Jens Hatlak wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 11 mars 2012, Jens Hatlak a écrit :
No need. Incidentally I fixed it yesterday (for 2.9 and later; too
late for 2.8 and earlier).
Big thanks!
Forgot to say: The change only affects new profiles, i.e. any profiles
Daniel wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 11 mars 2012, Jens Hatlak a écrit :
No need. Incidentally I fixed it yesterday (for 2.9 and later; too
late for 2.8 and earlier).
Big thanks!
Forgot to say: The change only affects new profiles, i.e. any profiles
created with SM 2.1
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 11 mars 2012, Jens Hatlak a écrit :
No need. Incidentally I fixed it yesterday (for 2.9 and later; too
late for 2.8 and earlier).
Big thanks!
Forgot to say: The change only affects new profiles, i.e. any profiles
created with SM 2.1 through 2.8 wil
Le 29 février 2012, robertb...@localnet.com a écrit :
Now, the extra junk i would like to remove is from the "Subscribe" thru and
including all of those dividers, to "Investing" which i want.
That way, there would still be a dividing line between "Manage Bookmarks"
and "Investing" and would loo
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 11 mars 2012, Jens Hatlak a écrit :
No need. Incidentally I fixed it yesterday (for 2.9 and later; too
late for 2.8 and earlier).
Big thanks!
Forgot to say: The change only affects new profiles, i.e. any profiles
created with SM 2.1 through 2.8 will *not* magically g
Lucas Levrel wrote:
> robertb...@localnet.com a écrit :
>> STUPID me; i saw the word "example" and immediately got what seems the
>> false impression that those files were actual examples and thus not
>> used.
>> Will look at them; thanks.
>
> For them to be used by SM, you first need to rename t
robertb...@localnet.com wrote:
Quoting Lucas Levrel :
Le 10 mars 2012, robertb...@localnet.com a écrit :
Quoting Lucas Levrel :
userChrome.css,
I find no such file, or even one with a crudely similar name (using
SM7.2).
It's not there by default. On older versions you had
userChrome-exampl
Le 11 mars 2012, robertb...@localnet.com a écrit :
STUPID me; i saw the word "example" and immediately got what seems
the false impression that those files were actual examples and thus not
used.
Will look at them; thanks.
For them to be used by SM, you first need to rename them (either or bot
Le 11 mars 2012, Jens Hatlak a écrit :
No need. Incidentally I fixed it yesterday (for 2.9 and later; too late for
2.8 and earlier).
Big thanks!
HTH
You bet!
--
LL
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://li
Quoting Lucas Levrel :
Le 10 mars 2012, robertb...@localnet.com a écrit :
Quoting Lucas Levrel :
userChrome.css,
I find no such file, or even one with a crudely similar name (using SM7.2).
It's not there by default. On older versions you had
userChrome-example.css and userContent-example.c
Quoting Lucas Levrel :
Le 10 mars 2012, robertb...@localnet.com a écrit :
Quoting Lucas Levrel :
userChrome.css,
I find no such file, or even one with a crudely similar name (using SM7.2).
It's not there by default. On older versions you had
userChrome-example.css and userContent-example.c
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 10 mars 2012, robertb...@localnet.com a écrit :
Quoting Lucas Levrel :
userChrome.css,
I find no such file, or even one with a crudely similar name (using
SM7.2).
It's not there by default. On older versions you had
userChrome-example.css and userContent-example.css in
Le 10 mars 2012, robertb...@localnet.com a écrit :
Quoting Lucas Levrel :
userChrome.css,
I find no such file, or even one with a crudely similar name (using SM7.2).
It's not there by default. On older versions you had
userChrome-example.css and userContent-example.css in a chrome/ folder in
Le 10 mars 2012, Desiree a écrit :
Ok. I reinstated the default theme. That button/icon does look like a long
tiny bookmark now. On some tabs it is light green in color and on others it
is light gray. I didn't know what the difference in color meant but I
(I learned that in the release notes a
"Lucas Levrel" wrote in message
news:alpine.lnx.2.00.1203102249290.14...@coulomb.univ-paris12.fr...
> Le 9 mars 2012, Desiree a écrit :
>
>> It's not new. It is the same window you get when you use Ctrl-D but it is
>> just under the right end of the address bar. I usually bookmark by right
>> cl
bookmarks pull-down?
I think some parts are hardcoded (maybe something can be done through
userChrome.css, but I'm no expert and can test for now). Your best
bet is submitting a bug / request for enhancement.
--
LL
___
support-seamonkey mailing
Le 8 mars 2012, robertb...@localnet.com a écrit :
**In that case, getting back to my original query, how can i alter /
trim / remove things from the bookmarks pull-down?
I think some parts are hardcoded (maybe something can be done through
userChrome.css, but I'm no expert and can tes
Le 9 mars 2012, Desiree a écrit :
It's not new. It is the same window you get when you use Ctrl-D but it is
just under the right end of the address bar. I usually bookmark by right
clicking somewhere on the page I want to bookmark and choosing "bookmark
this" and that opens the Add New Bookmark
Desiree wrote:
"Lucas Levrel" wrote in message
news:alpine.lnx.2.00.1203081221340.3...@coulomb.univ-paris12.fr...
