SeaMonkey and Github

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

Hi,

It seems that Github.com does not work with SM correctly in more
frequently used features than before. For instance, I no longer can
edit comments in issues using the Edit menu option at the top right
corner of the comment box. Also, I can't edit checklists in comments.
Changing the UA agent in different ways (through HTTP config and
setting an specific general.useragent.github.com preference) has not
helped.

In the past, the top message warning me of an obsolete browser was
just an annoyance, but I can't find the way to workaround this. Has
anyone been luckier than me with this?

TIA

-- 
Proyecto NAVE (Mozilla es-ES Localization Team)
Mozilla Hispano Community
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: No empty master password allowed in FIPS Software Security Device

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 5/3/20 a las 22:13, David E. Ross escribió:
> 
> 1.  Install the Password Exporter extension.  Since the "vanilla"
> version is not compatible with SeaMonkey, I am uploading my converted
> version to my Web site.  It is at
> .  (I will
> remove it from my Web site in two weeks.)
> (...)

Thank you very much. I've downloaded it and use it to follow your steps.

But, since I had the exported passwords and a full profile backup, I
dared to upgrade WITHOUT first removing the master password...

And guess what! Everything worked OK! I tested a number of saved
passwords in different websites, until I got tired of being successful
in every try. The email accounts work fine, too, and I have some X.509
certificates that also worked OK.

Still, I do not endorse anyone to do the same than me; if you do, be
absolutely sure that you have a good, complete backup of your profile
(and, if you have more than one profile, remember to follow steps for
each one).


> If you cannot import your passwords without first establishing a master
> password, then you have a version of SeaMonkey that has been tailored to
> meet FIPS security requirements.  (FIPS means "federal information
> processing statndards" and is imposed on government and government
> contractor computer installations.)


I'm using official builds of SeaMonkey, but my profile may be dated
back to 1995, when I started using Netscape as my email agent. It was
created on Windows 3.11 and ported to Linux some years after that. I'm
definitely using this profile on Linux with Mozilla Suite since, at
least, 2002. Could it be that the FIPS tail comes from that old ages?

Thanks a lot for all your help.

-- 
Proyecto NAVE (Mozilla es-ES Localization Team)
Mozilla Hispano Community

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: No empty master password allowed in FIPS Software Security Device

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 6/3/20 a las 6:37, jcteyssi...@gmail.com escribió:
> 
> One idea: just replace linux's profile (after abckup of course) with win 10's 
> one since mastrer password deleted?
> 


Profiles in Linux and Windows are different, so I can't do that. :-)
Actually, the Windows 10 profile is a very basic one (no email
accounts, for instance) with just one saved password added to test the
procedure.

Thanks anyway. In my reply to David E. Ross I explain the (surprising)
outcome of my story.

-- 
Proyecto NAVE (Mozilla es-ES Localization Team)
Mozilla Hispano Community

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

No empty master password allowed in FIPS Software Security Device

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

Hi,

I'm running SeaMonkey 2.49.5 on Linux (since 1995 starting with
Netscape 4, perhaps). I was ready to replace the master password with
an empty one, but it turns out that SeaMonkey does not allow me to set
an empty password.

At the same time, I repeated the steps on a recent installation on
Windows 10, and I had no trouble to set an empty password. The
difference? On Windows 10, the Security Device is named "Software
Security Device", whereas on Linux it is named "Software Security
Device (FIPS)".

Is it just a matter of naming? And, if so, can I rename it?

On the other side, in the Windows 10 installation, with just a simple
saved password, I purposely upgraded to 2.53.1 without emptying the
master password, just to see what errors or malfunctions happened.
And, funnily enough, nothing wrong happened; the saved password was
still there.

I'm ready to just do a profile backup and try the direct upgrade with
a master password set, but in case it fails, I wonder how could I fix it.

TIA

-- 
Proyecto NAVE (Mozilla es-ES Localization Team)
Mozilla Hispano Community
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Anyone else having trouble using Firefox Accounts login from SeaMonkey?

