
Subject: Re: Attachments
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:13:09 +0100
From: Neil Winchurst n...@pamneil.co.uk
To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On 21/08/11 17:00, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:50:29 +0100, /Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd
Rick Merrill wrote:
Neil Winchurst wrote:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
I don't think this has anything to do with Seamonkey per se,
Neil. The error message you are seeing is almost certainly
generated by the distant end (i.e., the receiving mail server)
which is operating
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Also any fresh download from AMO will correct it.
My understanding was that the download doesn't change but when XPI
doesn't claim compatibility then the Addon Manager will attempt to do an
update check from AMO.
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
David E. Ross wrote:
However, this does not help with those extensions that are not at
addons.mozilla.org; even with an Internet connection, they appear incompatible
until I tweak the maximum SeaMonkey version in their install.rdf files.
It depends on whether the extension provides a
or as
old as IE, but still a lot.
I am using FF 3.6.17. I do get updated regularly, but I have never had
any message about moving to FF 4. In fact I thought that new version
was still not yet ready. And again, as my version of FF works just
fine for me why change?
Neil
Ray_Net wrote:
Neil Winchurst wrote:
Although not new to computers I am fairly new to SeaMonkey. I am using
version 2.0.14. There has been a lot of chat about the new version 2.1.
Since my version works just fine for me is there any real reason or
advantage to moving up?
I feel that I would
Michael Gordon wrote:
Neil,
You might elaborate on what you mean by no stable release for
SeaMonkey. As far as I know when the SeaMonkey Team releases a version
for public release it is a Stable Release. Any versions rleased before
the public release are testing release versions
. If it ain't
broke .
Just wondering
Neil
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Daniel wrote:
Neil Winchurst wrote:
Although not new to computers I am fairly new to SeaMonkey. I am using
version 2.0.14. There has been a lot of chat about the new version 2.1.
Since my version works just fine for me is there any real reason or
advantage to moving up?
I feel that I would
Marc Stager wrote:
I'm currently using Seamonkey 1.1.18 and it seems to work fine with
on;y a few exceptions. Using Java 1.2, no problem with Java sites.
That's also an even older version of Java...
The password manager and forms manager, which fill in the relevant
fields automatically,
have two other users on this machine and I
had not thought to look at the set up for their version of SM. I must
see to that,
Neil
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
the downloaded
upgrade file. Trouble is I don't know its name or location.
Thanks for all the help so far
Neil
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
of Seamonkey. Then I extracted it to
/usr/local/seamonkey. (The previous version is in
/usr/local/bin/seamonkey).
I changed the desktop icon accordingly. It picked up all the relevant
details from my profile and all is well.
Thanks for the suggestion,
Neil
I missing something somewhere please?
Neil
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Daniel wrote:
Neil Winchurst wrote:
I have installed version 2.0.13 in /usr/local/bin which works fine.
There is now version 2.0.14 ready as an upgrade. I have downloaded it
but it will not install. I get a message about having other versions
installed. I do not have any version in /usr/bin
-_SeaMonkey
about how to recover from a locked profile.
I have checked for the profile and it is where is should be. I still
can't update.
Neil
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support
error message and the parentlock file, still empty, has been
recreated.
Neil
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
NoOp wrote:
As you all know, it was a pretty difficult transition for some users to go from SM 1.x to
2.0. If 2.0 is now maintenance only mode, then I wonder if it is worth
continuing with SeaMonkey further.
I think you have misunderstood the point of maintenance. New features
are always
dominique wrote:
I just found that the Seamonkey nightly broke Windows authentication
(NTLM ??? - not sure...) since build 20100617 or 20100618.
I filed this bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573238
Anyone having the same problem might want to help or simply confirm
the
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
