Mr. Ed wrote:
On 06/14/18 2:57 PM, cmcadams wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Mozilla User wrote:
First YouTube, then YahooMail, now I will soon no longer be able to track my
packages through USPS using SeaMonkey.
When on the USPS using SeaMonkey, I get this message:
Alert: As of April 30
David H. Durgee wrote:
Mozilla User wrote:
First YouTube, then YahooMail, now I will soon no longer be able to track my
packages through USPS using SeaMonkey.
When on the USPS using SeaMonkey, I get this message:
Alert: As of April 30, USPS.com will no longer support outdated browsers. To
dirk wrote:
cmcadams schreef:
dirk wrote:
I intend to install an SSD and keep my current HDD for storage and possibly (most
likely) program/app launch location.
So, what I want to do is install a new SSD, install W10 on that drive, and keep my
current HDD untouched. Well I will remove
dirk wrote:
I intend to install an SSD and keep my current HDD for storage and possibly (most
likely) program/app launch location.
So, what I want to do is install a new SSD, install W10 on that drive, and keep my
current HDD untouched. Well I will remove Windows 8.1 files of course. I'm not
Roger Fink wrote:
On 4/27/2018 5:40 PM, cmcadams wrote:
The site https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ suddenly has trouble loading
in SM2.49.2.
Mainly it refuses to load anything but the header. Sometimes it loads
and then disappears. Sometimes, as I'm trying to figure out how to make
it load
Or they decided to "put their foot down". Was working for me, then a few hours later
it wasn't. A scheduled change, I'm suggesting.
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
The website needs to do this or http will stay. If the http site no longer works I
would consider it a server misconfiguration.
FRG
EE wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
The site <https://www.realclearpolitics.com/> suddenly has trouble loading in SM
2.49.2.
Works fine here in 2.49.2 with Adblock Plus 2.9.1, no special effort. I tried
disabling ABP everywhere, clearing cache and c
David E. Ross wrote:
On 4/27/2018 2:40 PM, cmcadams wrote:
The site https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ suddenly has trouble loading in
SM2.49.2.
Mainly it refuses to load anything but the header. Sometimes it loads and then
disappears. Sometimes, as I'm trying to figure out how to make
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
The site <https://www.realclearpolitics.com/> suddenly has trouble loading in SM
2.49.2.
Works fine here in 2.49.2 with Adblock Plus 2.9.1, no special effort. I tried
disabling ABP everywhere, clearing cache and cookies and reloading, still no p
The site https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ suddenly has trouble loading in
SM2.49.2.
Mainly it refuses to load anything but the header. Sometimes it loads and then
disappears. Sometimes, as I'm trying to figure out how to make it load, it simply
goes ahead and loads without my touching
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Smiles wrote:
google maps no longer likes SeaMonkey what changes do I do change to view a map
Define "no longer likes"?
Works fine here.
Ditto.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0
SeaMonkey/2.49.2
Ray_Net wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote on 15-04-18 17:16:
On 4/15/2018 at 2:22 AM, Mozilla User created this epitome of digital genius:
First YouTube, then YahooMail, now I will soon no longer be able to track my
packages through USPS using SeaMonkey.
When on the USPS using SeaMonkey, I get this
WaltS48 wrote:
On 4/15/18 3:50 PM, cmcadams wrote:
Felix Miata wrote:
Ed Mullen composed on 2018-04-15 11:16 (UTC-0400):
Add this to your prefs.js file with SM closed:
user_pref("general.useragent.override.usps.com", "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows
NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:50.0)
Felix Miata wrote:
Ed Mullen composed on 2018-04-15 11:16 (UTC-0400):
Add this to your prefs.js file with SM closed:
user_pref("general.useragent.override.usps.com", "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows
NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/50.0");
That way you'll still be reporting as
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/31/2018 11:23 AM, EE wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Trying a user.js didn't work.
prefs.js didn't wish to be changed...tried both Windows 7 Notepad and
DOS Edit, but evidently didn't know the right save options, because
after running SM the new entry disappeared. Rejected
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/31/2018 6:49 PM, cmcadams wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/31/2018 11:23 AM, EE wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Trying a user.js didn't work.
prefs.js didn't wish to be changed...tried both Windows 7 Notepad and
DOS Edit, but evidently didn't know the right save options
Daniel wrote:
cmcadams wrote on 01/04/18 11:49:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/31/2018 11:23 AM, EE wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Trying a user.js didn't work.
prefs.js didn't wish to be changed...tried both Windows 7 Notepad and
DOS Edit, but evidently didn't know the right save options, because
after
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/31/2018 11:23 AM, EE wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Trying a user.js didn't work.
prefs.js didn't wish to be changed...tried both Windows 7 Notepad and
DOS Edit, but evidently didn't know the right save options, because
after running SM the new entry disappeared. Rejected
EE wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Trying a user.js didn't work.
prefs.js didn't wish to be changed...tried both Windows 7 Notepad and DOS Edit, but
evidently didn't know the right save options, because after running SM the new
entry disappeared. Rejected by SM, I suppose.
If an entry into user.js
WaltS48 wrote:
On 3/30/18 10:25 PM, cmcadams wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
On 3/30/2018 at 10:45 AM, Marisa Ciceran created this epitome of digital genius:
As of about a week ago, when I log into my Chase accounts account using SM 2.49.2
on my Windows 7 desktop and laptops, it goes to the following
Ed Mullen wrote:
On 3/30/2018 at 10:45 AM, Marisa Ciceran created this epitome of digital genius:
As of about a week ago, when I log into my Chase accounts account using SM 2.49.2
on my Windows 7 desktop and laptops, it goes to the following page:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
This is interesting. As an experiment I changed my SM 2.49.2 default SMTP from
smtp.att.yahoo.com to
smtp.gmail.com. Then I tried repeating the example I tried before with the same
results.
BUT...Seamonkey
jamielansf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 12:58:06 PM UTC-6, Jamie Lansford wrote:
On Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 12:14:04 PM UTC-6, cmcadams wrote:
Thunderbird menus (as in the link) are different from SM, but I solved the
problem of
switching to smtp.gmail.com
. This is sad!
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=39=3038519=15
cmcadams wrote:
This is interesting. As an experiment I changed my SM 2.49.2 default SMTP from
smtp.att.yahoo.com to smtp.gmail.com. Then I tried repeating the example I tried
before with the same
This is interesting. As an experiment I changed my SM 2.49.2 default SMTP from
smtp.att.yahoo.com to smtp.gmail.com. Then I tried repeating the example I tried
before with the same results. BUT...Seamonkey was NOT using Gmail's SMTP server, if
the box that pops up after you click Send is a true
Yes to both, so we shall see. No obvious category for the email component, so
categorized under General.
Craig
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
If you can reproduce it file a bug. Might be in shared mail / news code with
Thunderbird so if you run this too try there also.
FRG
cmcadams wrote
jamielansf...@gmail.com wrote:
I typically bcc myself and so I see replies and messages I have sent. Lately,
SeaMonkey seems to be inserting random punctuation or graphics, sometimes where
I had entered spaces. For example, I typed this correctly, but this is what
appeared in the copy I
Mr. Ed wrote:
On 02/07/18 10:08 PM, cmcadams wrote:
alex zuber wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 12:52:34 PM UTC-4, Black Fig Pizza Company
wrote:
Yahoo is asking for upgrade to a different browser.
Relly
Still working without complaints here on 2.49.1. One difference might
alex zuber wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 12:52:34 PM UTC-4, Black Fig Pizza Company
wrote:
Yahoo is asking for upgrade to a different browser.
Relly
Still working without complaints here on 2.49.1. One difference might be that I'm
using it through AT That is, Yahoo is (or
Tom Pamin wrote:
This nature webcam just shows a blank page with SM and IE. Can anyone see it?
https://dingdarlingsociety.org/webcam
The page says it's available only during daylight hours. It's also got a countdown
timer that shuts you out, won't reload. This is with SM 1.49.1. The countdown
to go for some trouble.
Craig
NoOp wrote:
On 12/3/2017 11:57 AM, cmcadams wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
2.49.1 and now the development build .2 was/is the most stable release I ever
used so
YMMV.
All depends on your browsing habits, if you keep countless tabs open, how often
you
close
st a guess: script! I will remember your backup and indexDB advice.
Craig
cmcadams wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
cmcadams wrote on 03-12-17 05:32:
NoOp wrote:
So, it's better to stay with SM 2.46 waiting for the next stable release >
2.49.1 ?