Le 6 mars 2012, Desiree a �crit :
If you drag the search bar to the customize area so it is no longer at
the
end of the address bar, then the address bar becomes extremely long. I
"Lucas Levrel" wrote in message
news:alpine.lnx.2.00.1203081221340.3...@coulomb.univ-paris12.fr...
> Le 6 mars 2012, Desiree a écrit :
>
>> If you drag the search bar to the customize area so it is no longer at
>> the
>> end of the address bar, then the address bar becomes extremely long. If
>
"Paul B. Gallagher" wrote in message
news:p_kdnugskrqwlsxsnz2dnuvz_h2dn...@mozilla.org...
> Desiree wrote:
>
>> "Paul B. Gallagher" wrote in message
>> news:08ydns4ljfvqxsrsnz2dnuvz_vqdn...@mozilla.org...
>>>
>>> FWIW, the various flavors of Windows behave somewhat differently with
>>> respect
that, and hope someone will make an add-on that fits
your need! (Did you look for one already?)
--
LL
**In that case, getting back to my original query, how can i alter /
trim / remove things from the bookmarks pull-down?
___
support-
Desiree wrote:
"Paul B. Gallagher" wrote in message
news:08ydns4ljfvqxsrsnz2dnuvz_vqdn...@mozilla.org...
FWIW, the various flavors of Windows behave somewhat differently with
respect to sort order. In WinXP and earlier, you could define a default
sort order and apply it to all folders, so for
Le 6 mars 2012, Desiree a écrit :
If you drag the search bar to the customize area so it is no longer at the
end of the address bar, then the address bar becomes extremely long. If the
search bar is left at the end of the address bar then the drop down Add New
Bookmark window appears right under
"Paul B. Gallagher" wrote in message
news:08ydns4ljfvqxsrsnz2dnuvz_vqdn...@mozilla.org...
> robertb...@localnet.com wrote:
>
>> OK; have seen various comments concerning extra-large bookmarks and have
>> the following "solution" suggestion (or at least a start in that
>> direction).
>> Notice th
robertb...@localnet.com wrote:
OK; have seen various comments concerning extra-large bookmarks and have
the following "solution" suggestion (or at least a start in that
direction).
Notice that WinDoze has various options for viewing a drive or folder;
relevant ones are List and Details.
These NE
OK; have seen various comments concerning extra-large bookmarks and
have the following "solution" suggestion (or at least a start in that
direction).
Notice that WinDoze has various options for viewing a drive or
folder; relevant ones are List and Details.
Theseo NEVER eat more than the spac
Desiree wrote:
"Lucas Levrel" wrote in message
news:alpine.lnx.2.00.1203061157230.3...@coulomb.univ-paris12.fr...
Le 5 mars 2012, Desiree a �crit :
Plus, if you only use the address bar for searching and eliminate the
Search bar then that box for adding a bookmark when you right click on a
we
"Lucas Levrel" wrote in message
news:alpine.lnx.2.00.1203061157230.3...@coulomb.univ-paris12.fr...
> Le 5 mars 2012, Desiree a écrit :
>
>> Plus, if you only use the address bar for searching and eliminate the
>> Search bar then that box for adding a bookmark when you right click on a
>> web p
"Daniel" wrote in message
news:g_idndabejlhf8jsnz2dnuvz_qidn...@mozilla.org...
> Desiree wrote:
>> "Paul B. Gallagher" wrote in message
>> news:dzwdndeafp3kjcjsnz2dnuvz_oadn...@mozilla.org...
>>> Desiree wrote:
>>>
"Paul B. Gallagher" wrote in message
news:45-dnfbd97liec3snz2dnuvz_r
Hmm..I found the link in universe #23, Galaxy 4095, star 7^5-23,
planet 3, location 3345/221/79, pulldown 47, folder "animals",
sub-folder "climbing", sub-sub-folder "ape", ... DARN! forgot what the
heck i was looking for!
Quoting Daniel :
Desiree wrote:
"Paul B. Gallagher" wrote in mess
Not too many main folders in the bookmark pulldown which does not
quite take up the screen vertically.
Sure wish there was a way to get rid of that (to me) extra junk on the top.
Quoting Desiree :
wrote in message
news:mailman.12395.1330751532.31724.support-seamon...@lists.mozilla.org...
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 6 mars 2012, Philip TAYLOR a écrit :
Can anyone explain the rationale for this ? Why /do/ developers
believe that there is an optimal size for a dialogue box, and s@d the
poor user if the data that he or she is trying to enter or display
does not
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 6 mars 2012, Philip TAYLOR a écrit :
That cramped
little box you get for adding a bookmark is backward and stupid.
led me to discover that this box, like far too many boxes
both in Windows and in Seamonkey, is not resizeable.
