Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

On 8/7/2011 11:01 PM PT, Stanimir Stamenkov typed: ... Seem related to the recent fact Google Groups is not showing any new messages for some time, although it seems to allow posting. Currently, the last message visible in mozilla.support.seamonkey on Google Groups is from Aug 2: http://groups.

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

[Sending to Don, in addition to the group.] Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:53:45 -0400, /Justin Wood (Callek)/: Don wrote: ... Don your message here is a repeat of yesterdays, yesterdays (Aug 6) also recieved many replies addressing your concerns, please do not double post, and see those replies. From

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

Don wrote: Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward. ... Don Don your message here is a repeat of yesterdays, yesterdays (Aug 6) also recieved many replies addressing your concerns, please do not double post, and see those replies. From there we can move on with further discussion if nee

Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward. It has many changes with no real improvement. This new version makes some things take more time, like simply saving a bookmark. Now there is no way to designate a new bookmark folder. Many other problems. For one thing there is no documentation for

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

Keith Whaley wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Don wrote: Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward. [...] Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.? Also how do I write the people who wrote this version to complain. Not just to report a

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

Ray_Net wrote: Don wrote: Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward. [...] Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.? Also how do I write the people who wrote this version to complain. Not just to report a bug. (this version I

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

Don a écrit : Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward. It has many changes with no real improvement. This new version makes some things take more time, like simply saving a bookmark. Now there is no way to designate a new bookmark folder. Many other problems. For one thing there is no doc

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

Don a écrit : Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward. It has many changes with no real improvement. This new version makes some things take more time, like simply saving a bookmark. Now there is no way to designate a new bookmark folder. Many other problems. For one thing there is no doc

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

Don wrote: Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward. It has many changes with no real improvement. This new version makes some things take more time, like simply saving a bookmark. Now there is no way to designate a new bookmark folder. Many other problems. For one thing there is no docume

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

Don schrieb: Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.? There is no older version that still is supported. Unsorted bookmarks are those you file quickly with the new bookmarks icon at the right of the location bar. Robert Kai

Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward. It has many changes with no real improvement. This new version makes some things take more time, like simply saving a bookmark. Now there is no way to designate a new bookmark folder. Many other problems. For one thing there is no documentation for t

Re: Certificates disappeared from Seamonkey 2.0.x - Fixed

user@domain.invalid wrote: Mac OS X 10.6.7 Seamonkey 2.0.14, problem first noticed under 2.0.13 My personal certificates and the CA certificates which authenticate them have disappeared from Seamonkey. This used to all work prior to 2.0.13 but not neither my personal certificates nor the CA Auth

Certificates disappeared from Seamonkey 2.0.x

Mac OS X 10.6.7 Seamonkey 2.0.14, problem first noticed under 2.0.13 My personal certificates and the CA certificates which authenticate them have disappeared from Seamonkey. This used to all work prior to 2.0.13 but not neither my personal certificates nor the CA Authority ceriticates shows up i

Re: Seamonkey 2.0.x and Firefox Sync extension

Jens Hatlak wrote: MCBastos wrote: I have been letting it auto-update itself for some time... but recently I noticed that it does not sync anymore. Worse: the extension Options dialog screen simply does not work (...) Is it just me, or is the Firefox Sync extension no longer really compatible w

Re: Seamonkey 2.0.x and Firefox Sync extension

MCBastos wrote: I have been letting it auto-update itself for some time... but recently I noticed that it does not sync anymore. Worse: the extension Options dialog screen simply does not work (...) Is it just me, or is the Firefox Sync extension no longer really compatible with Seamonkey? Ind

Seamonkey 2.0.x and Firefox Sync extension

The Firefox Sync extension used to work reasonably well, albeit with a limited feature set, in Seamonkey. That was back in the day when it was still called Weave, I think. I have been letting it auto-update itself for some time... but recently I noticed that it does not sync anymore. Worse: the ex