Sadly, I'll have to say yes. 2.49.1 is bet
Ray_Net wrote:
cmcadams wrote on 03-12-17 05:32:
NoOp wrote:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.1
Build identifier: 20171016030418
I switched from Adrian's 2.51 to the released 2.49.1 and on multiple
occasions I've had 2.49.1
NoOp wrote:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.1
Build identifier: 20171016030418
I switched from Adrian's 2.51 to the released 2.49.1 and on multiple
occasions I've had 2.49.1 freeze on me on Windows (Win 10 - 16GB memory,
same
to see where I was "keen on" any changes. I was confirming and commenting on a
broken function in the latest SM.
Seamonkey does care - for obvious reasons.
My comment was not aimed at Seamonkey. Seamonkey Project appears to be more sinned
against than sinner in this.
Craig
cmca
sites. Was not fun to play
catchup. There might still linger other problems.
FRG
cmcadams wrote:
Bingo, that fixed my modem screens login problem. But...SM was happily enough
filling most forms even with signon.autofillForms.http set to false. And there were
never problems with 1.48
Bingo, that fixed my modem screens login problem. But...SM was happily enough filling
most forms even with signon.autofillForms.http set to false. And there were never
problems with 1.48 with the (presumed) same about:config settings. I'll confess I
don't get it.
Craig
Frank-Rainer Grahl
Hawker wrote:
As the subject says, I just installed 2.49.1. In Facebook it still auto completes the
user name but not password. After entering it still does not do it the next time.
On some other sites it neither auto enters the user name or password.
How can I put it back like it was?
null wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Hi all,
Was reading mozilla.support.seamonkey and thought to myself,
"geez.. there's certainly a lot of spam.. where's the moderation.."
That's when my internal voice trailed off and said... 'oh'.
So this is a heads-up. If you see
Edmund Wong wrote:
Hi all,
Was reading mozilla.support.seamonkey and thought to myself,
"geez.. there's certainly a lot of spam.. where's the moderation.."
That's when my internal voice trailed off and said... 'oh'.
So this is a heads-up. If you see an influx of old messages you
can
Tom Pamin wrote:
Why does Seamonkey block this site, and IE doesn't?
https://www.hayneedle.com/
I'm seeing it.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Henrik37 wrote:
On my 64 bit Optiplex 780, Win7-Pro, SM 2.40, I loaded uBlock Origin as an 'add
on'.
One of the things I don't understand is that I am required to enable uBlock
Origin
every time I open SeaMonkey. If I don't specifically enable uBlock Origin, it
seems
to remain inoperative.
Mr. Ed wrote:
On 12/07/16 3:32 PM, Mason83 wrote:
On 07/12/2016 21:16, Mr. Ed wrote:
On 11/20/16 2:44 PM, Mason83 wrote:
1) I was using the StartPage search engine for searches done directly
in the location bar. It now goes to duckduckgo.
That also happens in SM 2.47 (64 bit). Build
Delete all the search engines in the pick list but the one you want. That becomes
your new default.
If this bug is ever fixed, Restore Defaults will restore all choices, so nothing
irreversible.
Mason83 wrote:
On 20/11/2016 20:44, Mason83 wrote:
1) I was using the StartPage search engine
Good enough, thanks.
A known problem is almost the same as no problem, right? :)
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
This is a known problem and tracked in Bug 1265881:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1265881
FRG
W3BNR wrote:
On 11/15/16 11:35 PM, cmcadams wrote:
I've just installed
I've just installed SM2.46, and discovered that the engine pick list in
Edit > Preferences > Browser > Internet Search
isn't working. I got my choice by deleting all the alternatives, which becomes the
new unchangeable option even if you then Restore Defaults.
Not a killer, because it can be
Edmund Wong wrote:
Edmund,
A good explanation.
So, here's my question: Are there any Gecko alternatives out there that
aren't changing at a such a furious rate? Something to give us a
reasonable (and safe) SM but perhaps with a more consistent internal
interface that would be simpler to
Edmund Wong wrote:
Stephan Thiele wrote:
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why
there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March,
almost half a year ago.
No. Not a stupid question at all. In fact, it's a very good question.
