Bernard Mercier wrote:
Après mure réflexion, Robert Kaiser a écrit :
Dale DePriest schrieb:
I lost my bookmarks as well. Here is what I did to fix it. I did an open
file and traversed the seamonkey support installation to the location of
the bookmarks.html file and there they were. So I
Zanqeutil wrote:
Daniel schreef:
Zanqeutil wrote:
Saemonkey 2.2 Windows 2000 (SP4)
When I compose an email and want to paste a part of another email as
quoted text,I use 'Paste as quotation' from the right-click menu.
I see the quoted text, the cursor is at the end of the last pasted
Après mure réflexion, Daniel a écrit :
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Après mure réflexion, Robert Kaiser a écrit :
Dale DePriest schrieb:
I lost my bookmarks as well. Here is what I did to fix it. I did an open
file and traversed the seamonkey support installation to the location of
the
[Spawned from Password Manager workaround.]
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:12:21 +0800, /Philip Chee/:
On 30/07/2011 16:44, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
... this thread has become quite big. I guess I'll need to compile
some document (at least for myself) describing the different use
cases, the current
sean nathan bean sent me the following::
i am once again using my @netscape.net e'mail as my primary e'mail in
Seamonkey 2.2...
wondering if anyone has an explanation as to why the aol servers send me
two copies of all the spam... anyone else seeing this via the @aim @aol
@netscape servers?
On 7/31/11 9:36 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
[Spawned from Password Manager workaround.]
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:12:21 +0800, /Philip Chee/:
On 30/07/2011 16:44, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
... this thread has become quite big. I guess I'll need to compile
some document (at least for myself)
sean nathan bean wrote:
sean nathan bean sent me the following::
i am once again using my @netscape.net e'mail as my primary e'mail in
Seamonkey 2.2...
wondering if anyone has an explanation as to why the aol servers send me
two copies of all the spam... anyone else seeing this via the @aim
SM 2.0.14, Win XP SP3
With almost 1000 threads in this newsgroup, I'd some times like to find
a particular thread, but whenever I try to search it fails, with the
message A News (NNTP) error occurred: chaining not allowed.
What does this mean? What am I doing wrong?
Thanks for any advice
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
1. Secure Login https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/secure-login/
It is not packaged as SeaMonkey compatible but is easily patched to make
it so - see secure_login+sm.diff attached.
That's a good start, but there are some more issues hidden under the
hood. For example,
Paul sent me the following::
sean nathan bean wrote:
sean nathan bean sent me the following::
i am once again using my @netscape.net e'mail as my primary e'mail in
Seamonkey 2.2...
wondering if anyone has an explanation as to why the aol servers send me
two copies of all the spam... anyone
JohnW-Mpls sent me the following::
Phooey, SM's 2.2 is no better at being fully accepted at some sites - 2.2's
new option to advertise FireFox compatibility does not help, at least for
me. One of my major sites is adding stuff SM just does not see and I
cannot afford to miss those things.
Mark D. Ballmer sent me the following::
*Second Copy:* Kind of embarrassing, Just after I pushed send, I
realized I had been referring to the subfolders as subfiles. Sorry, this
is the corrected document, so I don't feel like such a fool.
you can delete your own posts from newsgroups... right
sean nathan bean wrote:
really don't think that'd be the case... not that i get a lot of
spam hese days... i just find it interesting that i get duplicates
of 100% of what spam arrives...
seems like a hiccup in servers to me...
Easy to prove if they are duplicates or not. Look at the
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:28:36 +0200, /Jens Hatlak/:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
1. Secure Login https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/secure-login/
It is not packaged as SeaMonkey compatible but is easily patched
to make
it so - see secure_login+sm.diff attached.
That's a good start, but there are
upscope wrote:
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 08:06:01 AM Jens Hatlak wrote:
Alex wrote:
With SM2.2 I found that I'm not able to move individual contacts
between different address books. Is there a fix for this issue?
Will be fixed in SM 2.3.
HTH
Jens
It also deletes contacts in the personal
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:36:28 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:
Until I get my thoughts arranged in order to present them, I'll
throw some in here.
In case anyone is interested I'm attaching my current test suite
regarding password management (hope it will get through).
--
Stanimir
Title: Login
On 07/31/2011 12:04 PM, Larry wrote:
chaining not allowed
Found this (via Google):
http://readlist.com/lists/lists.mozilla.org/support-thunderbird/21/105841.html
Appears to be server related.
FWIW: I sometimes get it as well.
___
support-seamonkey
Ray_Net wrote:
upscope wrote:
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 08:06:01 AM Jens Hatlak wrote:
Alex wrote:
With SM2.2 I found that I'm not able to move individual contacts
between different address books. Is there a fix for this issue?
Will be fixed in SM 2.3.
HTH
Jens
It also deletes contacts
Marie Harvey wrote:
I am unable to open any html file existing on my hard drive from
composer. I read the help file but it is apparently out of date. Used
SM for years with no prob but it is unusable to me right now. Am I
missing something I can't see??
I asked the last person with a similar
On 07/30/2011 08:06 AM, Jens Hatlak wrote:
Alex wrote:
With SM2.2 I found that I'm not able to move individual contacts between
different address books. Is there a fix for this issue?
Will be fixed in SM 2.3.
HTH
Jens
Not working in 2.3B1:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux
Marie Harvey wrote:
On Jul 11, 5:56 pm, Don DeWittdondew...@gmail.com wrote:
A while back, I noticed that at least in version 2.0.13 of Composer
when one copies a link to another location in a file, the copied link
loses its data.
This is a known bug as I see.
If the link contains a complete
NoOp wrote:
On 07/31/2011 12:04 PM, Larry wrote:
chaining not allowed
Found this (via Google):
http://readlist.com/lists/lists.mozilla.org/support-thunderbird/21/105841.html
Appears to be server related.
FWIW: I sometimes get it as well.
Thanks for the tip.
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
upscope wrote:
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 08:06:01 AM Jens Hatlak wrote:
Alex wrote:
With SM2.2 I found that I'm not able to move individual contacts
between different address books. Is there a fix for this issue?
Will be fixed in SM 2.3.
HTH
Jens
It
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:29:01 -0400, Beauregard T. Shagnasty
a.nony.mous@example.invalid wrote:
JohnW-Mpls wrote:
Phooey, SM's 2.2 is no better at being fully accepted at some sites
- 2.2's new option to advertise FireFox compatibility does not
help, at least for me. One of my major sites is
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 22:46:22 -0700, David E. Ross nobody@nowhere.invalid
wrote:
On 7/30/11 4:23 PM, JohnW-Mpls wrote [in part]:
Phooey, SM's 2.2 is no better at being fully accepted at some sites - 2.2's
new option to advertise FireFox compatibility does not help, at least for
me. One of
On 7/31/2011 1:47 PM PT, sean nathan bean typed:
*Second Copy:* Kind of embarrassing, Just after I pushed send, I
realized I had been referring to the subfolders as subfiles. Sorry, this
is the corrected document, so I don't feel like such a fool.
you can delete your own posts from
Dans son message précédent, Bernard Mercier a écrit :
Après mure réflexion, Daniel a écrit :
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Après mure réflexion, Robert Kaiser a écrit :
Dale DePriest schrieb:
I lost my bookmarks as well. Here is what I did to fix it. I did an open
file and traversed the seamonkey
On 07/31/2011 04:48 PM, Bernard Mercier wrote:
Dans son message précédent, Bernard Mercier a écrit :
...
Perhaps KaiRo will correct me, but I believe SM 2.2 now stores your
bookmarks file in the same location as your mail profile. If you have
not created a bookmark since upgrading to SM 2.2
On 7/31/11 3:51 PM, JohnW-Mpls wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:29:01 -0400, Beauregard T. Shagnasty
a.nony.mous@example.invalid wrote:
JohnW-Mpls wrote:
Phooey, SM's 2.2 is no better at being fully accepted at some sites
- 2.2's new option to advertise FireFox compatibility does not
help,
On 7/31/11 4:23 PM, JohnW-Mpls wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 22:46:22 -0700, David E. Ross nobody@nowhere.invalid
wrote:
On 7/30/11 4:23 PM, JohnW-Mpls wrote [in part]:
Phooey, SM's 2.2 is no better at being fully accepted at some sites - 2.2's
new option to advertise FireFox compatibility
On 07/31/2011 03:51 PM, JohnW-Mpls wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:29:01 -0400, Beauregard T. Shagnasty
a.nony.mous@example.invalid wrote:
JohnW-Mpls wrote:
Phooey, SM's 2.2 is no better at being fully accepted at some sites
- 2.2's new option to advertise FireFox compatibility does not
Updated to 2.3b1 on a new profile/testing system and discovered an odd
component in the email header that I've not seen before. See:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/38/screenshotbug797718resu.png/
[Circled area just below Subject). If I click the 'Update' button the
header expands.
I do not
32 matches
Mail list logo