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 and Seamonkey 2.0

Hi, Le 18/02/2011 13:35, Robert Kaiser a écrit: > If it already happened, you should be able to get back your bookmarks at > least by going into the bookmarks manager and restore older bookmarks > from the Tools menu. Or you can try renaming the places.sqlite-corrupt > (or similar) file back to

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 and Seamonkey 2.0

Stéphane Grégoire schrieb: I'm using Seamonkey 2.1 nightly builds but sometimes by mistake I launch Seamonkey 2.0 and then in Seamonkey 2.1 I have not history and no bookmarks. How fixing it? Make a backup of your profile (which you should always do anyhow), and esp. your places.s

Seamonkey 2.1 and Seamonkey 2.0

Hi, I'm using Seamonkey 2.1 nightly builds but sometimes by mistake I launch Seamonkey 2.0 and then in Seamonkey 2.1 I have not history and no bookmarks. How fixing it? Seamonkey 2.1b3pre mail window look very pretty! -- Sorry for my bad english, the british dictionnary is disabl

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

On 30/12/10 04:26, NoOp wrote: On 12/29/2010 06:33 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 12/29/2010 5:07 PM, Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez wrote: - will provisions be made for importing/exporting lightning calendars? That's my biggest concern, too.:-) Lightning is an extension, one which does no

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

On 31/12/10 04:16, NoOp wrote: [...] OK, it was marked as RESOLVED as in: This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 613199 *** https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613199 Status: RESOLVED FIXED Product:SeaMonkey Hence, it was technically marked as FIXED.

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 23:51:02 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: > Philip Chee schrieb: >> On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:58:14 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: >>> NoOp schrieb: wait until they try 2.1 and try backing down to 2.0 and realize that their calendars no longer are compatible. >>> >>> Who say

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

On 12/30/2010 10:16 PM, NoOp wrote: Really? Why don't you switch to SM 2.0.11 instead of Thunderbird 3.1.7 and try it? Because I was, (and *am* in the middle of a compile cycle right now). I use Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and Firefox regularly. -- ~Justin Wood (Callek) _

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

On 12/30/2010 10:18 PM, NoOp wrote: On 12/30/2010 02:47 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 12/30/2010 4:15 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 12/29/2010 10:05 PM, NoOp wrote: Here is a paste of:

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

On 12/30/2010 02:47 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > On 12/30/2010 4:15 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >> Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: >> >>> On 12/29/2010 10:05 PM, NoOp wrote: >>> Here is a paste of: directly fr

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

** https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613199 Status: RESOLVED FIXED Product:SeaMonkey Hence, it was technically marked as FIXED. <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_activity.cgi?id=531210> > >> If we expect users to install 2.1pre versions simply so that th

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 12/30/2010 4:15 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 12/29/2010 10:05 PM, NoOp wrote: Here is a paste of: directly from 2.0.11. There are of course more exampl

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

Philip Chee schrieb: On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:58:14 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: NoOp schrieb: wait until they try 2.1 and try backing down to 2.0 and realize that their calendars no longer are compatible. Who says that they would not be compatible? From all I know, they are perfectly compatible

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

On 12/30/2010 4:15 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 12/29/2010 10:05 PM, NoOp wrote: Here is a paste of: directly from 2.0.11. There are of course more examples in the bug report, but that

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:58:14 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: > NoOp schrieb: >> wait until they >> try 2.1 and try backing down to 2.0 and realize that their calendars no >> longer are compatible. > > Who says that they would not be compatible? From all I know, they are > perfectly compatible so far.

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

Ray_Net schrieb: Robert Kaiser wrote: That 2.0 profiles will "just work" in 2.1 - downgrading from 2.1 to 2.0 might even work, but might have some flaws which we only intend to fix if it's easy (e.g. 2.1 bookmarks will never automatically work in 2.0). So the downgrading to 2.0 is NOT possib

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

Robert Kaiser wrote: That 2.0 profiles will "just work" in 2.1 - downgrading from 2.1 to 2.0 might even work, but might have some flaws which we only intend to fix if it's easy (e.g. 2.1 bookmarks will never automatically work in 2.0). So the downgrading to 2.0 is NOT possible - Great news ..

