Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:07:49 -0700
From: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
peter.potamus.the.purple.hi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Since 1.1.16: single mouse clicks seen as double-clicks?
To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Mark Hansen wrote:
I realize this sounds strange, but I'm
furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows.
Perhaps that is the reason for the problem
That's a memory limit per application, not the file limit on the drive.
I don't think SM stores all mails into RAM at a time...?
___
support-seamonkey mailing
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
We have been through this to death. Please see previous threads.
I as well as others top post as in my opinion it is outdated.
Post as you wish.
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
snip
Sorryyou top post because top posting, in your opinion, is
Le 14 avril 2009, Robert Kaiser a écrit :
Did you try switching back to English, restarting SeaMonkey, to French again,
and restarting again?
We unfortunately have an old Bug in SeaMonkey 1.x that makes us need that
sometimes. SeaMonkey 2 should work better there.
That worked! Thanks a lot.
Whatever pleases you.
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
In that case, begone.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
___
Martin Feitag wrote:
furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows.
Perhaps that is the reason for the problem
That's a memory limit per application, not the file limit on the drive.
I don't think SM stores all mails into RAM at a time...?
no, each folder has a 2 gig limit:
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
We have been through this to death. Please see previous threads.
I as well as others top post as in my opinion it is outdated.
Post as you wish.
If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read, they may
oblige you and not read them.
B/
That is perfectly fine, and in order with me if they don't read my posts.
Everyone is entitled to their choice.
Brian Mailman wrote:
If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read, they
may oblige you and not read them.
B/
___
Martin Feitag wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo schrieb:
Martin Feitag wrote:
furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows.
Perhaps that is the reason for the problem
That's a memory limit per application, not the file limit on the drive.
I don't think SM stores all mails into RAM at
Thanks for the advice. Both methods worked, but I like the scrapbook
system a bit more because of the bookmarking. I should have asked
earlier and saved myself a lot of time.
n...@home wrote:
I'm new to having a laptop, and we travel a lot. I do my research and
planning on the internet,
POP, The server is Exim4 and dovecote
I don't expect to do this often.
I have one partner who keeps her messages on the sever for a long time,
as a sort of safety mechanism. She downloads them constantly.
I was setting up a new computer for her and downloading the messages
happened as a
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Martin Feitag wrote:
furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows.
Perhaps that is the reason for the problem
I don't think so since each message is transferred and then appended to
the folder(file) individually. How would the file size limit affect
On 04/22/2009 10:21 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:46:47 -0400, Leonidas Jones wrote:
Martin Feitag wrote:
Be patient, it's still an alpha-version ;-)
(though I have to say it doesn't crash often here)
Oh not often at all, maybe once or twice a week. Still, its more then I
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
Brian Mailman wrote:
If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read,
they may oblige you and not read them.
That is perfectly fine, and in order with me if they don't read my
posts. Everyone is entitled to their choice.
In cyberspace, no one can hear
On 04/23/2009 06:59 PM, Brian Mailman wrote:
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
Brian Mailman wrote:
If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read,
they may oblige you and not read them.
That is perfectly fine, and in order with me if they don't read my
posts. Everyone is entitled to
Leonidas Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 04/22/2009 10:21 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:46:47 -0400, Leonidas Jones wrote:
Martin Feitag wrote:
Be patient, it's still an alpha-version ;-)
(though I have to say it doesn't crash often here)
Oh not often at all, maybe once or twice
Garrett Czmor wrote:
$irVivor §ireßird wrote:
Some two thirds of my bookmarks suddenly vanished last night for no
apparent reason.
I'd been looking at a site I've used dozens of times before (IMDB),
closed SeaMonkey, opened it again a few minutes later to check
another regular site (BBC
17 matches
Mail list logo