I am quite
Gerd Schweizer wrote:
Daniel schrieb:
On 1/07/2016 2:50 AM, sylviaandpau...@gmail.com wrote:
Are these two posts supposed to be blank?? I'm seeing nothing ... even
in Original HTML!!
me too
It's hardly a new thing. Happens occasionally and I have no clue why.
no...@nonospam.org wrote:
I'm running SeaMonkey 2.40 under Windows 10, and recently migrated my profile
from a
Windows XP machine which will soon be retired.
There are 74 files in my profile folder named Bookmarks-1.html through
Bookmarks-74.html with dates going back almost three years. They
WaltS48 wrote:
On 05/04/2016 10:42 PM, cmcadams wrote:
Big Jim wrote:
On 5/4/2016 10:19 PM, Ant wrote:
...
MAY 04, 2016 | 08:39AM EDT
LaToya replied:
We apologize for your difficulties in accessing our site due to the
recent introduction of a browser check and request to upgrade your
Ant wrote:
On 5/4/2016 7:42 PM, cmcadams wrote:
...
The weather.com web site now displays correctly, without showing the
nag screen. They
must have actually listened to us!
I'll bet it's hard to ignore an inbox clogged with complaints. :)
I wonder how many complaints? All from us? [grin
Big Jim wrote:
On 5/4/2016 10:19 PM, Ant wrote:
...
MAY 04, 2016 | 08:39AM EDT
LaToya replied:
We apologize for your difficulties in accessing our site due to the
recent introduction of a browser check and request to upgrade your
browser. We have introduced new features to our site to
Gordon Weast wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 05/04/2016 09:37 AM, no...@nonospam.org wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 5/3/2016 11:24 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
notme composed on 2016-05-04 00:56 (UTC-0500):
Has anyone from the SeaMonkey development team told these folks that
SeaMonkey is
http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20151217-the-tiny-creatures-that-flew-to-the-moon-twice-and-survived
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Rick Merrill wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 08/12/2015 2:51 PM:
stan pierce wrote:
I'm using SM 2.32.1. on Windows 7. Is it time to move to Windows 10
or should I wait for a newer SM? Thanks. Stan.
My usual practice with a new OS, and I recommend it to all my friends, is to
wait a
bit
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of development of
SM.
Also,
haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm beginning to feel that I'm nearing
the
point
where I cannot any longer stick with SM.
(snip)
Thoughts?
Why bother
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
Same, but I do manual scans once a week, for form's sake. First and only time I
ever got
got was a Java update that changed its own settings, and I stupidly didn't
check.
No more
Java, here.
Yah, I do
cmcadams wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
Same, but I do manual scans once a week, for form's sake. First and only time I
ever got
got was a Java update that changed its own settings, and I stupidly didn't
check.
No more
Java
Ant wrote:
On 6/27/2015 1:01 AM, cmcadams wrote:
...
I don't check for updates at present. I see them in passing, but I'm not
interested. One of my very specific reasons for staying with 2.26.1
has to do with how the HTML email editor still functions. As opposed to
the non-functioning evident
WaltS48 wrote:
On 06/25/2015 09:10 PM, cmcadams wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many
problems I
can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade, because my
short term
memory is so pathetic, and I've also forgotten the steps
chicagofan wrote:
What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many problems
I
can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade, because my short term
memory is so pathetic, and I've also forgotten the steps to upgrade [safely].
I'm
assuming instructions will still
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Plugin check now works for SeaMonkey. Thanks to those involved in fixing
it (Philip Chee, Schalk Neethling, and possibly others), and to cmcadams
for raising the problem here so it could be brought to their attention.
Woot
Ed Mullen wrote:
cmcadams wrote on 4/16/2015 10:31 PM:
Daniel wrote:
On 16/04/15 03:39, cmcadams wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 4/14/2015 11:06 PM, cmcadams wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
I'm finding that links at the redesigned http://www.bbc.com/news
Daniel wrote:
On 16/04/15 03:39, cmcadams wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 4/14/2015 11:06 PM, cmcadams wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
I'm finding that links at the redesigned http://www.bbc.com/news
website
are helter-skelter in SM 2.26.1.
The links under
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
I'm finding that links at the redesigned http://www.bbc.com/news
website
are helter-skelter in SM 2.26.1.
The links under the Most Popular head on individual pages end up at
the wrong
David E. Ross wrote:
On 4/14/2015 11:06 PM, cmcadams wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
I'm finding that links at the redesigned http://www.bbc.com/news website
are helter-skelter in SM 2.26.1.
The links under the Most Popular head on individual pages end up
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
I'm finding that links at the redesigned http://www.bbc.com/news website
are helter-skelter in SM 2.26.1.
The links under the Most Popular head on individual pages end up at
the wrong destination. Links that should be to the same
EE wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
I'm finding that links at the redesigned http://www.bbc.com/news website
are helter-skelter in SM 2.26.1.
The links under the Most Popular head on individual pages end up at
the wrong destination. Links that should be to the same story are
different for the links
cmcadams wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
I'm finding that links at the redesigned http://www.bbc.com/news website
are helter-skelter in SM 2.26.1.
The links under the Most Popular head on individual pages end up at
the wrong destination. Links that should be to the same story
I'm finding that links at the redesigned http://www.bbc.com/news website are
helter-skelter in SM 2.26.1.
The links under the Most Popular head on individual pages end up at the wrong
destination. Links that should be to the same story are different for the links
contained within photos and
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
I'm finding that links at the redesigned http://www.bbc.com/news website
are helter-skelter in SM 2.26.1.
The links under the Most Popular head on individual pages end up at
the wrong destination. Links that should be to the same story are
different
WaltS48 wrote:
On 04/08/2015 06:24 PM, cmcadams wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 04/08/2015 05:34 PM, cmcadams wrote:
When I go to https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/ I'm getting
Currently the plugin check service is only available to Firefox users.
That's new.
Well, SeaMonkey isn't
When I go to https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/ I'm getting
Currently the plugin check service is only available to Firefox users.
That's new.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
WaltS48 wrote:
On 04/08/2015 05:34 PM, cmcadams wrote:
When I go to https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/ I'm getting
Currently the plugin check service is only available to Firefox users.
That's new.
Well, SeaMonkey isn't a Mozilla product, just one that is based on Mozilla
Ed Mullen wrote:
cmcadams wrote on 4/8/2015 6:42 PM:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 04/08/2015 06:24 PM, cmcadams wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 04/08/2015 05:34 PM, cmcadams wrote:
When I go to https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/ I'm getting
Currently the plugin check service is only available
Geoff Welsh wrote:
for a long time, I have tried to remember, that, I should detach/delete
pictures sent
to me as attachments to messages. But, it just dawned on me that every time I
have
SENT a picture, as an attachment, that picture is saved in my Sent Folder.
Is there a setting to make
Desiree wrote:
On 1/26/2015 11:23 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Lee wrote:
On 1/27/15, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com
wrote:
Lately the Mozilla plugin check has been confused and confusing:
some plugins that are up to date according to their publishers are
listed as out of
NoOp wrote:
On 11/11/2014 09:46 PM, cmcadams wrote:
Another not-so-great difference between SM 2.26.1 and 2.30 I've discovered is
that
Disqus comments refuse to load on the politico.com website. This is the case on
two
computers running 2.30, running different OSes. The only relevant add
cmcadams wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Another not-so-great difference between SM 2.26.1 and 2.30 I've
discovered is that Disqus comments refuse to load on the politico.com
website. This is the case on two computers running 2.30, running
different OSes. The only relevant add
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Another not-so-great difference between SM 2.26.1 and 2.30 I've
discovered is that Disqus comments refuse to load on the politico.com
website. This is the case on two computers running 2.30, running
different OSes. The only relevant add-in for both
Another not-so-great difference between SM 2.26.1 and 2.30 I've discovered is that
Disqus comments refuse to load on the politico.com website. This is the case on two
computers running 2.30, running different OSes. The only relevant add-in for both is
Adblock Plus.
However they do load in IE
stan wrote:
I am getting red line above all emails from the organizations which are
politically
active i.e. Oath Keepers.
It states: Sea Monkey regards this message as a scam, Ignore Warning? X
There is no way how to permanently make any email from Oath Keepers friendly. I
suspect the
Daniel wrote:
On 28/10/14 10:13, cmcadams wrote:
EE wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Snip
Neglected to mention above that when the post contains photo the
filename appears at the top right under Attachments:. When you double
click on it, instead of displaying the photo 2.30 displays alphanumeric
NoOp wrote:
On 10/28/2014 09:42 AM, NoOp wrote:
On 10/27/2014 04:13 PM, cmcadams wrote:
...
Neglected to mention above that when the post contains photo the
filename appears at the top right under Attachments:. When you double
click on it, instead of displaying the photo 2.30 displays
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
At least as far as displaying MIME binaries from newsgroups. :-(
Ditto. Sad, because 2.30 is worlds better than 2.26.1 when it comes to
passwords.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/27/2014 01:30 AM, cmcadams wrote:
This might have already been addressed when I wasn't looking, but I'm now seeing
for myself that SM 2.30 refuses to display images in the only newsgroup I
subscribe
to that uses them. The placeholder shows forever.
Some improvements
WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/27/2014 08:53 AM, cmcadams wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/27/2014 01:30 AM, cmcadams wrote:
This might have already been addressed when I wasn't looking, but I'm now seeing
for myself that SM 2.30 refuses to display images in the only newsgroup I
subscribe
to that uses them
Daniel wrote:
On 28/10/14 00:33, cmcadams wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/27/2014 08:53 AM, cmcadams wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/27/2014 01:30 AM, cmcadams wrote:
This might have already been addressed when I wasn't looking, but
I'm now seeing
for myself that SM 2.30 refuses to display images
Daniel wrote:
On 28/10/14 00:33, cmcadams wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/27/2014 08:53 AM, cmcadams wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/27/2014 01:30 AM, cmcadams wrote:
This might have already been addressed when I wasn't looking, but
I'm now seeing
for myself that SM 2.30 refuses to display images
EE wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 28/10/14 00:33, cmcadams wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/27/2014 08:53 AM, cmcadams wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/27/2014 01:30 AM, cmcadams wrote:
This might have already been addressed when I wasn't looking, but
I'm now seeing
for myself that SM 2.30
Wolf wrote:
cmcadams schrieb am 27.10.2014 15:07:
Daniel wrote:
On 28/10/14 00:33, cmcadams wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/27/2014 08:53 AM, cmcadams wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/27/2014 01:30 AM, cmcadams wrote:
This might have already been addressed when I wasn't looking, but
I'm now seeing
WaltS48 wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
This might have already been addressed when I wasn't looking, but I'm
now seeing for myself that SM 2.30 refuses to display images in the only
newsgroup I subscribe to that uses them. The placeholder shows forever.
Some improvements in 2.30, but I'm starting
This might have already been addressed when I wasn't looking, but I'm now seeing for
myself that SM 2.30 refuses to display images in the only newsgroup I subscribe to
that uses them. The placeholder shows forever.
Some improvements in 2.30, but I'm starting to think 2.26.1...
User string:
David E. Ross wrote:
While Password Manager in SeaMonkey 2.29 allows users to save passwords
even when a Web page tries to block it, it still would not insert saved
passwords into some login pages. Has this been fixed in SeaMonkey 2.30?
I've been using 2.30 for less than a day, but my
David H. Durgee wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
While Password Manager in SeaMonkey 2.29 allows users to save passwords
even when a Web page tries to block it, it still would not insert saved
passwords into some login pages. Has this been fixed in SeaMonkey 2.30?
I've been
Eric wrote:
Cross Posted to all Groups
To All of you Seamonkey VOLUNTEERS:
Thank you for everything that you do for our growing community.
Thank you for listening to our bitches and moans.
Thank you for staying up late, hammering out all those lines of code.
Thank you for getting up early
question wrote:
Seamonkey asks for mail password when I try to send an e-mail even tho pass word
manager has it .
This is using smtp.att.yahoo.com and my sbcglobal account
Same version if I use gmail server with gmail account e-mail.. password is not
asked for
This all started with the
Trane Francks wrote:
On 4/9/14 1:31 PM +0900, cmcadams wrote:
Joyce Greer wrote:
Hi,
My husband and I just switched from outlook Express to SeaMonkey for our email
client. What I didn't realize (He did) was that the SeaMonkey browser would be
included in the download.
I have the Firefox
F Murtz wrote:
My modem (thompson tg782t) seemed to go bung (some sort of hub problem
computers both said cable unplugged but they were not, but wireless
worked)and I replaced it with another, same model,same cables, then tried to
set up seamonkey mail and newsgroups,which I have done many times
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