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

NoOp schrieb: wait until they try 2.1 and try backing down to 2.0 and realize that their calendars no longer are compatible. Who says that they would not be compatible? From all I know, they are perfectly compatible so far. Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

et as target milestone and/or the current development version". You're right that there are thousands of SeaMonkey 2.0.x users and exactly that's why we don't magically change the behavior with a possibly silent security update (unless we have to for security reasons) as t

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

NoOp schrieb: Phillip Chee pointed out this in: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210 <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210#c15> The SeaMonkey 2.0.x branch is in maintenance mode. Only security and stability fixes are allowed. If this is the case, then sho

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:26:08 -0800, NoOp wrote: > I *highly* recommend that the "Council" sort out the issues (personal > and technical) with the SeaMonkey & Lightning folks *before* any SM 2.1 Unfortunately there are no Lightning "folks" plural left. There is one solitary volunteer who works on

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

Hi, WLS a tapoté, le 30/12/2010 01:43: > Lightning 1.1a1pre (32-bit) works just fine for me in SM 2.1b2pre > (32-bit) on openSUSE 11.3. > > ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/calendar/lightning/nightly/linux-xpi/ The link which is working with Seamonkey 2.1b2pre is

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

se or 2.1. Phillip marked the bug as a duplicate of bug 613199, so bug 613199 is the one you need to nominate for SeaMonkey 2.0. -- Chris Ilias <http://ilias.ca> Newsgroup moderator ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 12/29/2010 10:05 PM, NoOp wrote: Here is a paste of: directly from 2.0.11. There are of course more examples in the bug report, but that one works for me. Which is in and of itself no

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

NoOp wrote: > Then you'd be seriously mistaken. Users have spent considerable time & > effort integrating lightning calendars & data into their systems. If you > think that there was backlash with SM 1.1.x and forms, wait until they > try 2.1 and try backing down to 2.0 and realize that their calen

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

rent Mozilla-Based application, space or no space, will work just fine. It's said other applications bug if they don't convert ' ' to '%20'. If copy/paste was entirely broken, in SeaMonkey 2.0.x that would be not only a regression, but a blocker imo; and I would b

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

On 12/29/2010 10:26 PM, NoOp wrote: On 12/29/2010 06:33 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 12/29/2010 5:07 PM, Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez wrote: - will provisions be made for importing/exporting lightning calendars? That's my biggest concern, too.:-) Lightning is an extension, one which do

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

On 12/29/2010 06:33 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > On 12/29/2010 5:07 PM, Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez wrote: >>> - will provisions be made for importing/exporting lightning calendars? >> >> That's my biggest concern, too.:-) > > Lightning is an extension, one which does not directly provide sup

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

On 12/29/2010 04:15 AM, Neil wrote: > NoOp wrote: > >> As you all know, it was a pretty difficult transition for some >> users to go from SM 1.x to 2.0. If 2.0 is now "maintenance only" >> mode, then I wonder if it is worth continuing with SeaMonkey >> further. >> >> > I think you have misunders

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

On 12/29/2010 5:07 PM, Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez wrote: As a 'User' of SeaMonkey (in both personal and production environments), > I'd appreciate an "official" comment from the SeaMonkey devs/project > management as to whether SeaMonkey 2.0 is "in mainte

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

On 12/29/2010 5:07 PM, Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez wrote: - will provisions be made for importing/exporting lightning calendars? That's my biggest concern, too.:-) Lightning is an extension, one which does not directly provide support for SeaMonkey, and is also [last I knew] currently target

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez wrote: NoOp escribió: Phillip Chee pointed out this in: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210 <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210#c15> The SeaMonkey 2.0.x branch is in maintenance mode. Only security and stability fixes are a

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

NoOp escribió: > Phillip Chee pointed out this in: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210 > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210#c15> > > The SeaMonkey 2.0.x branch is in maintenance mode. Only security and > stability fixes are allowed. >

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

Neil wrote: NoOp wrote: As you all know, it was a pretty difficult transition for some users to go from SM 1.x to 2.0. If 2.0 is now "maintenance only" mode, then I wonder if it is worth continuing with SeaMonkey further. I think you have misunderstood the point of "maintenance". New feature

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

NoOp wrote: As you all know, it was a pretty difficult transition for some users to go from SM 1.x to 2.0. If 2.0 is now "maintenance only" mode, then I wonder if it is worth continuing with SeaMonkey further. I think you have misunderstood the point of "maintenance". New features are alwa

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

NoOp wrote: Phillip Chee pointed out this in: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210 <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210#c15> The SeaMonkey 2.0.x branch is in maintenance mode. Only security and stability fixes are allowed. If this is the case, then sho

SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

Phillip Chee pointed out this in: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210 <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210#c15> The SeaMonkey 2.0.x branch is in maintenance mode. Only security and stability fixes are allowed. If this is the case, then shouldn't standa

Re: Adding search to SeaMonkey 2.0

probably a bit imprecise then. You need a browser that supports OpenSearch. SeaMonkey 2.0 doesn't, SeaMonkey 2.1 will. HTH Jens Yes it does, thank you. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozill

Re: Adding search to SeaMonkey 2.0

imprecise then. You need a browser that supports OpenSearch. SeaMonkey 2.0 doesn't, SeaMonkey 2.1 will. HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak <http://jens.hatlak.de/> SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker <http://smtt.blogspot.com/> ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Adding search to SeaMonkey 2.0

I am trying to add AOL Search to SeaMonkey. When I go to the web site to install it: https://addons.mozilla.org/seamonkey/downloads/latest/7098/addon-7098-latest.xml?src=search A popup appears telling me that I need a Mozilla-based browser. Last I checked, SeaMonkey -was- Mozilla-based...

Re: Is next/prev/up/etc. bar still in SeaMonkey (2.0)?

Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: Daniel Barclay wrote: SeaMonkey 1.1.x used to automatically add a toolbar when an HTML document contained links such as the following: ... What's the name of that toolbar? Does SeaMonkey 2.0 still provide it? ... Possibly: View > Show/Hide > Site

Re: Is next/prev/up/etc. bar still in SeaMonkey (2.0)?

Daniel Barclay wrote: SeaMonkey 1.1.x used to automatically add a toolbar when an HTML document contained links such as the following: My SeaMonkey 2.0 doesn't do that, at least by default? What's the name of that toolbar? Does SeaMonkey 2.0 still provide it? Daniel Poss

Is next/prev/up/etc. bar still in SeaMonkey (2.0)?

SeaMonkey 1.1.x used to automatically add a toolbar when an HTML document contained links such as the following: My SeaMonkey 2.0 doesn't do that, at least by default? What's the name of that toolbar? Does SeaMonkey 2.0 still provide i

userChrome.css and Seamonkey 2.0

Hi, Where can I read an explanation on how customise by myself Seamonkey by CSS, I have customised the browser for my netBook (the fonts were too big) but I didn't found explanations for the mail tabs. I opened some xpi themes for inspiration but it's too obscure for me and I have already disable

Re: ROT13 decoding with Seamonkey 2.0.x?

for rot13, and customizing. Now > mnenhy will not install since it is not compatible with 2.x versions of > seamonkey. Now I'm missing my rot13-function. Mnenhy now works with Seamonkey 2.0.* <http://mnenhy.mozdev.org/> Copy and FU2 mozilla.support.seamonkey -- Stéph

Re: Tone when printing in SeaMonkey 2.0+

art ha scritto: On 4/21/10 8:02 AM, Reed wrote: When upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.0+. Now when I keystroke Cmd-P for printing I hear a tone. This featur can it be removed? OS is Tiger 10.4.11 I experience the same on 10.4.11 with most keyboard commands such as cmd/C, cmd/X, cmd/V, cmd

