Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 11/02/2014 02:18 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
For me, it mostly works fine (it's not my taste, but it works).
However, some folders did provoke the about:blank window as described
the first time I visited them. After I reverted to the mail tab and
On 02/11/14 06:45, WaltS48 wrote:
On 11/01/2014 03:23 PM, EE wrote:
lucas.sicha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I know that this topic is a bit old. But I think it's worth looking
at it again.
In fact I am a Opera user. And I love Opera for it's integrated eMail
client.
Of course one
Daniel wrote:
On 02/11/14 06:45, WaltS48 wrote:
On 11/01/2014 03:23 PM, EE wrote:
lucas.sicha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I know that this topic is a bit old. But I think it's worth looking
at it again.
In fact I am a Opera user. And I love Opera for it's integrated eMail
client.
Of
EE wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 02/11/14 06:45, WaltS48 wrote:
On 11/01/2014 03:23 PM, EE wrote:
lucas.sicha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I know that this topic is a bit old. But I think it's worth looking
at it again.
In fact I am a Opera user. And I love Opera for it's integrated eMail
On 11/02/2014 02:18 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
EE wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 02/11/14 06:45, WaltS48 wrote:
On 11/01/2014 03:23 PM, EE wrote:
lucas.sicha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I know that this topic is a bit old. But I think it's worth looking
at it again.
In fact I am a
Hello everybody,
I know that this topic is a bit old. But I think it's worth looking at it
again.
In fact I am a Opera user. And I love Opera for it's integrated eMail client.
Of course one user likes tabs and another user doesn't.
But for me a so called Internet Suite should contain the
lucas.sicha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I know that this topic is a bit old. But I think it's worth looking at it again.
In fact I am a Opera user. And I love Opera for it's integrated eMail client.
Of course one user likes tabs and another user doesn't.
But for me a so called
On 11/01/2014 03:23 PM, EE wrote:
lucas.sicha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I know that this topic is a bit old. But I think it's worth looking
at it again.
In fact I am a Opera user. And I love Opera for it's integrated eMail
client.
Of course one user likes tabs and another user
Ray_Net a écrit :
Did you feel that implementing IRC-Chat and RSS are more pressing
matters ? :-)
Well, as far as IRC goes, if I'm not mistaken, it's used by some
programmers to interact. So far as it's used to push programming
forward, I can't blame them for giving it priority. Plus,
Ray_Net a écrit :
Lokk at the huge amount of unresolved bugs and of
small-feature-needing-half-an-hour-work suggestion not implemented. And
this situation exist from 10 years ago.
If it's so simple, why don't you volunteer do it?
S.
___
Ray_Net a écrit :
Tabs sucks ... I never use tabs - no need ... why do you need windows
inside a window ?
Because, for example, in my job, I need to use four sites in succession
hundreds of times a day. If I had only one window, I'd waste a huge
amount of time going from site to site,
S. Beaulieu wrote:
Ray_Net a écrit :
Lokk at the huge amount of unresolved bugs and of
small-feature-needing-half-an-hour-work suggestion not implemented. And
this situation exist from 10 years ago.
If it's so simple, why don't you volunteer do it?
Because i don't have my pc with all the
Ray_Net a écrit :
You may do exactly the same without tabs ...
I have also some sites opened 3 with SM and another with IE (sorry :-))
The bottom bar is very usefull and/or ALT-TAB to switch from one to
the other *no* *need* to wait for load nor login.
The bottom bar is *huge* and wastes too
Ray_Net a écrit :
Did you think that having the same action when replying than when
forwarding a mail is so much work . it's already existing in the
forward coding.
That's not for me to say. Seeing how it's hardly a critical problem, nor
one that's bothering much people, I can't blame
S. Beaulieu wrote:
Ray_Net a écrit :
You may do exactly the same without tabs ...
I have also some sites opened 3 with SM and another with IE (sorry :-))
The bottom bar is very usefull and/or ALT-TAB to switch from one to
the other *no* *need* to wait for load nor login.
The bottom bar is
S. Beaulieu wrote:
Ray_Net a écrit :
Did you think that having the same action when replying than when
forwarding a mail is so much work . it's already existing in the
forward coding.
That's not for me to say. Seeing how it's hardly a critical problem, nor
one that's bothering much
Ok, so there are about 50% to 50% negative and positive comments on this
feature request, I think it's really worth implementing folks :)
Also, consider this: when you are using gmail WEB interface, you basically
have your email in a new tab. Why not have seamonkey mail client in a new
NoOp wrote:
On 04/12/2011 08:49 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
Viliam Kubis wrote:
... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any
plans to implement it in the future? Please? :)
Also see this topic, started by me, navigaring to chrome URL works good
but is unstable, maybe only
AGREED, tabs are the way to go!!
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 20:34:52 +0200, Rufus n...@home.com wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 04/12/2011 08:49 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
Viliam Kubis wrote:
... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any
plans to implement it in the future? Please? :)
NoOp wrote:
On 04/12/2011 08:49 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
Viliam Kubis wrote:
... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any
plans to implement it in the future? Please? :)
Also see this topic, started by me, navigaring to chrome URL works good
but is unstable, maybe only
Yes, the developers will have their say and use user. the people thuse
the #$%^@ stuf will have absolutely none. It will ba surely added.
The developers care nothing about the users. They are just beating their
chest and saying look what I have done. look what I have done.
The object of
PhillipJones a écrit :
bang stuff that looks good. But it complicates code and makes
application run slower.
Again: much much less than having multiple windows open does.
The last version of SM 1 and all of the current 2.0 series, I have been
having problems with loading pages in the
PhillipJones a écrit :
The developers care nothing about the users. They are just beating their
chest and saying look what I have done. look what I have done.
The developers care very deeply about users. How can you think any
otherwise?
The object of software design is to please the
S. Beaulieu wrote:
PhillipJones a écrit :
bang stuff that looks good. But it complicates code and makes
application run slower.
Again: much much less than having multiple windows open does.
The last version of SM 1 and all of the current 2.0 series, I have been
having problems with
PhillipJones a écrit :
Explain Why the only Browsers I have a problem with Are Mozilla Browsers.
Because there is something in your system that conflicts with them for
some reason.
I personally have had various versions of SM installed in Win2K, XP and
7 as well as Red Hat Linux. I have
S. Beaulieu wrote:
PhillipJones a écrit :
The developers care nothing about the users. They are just beating their
chest and saying look what I have done. look what I have done.
The developers care very deeply about users. How can you think any
otherwise?
The object of software design is
PhillipJones a écrit :
Well many of use users ask not to put a silly feature in or in some
cases to fix a problem and they problem don't get fixed or the silly
feature still shows up.
Tabs are not a silly feature and my computer would slow down to a crawl
without them. They're a godsend in
Viliam Kubis wrote:
AGREED, tabs are the way to go!!
Tabs sucks ... I never use tabs - no need ... why do you need windows
inside a window ?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
S. Beaulieu wrote:
PhillipJones a écrit :
bang stuff that looks good. But it complicates code and makes
application run slower.
Again: much much less than having multiple windows open does.
This is not true, due to the re-entrancy coding.
___
Ray_Net wrote: Viliam Kubis wrote:
AGREED, tabs are the way to go!!
Tabs sucks ... I never use tabs - no need ... why do you need windows
inside a window ?
Is this another one of those copy MS or copy Apple things?
It's like double-clicking on folders in some Linux distros.
It copies a
S. Beaulieu wrote:
PhillipJones a écrit :
The developers care nothing about the users. They are just beating their
chest and saying look what I have done. look what I have done.
The developers care very deeply about users. How can you think any
otherwise?
Lokk at the huge amount of
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Ray_Net wrote: Viliam Kubis wrote:
AGREED, tabs are the way to go!!
Tabs sucks ... I never use tabs - no need ... why do you need windows
inside a window ?
Is this another one of those copy MS or copy Apple things?
It's like double-clicking on folders in some Linux
Ray_Net wrote:
Viliam Kubis wrote:
AGREED, tabs are the way to go!!
Tabs sucks ... I never use tabs - no need ... why do you need windows
inside a window ?
Tabs RULE!!! They save desktop space and keep things within on app
organized - like having multiple desktops. Tabs ROCK!
--
-
... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any plans
to implement it in the future? Please? :)
Also see this topic, started by me, navigaring to chrome URL works good
but is unstable, maybe only little modifications are needed to make it
fully operational?
Viliam Kubis wrote:
... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any
plans to implement it in the future? Please? :)
Also see this topic, started by me, navigaring to chrome URL works good
but is unstable, maybe only little modifications are needed to make it
fully
Of course as an option, not fixed for everybody. You could choose whether
to open the mail client in the traditional way (new window) or in new tab.
VK
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 23:52:48 +0200, WLS wls15...@yahooremove.com wrote:
Viliam Kubis wrote:
... the only thing holding me back from
Viliam Kubis wrote:
Of course as an option, not fixed for everybody. You could choose
whether to open the mail client in the traditional way (new window) or
in new tab.
This look inconsistent.
Mail is not another web page, it's completely different.
Opera is wrong - he mixed two different
That's a matter of perspective. Sure the email client is somethig
completely different than a web page in a browser tab, but I think I'm not
the only one who would like to have their email client in a new tab right
next to their open webpages. I, for my self, am used to tabbed browsing in
I would *love* to see this feature added to SM. I've asked this
question before myself, and I think I got an answer back that it was on
the SM road map, but I can't recall for sure.
Having Mail be able to open in a tab within the Browser window is *the*
way to go, particularly on a laptop
Viliam Kubis wrote:
... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any
plans to implement it in the future? Please? :)
Also see this topic, started by me, navigaring to chrome URL works good
but is unstable, maybe only little modifications are needed to make it
fully
PhillipJones wrote:
No! No! No! No!
It bad enough to deal with tabs in web Browser. We don't need such
silliness in email.
Agreed.
Bottom-posting on this list is nuisance enough ...
--
Thanks! 73, KD4E
David Colburn http://kd4e.com
SE-GA Tailgate - April 9th, 2011
Have an
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
No! No! No! No!
It bad enough to deal with tabs in web Browser. We don't need such
silliness in email.
Agreed.
Bottom-posting on this list is nuisance enough ...
Agreed!
--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it
On 04/12/2011 08:49 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
Viliam Kubis wrote:
... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any
plans to implement it in the future? Please? :)
Also see this topic, started by me, navigaring to chrome URL works good
but is unstable, maybe only little
On 04/12/2011 12:52 PM, Viliam Kubis wrote:
... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any plans
to implement it in the future? Please? :)
Also see this topic, started by me, navigaring to chrome URL works good
but is unstable, maybe only little modifications are
44 matches
Mail list logo