That's a registered bug, and people are wo
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 6 mars 2012, Philip TAYLOR a écrit :
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 6 mars 2012, Philip TAYLOR a écrit :
Can anyone explain the rationale for this ? Why /do/ developers
believe that there is an optimal size for a dialogue box, and s@d the
poor user if the data that he or
Le 6 mars 2012, Philip TAYLOR a écrit :
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 6 mars 2012, Philip TAYLOR a écrit :
Can anyone explain the rationale for this ? Why /do/ developers
believe that there is an optimal size for a dialogue box, and s@d the
poor user if the data that he or she is trying to enter o
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 6 mars 2012, Philip TAYLOR a écrit :
Can anyone explain the rationale for this ? Why /do/ developers
believe that there is an optimal size for a dialogue box, and s@d the
poor user if the data that he or she is trying to enter or display
does not fit ?
Why do you be
Le 6 mars 2012, Philip TAYLOR a écrit :
That cramped
little box you get for adding a bookmark is backward and stupid.
led me to discover that this box, like far too many boxes
both in Windows and in Seamonkey, is not resizeable.
That's a registered bug, and people are working on it.
https://
Le 5 mars 2012, Desiree a écrit :
Plus, if you only use the address bar for searching and eliminate the
Search bar then that box for adding a bookmark when you right click on a
web page drops down from the far right sid of screen with part of it off
screen and it cannot be moved.
I really do
Desiree wrote:
"Paul B. Gallagher" wrote in message
news:dzwdndeafp3kjcjsnz2dnuvz_oadn...@mozilla.org...
Desiree wrote:
"Paul B. Gallagher" wrote in message
news:45-dnfbd97liec3snz2dnuvz_rsdn...@mozilla.org...
Desiree wrote:
I'm curious. Do you have many bookmarks? I never use Bookmarks
"Paul B. Gallagher" wrote in message
news:dzwdndeafp3kjcjsnz2dnuvz_oadn...@mozilla.org...
> Desiree wrote:
>
>> "Paul B. Gallagher" wrote in message
>> news:45-dnfbd97liec3snz2dnuvz_rsdn...@mozilla.org...
>>> Desiree wrote:
>>>
I'm curious. Do you have many bookmarks? I never use Bookmarks
I don't really have any strong feelings about bookmarks --
I add them on a regular basis, archive them to a
different folder when I get too many, and that is about
it. But researching the earlier claim that
That cramped
little box you get for adding a bookmark is backward and stupid.
led me t
Desiree wrote:
"Paul B. Gallagher" wrote in message
news:45-dnfbd97liec3snz2dnuvz_rsdn...@mozilla.org...
Desiree wrote:
I'm curious. Do you have many bookmarks? I never use Bookmarks in SM
from drop down. I have a lot and no way I can access them from drop
down. With Fx, I have an extension,
wrote in message
news:mailman.12395.1330751532.31724.support-seamon...@lists.mozilla.org...
> My bookmark pulldown has looked about the same since NetScrape4.04; it
> has grown to mostly a list of folders that one sees, and some of those
> folders have folders in them.
> There are over a hun
"Paul B. Gallagher" wrote in message
news:45-dnfbd97liec3snz2dnuvz_rsdn...@mozilla.org...
> Desiree wrote:
>
>> I'm curious. Do you have many bookmarks? I never use Bookmarks in SM
>> from drop down. I have a lot and no way I can access them from drop
>> down. With Fx, I have an extension, Multi
My bookmark pulldown has looked about the same since NetScrape4.04;
it has grown to mostly a list of folders that one sees, and some of
those folders have folders in them.
There are over a hundred references in the total list; the folders
help group them by subject.
Example:
..
..
Electronic
Desiree wrote:
I'm curious. Do you have many bookmarks? I never use Bookmarks in SM
from drop down. I have a lot and no way I can access them from drop
down. With Fx, I have an extension, Multicolumn Bookmarks, that makes
bookmarks from drop down just like the vastly superior bookmarks in
Opera.
wrote in message
news:mailman.12144.1330631412.31724.support-seamon...@lists.mozilla.org...
> Thanks for showing how to get rid of the extra separators; that helps
> some.
> So you are saying there is no way to get rid of the "subscribe" or the
> "personal" entries.
> They are extra garbage
Thanks for showing how to get rid of the extra separators; that helps some.
So you are saying there is no way to get rid of the "subscribe" or
the "personal" entries.
They are extra garbage as far as i am concerned.
It is bad enough to have the "File Bookmark" (why have it - useless),
the "
Interviewed by CNN on 01/03/2012 02:40, robertb...@localnet.com told the
world:
> In the "old" 1.1.16 version of SeaMonkey one could make this fairly
> clean and manageable.
> In the newer 2.7 version, there is extra junk i would like to remove.
> Mine sort-of looks like this:
> Bookmark Thi
In the "old" 1.1.16 version of SeaMonkey one could make this fairly
clean and manageable.
In the newer 2.7 version, there is extra junk i would like to remove.
Mine sort-of looks like this:
Bookmark This Page Ctrl+Shift+D
File BookmarkCtrl+D
(Bookmark This Group of Tabs) <--
51 matches
Mail list logo