Re: Revision response to Re: Tone when printing in SeaMonkey 2.0+

lla based. Reed art wrote: On 4/21/10 8:02 AM, Reed wrote: When upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.0+. Now when I keystroke Cmd-P for printing I hear a tone. This featur can it be removed? OS is Tiger 10.4.11 I experience the same on 10.4.11 with most keyboard commands such as cmd/C, cmd/X,

Re: Revision response to Re: Tone when printing in SeaMonkey 2.0+

enced in Thunderbird, Postbox etc all Mozilla based. Reed art wrote: On 4/21/10 8:02 AM, Reed wrote: When upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.0+. Now when I keystroke Cmd-P for printing I hear a tone. This featur can it be removed? OS is Tiger 10.4.11 I experience the same on 10.4.11 with mo

Revision response to Re: Tone when printing in SeaMonkey 2.0+

Art: Attempted the fix. Did not work on this end. Yes, versions of SM below 2.0 worked fine. This toning issue I have experienced in Thunderbird, Postbox etc all Mozilla based. Reed art wrote: On 4/21/10 8:02 AM, Reed wrote: When upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.0+. Now when I

Re: Tone when printing in SeaMonkey 2.0+

Art: Thanks! I'd use the 'mute' button but times I have streaming audio as I use SM. Reed art wrote: On 4/21/10 8:02 AM, Reed wrote: When upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.0+. Now when I keystroke Cmd-P for printing I hear a tone. This featur can it be removed? OS i

Re: Tone when printing in SeaMonkey 2.0+

On 4/21/10 8:02 AM, Reed wrote: When upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.0+. Now when I keystroke Cmd-P for printing I hear a tone. This featur can it be removed? OS is Tiger 10.4.11 I experience the same on 10.4.11 with most keyboard commands such as cmd/C, cmd/X, cmd/V, cmd/shift/C (mark all

Tone when printing in SeaMonkey 2.0+

When upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.0+. Now when I keystroke Cmd-P for printing I hear a tone. This featur can it be removed? OS is Tiger 10.4.11 Reed ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 How do I lock the start-up mail directory structure displayed in the sidebar?

Bill Davidsen: >Hartmut Figge wrote: >> - user.js - >> user_pref("news.persist_server_open_state_in_folderpane", true) >> --- > >That doesn't show up in about:config for SM2, does for SM 1.1.xx. Some other >value there? Just user-defining it? Hm. Interesting. I have now teste

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 How do I lock the start-up mail directory structure displayed in the sidebar?

Hartmut Figge wrote: John: I've got one computer that preserves the way I want the mail storage directory structure to display at start-up. On another computer it collapses to Local Folders at every start-up and expands to show everything instead of the way it was last left. I've gone through

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 How do I lock the start-up mail directory structure displayed in the sidebar?

Hartmut Figge: >user_pref("news.persist_server_open_state_in_folderpane", true) C&P error. There should be a semicolon at the end. ;) user_pref("news.persist_server_open_state_in_folderpane", true); Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-se

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 How do I lock the start-up mail directory structure displayed in the sidebar?

John: >I've got one computer that preserves the way I want the mail storage >directory structure to display at start-up. On another computer it >collapses to Local Folders at every start-up and expands to show >everything instead of the way it was last left. I've gone through the >config file an

Seamonkey 2.0 How do I lock the start-up mail directory structure displayed in the sidebar?

I've got one computer that preserves the way I want the mail storage directory structure to display at start-up. On another computer it collapses to Local Folders at every start-up and expands to show everything instead of the way it was last left. I've gone through the config file and the entrie

Re: Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0

lease version would not install in SM 2.x. Just use Lightning 1.0 Beta 1 from addons.mozilla.org as that one works fine with all SeaMonkey 2.0.x versions. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0

Bill Davidsen wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Cecil Bankston wrote: Jeffrey Needle wrote: Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks. Lightning 1.0b2pre installed with no problems and seems to be working w

Re: Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0

Bill Davidsen wrote: Cecil Bankston wrote: Jeffrey Needle wrote: Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks. Lightning 1.0b2pre installed with no problems and seems to be working well in SM 2.0.2. Get

Re: Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0

Cecil Bankston wrote: Jeffrey Needle wrote: Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks. Lightning 1.0b2pre installed with no problems and seems to be working well in SM 2.0.2. Get the latest (Windows) n

Re: Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0

dominique wrote: Jeffrey Needle wrote, On 2/16/2010 8:44 AM: Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks. mozilla.support.calendar is the place (same news server) Dom Thanks! ___

Re: Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0

Jeffrey Needle wrote: Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks. Lightning 1.0b2pre installed with no problems and seems to be working well in SM 2.0.2. Get the latest (Windows) nightly build from this

Re: Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0

Jeffrey Needle wrote, On 2/16/2010 8:44 AM: Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks. mozilla.support.calendar is the place (same news server) Dom ___ suppor

Help with Lightning for Seamonkey 2.0

Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-s

external editor for mail in seamonkey 2.0

Hello I know that the there is an app for thunderbird (vs 2 or 3) which allows you to use an external editor. Unfortunately this app does not work for seamonkey. - how different is the code between the mail application for Seamonkey and Thunderbird? - does anybody know about a

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Jens Hatlak wrote: Philip Chee wrote: I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors. Since I don't normally auto-fill

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Graham wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Just had opportunity today to try it. failed. I even clicked the button, it added to ToolBar. Fail? Why is that a fail? Sure, it adds a button to the toolbar, but that's not all of it (and you can remove that button). It failed in that it didn't fill out a

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Phillip Jones wrote: Just had opportunity today to try it. failed. I even clicked the button, it added to ToolBar. Fail? Why is that a fail? Sure, it adds a button to the toolbar, but that's not all of it (and you can remove that button). ___ supp

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Evan Davidson wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:51:09 +0100, Jens Hatlak wrote: Philip Chee wrote: I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it to install and the UI to s

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:51:09 +0100, Jens Hatlak wrote: Philip Chee wrote: I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it to install and the UI to show up and there are no

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Jens Hatlak wrote: Bill Spikowski wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Now where are all those people screaming around time and again, demanding "bring back form manager"? It'll be interesting to see what they say, or if they react at all to this. "All those people" aren't using SM 2 yet, so we can't te

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Bill Spikowski wrote: > Jens Hatlak wrote: >> Now where are all those people screaming around time and again, >> demanding "bring back form manager"? It'll be interesting to see what >> they say, or if they react at all to this. > > "All those people" aren't using SM 2 yet, so we can't test it Y

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Jens Hatlak wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this >> public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it >> to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors. >

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Jens Hatlak wrote: Philip Chee wrote: I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors. Since I don't normally auto-fill

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Jens Hatlak wrote: Philip Chee wrote: I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors. Since I don't normally auto-fill

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:51:09 +0100, Jens Hatlak wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this >> public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it >> to install and the UI to show up and

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Philip Chee wrote: Hi! I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors. Since I don't normally auto-fill forms even wit

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Jens Hatlak wrote: Philip Chee wrote: I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors. Since I don't normally auto-fill

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Philip Chee wrote: > I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this > public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it > to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors. > Since I don't normally auto-fill fo

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:00:13 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: Hi! I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it to install and the UI to show up and th

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:00:13 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this >> public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it >> to install and th

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Philip Chee wrote: Hi! I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors. Since I don't normally auto-fill forms even wit

Re: Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:49:24 +0800, Philip Chee wrote: > Hi! > > I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this > public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it > to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious J

Help Test Autofill Forms 0.9.5.2 Mod for SeaMonkey 2.0!

Hi! I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors. Since I don't normally auto-fill forms even with SeaMonkey 1.1 I have

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >