On 10/26/2012 3:47 PM PT, Jim typed:
What's the URL to this Notron forum thread?
http://community.norton.com/t5/Norton-360/Help-with-false-positive/m-p/825018#U825018
Thanks. :)
--
I don't understand them anymore, these people that travel the
commuter-trains to their dormitory towns. These
Ant wrote:
On 10/25/2012 8:47 PM PT, Jim typed:
I followed up with Norton with this problem on their forums. The fix
that worked for me -- they told me to restored the file from quarantine
and Norton would no longer mess with it. I did that and that worked.
Also, I submitted the .dll to
Bill Davidsen wrote, On 24/10/2012 22:33:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/14/12 3:09 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross schrieb:
I go to the FTP server so that I can also download the related SHA1
checksum.
FYI, if you use the SeaMonkey-internal update mechanism, you get both
the advantages
Ray_Net wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote, On 24/10/2012 22:33:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/14/12 3:09 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross schrieb:
I go to the FTP server so that I can also download the related SHA1
checksum.
FYI, if you use the SeaMonkey-internal update mechanism, you get both
Jim wrote:
humptydumpty wrote:
Jim wrote:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
On 10/25/2012 8:47 PM PT, Jim typed:
I followed up with Norton with this problem on their forums. The fix
that worked for me -- they told me to restored the file from quarantine
and Norton would no longer mess with it. I did that and that worked.
Also, I submitted the .dll to Norton, and
Desiree wrote:
Sandy sa...@millport.net wrote in message
news:y8ednfyynp_lyutnnz2dnuvz_rodn...@mozilla.org...
Why does the partial update fail? This is the third time in a row that I
have had to endure the very slow servers and download the full update.
Why
is this?
I'm not going to further
Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross schrieb:
I go to the FTP server so that I can also download the related SHA1
checksum.
FYI, if you use the SeaMonkey-internal update mechanism, you get both the
advantages of using as-local-as-possible mirrors *and* verification with a
checksum that is not
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/14/12 3:09 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross schrieb:
I go to the FTP server so that I can also download the related SHA1
checksum.
FYI, if you use the SeaMonkey-internal update mechanism, you get both
the advantages of using as-local-as-possible mirrors *and*
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Jim wrote:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
associated
On Saturday, 13 October 2012 03:12:44 UTC+1, Edmund Wong wrote:
The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.13.1: An updated
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download [1]
now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox
release, it
On 10/20/12 5:26 AM, mickspi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, 13 October 2012 03:12:44 UTC+1, Edmund Wong wrote:
The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.13.1: An updated
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download [1]
now! Building on the same Mozilla
On 10/20/2012 7:58 AM PT, David E. Ross typed:
Remove SM 2.12.1. When asked, DO NOT remove the profile files. Make
sure the location where it was installed no longer contains the file
named seamonkey.exe. Then make sure no such file exists in your entire
system. Finally install SM 2.13.1.
On 10/14/2012 2:41 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Jim wrote:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a
On 10/15/2012 5:21 PM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:
FWIW, I reached them, apparently the way this person did the change
didn't go live to users until today. I also got an automated message
that it did go live, and mistook an earlier message of successful
submission as successful whitelist.
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Jim wrote:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is
On 10/14/12 12:20 pm, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release. If you use
the standard HTTP downloads, you get the benefits of the distributed
mirrors, so it's pretty quick.
If you'll post a link, I'll test that as well.
Not sure what you are
Steve Wendt wrote:
On 10/14/12 12:20 pm, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release. If you use
the standard HTTP downloads, you get the benefits of the distributed
mirrors, so it's pretty quick.
If you'll post a link, I'll test that as well.
Not
The source code tarball download link still points to 2.13.
After a few attempts at the URL, I found the 2.13.1 tarball under
http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/2.13.1/source/seamonkey-2.13.1.source.tar.bz2
___
cschan...@gmail.com wrote:
The source code tarball download link still points to 2.13.
Oops! Not only that link. Actually, *all* links on the below page showed
2.13 until now:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.13.1
The following page was correct from the start, though:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Jim wrote:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
Desiree wrote:
Sandy sa...@millport.net wrote in message
news:y8ednfyynp_lyutnnz2dnuvz_rodn...@mozilla.org...
Why does the partial update fail? This is the third time in a row that I
have had to endure the very slow servers and download the full update.
Why
is this?
I'm not going to further
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Link (2) gives the very detailed comment that Nothing but security
fixes and link (3) just mentions SM 2.13.1 but gives no differences
between SM 2.13 and SM 2.13.1 and the wiki page is as good as blank!!
Changes between minor versions of a release are only
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
As an experiment, I also went to the SeaMonkey website and downloaded
the full version of SeaMonkey Setup 2.13.1.exe, declared to be 16 MB,
but the download manager claimed it was 19.1 MB. When it completed, the
download manager reported 19.3 MB, but the Windows property
On 13/10/12 04.12, Edmund Wong ha scritto:
The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.13.1: An updated
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download [1]
now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox
release, it delivers the latest developments
Gabriel wrote:
I'm on the beta update channel, why does my 2.13b6 installed version
(OSX) doesn't auto update?
Because it'll auto-update to 2.14b1 once released (which will be in a
few days from now). Betas don't auto-update to releases.
Do I have to manually install the new 2.13.1 ?
If
On 14/10/12 12.17, Jens Hatlak ha scritto:
Gabriel wrote:
I'm on the beta update channel, why does my 2.13b6 installed version
(OSX) doesn't auto update?
Because it'll auto-update to 2.14b1 once released (which will be in a
few days from now). Betas don't auto-update to releases.
I didn't
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Jens, great, this page does give some details as to what was done and
why, so why isn't this page linked to in the release notification e-mail
or news post??
Because we forgot about it (Edmund in this case, but I'm not blaming him
since I would probably have
On 10/14/12 12:15 am, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
So I don't think the SM servers are the issue for you. I can't have
received it quickly if they are running slowly.
The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release. If you use
the standard HTTP downloads, you get the benefits of the
Jim wrote:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
associated with Foxfire and Sea
Steve Wendt wrote:
On 10/14/12 12:15 am, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
So I don't think the SM servers are the issue for you. I can't have
received it quickly if they are running slowly.
The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release.
Indeed and around the time we released this,
Steve Wendt wrote:
On 10/14/12 12:15 am, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
So I don't think the SM servers are the issue for you. I can't have
received it quickly if they are running slowly.
The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release. If you use
the standard HTTP downloads, you get
On 10/14/12 10:37 AM, Steve Wendt wrote:
On 10/14/12 12:15 am, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
So I don't think the SM servers are the issue for you. I can't have
received it quickly if they are running slowly.
The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release. If you use
the
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Jim wrote:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
associated
On 10/14/2012 1:21 PM PT, Rufus typed:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
associated
David E. Ross schrieb:
I go to the FTP server so that I can also download the related SHA1
checksum.
FYI, if you use the SeaMonkey-internal update mechanism, you get both
the advantages of using as-local-as-possible mirrors *and* verification
with a checksum that is not just SHA-1 but
On 10/14/12 3:09 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross schrieb:
I go to the FTP server so that I can also download the related SHA1
checksum.
FYI, if you use the SeaMonkey-internal update mechanism, you get both
the advantages of using as-local-as-possible mirrors *and* verification
Ant wrote:
On 10/14/2012 1:21 PM PT, Rufus typed:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed
it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
Edmund --
For a more complete list of major changes [2] in SeaMonkey 2.13.1,
see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.13.1 section of the Release Notes
[3],
[3] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.13/
I see no such section -- in fact, the text What's New in SeaMonkey
2.13.1
Edmund Wong ew...@pw-wspx.org wrote in message
news:_m6dnfvup-ebu-xnnz2dnuvz_jadn...@mozilla.org...
The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.13.1: An updated
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download [1]
now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as
Daniel wrote:
Link (2) gives the very detailed comment that Nothing but security
fixes and link (3) just mentions SM 2.13.1 but gives no differences
between SM 2.13 and SM 2.13.1 and the wiki page is as good as blank!!
Changes between minor versions of a release are only to be found on the
Why does the partial update fail? This is the third time in a row that I
have had to endure the very slow servers and download the full update. Why
is this?
I'm not going to further update SM if I have to do these big, slow full
updates.
Updated very quickly and easily here using Windows 7
Desiree wrote:
[...]
Why does the partial update fail? This is the third time in a row that I
have had to endure the very slow servers and download the full update. Why
is this?
I'm not going to further update SM if I have to do these big, slow full
updates.
I assume you use Windows,
Sandy schreef:
Why does the partial update fail? This is the third time in a row that I
have had to endure the very slow servers and download the full update.
Why
is this?
I'm not going to further update SM if I have to do these big, slow full
updates.
Updated very quickly and easily here
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
associated with Foxfire and Sea Monkey. So what
Jim wrote:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
associated with Foxfire and Sea Monkey.
humptydumpty wrote:
Jim wrote:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
associated with
The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.13.1: An updated
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download [1]
now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox
release, it delivers the latest developments in web technologies such as
HTML5,
On 10/12/12 7:12 PM, Edmund Wong wrote:
The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.13.1: An updated
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download [1]
now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox
release, it delivers the latest
Edmund Wong wrote:
The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.13.1: An updated
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download [1]
now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox
release, it delivers the latest developments in web technologies such
50 matches
Mail list logo