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 28/01/18 a las 09:26, Daniel escribió:
> WaltS48 wrote:
>> On 1/27/18 3:05 PM, Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've noticed in the last few days that I can't login into Mozilla
>>> Add-ons or Pontoon from SeaMonkey due to Firefox Accounts login system
>>> not working. From, for instance, Pontoon, I choose Sign in and get
>>> redirected here ("***" shows deleted data, not actual values):
>>>
>>> https://accounts.firefox.com/oauth/?redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fpontoon.mozilla.org%2Faccounts%2Ffxa%2Flogin%2Fcallback%2F_id=***_type=code==profile%3Aemail%20profile%3Adisplay_name%20profile%3Auid%20profile%3Auid%20profile%3Aemail%20profile%3Adisplay_name
>>>
>>> It shows an almost blank page with the Mozilla logo in the upper right
>>> corner and a progress spin in the center.
>>>
>>> Webtools console shows this error message:
>>>
>>> "  920c7d2a.main.es_ES.js:35:8783
>>> Response not received for: fxaccounts:fxa_status
>>> 920c7d2a.main.es_ES.js:18:4662
>>> d.prototype.error
>>> https://accounts-static.cdn.mozilla.net/scripts/920c7d2a.main.es_ES.js:18:4662
>>>
>>> d.prototype.add/b.timeout<
>>> https://accounts-static.cdn.mozilla.net/scripts/920c7d2a.main.es_ES.js:22:5118
>>>
>>> Are other people successfully using Firefox Accounts from SeaMonkey
>>> lately?
>>>
>>> TIA
>>
>> Possibly those that don't have "Mozilla/55.0 (Windows NT 10.0;
>> Win128; x128; rv:57.0) Gecko/20200101 Firefox/77.0" as their User
>> Agent String.
>>
> Ah!! In one of the other threads, here-abouts, we've been discussing
> Gecko and the need for its "20100101" production date. Seems Ricardo
> might be having a go at predicting the future with his "20200101"
> production date!! ;-)
> 
> And Win128!! Are there really such 128bit systems out in the wild ...
> let alone actual Win128 OS's out there??


The fake UA string was posted here as a solution (the only working
one, to be precise) to log into Yahoo! webmail site. I'm going to
check it and try to find a value that works at the same time in both
sites, Yahoo! and Firefox Accounts.

Thanks for the suggestion.

-- 
Proyecto NAVE (Mozilla es-ES Localization Team)
Mozilla Hispano Community
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Anyone else having trouble using Firefox Accounts login from SeaMonkey?

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

Hi,

I've noticed in the last few days that I can't login into Mozilla
Add-ons or Pontoon from SeaMonkey due to Firefox Accounts login system
not working. From, for instance, Pontoon, I choose Sign in and get
redirected here ("***" shows deleted data, not actual values):

https://accounts.firefox.com/oauth/?redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fpontoon.mozilla.org%2Faccounts%2Ffxa%2Flogin%2Fcallback%2F_id=***_type=code==profile%3Aemail%20profile%3Adisplay_name%20profile%3Auid%20profile%3Auid%20profile%3Aemail%20profile%3Adisplay_name

It shows an almost blank page with the Mozilla logo in the upper right
corner and a progress spin in the center.

Webtools console shows this error message:


"  920c7d2a.main.es_ES.js:35:8783
Response not received for: fxaccounts:fxa_status
920c7d2a.main.es_ES.js:18:4662
d.prototype.error
https://accounts-static.cdn.mozilla.net/scripts/920c7d2a.main.es_ES.js:18:4662
d.prototype.add/b.timeout<
https://accounts-static.cdn.mozilla.net/scripts/920c7d2a.main.es_ES.js:22:5118


Are other people successfully using Firefox Accounts from SeaMonkey
lately?

TIA

-- 
Proyecto NAVE (Mozilla es-ES Localization Team)
Mozilla Hispano Community
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey Project is pretty much dead.

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 19/12/17 a las 05:44, Paul in Houston, TX escribió:
> Mozilla User wrote:
>> I'm not a troll..
> 
> Please turn off the Avast.
> My Youtube and Yahoo webmail work ok.
> I did need to up the User agent override numbers though.
> 
> You don't need User Agent Switcher.  Just change it yourself.
> Keep the Firefox/number at or above the current version.
> general.useragent.override;Mozilla/55.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win128;
> x128; rv:57.0) Gecko/20200101 Firefox/77.0


Being a Yahoo! user that hardly ever access to the webmail UI, I can
confirm that:

1) Yahoo! Mail does not work with SeaMonkey "out-of-the-box", nor
checking the "Advertise Firefox compatibility" with Advanced preferences.

2) Manually adding, through about:config, right-click > Add new >
string value and the preference Paul mentions, makes Yahoo! Mail works
(although I find it very sluggish).

HTH

-- 
Proyecto NAVE (Mozilla es-ES Localization Team)
Mozilla Hispano Community
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.48 released!

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 31/07/17 a las 10:01, Edmund Wong escribió:
> Greetings,
> 
> After so long a delay, for which we apologize, the SeaMonkey
> Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.48!


Should I be worried if my Linux 32-bit installation "Check for
updates" indeed worked? :-)

BTW, big thanks for your work, Edmund.

-- 
Proyecto NAVE (Mozilla es-ES Localization Team)
Mozilla Hispano Community
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 12/11/16 a las 10:06, Frank-Rainer Grahl escribió:
> 
> Worst case the bundled extensions aka. Chatzilla, DOM Inspector and
> Lightning would need to be unbundled from the installer.
> 


Really? In that case, and given how outdated is nowadays the current
2.40 version, I see as a sensible move to release a stripped-down
version, at least for localized versions. Add-on manager should
provide the update path for Lightning; even if it doesn't, it is easy
to install updated versions of Chatzilla and Lightning from it. At
least, far easier than building your own binary (and perceived as
safer than downloading unofficial localized versions).

Other option would be releasing only the en-US binaries and provide
the language packs, but I've been searching fox recent XPIs in nightly
and candidate directories of releases.mozilla.org with no success.

JM2C

-- 
Proyecto NAVE (Mozilla es-ES Localization Team)
Mozilla Hispano Community
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 12/11/16 a las 10:48, Richmond escribió:
> "Cruz, Jaime"  writes:
> 
>> What are the odds of an up-to-date GA version of Seamonkey before the New
>> Year?
> 
> What does GA stand for?
> 

Gérard's answer is appealing, :-) but GA usually stands for General
Availability.

-- 
Proyecto NAVE (Mozilla es-ES Localization Team)
Mozilla Hispano Community
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: No internal updates yet? Re: SeaMonkey 2.40 released

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 14/03/16 a las 17:36, Ant escribió:
> On 3/14/2016 9:28 AM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
> ...
>> BTW IMPORTANT->the Check for updates menu items is broken on the Mac
>> claiming there is no new update.
>>
>> Please go here to find the update
>> http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/
> 
> No updates found in my very old, updated Windows XP Pro SP3 machine
> too! What's up?

In-place updates may need some time to be available (although I have
to say that I've got the warning on Linux just minutes after ewong
posted the news in SeaMonkey Blog).

I have SM 2.39 installed in a Windows XP virtual machine, and I've got
no updates on that, either.

-- 
Proyecto NAVE (Mozilla es-ES Localization Team)
Mozilla Hispano Community
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Gmail not permitted?

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 10/03/16 a las 15:24, Jonathan N. Little escribió:
> tokyoprogresss...@mailbox.org wrote:
>> I thought I sent this yesterday but it seems not to have gone
>> through. I tried to enter my gmail data but got a message gmail
>> telling me they blocked the attempt to retrieve
>> email from this application because it was not an up-to-date one. I
>> have the most recent Mac copy of SM, so I want to confirm if, in
>> fact, gmail does not play ball with Sea Monkey, if there may be
>> another reason for that message, or what.
>>
> 
> When setup SeaMonkey or Thunderbird to gmail you have to go to the
> webmail interface at gmail.com and in the settings change *enable
> "less secure applications"*. I think it is not about email client
> security but more that Google is pushing folks to use *their* Chrome
> and webmail interface.

Similar, but not exactly that reason. Google is promoting its own
protocol for authentications, on the basis that the current scheme of
login + password is flawed. It may or may not be true (I read it some
time ago, and I don't really like it too much). The protocol is not
closed (Google is, AFAIK, not asking for money for sites or services
wanting to use it), so it is more like Google wants to be recognized
for being the author of a critical shift in how services authenticate.

-- 
Proyecto NAVE (Mozilla es-ES Localization Team)
Mozilla Hispano Community
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Spell checker has a mind of its own

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 09/01/16 a las 20:15, Paul B. Gallagher escribió:
> The problem isn't that it's locked; I can easily change it to the
> appropriate language whenever I want. The problem is that it changes
> on its own to an inappropriate language. If I were composing a Russian
> message and it switched to the Russian dictionary, that would be fine.
> But when I'm composing an English message and it switches to the
> Russian dictionary, that makes no sense.


Just to confirm that, from time to time, I experience the same
problem, and I have been told that the same happens in Firefox, so it
is an infrastructure issue, not something specific of SeaMonkey.

JM2C

-- 
Proyecto NAVE (Mozilla es-ES Localization Team)
Mozilla Hispano Community
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: sync not working the last few days?

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 03/10/15 a las 13:42, Thomas Rocek escribió:
> On Saturday, October 3, 2015 at 5:51:14 AM UTC-4, Herrmann Hofer
> wrote:
>> 
>> 1443865390221 Sync.ErrorHandler ERROR X-Weave-Alert: hard-eol:
>> The sync1.1 service has been shut down
>> 
>> I might have to try to set up my own 1.1 Server :-(
> 
> Thanks for the note; I tried to look in my logs and didn't see
> that.  If you *do* figure out how to set up a server, could you
> please post instructions for those of us who are not very
> sophisticated in such matters?  Thanks very much again, best, Tom
> 

The instructions for setting up a Sync 1.1 server are here:

https://docs.services.mozilla.com/howtos/run-sync.html

This was anticipated, as Mozilla announced that it was going to shut
it down on October 1st, since Firefox is using Sync 1.5 since long ago.

SeaMonkey has got permission to use Sync 1.5, but it will take some
time to update SeaMonkey Sync code to 1.5.

HTH



-- 
Proyecto NAVE (Mozilla es-ES Localization Team)
Mozilla Hispano Community
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 11/09/15 a las 02:13, Ed Mullen escribió:
> NoOp wrote on 9/10/2015 3:12 PM:
>> How ironic... an add-on to fix the add-on manager!
>>
> 
> Ironic and idiotic.


Er... I have Firefox Aurora (42.0a2) installed in my mobile and the
add-on versions are shown in about:addons, so it is not related to a
consistent experience in mobile vs. desktop. It seems to be a
desktop-only "enhancement", which is even weirder.

-- 
Proyecto NAVE (Mozilla es-ES Localization Team)
Mozilla Hispano Community
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: What does Archives do?

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 11/01/14 23:53, stan pierce escribió:
 In my list of files where I can place incoming E-mail is an entry
 'Archives'. There is no explanation of this in the Help section of
 SeaMonkey, and I am wondering just what this will do for me and where
 things will be put.


Although written for Thunderbird, the following document describes the
Archiving feature and is valid for SeaMonkey (except for some UI changes):

https://support.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/kb/archived-messages

HTH

-- 
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Java Protection

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 13/09/13 21:41, David E. Ross escribió:
 Windows XP SP3
 SeaMonkey 2.20
 Java 7 u40 (7.0.400.43)
 
 Certain Web sites that I have visited for quite a few years use Java.
 Now, whenever I visit any those sites for the first time after a fresh
 launching of SeaMonkey, I get a dialogue popup that says:
 Do you want to run this application?
 An unsigned application from the location below is requesting to run.  
 etc, etc, etc
 [checkbox] I accept this risk and want to run this app.  


That dialog comes from Java itself, not from SeaMonkey. Starting with
Java 7u21, Java requires the applets to be signed always. It is a try
from Oracle to enhance Java security in the browser (and a failed one,
as some people explains [1]).

[1] http://www.duckware.com/tech/javacodesigningfailure.html

HTH

-- 
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Java Protection

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 14/09/13 12:12, Rob escribió:
 Another bug failure of the whole signed code concept is that even
 if it is implemented completely correctly, it only tells you who wrote
 the code (even if a name is a unique identification of that person or
 entity), it does not tell you what the code is going to do on your
 system.


Yes, the page I linked in my previous post explains it well. The
problem is that Oracle (and Sun previously) assumes that identifying
the author and warning the user about it means that, if the user
accepts, the applet can do anything. Instead of that, a list of
permissions should be requested, similar to what Android or Firefox OS do.

-- 
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Bug 507841 - Port Bug 422814 - Make account configuration quick, easy, and more secure (autoconfig, Quick Account Setup)

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 15/08/13 14:33, Paul B. Gallagher escribió:
 Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez wrote:
 Please note that having only one ISP, which is the common scenario
 indeed, has little or nothing to do with having email accounts with
 different email providers.
 
 Sure. But it does mean you have one SMTP server for all accounts,
 which /is/ one of the things we're talking about.


Hardly. Any correctly configured SMTP server will not allow to process
a message whose sender does not belong to the domain of the SMTP
server itself (otherwise, it would be an open relay available to be
abused to distribute SPAM), so it means that, if you use email
accounts with three different providers, then you need not only three
POP/IMAP accounts, but also three SMTP servers.


 I wouldn't go that way. You could ask for the email address (that's
 something the user is pretty much expected to know) :-) and, if the
 domain happens to be the same than an existing account, then some
 fields could be prepopulated, and the SMTP server used by default.
 
 I think most users would already know whether the new account has the
 same domain as an existing account, and in that case they /would/
 choose to prepopulate and edit. Do they really need help with that
 decision?


We may be envisioning slightly different UIs. I thought your idea of a
new email account wizard was something like:

Step 1) Do you want to prepopulate fields from an existing email
account? Yes - Step 2 / No - Step 3

Step 2) Choose existing email account to prepopulate fields in next step.

Step 3) Display all needed fields to create the account and check they
are valid.

Step 3 could, as it is now, be actually several steps to make screens
of the wizard lighter.

However, I was somehow more in the line I thought your idea of a new
email account wizard was something like:

Step 1) Enter your new email account address.

Step 2) (The wizard silently checks if the domain matches any existing
account. If yes, prepopulate the fields for the next step).

Step 3) Display all needed fields (except email address already
provided in step 1) to create the account and check they are valid.


 Overall, the autoconfig feature from Thunderbird should be the way to
 go, although it is not perfect.
 
 I'm not familiar with the features of TB,


It uses a mix of de-facto standards and heuristics:

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Thunderbird/Autoconfiguration

Supposedly, any email provider can be queried to get an XML with the
configuration details for any given email account. Mozilla was goint
to host a central database for most popular email providers.

If the above fails, Thunderbird tries with usual server names:
imap.domain.com, pop.domain.com, smtp.domain.com, etc.

Regards,

-- 
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Bug 507841 - Port Bug 422814 - Make account configuration quick, easy, and more secure (autoconfig, Quick Account Setup)

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 15/08/13 05:16, Paul B. Gallagher escribió:
 Here are a couple of scenarios where it makes sense:

 • For most ordinary users who have one ISP and several accounts, the
 SMTP settings will be the same, so the best strategy is just to
 point a
 new account to the existing SMTP server, which is set as default.

 How likely is that?
 
 In my experience, most users have only one ISP. So if they have
 several accounts, which is the scenario we're discussing, we're
 already there.


Please note that having only one ISP, which is the common scenario
indeed, has little or nothing to do with having email accounts with
different email providers.

Most sensible people nowadays don't use the ISP provided email
accounts, since if they switch ISP, they lose the email accounts.
Instead, people use email accounts from Gmail, Yahoo!, Outlook.com and
several other email providers, and while it may happen to have several
GMail accounts, the most sensible reason to have several accounts is
for fallback service, so you would use different email providers. For
instance, I have four different accounts (five a few days ago, before
Lavabit.com were shut down) and none of them share the email provider
with the others.


 • For users with several accounts within the same domain (e.g.,
 someone
 like me with their own domain), the POP settings will be the same,
 except username and password.

 How likely is that?
 
 Pretty likely, I'd say. Maybe we travel in different circles, but I
 know lots of people with their own domains, and lots of people with
 two or more throwaway accounts (yahoo, hotmail, gmail, etc.).


I don't know a lot of people having their own domain (and, for those
that do have it, some don't use the email accounts in them as primary
email, because it is not so ubiquitiously accesible as GMail or
Yahoo!). So I wouldn't give this scenario more than a 25 % of total cases.


 If I were designing the interface, I'd offer the user these options:
 a) prepopulate with settings from an existing account (user
 selectable)
 and modify them;
 b) start from scratch.


I wouldn't go that way. You could ask for the email address (that's
something the user is pretty much expected to know) :-) and, if the
domain happens to be the same than an existing account, then some
fields could be prepopulated, and the SMTP server used by default.

Overall, the autoconfig feature from Thunderbird should be the way to
go, although it is not perfect.

JM2C

-- 
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey german Umlauts

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 03/04/13 20:31, Uwe R. Kunzmann escribió:
 Hello together,
 
 starting with SeaMonkey 1.16 some E-mails will not be displayed correctly 
 anymore. That means, the german Umlauts (Ä, Ö, Ü, a, ö, ü, ß) will be 
 displayed not in the right manner, I see:
 geprüft und für instead of geprüft und für.


Did you mean 2.16 instead of 1.16? If so, I experienced the same
for a while, only in Windows.

-- 
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

[RePost] SeaMonkey and Firebug

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

(Reposting only one more time as I got no meaningful answers the first
post)

Lately I've noticed Firebug does not properly work in SeaMonkey.
Specifically, the Inspect Element contextual menu does not work. I've
not found this in the Known Issues section of SeaMonkey release notes,
nor in Bugzilla database, so I wonder if it could be specific to me,
but I've found the issue in separate installations/profiles in Linux
and Windows. Anyone else has experienced the same?

TIA

-- 
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [RePost] SeaMonkey and Firebug

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 06/01/13 21:00, Lemuel Johnson escribió:
 Works for me.
 Firebug 1.11.1
 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0
 SeaMonkey/2.14.1


Humm... And it works for me now, too. It seems Firebug didn't got
updated itself through the Addon Manager. Since the Firebug page in
Mozilla Addons says the addon is valid only for Firefox, I hadn't
tried before to install it on SeaMonkey. This time I have forced the
install of Firebug 1.11.1 and it works OK.

Thanks a lot for your answer.

-- 
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey default printer problem

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 29/12/12 06:28, Paul B. Gallagher escribió:
 OK, here's something that does work, though I'm not sure of any
 unintended consequences:
 
 In about:config, find the pref print_printer, right-click it, and
 choose reset. It becomes blank. Close about:config.
 
 Henceforth, whenever you execute a print command, the default printer
 is selected. You can select another printer, but the next time you
 execute a print command, the default is selected again. Just what the
 OP wanted.
 
 Any reason not to do this?
 
 I'd also like to know how to restore the default behavior.


My experience is that the printer you select in the *browser* window
of SeaMonkey persists across sessions, thus turning it into the
SeaMonkey default printer.

However, in the *mail  news* window, if you choose a different
printer when printing, the selection does not persist and it reverts
to the SeaMonkey default printer (the one last selected in a SM
browser window). All of this is running on Windows (XP); I haven't
really played with it on Linux enough to confirm it works the same way.

I haven't changed the preferences directly so I can't comment about
whether it works or not.

-- 
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: 2.14.1 mouse cursor changes to drag drop

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 28/12/12 01:54, NoOp escribió:
 On 12/19/2012 07:35 PM, NoOp wrote:
 In the past few days I've noticed my mouse cursor changing to 'DD'
 anytime that I move the mouse over a tab quickly. Similar to the issue of:
 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736811
 [Mouse occasionally changes to drag cursor and the mouse buttons stop
 functioning]
 Except in my case the mouse buttons et al continue to work fine.

 Anyone else noticing the same?
 
 Nobody?


Not between tabs, but it still happens often the first time I move the
pointer across the different mailnews panels. As you, the pointer
changes to DD but it still works (well, not really; I have to click
once to get the arrow shape again and, from then on, it works OK).

-- 
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SeaMonkey and Firebug

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

Lately I've noticed Firebug does not properly work in SeaMonkey.
Specifically, the Inspect Element contextual menu does not work. I've
not found this in the Known Issues section of SeaMonkey release notes,
nor in Bugzilla database, so I wonder if it could be specific to me,
but I've found in separate installations/profiles in Linux and
Windows. Anyone else has experienced the same?

TIA

-- 
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.12. Congratulations ! The worst update in all the Mozilla's life.

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 30/08/12 07:41, Interges escribió:
 I expected to receive responses from profesionals to find
 sollutions.I am wasting a lot of time because of an update not
 required.


SeaMonkey does not update itself without asking you in the first
place. So you accepted to update, making it a required one.


 For the rest, yes, the Norton is updated, and yes, Windows is
 correctly updated. And about if the problem is in my computer, the
 response is that Norton didn't show alerts like this since this XP
 was mounted as new, and that this alert only appears during the
 2.12 upgrade. More clues ?


I've just updated SeaMonkey on Windows to the 2.12 version and I have
not experimented any problems so far.

You could try a simple experiment: enter in the Program Files\Norton
Antivirus directory (or whatever name it has), choose a random DLL
inside it and delete it, then report back when you experience any
problem to complain about how dangerous is Windows Explorer breaking
your antivirus.

I see your point (one of the most popular among paid antivirus may
lead to errors in SeaMonkey 2.12 update, so many people could
complain), Callek has already said how this might be prevented on the
SeaMonkey Team part in the future, but please you must also
acknowledge that no antivirus should permanently delete a file without
prior user-content. If your antivirus removes files without you having
a chance to avoid it just because it wrongly detects them as
virus-infected, your antivirus is broken, no matter how popular it is.


 I have sended the file to Symantec, but seems that nobody more
 concerned about doing things as they should. Fix the problem
 causing the alert. This is the thing really disturbing.


To me, this looks like a PEBCAK.

-- 
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.10 released

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 07/06/12 21:30, NoOp escribió:
 On 06/06/2012 06:17 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
 NoOp:

 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736811
 [Mouse occasionally changes to drag cursor without clicking any buttons]
 should be:
 [Mouse changes to drag cursor without clicking any buttons - data loss]

 I have never seen this on Linux x86_64 with SM trunk.

 Hartmut
 
 Can you try with 2.10? If I get a chance I'll try with trunk (2.13) as
 well.


Confirmed also here, with both 2.10 and 2.12a2. Reported in bug. It
has happened for five or eight times (started SM in Mail window, in
two or three seconds the problem arises, it persists until I've closed
the application. After that, it has worked and I'm still running the
same session with Mail, Compose and Browser windows with no problem.

-- 
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: No multiple downloads with SM 2.9.1

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 02/05/12 18:03, hawker escribió:
 If you have different information, and modern download accelerators
 don't work like the old ones, than I would love to be enlightened.


The FAQ of DownloadThemAll can be of help here:

http://www.downthemall.net/howto/faq/#faq7

HTH

-- 
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Problem with S/MIME e-mail signatures in SM 2.6.1

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

Hi,

I'm having problems to digitally sign messages with SeaMonkey 2.6.1
using my personal certificate issued by a Spanish government agency
(FNMT). The personal certificate is valid (it expires in about two
months from now).

The CA for that agency is not bundled as part of SeaMonkey but I
imported the CA root certificate back in 2009, when I started using
the signature, and it has been working since then without a glitch,
including a couple of PC changes. The CA certificate is also well into
its validity time period.

But now, suddenly, when I try to send e-mails signed with this
certificate, I get a dialog prompting me to configure one or more
personal certificates before using the security feature and
redirecting me to the help contents. Nevertheless to say, the
certificate is correctly installed and selected to be used to sign
e-mail messages.

I've gone so far to remove the certificate from the certificate
database and reimported it, and it has worked for one of my e-mails,
but I forgot to remove the digital signature feature from the
remaining ones, and even though I've removed afterwards, completely
exited SeaMonkey, open it again and choose again the certificate, it
still fails to work.

Although I guess I can remove the digital signature feature from all
my e-mail accounts, remove the certificate, exit SM, open it again,
reimporting the certificate and restore the digital signature in the
selected e-mail accounts, I think something is working wrong in SM. As
I said, the certificate has been working right for years and I even
moved the SM profile from one laptop to another back in February 2011
without any problem.

I've searched Bugzilla but I haven't found anything applicable, though
I have proven to be pretty bad when digging the Bugzilla database. So,
my questions are:

1) Is anyone experiencing similar problems?

2) Should I file the bug (IOW, haven't I missed an existing bug)?

3) Can/Should I apply the full erase-reimport-reconfigure workaround,
or is it better to wait to help diagnosing the problem?

TIA

PS: Since the e-mail account I requested the certificate with is the
one still having problems to use it and the certificate expiration
date is near, I do have some interest in solving this soon. :-)

-- 
Ricardo Palomares (RickieES)
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/
http://www.proyectonave.es/
https://diasp.eu/u/rickiees

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey email features missing?

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 12/07/11 20:39, upscope escribió:
 1. The ability to call the address book without starting either the 
 browser or email programs. (save time updating lists and contact 
 information).


$ seamonkey -addressbook

should work, if you mean opening SeaMonkey address book without
previously opening another window. If you have any other SM window
open, just pressing [Ctrl]+[5] opens the address book.


 2. in KMail after a message is sent , you can right click on the sent 
 message (in sent mail box) and have an option to send again, including 
 attachments. This saves time when I have five distribution lists that 
 have to be sent separately ( two many contact and ISP considers it spam 
 if all included) the send again feature allows you to change the To, CC 
 and Bcc fields for the new list.


The easier way I know of doing something similar is selecting the
message in the Sent folder and pressing [Ctrl]+[E] to edit message as
new. Then you just need to change the To address, although you can
also change anything else you wish.

HTH

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: tagzilla phillip chee

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 02/07/11 07:37, Philip Chee escribió:
 On 02/07/2011 04:04, Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez wrote:
 El 01/07/11 06:38, Philip Chee escribió:
 I just realized that I might actually have write access to
 http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/
 At least according to:
 http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/members.html

 I probably need someone to help me update the html on that site as I
 have very little time to do that these days.


 Same topic on different newsgroups... :-)

 I can help you with it if you want. How would you like to get the
 updated files? Maybe a ZIP archive with the files to update in this
 directory?

 http://www.mozdev.org/source/browse/tagzilla/www/

 Ricardo.
 
 You probably need to use CVS to checkout the source.
 http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/source.html
 
 Email me @gmail.com so that I don't forget to followup.


Philip, reviewing the entire thread I guess the original poster is
willing to see TagZilla's main page at mozdev.org featuring your
latest (0.66.2) version for download, maybe also a working copy of JSLib.

I can send you a patch for the website CVS part, but should you upload
the 0.66.2 XPI to TagZilla downloads section, or would it suffice if
the TagZilla pages link back to the 0.66.2 XPI at XSidebar space?

BTW, neither TagZilla nor JSLib are present at AMO. Do you have by any
chance some recent contact with David Perry, the original author of
TagZilla?


 p.s. xsidebar is also hosted on mozdev so the same concept holds.


I have to admit that I have not used XSidebar for a long time by now.
Is it really needed to make it work some extensions in SeaMonkey?

Ricardo

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: tagzilla phillip chee

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 01/07/11 06:38, Philip Chee escribió:
 I just realized that I might actually have write access to
 http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/
 At least according to:
 http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/members.html
 
 I probably need someone to help me update the html on that site as I
 have very little time to do that these days.


Same topic on different newsgroups... :-)

I can help you with it if you want. How would you like to get the
updated files? Maybe a ZIP archive with the files to update in this
directory?

http://www.mozdev.org/source/browse/tagzilla/www/

Ricardo.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 26/05/11 11:30, Philip Chee escribió:
 Hi!
 
 SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the
 Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need
 volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1
 
 Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here:
 https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-miramar/
 SeaMonkey 2.1pre builds are here:
 http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-2.0/


I'm not an intensive user of Lightning, but I've been working with it
since I migrated to SM 2.1 (as of SM2.1b3, IIRC) and I only noticed
some minor aesthetic issues, which are gone since Lightning 1.0b4pre.

Ricardo

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: New Yahoo Mail

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

El 26/04/11 00:30, Thomas Pamin escribió:
 Yahoo wants me to upgrade to their new email application. When I try,
 it says Seamonkey is not a supported browser. How can I get the new
 Yahoo mail to work with Seamonkey?


If you use SM2.1b3, it will work. Yahoo! blatantly ignores that SM
ships a comparable Gecko than Firefox, and instead looks for Firefox
in the UA (User Agent) string. That's why SM 2.1 has a UI preference
to add Firefox to the UA string.

BTW, I tried to do something similar with the UA string in SM 2.0.x
some time ago and I failed to enter. I surely did something wrong.

HTH

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

NoOp escribió:
 Phillip Chee pointed out this in:
 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210
 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210#c15
 quote
 The SeaMonkey 2.0.x branch is in maintenance mode. Only security and
 stability fixes are allowed.
 /quote
 
 If this is the case, then shouldn't standard users be notified of this on:
 http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
 particularly since that is the Official download site and the supposed
 official release of SeaMonkey?


Correct me if I'm wrong, but SeaMonkey 2.0.x entered into maintenance
mode since the 2.0.0 version, as usually happens with every Mozilla
product (the only exception I remember of is Firefox 3.6.4, when OOPP
feature was introduced).

Being in maintenance mode doesn't mean it is insecure or that it has
reached is End Of Life. It means that no new features will be added to
that branch. This is no news at all in Mozilla world since I remember
(and I'm involved as a localizer to it since 2002).


 As a 'User' of SeaMonkey (in both personal and production environments),
 I'd appreciate an official comment from the SeaMonkey devs/project
 management as to whether SeaMonkey 2.0 is in maintenance mode and if
 Only security and stability fixes are allowed for 2.0.


I'm not an official voice for SeaMonkey Council, but I'm pretty sure
the above (both yours and mine) assertions are true.


 I'd also appreciate comments as to the direction of SeaMonkey;
 - will users go through yet another SM 1.x to 2.0 transition in the near
 future?


The transition will be 2.0 to 2.1 and it hopefully will be ready
shortly after Firefox 4 launch (although this largely depends of
available time of core contributors, besides how many people can help
with bugs).


 - will provisions be made for importing/exporting lightning calendars?


That's my biggest concern, too. :-)


 - what can users expect in the 2.0 to 2.1 transition?


If you test SM2.1b1, you can see most of the changes. From my own
experience, most of the changes are seamless and for the better; I
only found some problems importing bookmarks, but I didn't really try
it seriously. Well, and of course, Lightning doesn't work at all at
the moment.


 As you all know, it was a pretty difficult transition for some users to
 go from SM 1.x to 2.0. If 2.0 is now maintenance only mode, then I
 wonder if it is worth continuing with SeaMonkey further.


I think you have misunderstood the meaning of maintenance mode. It
has always been that way for every major release in Mozilla (as I
said, with the OOPP exception of Firefox 3.6.4) that no new features
are added and only security and stability fixes are provided for minor
releases.

HTH

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [HOW-TO] Import Passwords from Firefox/Thunderbird to SM 2.0

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

Philip Chee escribió:
 On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:03:41 +0100, Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez wrote:
 Philip Chee escribió:
 http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=40t=1588545
 (...)


 Hi, Phil, thank you for this recipe. May I ask what license applies to
 your post?. The reason I ask this is because I'd like to put a
 localized version of you recipe in our Spanish community site
 (http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/) but we publish all content under a
 CC 3.0-by-sa license, so I could only do it if your post is under a
 compatible license.
 
 CC 3.0-by-sa is fine with me. Also GFDL for those GNUists.
 


http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/documentacion/Importar_contraseñas_en_SeaMonkey_desde_Firefox_y_Thunderbird

Thank you, Phil! :-)

Ricardo

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [HOW-TO] Import Passwords from Firefox/Thunderbird to SM 2.0

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

Philip Chee escribió:
 http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=40t=1588545
 (...)


Hi, Phil, thank you for this recipe. May I ask what license applies to
your post?. The reason I ask this is because I'd like to put a
localized version of you recipe in our Spanish community site
(http://www.mozilla-hispano.org/) but we publish all content under a
CC 3.0-by-sa license, so I could only do it if your post is under a
compatible license.

TIA

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.0 RC2: will modal window for About:SeaMonkey return?

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

Phillip Jones escribió:
 Robert Kaiser wrote:
 asmpgmr wrote:
 Granted but why do things like change the download progress dialog UI
 to be less usable because you don't like dialogs (Your words:
 Download progress dialogs ? Eww!). There really is no reason why
 this can't look more or less the same as SeaMonkey 1.x

 If you love ugly, then you your own extension to make it ugly again.

 
 See exactly what I am talking about. You think it looks ugly. Other of
 us love it. Most of the silent Majority folks are not going to have the
 courage to speak up.


OK, I'll take the courage to speak up myself. :-) I love tabs, I
strongly think they don't waste resources (if any, they save
resources, since tabs don't create menu, menu items, toolbars, toolbar
contents and status bars that are part of new windows), I think they
add value to standard OS window management because they can be created
without grabbing focus (it may be possible now to do that with
windows, too, but it wasn't when tabs were first introduced in Mozilla
Suite), and I think new download progress windows are not so bad vs.
SeaMonkey 1.1.x (in fact, although I prefer dialogs vs. download
manager window, I find new dialogs more useful than SM 1.1.x ones).

And, despite above, I like more a separate dialog (whether modal or
not) for About SeaMonkey vs. the current tab behaviour. These are my
reasons:

- Most About... programs are presented as dialogs, so SM digress
from them here.

- Usually, when I want to launch About... dialog, I want to see it.
However, due to my preferences, the About... tab is open in
background, forcing me to switch to it to access the data presented in
it. I think my preferences are not too unusual, though.

- If I have the mail and browser components open, with the mail
component having focus, and I launch About..., I have to switch to
browser component and probably switch to another tab.

Still, I think this is not a priority issue, although if a patch
already exists and works, it could worth considering it.

My 0.02 cents.

Ricardo

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 1.1.17 Released

[Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez]

Robert Kaiser wrote:
 Downloads for all available platforms and languages:
 http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#1.1.17


I've noticed that the bouncer behind

http://releases.mozilla.org/

has directed me to a server that holds just binaries for 1.1.15 and
ahead. Since the last update for es-ES langpack was for 1.1.14, no
es-ES langpack is available through releases.mozilla.org. The link in
the Releases page of seamonkey-project.org works OK, I think because
it points directly to ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/

Since we have a link in our localization site to the langpack, would
it be polite if I change the URL to ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/ too? I
could link to our own local copy, but I think it is better if
mozilla.org / Seamonkey Council can have as much metrics as possible
of downloads.

TIA
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey