Delete and copy not working on 2.24

2014-03-03 Thread Lester Caine
I'm running 2.24 on SUSE Linux, but I've been having trouble with this for a 
little while now. Just after the latest update it has become a daily event. 
Actually it seems to be after running for just a few hours.

Currently, message filters seem to be working and messages are moved to the 
right folder, but delete is not working, and Junk messages are being tagged, 
but not moved to 'Junk'. When creating a new message, the local copy is not 
happening and one has to cancel out to delete the pop-up and loose it.

This has been happening for a few versions, but had been after running for 
several days. I'd restarted last night before tidying emails, and this morning 
it's broken again so I'm about to restart. Which while I can get a couple of 
web pages to reopen I have to manually reset each every time.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Firefox 3.5 RC1 is appearing

2009-06-18 Thread Lester Caine

JR WG wrote ...

A lot of unnecessary baggage
If you must top post THINK !

And are we really interested in what 'the opposition' are doing :)

--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Sick windows machine

2009-03-27 Thread Lester Caine

Lemuel Johnson wrote:

Lester Caine wrote:
I've got Seamonkey on an XP(SP3) machine and it's running fine EXCEPT. 
It's not displaying some websites. Googel and ask come up fine, but 
when I select www.pctools.com it seems to be saying the domain does 
not exist, jet the same search and link works fine on the machine next 
door.


There was a trojan on the machine which I've cleared out amd the disk 
is now fine, but trying to update the pctools anti virus fails, and 
following the link in seamonkey also fails. Seems to be 'selective 
amnesia' in relation to some IP addresses, but the firewall is off and 
I've even booted with all the start-up stuff disabled so all I'm 
running is seamonkey :(




I just spent an afternoon cleaning a viral infection from a friend's 
system which had the same symptoms after the trojan was removed.  Seems 
it silently installed a browser extension which redirects attempts to 
access certain anti-virus sites.  Search Google for GooredFix for 
further information.


Not having any pigging windows disks for the machine, I ended up hitting 
it with 'HP Recovery', and to my surprise it worked reasonably well. 
Only taken 2 days to put back all the windows updates and restore the 
programs it missed - so now can I charge the customer for two days time? 
A brand new machine would be cheaper these days ;)


--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Sick windows machine

2009-03-25 Thread Lester Caine

JeffM wrote:

Lester Caine wrote:

[...]when I select www.pctools.com it seems to be saying
the domain does not exist,
jet the same search and link works fine on the machine next door.

[...]trying to update the pctools anti virus fails, and
following the link in seamonkey also fails.


A quick peek at that site in my GetRight browser
shows it want to load 6 JavaScripts.  Got that disabled?

If I went there with a Mozilla browser,
I'd have to block almost everything to stand it.
From the contents listing I see using GetRight,
that page is also one of the most cluttered, junked-up things
I've encountered lately.


This is not a browser compatibility thing - at least I don't think so. 
The reason for going to the site was because the on-line anti-virus 
update was failing. THAT was when I found that seamonkey was having 
trouble, but the problem is not seamonkey - it's something deeper inside 
pigging windows.


This morning I quite happily started the machine - all the startup stuff 
has been disabled so it's only using windows drivers/services at 
present. I downloaded SM1.1.15 - installed it and navigated around for a 
bit avoiding known problem sites. But any attempt to go to M$ or pctools 
sites gives a dns error. And if i try to ping those problem addresses - 
address not found. But the other machines here ping pctools happily and 
get addresses for M$. It's only THAT machine which complains.


Since the important stuff IS working, I thought I'd just ignore these 
problems despite the fact that we can't update the anti virus, but I'm 
also having a problem getting email working. It will not connect to the 
email server.


THIS flagged up one thing which may be relevant. The customer is using 
AOL which I have had problems with in the past, and it seems that 
'talk-talk' are taking over and moving customers. So I'm wondering if 
something relating to THAT is now screwing up normal operation :(


So much for doing someone a 'quick favour'!

--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Sick windows machine

2009-03-24 Thread Lester Caine

JeffM wrote:

Lester Caine wrote:

[...]It's only the one machine that is NOT seeing these sites.
Just discovered that it does not like microsoft.com
either so I can't run windows update :(


Raise your right hand and repeat this:
I know that these sites use the LEAST-SECURE mechanism on the planet
yet I am willing to expose my Windoze install
to any infections they might want to shove down my throat.

http://google.com/search?q=cache:ZXpao3MnY7wJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Update+c+gnu+501+ActiveX+requires.Internet.Explorer+MSHTMLstrip=1


It's clearing up the effects that is the reason the machine is on the 
bench here. The shitting thing is clean as far as the trojan goes, but I 
can't get to updates for Seamonkey, pctools anti-virus and other sites 
LIKE microsoft.com to look for explanations :( Yet it still access 
google and most of the other sites quite happily!


I've wasted pigging 3 hours on the machine and if I could get alway with 
it, it would get Linux, but the customer has a some applications that 
will only work with windows, such as Sage accounts and their bank access 
 package.


--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Preparing to move my profile(s?) to a new machine

2009-02-19 Thread Lester Caine

Charles Milton Ling wrote:

Greetings!

I am in the process of backing up everything of importance.  I have read 
the instructions about transferring a profile, but now discover that I 
have a profile I didn't know anything about!
The Profile Manager tells me that I have two profiles, namely default 
and test (which I once created solely for testing).  Using Windows 
Explorer, however, I find that my main profile, the one containing all 
my e-mail etc., is called Charley.  I cannnot recall that I created 
it, and - as said - the Profile Manager apparently doesn't know about it 
either!
When I start SeaMonkey, default is apparently used, and works.  I am a 
bit confused, and grateful for any help.


The 'profile' is really only a short cut. The ACTUAL location of your 
emails will be identified by checking which directory your email 
accounts are using in 'Mail and Newsgroup account setting'. I normally 
change that location to the real location of my email and newsgroup 
history. Things like your bookmarks will still be in the 'default' 
profile. I tend to just copy that over the top of a new one created in 
the new machine.


--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 1.1.14 and Windows Vista?

2009-02-19 Thread Lester Caine

Eric Meurville wrote:

Hello,

I also received a new computer under Vista. After the migration of the 
profiles and of the mails, Seamonkey opens correctly, but it is so slow 
that it is absolutely unusable (e.g. few minutes to move a mail from a 
directory to another). Do you have some clues explaining and solving the 
problem? Moreover, I am not able to send any mails (SMTP error) in spite 
of the fact the configuration is exactly the same as on the previous XP 
computer.


You will probably find that port 25 is blocked by the Vista firewall.

I've kept well away from Vista ... we are just trying to get it off a 
Sony laptop at the moment. Customer gave it 3 months but has had enough :)


--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 1.1.14 and Windows Vista?

2009-02-19 Thread Lester Caine

Arne wrote:

Lester Caine wrote:

Eric Meurville wrote:

Hello,

I also received a new computer under Vista. After the migration of 
the profiles and of the mails, Seamonkey opens correctly, but it is 
so slow that it is absolutely unusable (e.g. few minutes to move a 
mail from a directory to another). Do you have some clues explaining 
and solving the problem? Moreover, I am not able to send any mails 
(SMTP error) in spite of the fact the configuration is exactly the 
same as on the previous XP computer.


You will probably find that port 25 is blocked by the Vista firewall.

I've kept well away from Vista ... we are just trying to get it off a 
Sony laptop at the moment. Customer gave it 3 months but has had 
enough :)


It's a bit hard for me to understand all the whining over Vista! I have 
used it since June last year and have never had a single problem with 
it! For protection I added only AVG as an addition to Vistas firewall 
and Windows Defender that was preinstalled.


No problem installing SeaMonkey, just recently upgraded to 1.1.14 as 
easy as ever before. Could there be any difference which edition is 
used? I have the business edition.


The first problem with vista on laptops is that you HAVE to switch of 
the bulk of the 'bling' ( aero interface ) to get any sensible battery 
life. If you switch that OFF that then why even load vista?


Most business suppliers (in the UK) ship laptops COMPLETE with an XP 
downgrade disk so that it can be made compatible with the corporate 
network again. Assessment of power consumption shows that vista needs 30 
to 40% more power to do the same job as an existing XP machine. A lot of 
power at a time when we are drying to reduce power consumption. Vista 
will not even install on the low power computers that are now being used 
as desk top machines as part of the power usage assesment.


The main problem with vista however is the 'learning curve' when one has 
used windows 'classic' for years. Try and talk a customer through 
problems on the phone when you do not even know what they are looking 
at. This is why MANY large sites here are still on W2k, the COST of 
upgrading all of the support structure even to XP is an expense that 
simply can't be justified :(


--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Suite over components

2008-12-14 Thread Lester Caine
A few weeks back now I got so fed up with the Windows machine that I 
switched all the paperwork stuff to Linux. ( Mandriva 2009.0 but that is 
not critical )


Seamonkey works fine apart from a few quirks on hot keys which have been 
covered already, but increasingly I'm finding that the reasons for USING 
Seamonkey are being eroded. On windows things do not integrate together 
nicely, the Calendar and Address Book are still separated from one 
another and hot keying between links in messages and notes is lacking.


On Linux there are still a few rough edges, but the environment seems a 
lot more 'interoperability friendly', unlike windows? That said, I find 
that I still have problems with Seamonkey talking to other things, and 
the same with Firefox and Thunderbird. While KDE gives me a nice 'flat 
playing field' when it comes to integration. ( Although KDE4 is about as 
user friendly as Vista! :( )


I think I can understand why the drive to split up Mozilla came about 
since many developers do seem to be working on Linux rather than 
Windows, and the same applies across many projects. The Windows 
requirements are somewhat different to those of Linux, but I don't think 
that the current developments are being 'productive' as they could be? 
The Seamonkey development can't address the gaps left by the original 
breakup, and the drift to Firefox being totally isolated seems to be 
increasing? So are we reaching a point where a radical overhaul of the 
roadmap is inevitable?


--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey